US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Even if you pay attention it doesn't mean the kid won't have a friend that has parents passing them the iPad to shut them up.
Yes, part of being a parent means not letting your child hang around bad influences.
Because the govermment went broke in the Depression, so FDR needed to raise money and that meant bringing back liquor taxes. Simple as that. And while there are unconstitutional amendments like the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment which interferes in states' rights,
Maybe if FDR wasn't paying farmers to soak their oranges in kerosene, he wouldn't have needed all that tax money.
And just so we don't get confused:
1735895086734.png
It was a failure at reducing alcohol consumption. By 1923, people were drinking more than pre-Prohibition.
Not only did it not work, it actively damaged the already dropping rate of consumption that was happening.
Prohibition is not unconstitutional because the federal government always had the power of commerce between states.
>it wasn't unconstitutional
>which is why they had to ratify the constitution to give them the power to do so
1735894974969.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It was a failure at reducing alcohol consumption. By 1923, people were drinking more than pre-Prohibition.
Not only did it not work, it actively damaged the already dropping rate of consumption that was happening
Because many states were passing state Prohibition bills before that time. Your own chart shows how wrong you are that it damaged anything. You've been programmed your entire life by liberal memes about how Prohibition didn't work and that means we need to legalize all drugs, but you're very, very wrong.
>it wasn't unconstitutional
>which is why they had to ratify the constitution to give them the power to do so
Wrong! State-level prohibition was correctly deemed wholly legal and to this day there are dry counties. While I believe constitutional amendments can be inherently unconstitutional, there is nothing unconstitutional about Prohibition.
 
porn is responsible for most rape
I would think alcohol or other substances that lower inhibitions and critical thinking would be the main motivator.

child molestation (pedos get their start on normal porn before switching to child porn)
There is a lot more too it than just that. But I will agree the heavy age play themes in mainstream incest videos is very fucking concerning.

It's responsible for absolutely destroying the institution of families, marriage, and having children.
Just like any other addiction. I also don't think porn is the main reason why people don't have kids. Years of global warming/over population/economy fear mongering would do that along with pushing a selfish consequence free lifestyle in the mainstream culture.

Porn exploits hundreds of thousands of its performers who demean themselves on camera and many end up dead, insane, or addicts. The porn industry is deeply tied with human trafficking, and one of PornHub's top lawyers is also linked to European pedophile rings.
Why didn't you start with this? The exploitative nature of the industry alone warrants it to get shut down and is the strongest argument against it. Cut out most of the earlier fluff that make you sound pedantic and you would have most people agreeing with you.
 
I'd rather have government having their hand in every aspect of society over perverts and CP hoarders
My government covered up (for over 40 years at this point) 1400 young girls being molested, raped, force feed drugs and booze all while arresting the fathers who tried to stop it happening to their daughters. Both the red and blue team. I'd take lolberts who'd let me [FED POST REDACTED] them over the current "government".
 
Because many states were passing state Prohibition bills before that time. Your own chart shows how wrong you are that it damaged anything.
>it wasn't a failure even though federal prohibition undid everything on a state level
How the fuck do you look at the rate of consumption increasing to rates higher than two years before Prohibition and say that it's a success?
:lossmanjack:
State-level prohibition was correctly deemed wholly legal and to this day there are dry counties.
Yes, it's called The Tenth Amendment. Your so smrt.
That said, it doesn't really matter when Cletus can drive his jalopy to the next state over and get his weeks worth of Buttwiper.
 
Last edited:
Thomas Jefferson fucked his house niggers, but I still love him.

I don't intend to derail the thread from the topic of burgers or booze. I just find the mainstream narrative around Sally Hemings misleading.

Sally Hemings was an "octoroon" (⅞ths White, ⅛ Black). She was the half-sister of Thomas Jefferson's wife Martha. They were both daughters of John Wayles (a wealthy Virginian). Martha was older than Sally. There are no portraits of Sally. The only two contemporary descriptions of her mention she was "light-skinned" and had long straight black hair.

Martha died in 1782. Jefferson brought Sally to France in 1787. In 1789 Sally became pregnant while in France. Slavery was abolished in France at the time. Sally could have stayed in France a free non-slave. Sally chose to travel back to America and live at Monticello with Jefferson.

Jefferson freed all of Sally's children (1/16th Black, 15/16th White). Of the 4 children who made it to adulthood 3 passed into White society. Madison Hemings chose to identify as a "free black" and moved to Ohio with his "mixed-race" wife. Madison Hemings' sons served in the Civil War as White soldiers.

The majority of Sally Hemings descendants are White. After 10 generations (~200 years) a descendant has 1024 tenth-gen "grandparents" (assuming no inbreeding). A modern Black descendant of Sally Hemings received ~1/8000th of their "Blackness" from Sally, and ~15/8000ths of their "Whiteness" from Sally & Jefferson.

My point being that any modern Black descendant is Black because more Black was added. I'm sure there are Black descendants of many famous Whites from over 200 years ago. I avoided mentioning Thomas Jefferson possibly not beeing the father, since the post is already long (and I lean towards it being him).

Here is a picture of Lena Horne:
Lena Horne.jpg
Lena Horne was the first Black woman to get a contract with a major Hollywood Studio. If you were Jefferson, would you?
 
They were both daughters of John Wayles
Sally was given to Martha as a personal maid when she married. According to many who knew both she was almost identical to Martha. I can't imagine what Virginia planter society was like in the 1700s so I can't judge but she was not some rando nigress plucked from the fields when Jefferson wanted a good time. She would have had some education (the ability to read and write), poise and manners as a member of the Jefferson household. These relationships were common in the South and in other countries where Africans were enslaved; Xica da Silva is a famous slave from Brazil who became a wealthy plantation owner's mistress under similar circumstances, and whose sons were given noble titles by the Portuguese court.

Xica from the Brazilian telenovela.
1735898865368.png
 
Last edited:
I would think alcohol or other substances that lower inhibitions and critical thinking would be the main motivator.
Everything from risky sexual activity to serial rape is directly linked to porn consumption. If people weren't so porn-brained, they wouldn't be doing that shit to begin with. And that goes for women too, like when they read "romance novels" (smut) about how great Chad or Tyrone are to be in a relationship with.
Just like any other addiction. I also don't think porn is the main reason why people don't have kids. Years of global warming/over population/economy fear mongering would do that along with pushing a selfish consequence free lifestyle in the mainstream culture.
They've been talking about global warming and Peak whatever for 20+ years, but birthrates just keep dropping. Could it be that widespread access to the internet and porn is to blame? Nah!
Why didn't you start with this? The exploitative nature of the industry alone warrants it to get shut down and is the strongest argument against it. Cut out most of the earlier fluff that make you sound pedantic and you would have most people agreeing with you.
Because it's not the strongest argument, since I can envision a scenario in the industry is strictly regulated that these abuses would mostly go away. I cannot envision a scenario where the overall social harm from porn, especially to children and teenagers who are introduced to it, goes away.
>it wasn't a failure even though federal prohibition undid everything on a state level
How the fuck do you look at the rate of consumption increasing to rates higher than two years before Prohibition and say that it's a success?
:lossmanjack:

Yes, it's called The Tenth Amendment. Your so smrt.
That said, it doesn't really matter when Cletus can drive his jalopy to the next state over and get his weeks worth of Buttwiper.
Because you have zilch idea what you're talking about. Prohibition was already enacted in most states and counties before the 19th amendment. Therefore there was a huge drop as these laws were passed, followed by a bigger drop as it became illegal nationally, and then a rise as alternate distribution paths became used. It's painfully obvious if you understand anything.

BTW do abortion next when you talk about how bans don't work. To no one's surprise, they seem to be working.
 
The "Nuclear Family" is an unnatural and soulless false god.
You're right, the nuclear family should be replaced with something more natural. Like gooning to hard-core porn produced by jews for 25 hours a day.
It neglects that most people who come from Nuclear Families are either broken and inanimate consumers or deranged animals. I am the latter.
>"I'm a complete failure and my opinion matters."
Lmao. Rofl even.
 
farming, bakeries, etc. The Nuclear Family is a no-pun intended atomized cancer that produces en masse mediocrity, maladaptation and wiggerdom.
you know buddy, I think I can see what your alluding too, but do you really think a close community is a more natural state?

Cause i have watched people who have lost parents or spent 20 years in prison try to do the found, queer family shit, or worse been adopted and it seems far interior. to blood
 
The easiest fucking thing to do is to forbid kids from having phones with Internet access. You solve a lot of problems there - at the very least you ensure kids need an actual computer to look it up.
Here's my idea. Every time that you want to connect to the internet you have to answer a basic geography question. This will keep children and retards off the internet.
 
Feels to me like the right have lost any sense of nuance over this issue and are rolling toward a self-own. Are your commentators that calm you down still off for Christmas and New Year?

Like so many things, the idea is good but the imementation is rife with fraud.

You cap H-1B visas at 2,500 per year, making them much more competitive and eliminating the chance for the visa to be abused. America's biggest problems revolve around doubling-down on failed ideas and looking the other way when a good idea is being ignored or manipulated to commit fraudulent acts. Cap the visa and take the 2,500 smartest foriegners from their homelands each year.

Sounds good.

As with most things, the issue was fraud. The people complaining about gardeners and janitors are correct. The people talking about the utility of fast-tracking visas for geniuses and high-skill workers are also correct.

The people with a black and white view on this issue that can't seem to figure out any positive or negative aspect of their own ideas are assholes.
 
On the H-1B thing, here in Bongland there got to be a shortage in tradesmen, especially plumbers,as the government thought it was a great idea if they tried to get half the population to go to university even though a good chunk of people really had no business being there.

This lead to a massive increase in how much a man with a trade could earn especially plumbers.

What happened then was there was a massive uptick in young men getting apprenticeships, which was slowly bringing some sanity to wages and letting the traditional working class have a great lifestyle.

Then the government realised you could just attract a bunch of potato monkeys over from Eastern Europe to do it for half the price and it hit a lot of people.

It really fucked over what factory jobs we had left as what used to be hard work but with decent pay became minimum wage jobs employing only 80 IQ dead eyed Poles.

It also created this perverse environment were there were so many graduates that you needed a degree for entry level office jobs, leading to graduates from southern Europe flocking in and starting to depress wages across those sectors.

At least we had Brexit, which made things better for a bit (for workers, despite what the media tells you.) But now both parties what to open the flood gates to the third world to get the cheap labour back.

Burgers, don’t let this happen to you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back