Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

There is also another branch of socialistic Urbanists who have toxic positivity. Everybody in the entire world must feel anxious and afraid because of a small minority of anti-social lunatic homeless people. These homeless people who have been banned from every homeless shelter in the city are not assholes and insane - no, they are victims of capitalism. The bigotry of low expectations ramped up to 11.

1736466015166.png

The end result of these ideas.
 
The bawling like a small child is what got me for this one.

Nooo! You can’t have beautiful buildings! Your cities must look like a sea of endless drab concrete boxes.
Two minutes in and he was refuting urbanists "idolizing" the buildings in Budapest. However, from scrolling through the transcript it's mostly sperging about why the buildings are what they are with lots of Hungarian history and politics that most people just aren't going to care about, nor is really relatable to how American cities changed post-WWII.
 
The kid is wearing a kippa and the bus has Hebrew writing on it. The kid is definitely Jewish.
Also, it's Williamsburg.
The Orthodox neighborhoods in Brooklyn are swarming with kids when the schools get out. The bicyclist should have been alert to that fact and extra careful.

RE: the NYC cultural scene, you don't really have the chance to indulge in it that much unless you're independently wealthy. Even if you have to work, study, or take care of kids, you don't enjoy it that much more often than someone in commuting distance IME.
 
Meat Canyon just got on the fuck cyclists train.

They're mad:
1736475407840.png
1736475421527.png
1736475429636.png
Source (Archive)


Road Guy Rob directly responds to Jason Slaughter's video whining about firetrucks.

(Preservetube)

I bet Jason will be seething despite RGR agreeing a lot with the idea of traffic calming measures.

They're also mad about about that video:
1736475387595.png
1736475304741.png
1736475297767.png
1736475339969.png
Agreeing with Rob gets you downvoted:
1736475319467.png
Source (Archive)
 
Bikefags suck but the kid was at fault there. He just jumped in front of the bike between the cars without looking at all. The biker couldn't have stopped in time because he couldn't see him and the child was acting recklessly. Not looking is just brainless behavior and I hope he got serious talking to because doing shit like that will get you killed.
That's a Heeb child hopefully the bicyclist was a Hamas supporter.
 
They point the "too broke to own a car line", which, lol, but not the point MeatCanyon shows of how throughout the years Cycalists have always been assholes, like taking over the streets in the last Friday of a month and fucking everyone over on the way home from work.
 
They point the "too broke to own a car line", which, lol, but not the point MeatCanyon shows of how throughout the years Cycalists have always been assholes, like taking over the streets in the last Friday of a month and fucking everyone over on the way home from work.
The problem is they can't refute the "just a hobby" or "too broke to afford a car" arguments, not there's anything wrong with either; but they just get mad because it demolishes their arguments. ("Virtue-signaling" or "lost my license from criminal activity" would also fall into those two).
 
The problem is they can't refute the "just a hobby" or "too broke to afford a car" arguments, not there's anything wrong with either; but they just get mad because it demolishes their arguments. ("Virtue-signaling" or "lost my license from criminal activity" would also fall into those two).
I think they're also mad because someone outside the bubble pointed out they were broke fucking larpers. A fat guy no less.
 
The biker should have came to a complete stop. Bikes are legally road going vehicles and forced to follow all rules of the road. So he either ignored traffic control devices, or was driving an unsafe overloaded vehicle. There's zero culpability on the child besides the general lack of awareness a child has.
Like I said I didn't know about this law. To me an idea that the traffic has come to a complete stop because kids in the area is extremely foreign and kinda dumb. I grew up with a culture where kids are expected to follow the same laws and look after themselves just like adults. At most we have warning signs near schools, daycares and playgrounds to be extra observant just in case. We know kids more probable to do something unexpected and stupid because kids are like that but isn't seen as an excuse for recklessness. If a child is too small and stupid to act safely, then they shouldn't be crossing roads on their own.

Actually only real difference between kids and adults on roads is that kids are allowed to bike on walking only roads if they are under 12. Beyond that kids are the same as any other road user and are to behave just any other road user.

Just to be clear, of course bikers should act safely too. They need to keep a reasonable speed and follow traffic laws whatever those are. If the local law is to stop and let kids to act like dumb little monsters then bikers should the very least follow the spirit of the law and slow down to such speed that they can come to an immediate stop if a gremlin child jumps in front of them.
 
Last edited:
"I WANNA BE TREATED JUST THE SAME AS A KKKAR DRIVER"
Alright well you'll need a license for that bike, also headlights, tail-lights, turn signals... need to be federally certified as a safe design, plus you'll have to stop for red lights-
"NO NOT LIKE THIS"
They start popping veins when you tell them stop signs also apply to them.
 
At most we have warning signs near schools, daycares and playgrounds to be extra observant just in case.
So a giant yellow bus with flashing lights isn't a warning? Somehow it's the kids fault.
We know kids more probable to do something unexpected and stupid because kids are like that but isn't seen as an excuse for recklessness.
You mean like get off a bus excitedly and walk out into a bike path because he just got home from school? Probably a bike path that is hardly ever used?
If a child is too small and stupid to act safely, then they shouldn't be crossing roads on their own.
He didn't cross a road, he got off a bus. You really are batting zero here.
Actually only real difference between kids and adults on roads is that kids are allowed to bike on walking only roads if they are under 12.
So kids have a lower level of responsibility because they are impulsive and dumb because their brains aren't developed, yet you still find more fault with a child than a biker. Do you hate kids of just love bikes?
Beyond that kids are the same as any other road user and are to behave just any other road user.
No they aren't, they are physically and mentally nowhere close to adults.
Just to be clear, of course bikers should act safely too. They need to keep a reasonable speed and follow traffic laws whatever those are.
You still blame the kid though.
If the local law is to stop and let kids to act like dumb little monsters then bikers should the very least follow the spirit of the law and slow down to such speed that they can come to an immediate stop if a gremlin child jumps in front of them.
That dumb little monster getting off a school bus. Not the abhorrent monster overloading his bike and being unable to react to anything. Are you an antinatalist or something?
 
Back