Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 15.3%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 52 11.8%
  • This Year

    Votes: 71 16.2%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 148 33.7%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 101 23.0%

  • Total voters
    439
And it is indeed owned by his family. And since the tax office mailing address is the same, it's likely not a rental or anything.
2025-01-02_15-35.png
 
I can't help but wonder if an alternative explanation exists: Russ is homeless and has no address to his name so he wants Hardin to mail checks to his dad's house so he can pick them up eventually. I think it could go either way at this point, stranger things have happened in this case.
 
We now come back to the question of whether the judge wants to let Russ keep shuffling along with a zombie case (based on his inability to identify and enter anything useful into evidence) or to put it down now as a mercy to everyone. I'd guess even odds.
It's the new year, and there is bound to be a lot of new cases and lawsuits as the year goes on. If the judge is smart he'd try to clear out some old cases before he's swamped.
 
I can't help but wonder if an alternative explanation exists: Russ is homeless and has no address to his name so he wants Hardin to mail checks to his dad's house so he can pick them up eventually. I think it could go either way at this point, stranger things have happened in this case.
That would make sense, but he listed an NV po box in his amended complaint so why wouldn't he just have checks sent there?
 
It's his old PO box. He used an old document and failed to update it. He does that a lot.
Maybe I missed it, but his original complaint lists a UT PO box, not sure if the NV box he listed in the new one has shown up.
 
Last edited:
It's his old PO box. He used an old document and failed to update it. He does that a lot.
And the other document had his old apartment address where he was evicted from which apparently is where Hardin sent the check.

Maybe I missed it, but his original complain lists a UT PO box, not sure if the NV box he listed in the new one has shown up.
Do you not read every single word in this thread?

Yea, it does, I found it in a 2021 document.
 
i was all ready to say hardin is absolutely cutthroat, but no, not really. he’s just expecting russell to follow the fucking rules, and actually holding him accountable to those rules. russell has always seen himself as basically a lawyer, and he’s upset and tard-raging over being expected to do what an actually really real lawyer actually does. hardin is doing probably 10x the work and 10x the effort communicating with russell than he would if he were dealing with fellow counsel in this case. extra good on him for essentially getting all his email communication with russell into evidence. at SOME FUCKING POINT, the judge HAS to see that being lenient to a pro-se litigant does not mean allowing the defense to eat up time and money because the retard refuses to cooperate or understand. russell has admitted many times over he is out of his depth, how fucking far out of his depth does he have to continue to be for this judge to realize what a colossal waste of fucking time and money this is???

edit: and, even in his amended complaint that removed the “fluff,” russell still uses the court as his personal livejournal. what a fucking cocksnot.
 
i was all ready to say hardin is absolutely cutthroat, but no, not really. he’s just expecting russell to follow the fucking rules, and actually holding him accountable to those rules. russell has always seen himself as basically a lawyer, and he’s upset and tard-raging over being expected to do what an actually really real lawyer actually does. hardin is doing probably 10x the work and 10x the effort communicating with russell than he would if he were dealing with fellow counsel in this case. extra good on him for essentially getting all his email communication with russell into evidence. at SOME FUCKING POINT, the judge HAS to see that being lenient to a pro-se litigant does not mean allowing the defense to eat up time and money because the retard refuses to cooperate or understand. russell has admitted many times over he is out of his depth, how fucking far out of his depth does he have to continue to be for this judge to realize what a colossal waste of fucking time and money this is???
Counterpoint: Is Hardin possibly making a mistake in doing all this work, essentially, for Russ? Could it be that the judge looks at this and thinks, "Well, if Hardin is willing to put up with this bullshit, so should I"?
 
View attachment 6813784
Rusty's thread wasn't created until May 2017, and a search for "Greer" prior to March 1, 2017 only shows results for Leo and Germaine. We had never once spoken about Russell Greer (YET) so how are we responsible for something that happened in February 2017?
He doesn't know how IT really works.
Again, it's all irrelevant to copyright.
Also, what happened in his 'former city' was probably brought on by himself bragging about the lawsuit and the Swifties were not happy.
 
Counterpoint: Is Hardin possibly making a mistake in doing all this work, essentially, for Russ? Could it be that the judge looks at this and thinks, "Well, if Hardin is willing to put up with this bullshit, so should I"?
No. The madness only ends through equal madness. Russ wants a fight. He will get one.
 
Back