Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[SouthernBitchBob]

View attachment 6784951

 

[Mad Hunter]

It's even more insufferable when they do it outside of "art". Nothing makes me cringe harder than a performatively horned-up woman thinking she's being "empowered" by acting as trashy as humanly possible. It's not cute, it just makes you come off like an overcompensating whore who'll pitch a toddleresque tantrum the moment she's told "no".

I don't even think it's a modern phenomenon. It's probably what used to be called "vamping" in old timey slang and it's a lot more transparent and annoying than women who do it thinking they're master manipulators assume it is if they're unfortunate enough to try it on anyone with at least a room temp IQ; I may be a retard but I'm not a paste-eater, ma'am.

Many female rappers are a really good example of this. It's even worse than the vamping. Nicki Minaj, Cardi B, Megan Thee Stallion, etc. They just bend over and show their jiggling fake silicon ass cracks on screen as a statement of "I'm so strong and confident you boys are stupid and dumb and us women are smart and sexy hahahaha" then they publicize the statement as "politcal female rage and female gaze." No. I don't see any empowering statement. I only see a fetish. It's their fetish and they're denying it by saying "CONFIDENCE BETCH KWEEN."

And that female rage thing? I don't know, but it's so annoying and petulant. I don't see how it's gonna convince anyone. Nowadays, it's most likely just gonna make people give you likes on social media. Most female rage stuff I see always comes off as a child throwing a tantrum because her father or any authority that happens to be male because he said "no" for a good reason.

 

[The Ugly One]

Many female rappers are a really good example of this. It's even worse than the vamping. Nicki Minaj, Cardi B, Megan Thee Stallion, etc. They just bend over and show their jiggling fake silicon ass cracks on screen as a statement of "I'm so strong and confident you boys are stupid and dumb and us women are smart and sexy hahahaha" then they publicize the statement as "politcal female rage and female gaze." No. I don't see any empowering statement. I only see a fetish. It's their fetish and they're denying it by saying "CONFIDENCE BETCH KWEEN."

If I recall, the feminist explanation for Cardi B's "W.A.P." came from white feminists, and after some weeks of them trying to rationalize her whore persona, whore music, and whore outfits, her explanation for her the lyrics of her hit was, "cuz everybody luvz wet ass pussy, nigga." The actual negress whores making this trash are completely unable to explain feminism and, in interviews, come off like retards who just want money and fame. They present as super-slutty because they like sex and like feeling like they're hot. It's the clucking white women and nu-male fans hanging onto them that try to import something deep and meaningful into what they do. This does show how intellectually bankrupt feminism is, though. It seems like their only rubric for deciding if something is "demeaning" or "empowering" is whether or not white men approve of it. White men disapprove of negress whores shaking their nearly-naked asses in public, so that means it's empowering. White men approve of movie stars being attractive, so that's demeaning, and actresses should be ugly.

 

[God of Nothing]

Women view being a whore as empowering because it is the rock bottom and automatic assignment of their sex YET they can go around with no consequence. It's like showing a monkey a magic trick. The dumb thing doesn't realize what it's seeing is just a trick of the eyes. It thinks it's real. In spite of how utterly trash a woman can be, she still has value when in reality she's ruined herself for a fleeting feeling, many such cases.

It's little different than those cringetoks of women knowing they're the problem, outright saying it, and then saying they'll keep going regardless. As if their insistence will somehow make it true. Little different than a child wanting to be right.

 

[The Hardest R]

"Just ask her out bro"
View attachment 6791860

Gonna guess this dumb cunt was never going to be considered Oxford material and this poor schlub is the scapegoat.

If I recall, the feminist explanation for Cardi B's "W.A.P." came from white feminists, and after some weeks of them trying to rationalize her whore persona, whore music, and whore outfits, her explanation for her the lyrics of her hit was, "cuz everybody luvz wet ass pussy, nigga." The actual negress whores making this trash are completely unable to explain feminism and, in interviews, come off like retards who just want money and fame. They present as super-slutty because they like sex and like feeling like they're hot. It's the clucking white women and nu-male fans hanging onto them that try to import something deep and meaningful into what they do. This does show how intellectually bankrupt feminism is, though. It seems like their only rubric for deciding if something is "demeaning" or "empowering" is whether or not white men approve of it. White men disapprove of negress whores shaking their nearly-naked asses in public, so that means it's empowering. White men approve of movie stars being attractive, so that's demeaning, and actresses should be ugly.

It’s worth pointing out that WAP was released summer of 2020, during both peaks of the Summer of Love and The Year of the Nigger. So white women were desperate to make a song about wet pussies seem like two nigger whores wrote a song taking a revolutionary stand about muh patriarchy muh aboos muh raycisms, etc.

If Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion weren’t such low IQ whores, they’d have been freaked out about their trashy single being considered a revolutionary diatribe. This is one of those ignorance is bliss moments where they were too retarded to see all the projections made about their song and were better off for it.

 

[Clitonium]

The more I interact with women the more misogynistic I seem to become.

I might just be a misanthrope or it might just be the women I've interacted with just aren't good people.

I don't know bros.

 

[Stasi]

You know, maybe the people that hate women the most are other women.

Was telling a female friend about this chick I've been spending time with (that I realised myself isn't going anywhere) and my friend was pretty savage. "She sounds immature and emotionally damaged, she likes your attention and company but isn't putting out and things wont go anywhere. I know because I used to be like that when I was younger using guys for attention. Don't waste your time and find someone better who is actually interested".

Also found out the modern dating lingo for this is "breadcrumbing" - "She is giving you enough crumbs to keep you interested and looking but you're never getting that sandwich". Damn. I'm old and don't use apps so don't know any of these terms but pretty good analogy tbf

 

[Mad Hunter]

I don't like how feminism has turned into something so complicated nowadays. I thought feminism was allowing women to work and be paid equally to men, for them to be safe, healthy, confident, and assured even if they are alone, for women to be recognized for their achievements and efforts without men taking credit, for women to be able to vote and have a proper opinion.

Now, it's been overshadowed by screaming, whoring, policing of thought and opinion, not wanting to do something but still getting credit, and dying your hair while looking stupid and calling that "activism."


Women should be able to work safe fulfilling jobs while being paid equally. Women should be able to make the choice to abort a child or not. Women shouldn't be raped for looking a certain way or being alone. Women should be able to vote and express their opinion. Women should be able to get credit for their efforts. Women shouldn't be hindered in their careers and passions if they have families already. But all this has been twisted into...I don't know.

Feminism is for both women and men, for them to find a middle ground and work together than put each other down. Not for one to claim superiority no matter how subtle.

 

[God of Nothing]

Feminism is for both women and men, for them to find a middle ground and work together than put each other down. Not for one to claim superiority no matter how subtle.

there is no middle ground
that's why we're in this situation to begin with

 

[Bungdit Din]

I don't like how feminism has turned into...

Foidism hasn't changed, it's culminated. Sorry for the 'Dumb' rating, but it's only appropriate.

Women shouldn't be raped for looking a certain way or being alone.

Agreed. Those aren't the only reasons.

Feminism is for both women and men

LMFAO. C'mon, this has to be bait.

 

[The Hardest R]

Anyone who claims feminism is about equality is either stupid or malicious and ultimately it’s a distinction without a difference.

 

[The Ugly One]

I don't like how feminism has turned into something so complicated nowadays. I thought feminism was allowing women to work and be paid equally to men,

Women have never wanted to "work equally" with men. The minute they discovered how many sacrifices it takes to get ahead in the man's world, they demanded favoritism in the workplace...and got it.

for women to be able to vote and have a proper opinion.

Women never wanted the franchise equally. Voting had, before female suffrage, been a privilege tied to a duty, the duty to defend the nation's soil when called upon. No surprise, government is first and foremost the power to raise and deploy an army, so it makes sense that anyone with a say in who joins that army and where it fights should have some skin in the game. The very first suffragists demanded they be exempted from the duties of male citizenship, and they got it.

 

[Mad Hunter]

That's the problem. There are just people who really hate having to work with others or make sacrifices. The feminists nowadays are promoting a personality so hard to work with. I've seen a comment stating that the female boss made an all-female workplace and they all began fighting each other. She got tired and had to add males in the group for a balanced situation.

Women have never wanted to "work equally" with men. The minute they discovered how many sacrifices it takes to get ahead in the man's world, they demanded favoritism in the workplace...and got it.

Now, I'm not saying people of certain genders cannot be soldiers, but I slightly disagree. Being in a nation's military requires you to go out to war. And war brings out the worst in people. Women have always been vulnerable to the conflicts started by men mostly, and in war, they could get the worst end of the stick - rape, torture, slavery, and all things horrible.

But, you did have a point with the first part. Maybe that could be their contribution - to work properly - but, of course, the sort of people we're discussing DON'T WANT TO MAKE SUCH A SIMPLE SACRIFICE. Mind you, they are the ones saying even a tiny action can change the world.

I know workplace conditions can be shit and don't really take gender and differences into much consideration which can be concerning (remember pregnancy), but, if, by any chance, the feminists we are talking about land a decent job in a perfectly decent environment, they might just complain. That's the simple action they can take, and they STILL DON'T WANT IT.

Women never wanted the franchise equally. Voting had, before female suffrage, been a privilege tied to a duty, the duty to defend the nation's soil when called upon. No surprise, government is first and foremost the power to raise and deploy an army, so it makes sense that anyone with a say in who joins that army and where it fights should have some skin in the game. The very first suffragists demanded they be exempted from the duties of male citizenship, and they got it.

Sorry. The state of feminism nowadays has kinda confused me so bad. I can't even be convinced to join the cause. All I know is just be a decent person. Don't condone rapists and harassment, women should be able to work, get paid, be credited for their efforts, women should be able to vote, be aware of the problems a female body can have like period cramps, just that. I don't know why it has turned so, so complicated. It's like the women behind the feminism these days went, "why do simple when you can do complicated?" Now, people are bending over to them.





Same with LGBT politics. I always facepalm when I see them whine about corporations doing the pride-flag-in-the-store-and-logo thing. THEY wanted the recognition, now THEY get RECOGNIZED. THEY asked for it and now they ARE NOT EVEN HAPPY. It's just like putting up american flags and cartoon bald eagles with colorful greetings for 4th of July or adding silly spooky decorations for Halloween, so what's their deal? People are bound to celebrate these things, whether the corporations are being genuine or not. It's fun and rakes in the money at the same time. They made everyone bend to them by being so petulant and irritating and they're upset people are doing what they wanted. Again, "why do simple when you can do complicated?" is at play here.





I guess I'm just releasing my woes about certain advocacies and what they've turned into nowadays at this point. When I was a child, I thought these advocacies were all voices being raised in unison for something better, always the good against bad, a cry for freedom in the oppression. But, as I grew older, I have seen how such causes are so divided themselves and how they caused division. I'm all for inclusion, happiness, tolerance, and kindness, but the advocacies I'm talking about, they just feel...hollow. They feel like something meant to be good gone wrong because they failed to account for something completely natural and normal in people. I just cannot put what it is.

 

[The Ugly One]

Women have always been vulnerable to the conflicts started by men mostly, and in war, they could get the worst end of the stick

No, they couldn't.

That's the problem. There are just people who really hate having to work with others or make sacrifices. The feminists nowadays are promoting a personality so hard to work with. I've seen a comment stating that the female boss made an all-female workplace and they all began fighting each other. She got tired and had to add males in the group for a balanced situation.

The problem is not a moral problem, women's mere unwillingness to make sacrifices. The problem is the nature of woman. A woman's body exists as female for one purpose, to be the incubator, nurse, and caretaker of the next generation. That is, every single physical and psychological difference between men and women is due to woman's unique role in reproduction.

Man's physical form and psychological profile, by contrast, stems from our role in acquiring resources, fighting, and protecting. For a woman to succeed in a man's role, she must by necessity sacrifice her womanhood. She must have fewer or no children and pay less attention to them. Every minute she spends focusing on her primary role in our species is a minute she is not spending competing in the man's world. Man's world is dog-eat-dog, so she is necessarily falling behind.

Even if she does sacrifice her fertility to be the best man she can be, she still is at a monstrous disadvantage. She is smaller, weaker, and more frail. Her mind is naturally averse to taking on risk and afraid of bucking consensus, the very things you need to excel and rise above. She finds herself sexually attracted to the men she's supposed to be competing with. Even when she finds herself in a management role, her social nature militates against her own success, since male hierarchical socialization evolved in the hunting party and the war-band, while female socialization evolved in the village, and thus all-female organizations tend to fail at their purpose.

They can't be happy because the world of government, business and war is a man's world. It's not a man's world because we "dominate" it, as though it were just out there in the wild, and we grabbed it before women could get to it. It's a man's world because we made it. We built it. We unconsciously designed it for us, and attempts in the 21st century to redesign our world for women has broken both the world and the women.

 

[Deus Exica]

Women have always been vulnerable to the conflicts started by men mostly, and in war, they could get the worst end of the stick - rape, torture, slavery, and all things horrible.

Listen, if you threw me in a war and told me I had to choose between getting raped, tortured, and enslaved or have my brains blown out I would probably choose the rape.

Women are so self centered and retarded they literally think being raped is worse than being killed.

 

[Trump's Chosen]

False accusations are becoming a trend where I'm from.

In that case it's not a false accusation though. He exchanged phone messages with a family member that he later deleted about touching her ass.

False accusations are a problem, but so are handsy spergs.

They can't be happy because the world of government, business and war is a man's world. It's not a man's world because we "dominate" it, as though it were just out there in the wild, and we grabbed it before women could get to it. It's a man's world because we made it. We built it. We unconsciously designed it for us, and attempts in the 21st century to redesign our world for women has broken both the world and the women.

The redesign achieves the goals it's meant to achieve. It craters population growth. It uses women to disenfranchise men politically and socially and turn both into more compliant slaves. Descendants of the men that built government (and upstarts that figured that they should and could be part of the new order) figured out a way to better control their potential competitors.

It's like bill gates wanting common core to be the standard educational profile, while making sure his kids are in private schools that don't adhere to common core. At a certain level, resources are a zero sum game and improving the resourcefulness of your progeny has more limits than limiting the resourcefulness of their competitors. If you teach really bad stuff, the smart ones will figure it's dumb, but they'll still have to take some time to throw off the propaganda. Conversely, their kid has more chance of being an alexander the great who was had a mix of talent and excellent education and able to put things into action in the most virile years of life.

I know it's the wealthy women that pushed feminism on the poorer women that tried resisting it, but I wonder if it isn't also their husbands that pushed for it, as more extensive education for women is one of the most effective tools against population growth.

I thought feminism was allowing women to work and be paid equally to men, for them to be safe, healthy, confident, and assured even if they are alone, for women to be recognized for their achievements and efforts without men taking credit, for women to be able to vote and have a proper opinion.

Why did you think this? What gave you this perspective? In what year, with what source? What writer or academic or polemicist gave you this idea?

 

[Mad Hunter]

more extensive education for women is one of the most effective tools against population growth.

In fairness to that, I sure as hell don't want an overpopulated nation because I am not going to waste my time at work just to have my taxes thrown away to a bunch of morons who cannot take care of their own damn children. Their fault not mine.

 

[The Ugly One]

False accusations are a problem, but so are handsy spergs.

The duality of man.

In fairness to that, I sure as hell don't want an overpopulated nation because I am not going to waste my time at work just to have my taxes thrown away to a bunch of morons who cannot take care of their own damn children. Their fault not mine.

This is a dumb argument, because morons who can't take care of their own children are the ones who aren't sterilizing themselves. It's the higher-IQ, low time-preference white women who are stopping their families before they start so they can have careers.

 

[Mad Hunter]

This is a dumb argument, because morons who can't take care of their own children are the ones who aren't sterilizing themselves. It's the higher-IQ, low time-preference white women who are stopping their families before they start so they can have careers.

And my taxes will still go to those kids one way or another. I am not gonna stand for that shit whether it goes to the broke women who bang deadbeat drunkards and end up with too many children or those women you are talking about who really need to be sterilized or to abstain. I am not going to waste my time and lifeblood on kids that aren't mine.

 

[Trump's Chosen]

In fairness to that, I sure as hell don't want an overpopulated nation because I am not going to waste my time at work just to have my taxes thrown away to a bunch of morons who cannot take care of their own damn children. Their fault not mine.

Right, but when you combine it with mass immigration it's a slow genocide. It would be recognized as genocide by the geneva convention if these kind of illegitimate international laws were actually applied evenly and we didn't live in a world of shadowactors and realpolitik.

You'll still live in an overpopulated nation, but now they're a diverse, not-united people that are easily divided and conquered.

I am not going to waste my time and lifeblood on kids that aren't mine.

Yes, you will. It's not even a choice not to. We all do.

Our taxes go to women, children and old people. Over a lifetime, on average, only men are a net benefit to the state coffers.