US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:

You ever see a thing and it's so funny from so many angles that you don't even laugh? You feel just a slow grin dawning on your face because it's too perfect a storm?

Thanks_For_The_Water.png

They_Got_The_Dud.png

The jewish ukranian ex-pat descended water baron growing drought almonds while his host state burns down over and over while people there are blaming the chud nazis and global warming. Knowing this is one of the guys responsible for a large sum of California's current hardships is a better monkey's paw ironic twist than I could ever write.
 
SEAN SPICER: From a strategic standpoint how important is Greenland to the United States?

ERIK PRINCE: It is an enormous amount of mineral potential. It is of significant interest to the Chinese Communist Party. And so I think what Trump had proposed last time, last administration, was effectively a 50-50 rev share where the US would take over the overhead costs because it costs Denmark tens of billions of dollars a year for the policing, security, and administration of Greenland. The US would take that on, but then it would basically split the revenue of any mining or energy development together with Denmark. I think it's a good deal for Denmark and a good deal for the United States.

SEAN SPICER: Does Denmark view themselves right now as potentially being under attack by the Chinese or under threat from them?

ERIK PRINCE: No, but it's the same CCP approach of show up with a lot of money, buy a lot of influence, and create presence—literally in our attic—that the Canadian government doesn't do nearly as much of effective patrolling of all those waters and areas. And so, as a defensive play and as a good opportunity for the United States to maximize the reach and the economic development in our own hemisphere, it makes perfect sense. Most importantly, there's some fantastic back country and helicopter skiing.

SEAN SPICER: I knew there'd be a silver lining, but I mean in all honesty I just can't imagine Denmark saying oh yeah yeah we'll give up 50% or 20% even of our sovereign territory because you guys want.

ERIK PRINCE: They were almost ready to do the deal last time. Yes, and because Denmark—I don't believe Denmark doesn’t come anywhere near to the 2% that they’re supposed to be spending on NATO. Maybe it’s just a false flag by the president to make Denmark spend their 2% on NATO. But it's an interesting approach and I hope he sees it through.

SEAN SPICER: If you had to make a prediction whether Denmark agrees to some kind of a deal, where would you put it?

ERIK PRINCE: Above 50%. Remember, you know, think about, um, you know, they called the purchase of Alaska Seward's Folly and it turned out to be absolutely a brilliant purchase. I think it came out to two or three cents per acre in terms of value. Um, the United States, you can imagine, where would we be without Alaska? So maybe in five years or 10 years, we'll be looking back, where would we be without Greenland?

tldr - Donald Trump’s first administration was closer to securing a groundbreaking agreement with Denmark to take control of Greenland than previously known.
 
Too bad. I'm happy with Trump winning and will vote in the next election available to me. Interesting how all the "voting isn't real" morons got real quiet, but that's a separate thought.
tbh I'm still a little shocked from Trump getting elected the first time showing that elections might actually be real
 
Might be late? But I just found this interesting little tidbit in an interview USA Today just put out with Biden.

Biden said he is considering preemptive pardons for public figures such as former Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney and former senior health official Dr. Anthony Fauci who have been threatened with investigation and prosecution by incoming president Donald Trump.

When Biden met with Trump in the Oval Office a week after the November election, he urged the president-elect not to go forward with threats to target those who have criticized him or, in Cheney's case, helped lead efforts to impeach him.

"I tried to make clear that there was no need, and it was counterintuitive for his interest to go back and try to settle scores," Biden said. How did Trump respond? "He didn't say, 'No, I'm going to ...' You know. He didn't reinforce it. He just basically listened."

 
Didn't see this posted. Head of DEI bureau at LAFD responds to comments about not being able to carry someone's husband out of a fire (because woman) with "your husband got himself in a bad situation if he needs to be carried out of a fire"
It is even worse watching the video. How is this real.

 
Too bad. I'm happy with Trump winning and will vote in the next election available to me. Interesting how all the "voting isn't real" morons got real quiet, but that's a separate thought.
>he still thinks voting is real
I'm sure it has nothing to do with Trump selling out to Musk, Thiel, etc and having them tell Dems not to rig the election.
 
Didn't see this posted. Head of DEI bureau at LAFD responds to comments about not being able to carry someone's husband out of a fire (because woman) with "your husband got himself in a bad situation if he needs to be carried out of a fire"
It is even worse watching the video. How is this real.

View attachment 6839337
Here it is: leftoids cannot understand logic or reason. They equate what they think are snappy zingers with intelligence. It really is a mental disorder that they publish retarded shit like this and think it makes them look good.

See below for another example:
>he still thinks voting is real
I'm sure it has nothing to do with Trump selling out to Musk, Thiel, etc and having them tell Dems not to rig the election.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back