US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

 

[namelesstacotruck]

The 10% use cases are the cases that decide wars.

Cart before the horse thinking. Yes the 10 percent is what all the movies get made about. But the thing that really wins wars is showing up.

Ask me to bet on the air force that can do Top Gun missions or the one that can regularly, consistently and safely keep planes in the air to do patrols, ferry supplies, run regular and routine bombing missions while also being more casualty tolerant? I will pick the ai one.

The US military has this race car mindset of everything has to be high performance one hour of performance for 24 hours of maintaince, cost be damnned bullshit.

When the last war the US could have said to have well and truly won looking back 20 years had the exact opposite mindset.

Ai drones WILL be running bombing missions and patrols assuming the world doesnt completely collapse. Pretending otherwise is talking about the importance of our horse cavalry in 1910.

 

[Rudolf's Friend]

Woah Massie looks like a total fucking retard voting for Tom Emmer and sperging about being being mad at him for it. Jefferies came pretty fucking close to winning I hope people see how truly awful Massie is now total loser (Emmer is god awful btw would be worse then Johnson)

wouldn't the people who voted for a different speaker have to vote for Jefferies for him to become the next speaker or is there some other way?

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

Europe wants America gone. We want your influence gone

They want us in the cuck chair paying their Military budgets while we have no influence.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

View attachment 6817485
Oh wait I think he got it

Trump was right again:

 

[The Last Stand]

Okay, this is funny.

 

[WelperHelper99]

They want us in the cuck chair paying their Military budgets while we have no influence.

Bingo. Because without the US, no more socialized medicine, no more shit like climate treaties, they'll actually have to get real jobs and start cutting down trees and mining again.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

That's a fucking lie. They already are. Have you heard of TACAN? That has been in every Tomahawk cruise missiles targeting system since Block 1. AI type systems in military use isn't new and will continue to be used and integrated. Because it makes war far more efficient. The F-35 alone is proof of that.

You've misunderstood, possibly because you're an overly emotional sped.

AI exists in targetting systems but it CANNOT, by laws and regulations agreed upon by the world's nations, be the final command on whether or not to kill a human/animal.

Military jets have been capable of taking off, flying a sortie, dropping bombs, having a fly about and then landing, all automatically. We have the technology. However, the computer cannot be the one to decide to drop the bombs, that's a series of commands from humans.

They want us in the cuck chair paying their Military budgets while we have no influence.

Take everything American out of Europe and the place will flourish in no time. Imagine a continent with zero jewish, tranny-loving and nigger-worshipping influence.

 

[Fellen]

Thank goodness that Johnson got it. I might not like him, but a prolonged battle would've been a headache.

 

[Hey Johnny Bravo]

Take everything American out of Europe and the place will flourish in no time.

Tired of the daily humanitarian rations, are we?

 

[WelperHelper99]

You've misunderstood, possibly because you're an overly emotional sped.

AI exists in targetting systems but it CANNOT, by laws and regulations agreed upon by the world's nations, be the final command on whether or not to kill a human/animal.

Military jets have been capable of taking off, flying a sortie, dropping bombs, having a fly about and then landing, all automatically. We have the technology. However, the computer cannot be the one to decide to drop the bombs, that's a series of commands from humans.

Treaties are nice things until a proper war breaks out lmao. Then they are toilet paper, because at that point winning is what matters, not dying on principle. Humans will remain in control of the big guns. Smaller guns? You kid yourself.

 

[The Ugly One]

Ask me to bet on the air force that can do Top Gun missions or the one that can regularly, consistently and safely keep planes in the air to do patrols, ferry supplies, run regular and routine bombing missions while also being more casualty tolerant? I will pick the ai one.

You say this like human-piloted cargo plans are constantly dropping out of the sky. They aren't. AI offers at best a marginal advantage here. But now we're moving the goalposts from winning combats that otherwise would have been lost to a 2% increase in fuel hauling efficiency.

The US military has this race car mindset of everything has to be high performance one hour of performance for 24 hours of maintaince, cost be damnned bubullshit.

The US military has been the undefeated global champion of logistics for a century.

And yes, against an innovative foe, i.e. the kind of enemy where success in combat is the knife edge on which the war turns, paint-by-numbers rearward facing robots won't cut it.

Ai drones WILL be running bombing missions and patrols assuming the world doesnt completely collapse

Sure, just like we used human-piloted drones in Iraq and Afghanistan, we'll be using them in the kinds of conflicts we've been losing since 1972 and continuing to lose them. But I agree they'll be great at dropping ordnance out of the sky at enemies who can't shoot back. They'll just be shit at winning when the stakes are high.

AI is a retard that can't improvise, can't handle unfamiliar situations, and is prone to a whole different class of mistakes than humans are. These aren't mere teething problems; they are fundamental to how AI works.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

Treaties are nice things until a proper war breaks out lmao. Then they are toilet paper, because at that point winning is what matters, not dying on principle. Humans will remain in control of the big guns. Smaller guns? You kid yourself.

Every time you reply to me, you do so with the most cock-sure reply which is founded in complete retardation.
Go to war and learn the rules of engagement. The come back to me.

 

[Conan]

I'm fine with Europe being responsible for their own defense. I just don't want to hear the hypocritical bitching I've endured for 20 years.
US doing too much? Euros complain we're acting like a global bully/policeman.
US not doing enough? Euros complain we're neglecting our allies and agreements (don't ask how much they contribute).

Remove US bases, troops, everything. Let the US spend on US soil. If the euros can handle their mixed market economies that rely on the US defensive umbrella shifting gears to allot for defense then I am all for it.
I am not entirely confident every country in Europe could do it but the US is under no moral obligation to subsidize their defense, and many Euros would prefer we didn't.
But are they confident their economies and welfare states could handle the defense vacuum? That is what I would like to see them discuss.

 

[Day of the Cope]

If laws don't make things harder to do, why are you so mad about them?

Because niggers like you with no long-term thinking never seem to care about unintended side effects?

The weird thing about libertarian economic logic is you only selectively apply it. Libertarians will complain about government regulations on medicine, automobiles, dishwashers, or anything else you don't like because, by banning this or that, the government makes the good in question more expensive, more difficult to obtain, and out of reach for more people. And on the flip side, deregulation results in growth in whatever industry gets deregulated.

Yet, when it comes to porn, prostitution, and drugs, things that many libertarians are addicted to, regulations magically stop working! We are assured that government regulations do absolutely nothing whatsoever. They don't make things more expensive. They don't make things harder to get. Somehow, they only have this effect on dishwashers and cancer treatments. Government regulations on porn won't make porn more expensive or harder to get. They're a total waste of time (but you're also very angry about them).

How fucking long does the failing War on Drugs have to drag on for until you fucking retards get it?

 

[ye's Official KF Burner]

I post here maybe once in a while, but I wanted to join the burger squad with my oc donut steele

Anyway, I've seen a lot more normie fearmongering about riots happening on J20 as a response to Trump going into office and of course TPTB are blaming the Free Palestine niggers already.

 

[CallmeCicada]

Hello, gentlemen of USPG. I wanted to leave you all a message to tell you that despite all your disagreements that you still found something mirthful among all the heated debate and negativity. Thank you for spreading something joyful, it's things like this that make me glad to use this site. Stay awesome USPG, and have a McRib on me.

 

[I.B. Niggin]

Hakeem Jeffries had me in the first half, not gonna lie, and then of course he pivots to typical liberal faggot drivel and blames the Republicans and lauds the Biden administration for ten straight minutes.

 

[Internet Wizard]

But are they confident their economies and welfare states could handle the defense vacuum? That is what I would like to see them discuss.

When they aren't declaring offensive wars every 5 years it's a lot easier

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

But are they confident their economies and welfare states could handle the defense vacuum? That is what I would like to see them discuss.

Yes.
Americans think being in Europe is you giving your money to us to pay for your military, it isn't, it's a whole lot more and we as a continent would be better off without American influence and interference over here. Our energy would be cheaper for a start.

However, I don't want the US to just take their tanks and guns home, I want all American influence gone. Take your long-noses out of our business.

 

[WelperHelper99]

Yes.
Americans think being in Europe is you giving your money to us to pay for your military, it isn't, it's a whole lot more and we as a continent would be better off without American influence and interference over here. Our energy would be cheaper for a start.

However, I don't want the US to just take their tanks and guns home, I want all American influence gone. Take your long-noses out of our business.

Then you'll start killing eachother again. No. Us staying prevents you fucking retards from being savages against one another