Like 150 pages back I linked a story about a guy who saved his home with some brilliant invention. He used a commercial gas powered sump pump. The ones that are on a little wheeled cart. Used it to draft water from his pool which he fed to three folding tripod mounted agricultural sprinklers and 1 1 1/2" hose with nozzle. He kept his property damp enough to not ignite. Used the hose to save his house and his neighbors.
I saw that, and I thought it was brilliant.
I've become cynical from the amount of bullshit I have seen in the world as I have aged, and this thread has already increased that. I would be in no way surprised that in the aftermath of this disaster, this man is punished by some arbitrary bureaucratic process, or some new regulation or legislation in reaction to the fire makes a system like this illegal.
The same CARB regulation that's making portable generators illegal would probably do it, but there may be others.
Apparently there's already a
company doing it (bummer, I took the post down thinking it'd be a fun patent).
If I was a company like this, I'd be putting these systems in free at specific houses in the areas with the most extreme fire risk, then just wait for the photos after disaster strikes of whole neighborhoods leveled with the protected house still standing tall, not a singe on it.
Similar idea to what the guy upthread did, and a good one. This actually seems to be competently designed. It prioritizes the structure itself and the immediate area first, and then the surrounding area next. By default, it runs from the municipal supply, but can switch to a secondary source, such as a tank, well, or pool if the municipal supply drops too low (you will need to provide your own pumping power). It has its own battery backup in case power goes out. It uses a Class A foam that's Forest Service listed. Finally, not only can the control of the system can go over wifi, cell tower, or satellite, it has a manual activation switch.
On top of all that, it has already been proven in California wildfires before. I'm the first to complain about unnecessary regulations, but I would actually not have a problem with California building codes requiring this system or a similar one to be installed on properties in wildfire-prone regions, or insurance carriers requiring it in order to get a policy.
They going overboard on the climate change memes in the local news and distracting from Newsom's failures.
I find it funny. Meming about climate change is not the rebuttal to or distraction from Newsom's failures that they think it is. It only makes them more egregious. If climate change is increasing fire risk, why have there not been even
more prevention and preparedness efforts above and beyond the ones they already should have been doing?