Controlled burning IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES doesn't fucking work.
You could have tried saying exactly that to start with, instead of making a blanket statement. Now you have people calling your retarded statements retarded, and your malding at that is providing bonus entertainment for everyone else in the thread.
I know this is a joke but I'll say this anyways for those who are curious.
This is fire retardant. It covers trees and makes it harder for fire to spread. Simple enough.
So the fire just sits there and dies out because too retarded to realize that more fuel to consume is right there in front of it? Clever strategy.
You shit your pants in public and then expect a "rebuttal" when the only response is really dude, you just shit your pants, shut the fuck up.
Autistic nigger mad at being called autistic nigger in the Autism and Niggers section of the Autism Thunderdome. Film at 11.
No, you only need to do one you backpedaling faggot. REMOVE TREE
You are so autisically hyper-focused on the Eucalyptus, that you fail to realize the Australia is not LA, or anywhere else, Australia is Australia. It is ironic you scream "Learn some geography," while failing to understand it yourself. Yes, LA might have some climactic similarities to where you're at in Australia, but it is not identical. Nor is its local ecology. The local native flora spring back lickety-split from a wildfire because they're adapted to it, and some of them even require it as part of their reproductive lifecycle.
So here you are, screaming that LA needs to get rid of all the invasive Eucalyptus. Here, you are correct. Then, in your retardation, you declare that because prescribed burns don't work in Australia, they can't possibly work in climatically similar LA. Here, you show your ignorance of southern CA's climate and ecology, and then start acting like a spaz when people call you out for it.
This fire isn't caused by
just the invasive Eucalyptus, this fire is a confluence of multiple factors. Even if all the Eucalyptus trees, their seeds and fallen detritus all had magically disappeared a week ago, this fire would still be a raging inferno. Guess what happens when an environment which has come to depend upon small and frequent wildfires doesn't get them for years upon years, because the local envirotards whinge about keeping all that climate-change-causing carbon naturally sequestered? Fuel, fuel that would normally be barely enough for small, containable, sub-apocalypse-level fires, will accumulate. It will build up, build, build, and keep building, until the the tiniest spark opens a portal to Hell that will not close until the entirety of the LA basin is a smoldering crater.
