'Queer' Hasn't Even Earned a Tenth of Its Reported Budget at the Global Box Office Yet - Movies?

Article / Archive

Earlier this year, director Yorgos Lanthimos followed up the biggest hit of his career, Poor Things, with a film that massively under-performed at the box office — Kinds of Kindness. Mere moths later, another European arthouse filmmaker has followed up his biggest hit with what appears to be a box office disappointment. Director Luca Guadagnino experienced mainstream success earlier this year with the sports drama Challengers, and some weeks ago, debuted his latest film, the period film Queer. Starring Daniel Craig, the movie is having a difficult time at the box office, while still playing in limited release.

Distributed domestically by the indie outfit A24, Queer is based on the book by William S. Burroughs and follows an American expatriate’s relationship with a younger man in 1950s Mexico City. The film has grossed $2.8 million domestically and around $300,000 in overseas markets, for a cumulative global haul of $3 million. Queer was produced on a reported budget of $50 million. It’ll be released by the streaming service MUBI in several key regions around the world.

Positioned as something of an awards contender, Queer has divided audiences. The movie holds a 76% “fresh” approval rating on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, but the platform’s audience score is languishing at 58%. In his review, Collider’s Ross Bonaime praised Craig’s performance, and described the film as “an audacious adaptation and yet another remarkable film in Guadagnino's increasingly impressive filmography.”

'Queer' Marks a Departure From Franchise Films for Daniel Craig​


It is, however, one of Craig’s lowest-grossing films. By comparison, even the Netflix release Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery earned five times as much in its limited theatrical run. Queer opened in seven domestic locations, and was expanded into 47 theaters in its second week. It received a further expansion into over 450 theaters in week three, but was downgraded to around 380 locations in week four. This isn’t a promising sign. The movie will need significant awards attention to bounce back. Also starring Drew Starkey, Lesley Manville and Jason Schwartzman, Queer premiered at the Venice Film Festival. You can watch the film in theaters, and stay tuned to Collider for more updates.
 
How the fuck did this cost $50 million? How did they expect a movie like this to earn back that kind of investment? It's too weird and gay for mainstream audiences and not clearly not gay enough for the horny queer crowd it seems to be trying to court if that article BlewberryNausea linked is to be believed.

Also, why does Daniel Craig seem to have a thing for playing gay characters lately? Maybe he's so sick of James Bond he's trying to get as far away from that archetype as possible.
 
buddy, it's a gay romance film literally named "Gay". it's not exactly mass appeal material. films like this usually get attention because they're transgressive, because gay romance is has classically been considered nontraditional. however, nontraditional sexuality has been so monomaniacally centered in modern culture that two dudes fucking is not transgressive, it's not even unusual. pretty much every Netflix show includes gay romance for the femcels at this point. "queer" culture has moved on to the current frontier of transgressiveness, i.e. drag queens dangling their dicks in front of kids and troony genderblobbery. gay sex drama doesn't pass the minimum dose anymore. besides, I'm going to guess that if you had a romance story that stood on its own merits instead of just being about dudes fucking, it wouldn't have such an obnoxiously on-the-nose name like Queer. also, does anybody really give a fuck about Daniel Craig? adjust your expectations.
 
It's a super-homo arthouse film showing at small-time arthouse theaters. Of course it's not going to make anything. I saw a different film at my local, small-time arthouse theater and they showed a trailer for this one. It looked gross (the younger man looks younger than the actor's actual age, and Daniel Craig looks even older than he actually is), pretentious, and probably boring as fuck. Only pretentious and obnoxious ultra-lib types care to "enrich" themselves with that kind of "culture," which is what the group ahead of me in line buying tickets for this film appeared to be.
 
"This summer, two gay lovers will fall in gay love and have gay sex while being gay.

In the gay city of San Francisco, Gaylord McGayerson is a middle aged interior decorator. While at a broadway musical, he meets young Indian-American columnist Suhkdeep Dikshit. The two have a whirlwind romance for the ages, but their love is put to the test when it turns out one of them has AIDS.

A24 presents, FAGGOTS (rated NC-17)

Coming (out) to theatres this June."
 
A movie called "Queer" just isn't going to do all that well. Most people are not going to see it.

This is the synopsis from Wikipedia. Be amazed at how retarded the plot is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_(film)

William Lee is an American expatriate living in 1950s Mexico City, passing time by bar hopping and indulging in sexual activities with men younger than him. While out on an evening stroll, he catches the sight of Eugene Allerton, a GI who is also an American expatriate. Smitten, Lee grows obsessed with Allerton, searching for him throughout the city in the hopes of gaining his affection. Allerton is cool to Lee’s advances; nevertheless, he permits Lee to seduce him.

Despite establishing their relationship, Allerton maintains his distance from Lee, his demeanor a sharp contrast towards Lee’s desire for connection; Allerton’s explanation for this is that he does not see himself as "queer" in the same manner that Lee does. Desperate to develop their relationship further, Lee invites Allerton to travel with him to South America in the hopes of finding yagé, a plant said to offer telepathic abilities to those who consume it. Allerton demurs from accepting Lee's invitation for a few days before agreeing to accompany Lee after being asked a second time.

The trip goes on, but not without issue: Lee’s dependence of drugs brings on a bout of dysentery, and Allerton keeps Lee at a distance. Lee eventually hears of a doctor who lives in Quito that could assist him in his search for yagé.

The two men arrive in Quito to the residence of Dr. Cotter and her husband. Initially apprehensive, Cotter warms to the men and brews the yagé found in the forest surrounding her residence, creating ayahuasca for the four of them to drink. Shortly after consumption, Lee and Allerton spend the rest of the day experiencing vivid hallucinations such as the two vomiting out their hearts and communicating telepathically then disappearing in front of each other. The night ends with the men melding their bodies together.

The morning after, Dr. Cotter suggests the men stay to further explore the effects of yagé. Before agreeing, Lee witnesses Allerton vanish in the jungle.

Two years pass before Lee returns to Mexico City, where his friend Joe informs him that Allerton has taken another trip down South America as a guide for an army colonel. Later that night, Lee dreams of discovering Allerton in a hotel room adjacent to his. Allerton engages Lee in a round of William Tell by placing a glass on his head. Lee shoots Allerton in the head, then holds his body before it vanishes again, with everything else in the room and Lee following suit.

Lee finds himself in his hotel room, now an elderly man. He settles into bed, where a still-youthful Allerton reappears beside him, cradling Lee as he dies, and the final shot is of flashing lights of different colors.
 
You couldn't pay me to watch that shit, and apparently very few are paying to watch that shit.

Well, it's based on a William S. Burroughs novel.
I've never read his work, but I have seen David Cronenberg's adaptation of 'Naked Lunch' (again a semi-autobiograffical work by Burroughs that weaves in the story about that time he shot and killed his second wife in Mexico), to call his work 'un-commercial' is an understatement. It's a weird, hypnotic, heroin induced fever dream that I don'tknow I could reccomend.
Burroughs appears in Gus Van Sant's 'Drugstore Cowboy' (an excellent film I would highly recommend) playing a heroin addicted priest, but really just playing himself.
Daniel Craig however is a more insufferable faggot then Burroughs could ever be.
 
Well, it's based on a William S. Burroughs novel.
I've never read his work, but I have seen David Cronenberg's adaptation of 'Naked Lunch' (again a semi-autobiograffical work by Burroughs that weaves in the story about that time he shot and killed his second wife in Mexico), to call his work 'un-commercial' is an understatement. It's a weird, hypnotic, heroin induced fever dream that I don'tknow I could reccomend.
Burroughs appears in Gus Van Sant's 'Drugstore Cowboy' (an excellent film I would highly recommend) playing a heroin addicted priest, but really just playing himself.
Daniel Craig however is a more insufferable faggot then Burroughs could ever be.
Junkie is pretty decent, they should’ve adapted that one instead.
 
Back