Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

[Brad Watson_Miami]

http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v8/n1/full/nphys2190.html

Nature Physics | Review

Between order and chaos
by James P. Crutchfield1,
Nature Physics Volume 8, Pages: 17–24, Year published: (2012)
doi:10.1038/nphys2190
Received 28 October 2011
Accepted 30 November 2011
Published online 22 December 2011
Corrected online 17 May 2013 Corrigendum (June, 2013)

Abstract​

What is a pattern? How do we come to recognize patterns never seen before? Quantifying the notion of pattern and formalizing the process of pattern discovery go right to the heart of physical science. Over the past few decades physics’ view of nature’s lack of structure—its unpredictability—underwent a major renovation with the discovery of deterministic chaos, overthrowing two centuries of Laplace’s strict determinism in classical physics. Behind the veil of apparent randomness, though, many processes are highly ordered, following simple rules. Tools adapted from the theories of information and computation have brought physical science to the brink of automatically discovering hidden patterns and quantifying their structural complexity.


Synchronism: 10:51 "Do you think I got this job through coincidence?" - The Sound Of Drums,
Doctor Who on BBC AMERICA

Randomness is the lack of pattern or predictability in events. A random sequence of events, symbols or steps has no order and does not follow an intelligible pattern or combination. Individual random events are by definition unpredictable, but in many cases the frequency of different outcomes over a large number of events (or "trials") is predictable. - http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness

http://www.nature.com/articles/srep00091

http://web.mit.edu/cocosci/Papers/random.pdf

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2014.00049/full

Chaos theory is the field of study in mathematics that studies the behavior and condition of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions—a response popularly referred to as the butterfly effect. - http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

http://www.nature.com/news/chaos-theory-pioneer-nabs-abel-prize-1.14935
"In maths, 'a good definition is as important as a good theorem.'”

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Remember what i said yesterday about Brad not actually understanding what he reads? He again proves it.

 

[Adamska]

Well he did attempt to science with his first post as an abstract, which is a step up from last time. Now if he stopped being dishonest and stopped trying to post stuff that was debunked over 700 pages ago like it was brand spanking new and unassailable he might have some hope.

 

[bacterium]

Randomness is the lack of pattern or predictability in events. A random sequence of events, symbols or steps has no order and does not follow an intelligible pattern or combination. Individual random events are by definition unpredictable, but in many cases the frequency of different outcomes over a large number of events (or "trials") is predictable. - http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness

http://www.nature.com/articles/srep00091

http://web.mit.edu/cocosci/Papers/random.pdf

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2014.00049/full

Chaos theory is the field of study in mathematics that studies the behavior and condition of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions—a response popularly referred to as the butterfly effect. - http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

http://www.nature.com/news/chaos-theory-pioneer-nabs-abel-prize-1.14935
"In maths, 'a good definition is as important as a good theorem.'”

Not even gonna try to read that as dark red on black = eye strain.

ETA: Holy shit. I just realized, that is more scientific than anything Brad has said.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

Randomness is the lack of pattern or predictability in events. A random sequence of events, symbols or steps has no order and does not follow an intelligible pattern or combination. Individual random events are by definition unpredictable, but in many cases the frequency of different outcomes over a large number of events (or "trials") is predictable. - http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness

http://www.nature.com/articles/srep00091

http://web.mit.edu/cocosci/Papers/random.pdf

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2014.00049/full

Chaos theory is the field of study in mathematics that studies the behavior and condition of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions—a response popularly referred to as the butterfly effect. - http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

http://www.nature.com/news/chaos-theory-pioneer-nabs-abel-prize-1.14935
"In maths, 'a good definition is as important as a good theorem'... 'What are we actually talking about here?' This drive to get the right definition — the starting point for any modern mathematical theory... has helped --- identify what is truly important and fundamental to the way a system behaves."

This is Seal #2: Plan-it Theory of GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4; FIG=6|7 (Design Worlds Theory) as it now appears on the cover of the "book/scroll sealed with 7 seals" (Rev 5:1)...

GOD=7_4, 7/4=July 4th or 7 April GOD=GOOD=GOOOOOD=G-d=7_4 Simple674 English774 Gematria874 - the key74: A=1, B=2…Z=26
royal cubits74=7 palms×4 fingers, regular cubits=6p•4f=17.76”, G & F clefs 4/4, FIG=6|7, Genasis74 1:1 7 Hebrew words/28 letters: God’s Signature, NYC 74°W
John447 the Baptist7 b 11/12/7 BC/747 AUC. Jesus74 b Sat. 4/17/6 BC/748, on Cross74 G7ood4 Friday74 4/7/30 AD/783. Tawaf: circumambulate Kaaba 7×, 4 reg.

FOD=6_4 FOD=FOOD=FOOOOD=F-d=6_4 Genasis 6:4 “Nefilem64”, Juan46 1:1 – Fod Founder of Plan-it Nestor Sain†63 Pe†er64, 64, d 10/13/64 AD
Venus .7 & Mercury .4 AU, 4 lunar phases 7.4 days each, etc. Nestor’s inner planets .6 & .4 and/or 6 & 4 AU,
4 lunar phases 6.4 days, etc., hence F6OD4. Rev 21:1
“Identifying ‘True Earth-like Planets’ – All New Worlds Are Built On 7_4 (like Earth) Or 6_4” (Nestor) (NASA Conf. Missions for Exoplanets: 2010-2020, 4/21/09)


Synchronism: 20:00 "The comparisons to Christ were evident by all." - opening of The Assassination of Abraham Lincoln on PBS Ch 2

 

[Adamska]

Not even gonna try to read that as dark red on black = eye strain.

ETA: Holy shit. I just realized, that is more scientific than anything Brad has said.

I like how he's now just doing it to be a dick. Haha no wonder no one believes he's Jesus and why they barely tolerate him with that type of attitude.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

"Using your secret decoder ring: 2-9-16-16-25 (bippy)." - Laugh-In (1969) on DECADES 21:56

 

[grimbaud]

Just want to clarify for anyone that isn't crazy that chaos theory studies deterministic systems whereas randomness, if it truly exists, is the definition of nondeterministic. It's really great stuff to read into if you aren't insane

@Brad Watson_Miami There's nothing special about the english language

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

I like how he's now just doing it to be a dick. Haha no wonder no one believes he's Jesus and why they barely tolerate him with that type of attitude.

Maybe Brad always was trying to be a dick, for one reason or another. Read back to his very early posts... even then, his "theory" was all about how special he was and how he's Jesus. Trying to find ways to elevate yourself above others is a pretty dick move, and Brad's MO hasn't changed since Day 1.

 

[bacterium]

"Using your secret decoder ring: 2-9-16-16-25 (bippy)." - Laugh-In (1969) on DECADES 21:56

You know, I think Brad may be right

But no, he is dumb as hell. Everyone knows I am Jesus.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

@grimbaud,

Just want to clarify for you: There Are No Coincidences - everything is connect74ed. Chaos theory is found everywhere - there are underlying patterns in the apparent randomness of this Universe with the BIGGEST pattern/initial condition being GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4.
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

There's is something very special about English774 which is Earth's primary language. In countries like China and India where English is not the primary language, it's taught as the secondary language. English is the ultimate evolution of language, yet, it's the reconstuction of the Holy Tongue that God-incarnate used to create Earth a long time ago.

The spoken language is connected to the written language which is based on its alphabet which is phoenetic, pictographic, and has a numerical order (A=1, B2...Z26) based on history, science and Nature, i.e. S=19 (Snake) and the metonic cycle, Z=26 and GOD=26=G7+O15+D4.
http://wikipedia.org/wiki/Metonic_cycle

You came on this thread for apparently the first time and chose to rudely judge me, therefore...

By the power77 vested in me by GOD as His/Her Christ77=C3+H8+R18+I9+S19+T20, I hereby rule that 1/18/17 is your Judgment Day: you FAIL.

Sentence: Awful luck for the rest of your life, then your eternal soul won't be reincarnated as human for 2,000 years with 74 years non-commutable. When you are born-again as human, it will be under really hellish circumstances.

Note: You can repent...

You're now part of a grand scientific experiment to last 1,000+ years.

c.c. http://7seals.yuku.com

-------------------------------------
​

Sentence: Awful luck for the rest of your life, then your eternal soul won't be reincarnated as human for 4,000 years with 74 years non-commutable. When you are born-again as human, it will be under really hellish circumstances.

Note: You can repent...

You're now part of a grand scientific experiment to last 1,000+ years.

c.c. http://7seals.yuku.com



The following is the title, subtitle and tweaked brief explanation of the "book/scroll". I replaced 'chaos' with apparent randomness...

There Are No Coin4c1idences788​

There is synchronism, nonlocality, retrocausality, subconscious telepathy,
and design-and-alignment.
Everything evolves by laws of Nature, is (w)holē40 and mathematically interwoven.
Everything is connected; there are patterns within the apparent randomness.
Every†hing has meaning in the Grand Scheme of GOD/FOD’s universes.
Anytime an idea19* is connect59/74ed to Nature, it’s not only logical59, it’s inevitable, i.e. sacred** geometry/gematria74 (in English774) and base 10 (10 fingers). In this biocentric/anthropocentric Universe, we’re not only “observers who affect the experiment”, we’re participants and cocreators…
​

See http://7seals.blogspot.com .


symmetry breaking: the absence or reduction of manifest symmetry in a situation despite its presence in the laws of nature underlying it, a process of by which a physical system in a symmetrical state ends up in an asymmetrical state.

 

[Kartoffel]

The following is the title, subtitle and tweaked brief explanation of the "book/scroll". I replaced 'chaos' with apparent randomness...

There Are No Coin4c1idences788​

There is synchronism, nonlocality, retrocausality, subconscious telepathy,
and design-and-alignment.
Everything evolves by laws of Nature, is (w)holē40 and mathematically interwoven.
Everything is connected; there are patterns within the apparent randomness.
Every†hing has meaning in the Grand Scheme of GOD/FOD’s universes.
Anytime an idea19* is connect59/74ed to Nature, it’s not only logical59, it’s inevitable, i.e. sacred** geometry/gematria74 (in English774) and base 10 (10 fingers). In this biocentric/anthropocentric Universe, we’re not only “observers who affect the experiment”, we’re participants and cocreators…​

Coincidently, you also don't have any suffient arguments to back up your bradicolous claims.

 

[Adamska]

Coincidently, you also don't have any suffient arguments to back up your bradicolous claims.

And he writes like an escaped mental patient to boot. Formatting Brad, do you speak it?

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

symmetry breaking: the absence or reduction of manifest symmetry in a situation despite its presence in the laws of nature underlying it, a process of by which a physical system in a symmetrical state ends up in an asymmetrical state.


"The Universe is a spheroid region 705 meters in diameter"... "Computer, how long can life support systems continue?" "4 minutes and 17 seconds"... "My thoughts created this universe." - Remember Me, Star Trek: TNG (S4/Ep5, 1990) on BBC AMERICA 12:48

Note: If they had said, "704 meters", the writers would have clearly divulged the GOD=704 Code and they chose not to be that overt. 4/17 was Jesus' Birthday in 6 BC/748 AUC/3755 HC.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

Is Brad the natural result of early-2000s 133t5p3ak breeding with late-2000s daytime TV, fertilized by the toxic sludge ecosystem of outer Miami?

 

[Kartoffel]

symmetry breaking: the absence or reduction of manifest symmetry in a situation despite its presence in the laws of nature underlying it, a process of by which a physical system in a symmetrical state ends up in an asymmetrical state.

Translation: If something is not there, although the law says it should, everything goes to shit.

That's a suprisingly accurate description of Brad. Coincidence?

 

[bacterium]

@Brad Watson_Miami Still waiting for YOUR scientific proof of reincarnation. Not anecdotal evidence.

Ignoring me again will indicate there isn't any.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

@Brad Watson_Miami Still waiting for YOUR scientific proof of reincarnation. Not anecdotal evidence.

Ignoring me again will indicate there isn't any.

You realize, of course, Brad doesn't comprehend the difference between scientific and anecdotal.

 

[RomanesEuntDomus]

He doesn't even understand that theft is something he shouldn't do, so what can we expect?

 

[Kartoffel]

You realize, of course, Brad doesn't comprehend the difference between scientific and anecdotal.

Perhaps we should try to use a more bradian approach to express what we want:

@Brad Watson_Miami you are probably able to read music sheets. If there is a piece of music someone says that it is awesome, then you can take the sheet and play it yourself and tell afterwards if this is really the case. You will be able to see if there are major mistakes like suddenly using 6 lines or something like that; and you can call out the author that this is a piece of shit and does not work.
If you write music yourself, no one will believe you when you say it's awesome, before analysing it themselves; because you are not neutral and can't objectively rate your own stuff.
When you take music from other composers you will to have to tell everyone what you took from whom, otherwise your will be sued because you infringed copyright.
Also, you will probably rate the oppinion of a non-musician much lower on the topic of music than the oppinion of a professional.

And science in a nutshell is exactly the same:
1. stuff must be reproduceable or its automatic bullshit.
2. if there are mistakes in something, people will call you out
3. copying the work of others without sourcing them is fraud
4. real scientists are more believeable than hobbyists

So to make a convincing argument you must cite credible sources (as published in a scientific paper) by real scientists (which have been publiched in scientific publications) that use repeatable (as in don't claim something is true because they experienced it once) methods.

So, I hoped I was able to get the sweet spot between verbosity and simplicity that you like so much, Brad. I even add a few numbers for good measure: 4 7 4 7 4 7777 4444 777 444 777 444 4747474 7474747 7744 77 44 77 44444 777777 4444 777 47474744444 77777