Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
  • Like
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
Hey Brad, you believe in Adam and Eve, right? You also believe in reincarnation, right? How do you deal with the fact that there were only two souls in the garden of Eden? Do new souls just sorta pop into existence when someone gets born and there isn't enough souls to go around?
 
What we're seeing now (aside from the acceleration of some form of schizophrenia) is that Brad's "theory" is incredibly complex and (as has been noted many times) contradictory. Why?

A lot of us have been looking at Brad's posts as a habit of a man trying to evangelize his beliefs. The fact that Brad says this is why he posts his gibberish all over the Internet backs this up. However, it's quite clear by Brad's lack of concern for his readers, or their comprehension, or the obvious factual errors contained in his writing and pointed out repeatedly, that Brad isn't overly bothered by the fact that people don't believe him.

Then there's the book he's been working on for a Connor's age. That he keeps in secret and has no plans to publish. What's that about?

I'm going to make the following suggestion: Brad's theories are so complex because their purpose is to convince BRAD. Brad wants to feel important, so he invents this theory, and sinc his theory sucks, he needs to invest an absurd amount of time into proving it to himself again and again. This is why Brad points out every 7 and 4 he can find... because it gives him a few more minutes of validation and helps him stave off self-reflection just a little bit longer. It takes everything Brad has to convince himself, even WITH his obvious mental problem.

With that in mind, it's clear why Brad doesn't care about convincing anyone else-- he doesn't have the energy for it. At the end of the day, Brad knows something's not right when his predictions go awry.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
Do you believe that time travel is possible?
Sure, general relativity supports time travel.
I think I remember you saying you sent your thoughts back in time on a few separate occasions but I could be wrong.
You're right.
If the past is changed do you believe the timeline splits into two from the moment it was changed? Or do you believe there can only be one timeline?
One timeline, but it's not all etched in granite74.
The former seems like a safer concept but also a bit too neat while the latter seems like a hot mess where anyone capable of any level of time travel could create some cosmic problems. So do you believe in alternate timelines being created when time is changed or are we always on the edge of paradox and numerous other bad stuff we can't even comprehend?
One timeline that we can comprehend thought (which is massless outside the brain) being able to travel faster-than-light. Thus, it's possible for thought to go back in time creating a new event with a new chain-of-events that appears as a synchronism in the present.
Also what are your favorite books, episodes, movies, etc about time travel and alternate timelines?
The Philadelphia Experiment both the original and the remake are good. Albert Einstein worked on it in 1943.
Primer is good and it's one of the few movies where time travel is the subject and not purely a plot device. Just make sure to pause it if you have to do something because if you miss a scene then it can be easy to get lost since every bit of dialogue is important.
I haven't heard of Primer.

Hey Brad, you believe in Adam and Eve, right?
This Universe is 13.8 billion-years-old. Earth is 4.567 billion-years-old. Humans are 2.8 million-years-old. The ET God-guy appeared in the Tigris-Euphrates River Valley about 6,000 years ago and used his DNA19 to clone himself to produce Adam19 and19 cloned Adam while changing a chromosome to create Eve (19 in Hebrew gematria).
You also believe in reincarnation, right?
Reincarnation has been proven through the scientific method.
How do you deal with the fact that there were only two souls in the garden of Eden?
Actually, there were three humans in the Guardin' of Eden: God-incarnate, Adam and Eve.
Do new souls just sorta pop into existence when someone gets born and there isn't enough souls to go around?
No. Animals have souls and there's alot of ETs out there - alot!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This Universe is 13.8 billion-years-old. Earth is 4.567 billion-years-old. Humans are 2.8 million-years-old. The ET God-guy appeared in the Tigris-Euphrates River Valley about 6,000 years ago and used his DNA19 to clone himself to produce Adam19 and19 cloned Adam while changing a chromosome to create Eve (19 in Hebrew gematria).

Reincarnation has been proven through the scientific method.

Actually, there were three humans: God-incarnate, Adam and Eve.

No. Animals have souls and there's alot of ETs out there - alot!
How small can an animal be and still have a soul? Do ants have souls? Bacteria? Plants?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
Good job failing basic math, again.
Wrong. The Wikipedia article referred to "the first homo erectus 1.8 million-years-ago as having brains 74% of modern humans".
Also, parallel universes are infinitely more believable that any of you 'theories'
Only an idiot would think that whether they had chosen not to scratch their ass this afternoon that that would have created a parallel world/parallel universe.
He sent his thoughts back in time to kill people.
That's a lie. I have never consciously done that.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
Reactions: Mr. X
Wrong. The Wikipedia article referred to the first homo erectus 1.8 billion-years-ago as having brains 74% of modern humans.
And this site suggests it is more like 69%; 900 cc compared to 1300 cc.
http://www.becominghuman.org/node/homo-erectus-0
http://www.becominghuman.org/node/homo-sapiens-0

But brain size is definitive, so its trivial.
Even Wikipedia (which is NOT a good source for scientific argument) lists it as:

Brain sizes of hominids

Name Brain size (cm3)[12]
Homo habilis 550–687
Homo ergaster 700–900
Homo erectus 600–1250
Homo heidelbergensis 1100–1400
Homo neanderthalensis 1200–1750
Homo sapiens 1400
 
  • Like
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
Animals have souls

You have repeatedly stated that humans who fail their judgments will be reborn, by your command, in animal bodies for some very large number of years depending on the offense.

Question: If an animal that has always been embodied as an animal does something really awesome, could it be reborn as human under fairly decent circumstances? Would barking or otherwise alerting, say, a sleeping human to a house fire and thus saving one or several lives count as sufficiently awesome to earn a human rebirth? If not, where exactly is the cutoff line?
 
"Currently, the US has 4.7% unemployment." - CNN 8:47

And this site suggests it is more like 69%; 900 cc compared to 1300 cc.
http://www.becominghuman.org/node/homo-erectus-0

But brain size is definitive, so its trivial.
Even Wikipedia (which is NOT a good source for scientific argument) lists it as:

Brain sizes of hominids

Name Brain size (cm3)[12]
Homo habilis 550–687
Homo ergaster 700–900
Homo erectus 600–1250
Homo heidelbergensis 1100–1400
Homo neanderthalensis 1200–1750
Homo sapiens 1400
74% of 1400 is 1036 which is toward the high side of 600-1250 for Homo erectus according to these numbers.

You have repeatedly stated that humans who fail their judgments will be reborn, by your command, in animal bodies for some very large number of years depending on the offense.

Question: If an animal that has always been embodied as an animal does something really awesome, could it be reborn as human under fairly decent circumstances? Would barking or otherwise alerting, say, a sleeping human to a house fire and thus saving one or several lives count as sufficiently awesome to earn a human rebirth? If not, where exactly is the cutoff line?
A barking dog alerting their master to a house fire and thus saving their life is right out of a 1950s Lassie episode. Yes, that would receive serious karma points. But keep in mind that being reincarnated as someone's pet dog is a pretty good reincarnation that would have been a reward for good karma as human. Someone with bad karma is not going to get such a comfortable, heavenly rebirth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So the Buddhists have it wrong, then? Because to them, any human existence -- being born in slum conditions with insufficient food -- is preferable to any animal existence, even that of the pampered pet (I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt here and assume owners who are not idiots and thus care for their pet properly... you'd be shocked how many cage pets die of the wrong living conditions, even respiratory infections from the wrong bedding), because as an animal, you have no chance of reaching enlightenment.

Also, is it still "heavenly" if they have the pet neutered, or does it only count if the pet gets to reproduce its genes? Someone has to think of the details.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Trombonista
Brad, I'd like to hear your opinion on the "nature vs nurture" debate.

For instance, when you think of the people on this forum, do you think they are this mean due to their genes or is it the outcome of their lives, what they did and experienced?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: ChurchOfGodBear
Brad, I'd like to hear your opinion on the "nature vs nurture" debate.

For instance, when you think of the people on this forum, do you think they are this mean due to their genes or is it the outcome of their lives, what they did and experienced?
Interesting that Brad's understanding of Nature and Nurture make both something that is the indivudual's fault. Good topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RomanesEuntDomus
So the Buddhists have it wrong, then?
The Buddhists have it wrong starting with Gautama Buddha was not the reincarnation of Vishnu and Krishna; Pythagoras was. The Hebrew Daniel in Babylon was also a contemporary of Pythagoras and Buddha. Those were three heavy cats!

----------------------------

7 = [4+4] - [4/4]

when you think of the people on this forum, do you think they are this mean due to their genes or is it the outcome of their lives, what they did and experienced?
The people that are mean on this forum - which is not everyone - are mean because they're assholes. Why are they assholes? Because they enjoy being assholes and are delusional in thinking that their actions don't have consequences.

Now, you tell us why you're mean.

This morning, I tweaked how Seal #7 Reincarnation Theory and its 26 Principles including Theory of Luck (ex. Einstein reincarnated as Watson) reads on the cover of the prophesied "book/scroll" of Revelation 5:1...

Reincarna†ion
†heory & its 26 Principles (Mt 11:14-15) includes 11 ways to track an eternal7 soul4, i.e. law of attraction + laws of energy, consciousness & information can’t be destroyed, only transferred. Life (like all matter & energy) is both waves & particles. Natural selection/“survival of the fittest” assures that humans that help the global system (Gaia) will return as human (Mt 5:5). Heaven & hell are frames-of-mind.

Theory of Luck 100 = [karma 4 + modesty 1] × [desire 4 + actions 4 + ability 4 + contribution 4 + blessings 4]

FDR & Eleanor→Barack & Michelle Obama
Cromwell→George Washington→R.E. Lee→Ike
Nathaniel Greene→U.S. Grant→Omar Bradley
Jackson→TR
Abigail Adams→Mary Lincoln→Marilyn Monroe→Janet Jackson58/73
Thomas Paine→Frederick Douglass→MLK
Copernicus→Kepler→Newton→Gauss→ Schwarzschild→Hawking
Mileva Maric Einstein→Janna Levin
Elsa Einstein→---
Monteverdi→Bach→Mozart→Berlioz→Ravel→Corea
Billie Holiday→Mariah Carey
Elvis→Bruno Mars
Old Tom Morris→Arnold Palmer
Young Tom Morris→Bobby Jones→Tiger Woods
Lenin→Putin
Nero…John Wilkes Booth→Ronald6 Wilson6 Reagan6
King George III→George McClellan→Hitler→George Bush Jr.
Mussolini→Donald Trump666 (A=49, B50…)
Caesar→Jesus…Muhammad74...St. Bernard→Fibonacci→Dante→Oresme→
Joan of Arc→Da Vinci→Galileo→Carlos Sigüenza→Franklin→Lincoln→Einstein→

Richard ‘Brad’shaw Wa†son77 II - Chris77 II


See http://7seals.blogspot.com


Synchronism: 20:14 Sherlock & Watson face their greatest challenge. "Well done, Dr. Watson."
- The Final Problem, Sherlock on Masterpiece - PBS
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
Reactions: Mr. X
There Are No Coin4c1idences788

There is synchronism, nonlocality, retrocausality, subconscious telepathy, and
design-and-alignment.

Everything evolves by laws of Nature, is
(w)holē40 and mathematically interwoven. Everything is connected; there are patterns within the 'chaos'. Every†hing has meaning in the Grand Scheme of GOD/FOD’s universes. Anytime an idea19* is connect59/74ed to Nature, it’s not only logical59,
it’s inevitable, i.e.
sacred** geometry/gematria74 (in English774) and base 10 (10 fingers).
In this biocentric/anthropocentric Universe, we’re not only “observers who affect the experiment”, we’re participants and cocreators…

The above is a tweak I've just done to the opening of the Title Page. It's good to be able to post it here for a different perspective and immediate feedback.

Synchronism: 20:51 Kansas City 7 Pittsburgh 6.

The following is the tweaked Seal #2 from the Title Page. I didn't have my regular church gig this morning, so I took the time to add "G Clef 4/4" to...


GOD=7_4, 7/4=July 4th or 7 April
... GOD=GOOD=GOOOOOD=G-d=7_4
Simple674 English774 Gematria874 - the key74: A=1, B=2…Z=26

Royal Cubits74 = 7 palms × 4 fingers, Standard Cubits=6p•4f=17.76”, G Clef 4/4, FIG=6|7, Genasis74 1:1 is 7 Hebrew words & 28 (7x4) letters: God’s Signature

John447 the Baptist7 b 11/12/7 BC/747 AUC. Jesus74 b Sat. 4/17/6 BC/748, on Cross74 G7ood4 Friday74 4/7/30 AD/783. Tawaf: circumambulate Kaaba 7×, 4 reg.

FOD=6_4 FOD=FOOD=FOOOOD=F-d=6_4 ... Genasis 6:4 “Nefilem64, Juan46 1:1 – Fod Founder of Plan-it Nestor ... Sain†63 Pe†er64, 64, d 10/13/64 AD

Venus .7 AU & Mercury .4 AU, 4 lunar phases 7.4 days, etc. Nestor’s inner planets .6 & .4 and/or 6 & 4 AU, 4 lunar phases 6.4 days, etc., hence F6OD4. Rev 21:1

“Identifying ‘True Earth-like Planets’ – All New Worlds Are Built On 7_4 (like Earth) Or 6_4” (NASA Conference Missions for Exoplanets: 2010-2020 4/21/09)


Synchronism: 21:00 "The Kansas City Chiefs haven't won the Super Bowl in 47 years." - KC vs. Pittsburgh on NBC
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Still waiting on whether or not I'm sitting on like 1000 souls in my ant farm.
 
Back