Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 68 17.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 156 40.5%

  • Total voters
    385
However, about when his daughter would have been exposed to cocaine, however that happened, he went on maudlinly about some horrible health crisis, and that this is just the kind of thing that happens "when you're a dad," and it really sounds like at the very least, his daughter got into OD territory with cocaine and he chose not to get her medical assistance to preserve his own ass, because that's just how pathetic a piece of shit he is.
I choose to believe Nicky willingly gave her coke because she's, by Nick's own words, the favorite. Why wouldn't Nick want his favorite child to be cool and edgy just like dad? The sooner he gets her started on being a cool kid the sooner she can impress her classmates with her drug and sex knowledge and be everything Nick wasn't in his school years. He's so pathetic and retarded I guarantee that was his justification

If I'm wrong and it truly was an accident then my point still stands. He wants his kids to be cool just like him and do sex and have drugs and stream about balldos and why having a girlfriend means you're monogamous as hell
 
Nick, there is literally no coming back from your daughter testing positive for cocaine. That was the nail in the coffin. Nothing you've done or will ever do, will stop people from bringing it up. This is your legacy now. You are the lawyer who gave his daughter cocaine. You can keep coping, trying to control the narrative\correct the record. It does not matter. The fact that this is your priority as opposed to the fact that your daughter tested positive, is horrific and shows how monstrous of a father you are. Edit: basically, you fuck one sheep, it erases everything else and your now the sheep fucker. At least in some places it's beating your association with the balldo
There is one thing he can do. He can disprove the narrative by releasing the sealed CPR record showing it's a false positive. While he's at it, he can also release the bodycam footage showing how clean his house is, and some footage from the cameras he has around the house that prove he and Kayla were feeding the kids.

You know, like any normal person accused of such heinous crimes would have long since done. He could've even gotten it cleared with the Barneswalker that it wouldn't affect his case. Normal people accused of heinous crimes do not hide the evidence with "oh but I got a great story to tell later and you'll see how I'm innocent." You know, just like Vic Mignogna, Kyle Rittenhouse, and Johnny Depp did.
 
Nick dosing his kid with cocaine makes perfect sense if you grew up with an addict.

ADHD meds bring kids down with the condition. For everyone else, it's basically legal speed.

Addicts have a preferred drug, but in a pinch, any port in a storm. Daddy Nick goes out to score. Fails to. Happens all the time, especially if you have only one dealer and you're a schmuck in the burbs.

Well the party can't just fucking stop. So Daddy and friends just chop lines from the kid's meds.

A coke head can do a lot of speed, especially with booze and other coke heads involved. Fast forward, Daddy and friends have snorted all the kid's meds. Can't exactly just tell a doctor that 30 days or so of legal speed just went poof, plus Nick is a dysfunctional addict. So the easiest solution, once the little shit is bouncing off the wall while Daddy and friends are trying to sleep off another multi day binge is to just dose her until they can renew her prescription.

Is it stupid? Yes? Is it child abuse? Absolutely. But when you are a crackhead and an alcoholic that hates his fucking kids, it makes perfect sense.
 
"Capital" is a work of serious economics that is responsible for my third-world country insisting on failed economic policies to this day. Very serious, but not as you may think.

Austrian economics seems to be faring better for my Argentinian friends than this Marxist nonsense being implemented in my country. I hope you and your family will never have to live through hyperinflation to understand the devastating effects Marxist economic decisions may have on your life. I hope you won't have to experience this being implemented in your country, as it can be very appealing politically to ignorant masses.
China has more Marxist policy than Brazil. Why cant we just say Commies and Austriams are both retarded? Imagine not being Neo-Keynesian in Current Year *smug chortle*
 
There's a lot here that doesn't make sense in this totally reasonable explanation from his mortal enemy who lost his wife to.
And Nick's totally reasonable explanation is the cops glove was covered in cocaine when he rubbed his daughters hair because he said that's how hair tests work from his many years as a scientist that failed science. And that she is a very clean child that totally doesn't smell, that bathes regularly and wears clean clothes in the week between arrest and drug tests. Oh, and there was no cocaine in the house - just on the glove..

(And no, I don't believe he was intentionally drugging his daughter. His story though is less believable than the "drugging his daughter" story. It's like a UFO story: Reports of strange lights - Aaron: "It's Unidentified Flying Objects, maybe drones or space Aliens" Nick: "Flying is impossible. I read science papers on gravity and burn ooo lee. The math doesn't work. Evel Knievel didn't even have wings. 75% of motorcycles never leave the ground")
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't this have shown up in a drug test?

If he was drugging his daughter, lock him up, throw away the key, indefinitely. Sick piece of shit.
Yeah, it did. Yes, he was drugging his daughter.

At over 10 times the cutoff. A cutoff that was already pretty high, at 500pg/mg. Workplaces use 100 or 150.
 
At over 10 times the cutoff. A cutoff that was already pretty high, at 500pg/mg. Workplaces use 100 or 150.
Now that I think of it I bet it's set that high just to make sure it wasn't a one time thing where the kid touches coke and picks it's nose or something. Must be to make sure it's at dosing levels.
 
Now that I think of it I bet it's set that high just to make sure it wasn't a one time thing where the kid touches coke and picks it's nose or something. Must be to make sure it's at dosing levels.
I'm pretty sure the low body weights of the subjects come into play as well.
 
Now that I think of it I bet it's set that high just to make sure it wasn't a one time thing where the kid touches coke and picks it's nose or something. Must be to make sure it's at dosing levels.
That was exactly the reason of such high cutoffs used in tests. She didn't get 300 or 499, or even 1000. It was written as >5000. It was too high for the machine, out of its range. The upper cut was 5000. For all we know, it could have been 10,000 or 25,000 if the laboratory workers lowered resolution for a higher range.

He belongs under the prison.

False positive means exactly false positive, it doesn't happen with cocaine. She could have gotten 300 which was below cutoff. That's not a negative, just not enough for the state to give a shit. It still indicates exposure.

>5000? Yeah.
Die Nick.
 
Wouldn't this have shown up in a drug test?
Yeah, it did. Yes, he was drugging his daughter.
And Nick knew she was going to test positive and tried to give a reason 2 weeks before the results came in.
5000_cocaine_child.png
009.01.15 whatanoddthingtosay.jpg
 
And Nick knew she was going to test positive and tried to give a reason 2 weeks before the results came in.
View attachment 6797697
View attachment 6797700
What do you mean my spouse is missing? She was fine! We were doing great!
I didn't dismember her with a Festool circular saw I bought with Uncle Joe the Carpenter's joe1488 coupon code for 14.88% off (he died of pancreatic cancer), it wasn't delivered precisely 4 days, 21 hours, 6 minutes and 28 seconds before I called the cops about my missing wife and I didn't scatter the remains along 15th Avenue at 45.137754, -94.853794 to 45.138865, -94.815435. If you found anything, it was merely a false positive! She was a lovely lady!

Not guilty.
 
And Nick knew she was going to test positive and tried to give a reason 2 weeks before the results came in.
View attachment 6797697
View attachment 6797700
Just where exactly an 8 year old, whom is homeschooled and only seems to leave the house for child groups and activities, can have the opportunity to be an avidly keen coke user/addict, that comes back at over ten times the cutoff value in a hair follicle test, is very funny and weird to me.

Nick and Kayla were shitting themselves upon getting busted as they realized Daddy's little favourite was gonna get tested and blow the needle off of the testing scale. They had to frantically find someone else to blame.. and fast. The excuse with the cop touching the hair of one of his children was his "I've got it!!" moment for them.

However, seeing as we haven't seen the footage, yet, and I know we always have a chance to as there are top minds working behind the scenes to find a way to access it. I will disbelieve Nick in that I don't even think that happened on the body cam at all. And if it did, it was with another of the 5 children.

Not that it makes a difference in any way, shape or form as to the results of the drug test. It's hair follicle testing so it's a test for how long the drugs have been in the childs system and are still present in hair follicles during a certain hair growth length.

Nicks excuse was to fool the normies out there who are unaware of drug testing and its requirements for a positive test coming back. He assumed most people to just take his word at face value. The same word of a guy who just got busted for intent to supply levels of drug possession and usage. In a house that looks like a niggers crack den on camera.

If he believes deep down that his life will be the same as 2 years ago after all this, and he has any hope whatsoever of being a streamer again in any meaningful way, then he's only coping this absolute bullshit lie to himself. The normies knew that he was going off the rails with drunkenness and debauchery publicly, as this is what he was happy to show them.

So how he thinks child abuse through giving your daughter access to cocaine, or dosing her on the regular with it, is EVER going to be forgotten by his chat, is beyond comprehensive, logical and reasonable thought.

Only the most junkied of all junkies must believe this reality over the real one that we all live in.

I hope he does try to make a concerted effort to restart his streaming career. He's going to get fucking DESTROYED live every day.
 
And Nick knew she was going to test positive and tried to give a reason 2 weeks before the results came in.
View attachment 6797697
View attachment 6797700
I think it is likely he was having her ingest it. "Here, drink your milk"

It reaches the brain much slower, doesn't give much of a high and rarely leads to addiction. Dr Nick using it to treat her ADHD and her normal meds likely left yer not feeling much of a difference.

When the child was asked if she had been inhaling any white substances through her nose, she obviously said no and that left the state not being able to show any intent.

I call bullshit on him being denied a retest. He didn't demand it in the court documents until the time sealed, which appears to have been two separate court sessions. He absolutely knew she was going to test positive, pleaded ignorance after and absolutely didnt request a retest. Prove me wromg Nick, petition for the transcripts showing how the state denied it.
 
i'm trying to not allow myself to believe he gave the kid coke. i think occams razor applies here. hes a junkie with a young kid. kids watch and like to mimic their parents behavior and he probably just had it laying around for the kids to try while he was off neglecting them in another part of the house or passed out cold after the comedown.

if he literally fed the kid coke then i dont think its a leap to assume that theres a high likelihood that he physically/sexually abused them as well. as terrible and unforgivable as it is to be a drug addict piece of shit and neglect your kids and do drugs around them, i think enabling them to do drugs in your presence is just a much different, deeper level of depravity. nobody in the history of drugs has given someone coke to shut them up or make them go to bed so the grim excuse of "shut these annoying brats up so i can do more drugs with the adults" doesnt hold.
 
i'm trying to not allow myself to believe he gave the kid coke. i think occams razor applies here. hes a junkie with a young kid. kids watch and like to mimic their parents behavior and he probably just had it laying around for the kids to try while he was off neglecting them in another part of the house or passed out cold after the comedown.

if he literally fed the kid coke then i dont think its a leap to assume that theres a high likelihood that he physically/sexually abused them as well. as terrible and unforgivable as it is to be a drug addict piece of shit and neglect your kids and do drugs around them, i think enabling them to do drugs in your presence is just a much different, deeper level of depravity. nobody in the history of drugs has given someone coke to shut them up or make them go to bed so the grim excuse of "shut these annoying brats up so i can do more drugs with the adults" doesnt hold.
I hate to devil's advocate that reprobate, but if there were any level of evidence that even hinted that the minors may have been inappropriately touched, wouldn't that be reflected in the charges or at least the language of the reports? Nick's a sociopath, but do we have any evidence to suggest that any activites of this nature transpired? I'd definitely consider it if any physical evidence existed to that effect.
 
i'm trying to not allow myself to believe he gave the kid coke. i think occams razor applies here. hes a junkie with a young kid. kids watch and like to mimic their parents behavior and he probably just had it laying around for the kids to try while he was off neglecting them in another part of the house or passed out cold after the comedown.

if he literally fed the kid coke then i dont think its a leap to assume that theres a high likelihood that he physically/sexually abused them as well. as terrible and unforgivable as it is to be a drug addict piece of shit and neglect your kids and do drugs around them, i think enabling them to do drugs in your presence is just a much different, deeper level of depravity. nobody in the history of drugs has given someone coke to shut them up or make them go to bed so the grim excuse of "shut these annoying brats up so i can do more drugs with the adults" doesnt hold.
For me personally I will hold out hope that the child in question has not been abused in this way. I would guess that maybe that would have come to light in the 6 months period of them being removed from the house. Child services would maybe have looked at all angles with the children's welfare. Especially in light of the positive test. I would guess that they have ways and means of asking them quality of life questions. Such as, does anybody do anything to you in a place that they are not supposed to etc. If that was brought to light, the child would not lie, and physical tests would have been done to confirm or deny.

So even though Nick is an abhorrent piece of shit, I don't believe that has happened to the child in question. They would not have had the kids back, even for visitation, if this was the case.
 
Back