What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

Theoretically, it should entirely depend on how thoroughly the tulpa was developed by its creator. Though, one that persists after its creator was already powerful enough to act beyond its creator’s intent.
Pulled from the abyss?
 
fraudulent Helen Keller
nllqwfg3blc21.jpg

Tell me more
 

There's a bunch, some people think she was not deaf and blind. Or not to the full extent that was claimed. That her accomplishments were exaggerated or entirely fabricated by her teacher Anne Sullican. Who was controlling and manipulating Helen's public image to make her seem much more capable than she was.

Her academic achievements were not genuine, her work was ghost written and she was given undue assistance. Her whole story and media presence was an inspirational one that people wanted to be true. She was also used to push various political motives as a figure head being used by others.

No idea if it's true, apparently there's plenty of documentation so suggest otherwise but it's easy to see how it could be an elaborate fake. She had some abilities but that doesn't rule out exageration. It may have all been in good faith. Another claim is that too many people met and witnessed her. However, it's a highly unusual spectactle. How would you necessarily know the person translating by hand movements is actually doing it? Being so unusual you may not question it or your questions can be cast aside. Also who'd want to be the asshole to go, "That was kind of bullshit" about such a well known inspirational figure.

You can watch footage of her talking, where it's badly pronounced sentances, where Anne translates. They seem to match, but that could be a parlor act where she's just trained to roughly say prewritten lines.

It's interesting.
 
@Screamer_2 gets the gist of it. Helen was also shown to be less than honest from the start. (archive) She "wrote" The Frost King at 11 and it was fairly blatantly a plagiarized version of a book by Margaret Canby. Personally I think it's a little bit of columns A, B, and C. Helen was largely a clever prop for her handlers, she did have exceptional ability to cope with her disabilities (though nowhere close to the extremes claimed), and her conditions were not total deafness/blindness as is commonly described.
 
The discussion of the gradual black-washing of Europe made me think back to some of the earliest iterations of Black Nationalism in the US - it used to focus more toward one's heritage back in Africa, and the countries and tribes therein. This kind of sentiment was fairly prevalent in the first half of the 20th century, but nowadays the mainstream wants to shift the focus beyond Africa and instead claim that nations across Europe are a part of black history themselves.
It's likely just another angle that those above are taking in an attempt to dismantle cultural identity.
 
The discussion of the gradual black-washing of Europe made me think back to some of the earliest iterations of Black Nationalism in the US - it used to focus more toward one's heritage back in Africa, and the countries and tribes therein. This kind of sentiment was fairly prevalent in the first half of the 20th century, but nowadays the mainstream wants to shift the focus beyond Africa and instead claim that nations across Europe are a part of black history themselves.
It's likely just another angle that those above are taking in an attempt to dismantle cultural identity.

The difference would be that black nationalism came from black people right?

White black washing of European history appears to me to be coming from progressive white liberals for a variety of retarded reasons that extend beyond attempting to dismantle cultural identity. I suspect in part they see the idea of a society that is just white as horrific. They extend that back into the history.
 
The difference would be that black nationalism came from black people right?

White black washing of European history appears to me to be coming from progressive white liberals for a variety of retarded reasons that extend beyond attempting to dismantle cultural identity. I suspect in part they see the idea of a society that is just white as horrific. They extend that back into the history.
(((White))) if you will
 
No idea if it's true, apparently there's plenty of documentation so suggest otherwise but it's easy to see how it could be an elaborate fake. She had some abilities but that doesn't rule out exageration. It may have all been in good faith. Another claim is that too many people met and witnessed her. However, it's a highly unusual spectactle. How would you necessarily know the person translating by hand movements is actually doing it? Being so unusual you may not question it or your questions can be cast aside. Also who'd want to be the asshole to go, "That was kind of bullshit" about such a well known inspirational figure.

You can watch footage of her talking, where it's badly pronounced sentances, where Anne translates. They seem to match, but that could be a parlor act where she's just trained to roughly say prewritten lines.
Kind of related:
 
Zuckerface and the other tech giants are trialballooning some kind of gayops around getting braindead zoomers into a gay and retarded version of "tradmaxxing" for reasons I have not entirely sussed out yet.

Weird surge of Islamic, Amish, and Hasidic "influencer" content into the feeds of randoms getting reported. It's too early to say for sure what's up but something is up.
- prepping the public for victory gardens v2: ww3 edition
- funneling dissatisfaction with the modern world into "traditions" that do not threaten the existing power structure
- algo fags noticed a trend and are monetizing it like usual
Maybe all of the above.
everything involving elite pedo rings, i heard through gossip way way back that there was this boxer/MMA fighter that went to this party with a bunch of other boxers and the jist of it is there was open child rape going on there, supposedly as soon as he left he started a livestream (dont remember which platform) saying so-and-so happened at said party. this was a long time ago so i forgot the guys' name, and god knows what happened to him after this. have there any incidents like this of people making it to the top and speaking out once introduced to this stuff?
 
Democracy doesn't exist. It never has.

Each election cycle, we play games with each other—left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative. But this isn't any different from a heel vs. babyface wrestling fantasy, except we all think it's real.

People laugh at the idea of the Illuminati or the Freemasons, but those groups once held real power. Who's to say they didn’t simply rebrand and evolve with the times?

They make us fight over things that don't truly matter, all for their own interests. They couldn't care less about who the next president is or who wins an election because all politicians ultimately work for them, whether they realize it or not. Politicians fight for scraps—titles, money, influence—but they all serve the same masters.

Every election, they throw us a bone, letting politicians "decide" on issues they don't truly care about, like abortion or the latest fabricated cultural war over "wokeness." How else do you explain this sudden wave of divisive insanity, seemingly coming from nowhere and infecting everything? "Cultural Marxism" is not a satisfactory answer. It’s far more powerful than something dreamed up by underpaid college professors. It had too much influence, too much money behind it. This was 100% planned.

But when it comes to the real decisions—how the world is divided, how power is distributed, who owns the money, which nation rises or falls, who rules each country, what the current global zeitgeist is, or who goes to war—those decisions aren’t ours to make. They call the shots, not us.
 
Last edited:
Democracy doesn't exist. It never has.

Each election cycle, we play games with each other—left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative. But this isn't any different from a heel vs. babyface wrestling fantasy, except we all think it's real.

People laugh at the idea of the Illuminati or the Freemasons, but those groups once held real power. Who's to say they didn’t simply rebrand and evolve with the times?

They make us fight over things that don't truly matter, all for their own interests. They couldn't care less about who the next president is or who wins an election because all politicians ultimately work for them, whether they realize it or not. Politicians fight for scraps—titles, money, influence—but they all serve the same masters.

Every election, they throw us a bone, letting politicians "decide" on issues they don't truly care about, like abortion or the latest fabricated cultural war over "wokeness." How else do you explain this sudden wave of divisive insanity, seemingly coming from nowhere and infecting everything? "Cultural Marxism" is not a satisfactory answer. It’s far more powerful than something dreamed up by underpaid college professors. It had too much influence, too much money behind it. This was 100% planned.

But when it comes to the real decisions—how the world is divided, how power is distributed, who owns the money, which nation rises or falls, who rules each country, what the current global zeitgeist is, or who goes to war—those decisions aren’t ours to make. They call the shots, not us.
Oh, I thought that was the corporations.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mystery Spy
Back