Sweet Baby Inc. and the Steam Curator Group Conspiracy - The company that is responsible for the diarrheic video game writing.

The epicenter of GG was 8chan
yes, and no one gave a shit about 8chan, not even in it's heyday. that's why whatever happened there means fuck all, and even if it were true no one cared because at that point you already had stuff like the law and order episode. the official narrative was long set, with or without any "coomers", journos already made up all the "facts" they needed like johnny-boy claiming he got into a traffic accident because of GG and was now on the run "for his life".
that's why going OMG THEY MIGHT WRITE GG 2.0 IS THIS OR THAT is fucking retarded, they gonna do that anyway. they've been making shit up about trump almost 10 years, you fucking think they care how legit their reporting about "nerd shit on the internet" is? even before GG got it's own label it was about journos writing all kinds of shit, unless you forgot the whole "ethics in games journalism" part.

besides it reeks of fucking reddit with the whole "never let a nazi into your bar" spiel, which is reason enough to dismiss it. let alone for trying to gatekeep something without any hierarchy or anything official. who's gonna decide what is "true gamergate"? you? grummz? a twitter vote? shit doesn't work like that.

Much of the fanart made of her to this day is coomer art, usually straight up porn, what more can be said?
so just like overwatch. you're saying ow2 failed because people made /d/-tier porn? there are people drawing porn of luce ffs. just because some people one some website are retarded doesn't mean it's a mirror or example of the rest. besides, if GG has been "taken over" by LE COOMERS it just means it was already small and insignificant as a "movement". plenty of people shat on milo when he tried to claim any status, no one doing that later doesn't mean anyone took over, it simply means no one gave a fuck anymore.

you're also ignoring that a whole fucking point of that pro-gg part was OMG SEXY WOMEN BAD. you have a literal patrick klepek video virtue signaling shielding his eyes from a yakuza video, of fucking course anyone wanting to piss on those pseudo-puritans is using porn to shitpost. it also ignores the whole thing kicked off for real when chelsea fucked around to push her game, the fucking GAMERGATE HATES WOMEN narrative was set from day fucking one as deflection. wikipedia LITERALLY calls it's a "loosely organized misogynistic online harassment campaign motivated by a right-wing backlash against feminism, diversity, and progressivism in video game culture."
another thing you ignore is MUH WOMEN stuff became general internet shit because of #metoo, which was a much bigger topic for normalfags. anyone still talking about GG at that point (mostly journos and sad generals on 8chan) were of course influenced by that.
 
besides it reeks of fucking reddit with the whole "never let a nazi into your bar" spiel, which is reason enough to dismiss it. let alone for trying to gatekeep something without any hierarchy or anything official. who's gonna decide what is "true gamergate"? you? grummz? a twitter vote? shit doesn't work like that.
All I said was that you should be careful who you let into your group, especially people who don't care about it's core beliefs and who will inevitably make it look bad. In response, you write me an entire novel that ends up not saying anything of value.
Fair enough, I guess we should allow pedophiles on the farms then, since any sort of gatekeeping is "gay reddit shit".
 
@ZMOT I'm be honest:

There's probably no point in engaging with 30+.

The guy seems like the cucked type who can't seem to understand that one of the biggest reasons Gamers™ lost back then was because they tried capitulating to the SJWs.

"Oh I'm not a incel loser"
"Oh I'm not a degenerate who's complaining about the women not being hot"
"I'm not racist guys!!"
Etc.

I mean, 30+ ignored a majority of what happened back then to focus on the minute detail of "You all sound like coomers because you can recognize that they're making women uglier than they are even in real life".


As if there was any reasoning with the Activists and the Journos (something that the Wikipedia page proves otherwise 😂)
 
If anything, Overwatch as a whole survived literally because people made porn of it. At the very least, the characters were remembered precisely because they were fairly attractive and didn't follow the standard rules of the "modern audience" (at least near the tail end of the first Overwatch and the launch of the second game). They started losing steam primarily because they focused more on diversity and "inclusion" check boxes rather than have appealing characters. Focusing on which characters sucked dick or munched box didn't necessarily help the popularity either, considering that was time wasted that could've been spent fixing and balancing the overall experience and actually adding a PvE mode (which players were more than clamoring for around the first game's launch in its barebones state).
 
They started losing steam primarily because they focused more on diversity and "inclusion" check boxes rather than have appealing characters. Focusing on which characters sucked dick or munched box didn't necessarily help the popularity either, considering that was time wasted that could've been spent fixing and balancing the overall experience and actually adding a PvE mode (which players were more than clamoring for around the first game's launch in its barebones state).
It lost steam because Blizzard was entirely focused on balancing the game for what would look good on screen for their stupid ass astro-turfed pro e-sport overwatch league(that basically ruined the already growing independent esports leagues that had adopted the game or begin to pop up). Going as far as to push the game balance to revolve around timing for everyone to hit their ults at once just so it would always be on screen and they wouldn't have footage of someone doing something boring. Meanwhile the entire OWL thing blew up in their faces and as I recall got sold off to some bullshit saudi investors. This wasn't even specific to Overwatch, as Blizzard had already done the same thing nuking Starcraft 2 as an e-sport(when SC:Broodwar had practically been a korean national passtime at one point), and also failed with their astro-turfed college e-sport Heroes of the Storm league(heroes of the dorm or some dumb shit) that was never going to compete with LOL and DOTA due to the map variation, lack of store, leveling balance, etc. but actually had a casual following that didn't require any investment on their part.

The lack of PvE that players had been demanding, and blizzard said they were doing, but then cancelled when "OW2" launched unnecessarily just made the hill that the game was already rolling down even more steep than previously.

The coomer weirdos just ignored all of the bullshit genderblobs and androgynous whatevers that got added to the game later.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
the characters were remembered precisely because they were fairly attractive and didn't follow the standard rules of the "modern audience"
I had no idea that the porn was more popular than the game, which is odd for a FPS where the story and characters don't really matter. Didn't they make changes or tone down the designs to their popular characters such as Dva, Mei and Tracer?
 
The aggressive hate boner people have for Grummz is baffling to me. Like, I get it. He's a fucking moron who occasionally posts something relevant, but he's not worth having a conniption fit over. Holy shit.
I don't hate him, I'm just baffled by the way some people revere him. If he hadn't stumbled into GamerGate 10 years ago nobody would know or care who he is or what he has to say.
Odds on this having unknown 9 level of sales?
I think it will do better, if only because it's copying the Into The Spiderverse art style and it's got an interesting premise (which I'm sure will be completely mishandled).

Unknown 9 remains a complete mystery why anyone thought that game needed to be made.
 
I had no idea that the porn was more popular than the game, which is odd for a FPS where the story and characters don't really matter. Didn't they make changes or tone down the designs to their popular characters such as Dva, Mei and Tracer?

See also Genshin Impact and Hoyoverse games in general.

Anyone claiming that isn't one of if not the biggest factors in those games' success is kidding themselves.
 
He took a lot of people's money and hasn't delivered fucking shit. I'm judging him on that.
20 years ago, and he's done nothing noteworthy since except scam people with a vaporware crowdfund and refuse to let GamerGate die.
Then judge him on that when he's selling a game (or crowd funding scam). Otherwise it's just Whataboutism.

The aggressive hate boner people have for Grummz is baffling to me. Like, I get it. He's a fucking moron who occasionally posts something relevant, but he's not worth having a conniption fit over. Holy shit.
Same with Rev Says Desu, and Asmongold. One of my favourites with Grummz and Rev is when they get called incels.

Anyways, as far as degenerates go, those idiots that were given media attention? That doesn't change the fact that they were "part of the movement", and without central authority figures to disavow them or correct the record, degenerates did as they do-take over and make everything about themselves and their fetishes, ruining the public image as they went along.
ZMOT already covered the fact they lie and send themselves "death threats". But even if we accept it as true, they don't care about degenerates. They are all "sex work is real work" "every body is beautiful" "join my OnlyFans" when it's things they approve of, but now I'm supposed to care when it's something people actually like.

The lack of a central authority figure is part of why GG won, and GG2 is winning. They want a central authority figure so they can cancel them. Look at how they tried to get Valve to ban Kabrutis and delete all his Steam games. That failed so they went after Grummz.
 
Sweet Baby Inc. is not collaborating on the development of The Witcher 4, says the CEO of CD Projekt Red..

w42.jpg


When your DEI is in-house
:story:


sbi.jpg
 
Then judge him on that when he's selling a game (or crowd funding scam). Otherwise it's just Whataboutism.
Whataboutism would be bringing up the weird obsession with women's stomachs because it has nothing at all to do with video games.

When you're discussing a person's credibility in the industry it's perfectly reasonable to judge them by their failure to deliver on projects (or the complete absence of projects in general), even if it's not a direct correlation with the topic at hand.
 
Anyone claiming that isn't one of if not the biggest factors in those games' success is kidding themselves.
The sad part is that we need to reinvent the fucking wheel of "attractive women sell" because leftists are defective, mentally ill humans.

I wonder how many years it will take for the Western industry to clue into this fact again, or maybe they'll just keep their heads buried in the sand and keep losing market share to Chinese and Korean developers that aren't afraid of giving the audiences what they want.

Commies always lose because they try to fight human nature.
therby further proving that the rot is industry-wide, and solely focusing on Sweet Baby is misguided at best, a deliberate red herring at worst.
It's easier for the average smoothbrain to latch onto Sweet Baby than try to explain to him that Sweet Baby is one among many Marxist consultancy agencies, or the fact that these agencies are oftentimes preaching to the woke choir, telling the developers all they want to hear, instead of being some shadowy mob running a racket and blackmailing poor developers into shitting up their games.

Ultimately, I view it as a positive turn of events, because at the very least the audience now can point at a culprit, or at the very least, a category of culprits (and the ideology they espouse) when they start becoming noticers.
When you're discussing a person's credibility in the industry it's perfectly reasonable to judge them by their failure to deliver on projects (or the complete absence of projects in general), even if it's not a direct correlation with the topic at hand.
To be fair he's among many industry has-beens that seem incapable of making anything worthwhile once removed from the studio where they attained their "legendary" reputation (see also Chris Roberts, Warren Spector, Ken Levine, Peter Molyneux et al). Doesn't help that most of the time the developers themselves either have no clue why the game they made is popular, or are completely incapable of playing it.
 
To be fair he's among many industry has-beens that seem incapable of making anything worthwhile once removed from the studio where they attained their "legendary" reputation (see also Chris Roberts, Warren Spector, Ken Levine, Peter Molyneux et al). Doesn't help that most of the time the developers themselves either have no clue why the game they made is popular, or are completely incapable of playing it.
Warren Spector became an anti-violent video game nut for some reason. When the White House uploades that stupid supercut of games being violent, he said the developers of those games should be ashamed. Sir, your most famous game allows players to shoot rockets at a kid.
 
therby further proving that the rot is industry-wide, and solely focusing on Sweet Baby is misguided at best, a deliberate red herring at worst.
Thankfully I've yet to hear of anyone who would or has been convinced that thought ought to be complacent solely because of a lack of Sweet Baby involvement. It was pretty easy for most I''ve observed to realize that companies "walking back" on DEI divisions just meant that they're doing BRIDGE in the future.
 
Warren Spector
He's making a new game, and so is Levine. Who knows how they'll turn out.

Open question: Does anyone remember who was patient 0 for the "women in games are ugly" phenomenon?
I ask because I can't remember this being a talking point on the early days of GG and it's something that came after, but can't quite pinpoint it. Quick internet searches only go back 2 or 3 years at the most.
 
Back