Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.6%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 110 24.0%

  • Total voters
    458
Tickled that the judge choose to define moot. Even assuming the nicest tone possible when reading document it is clear the judge is frustrated.
1736916379159.png
The word moot appears seven times in the document with four of those times in the below paragraph alone. Might be reading into it too much but the judge maybe specifically be annoyed by the use of the word moot.
1736916716344.png
 
InB4 Russ files a whiny plightfiling bawling about how he didn't KNOW he had to specifically note something as confidential or "for counsel's eyes only" to have it covered under the protective order, so that shouldn't count! How is he supposed to know that? He's not some fancy lawyer! It's not fair!
I did appreciate that even the Judge came out and told Greer that Hardin did in fact not violate the protective order. Basically just one step away from telling Greer he's a fuckin moron who couldn't figure out how to mark documents correctly.
 
InB4 Russ files a whiny plightfiling bawling about how he didn't KNOW he had to specifically note something as confidential or "for counsel's eyes only" to have it covered under the protective order, so that shouldn't count! How is he supposed to know that? He's not some fancy lawyer! It's not fair!

If Hardin was truly a neutral 3rd party, he would have deleted Russ' email and told him how to mark something confidential, instead of filing it with the court!
 
Plaintiff is confused why Defendants filed ECF 215. This is the latest example of Defendants consuming judicial resources to bring notice to trivial matters
Oh that is going to go over oh so well given the smackdown the Judge just handed him. Hardin is NOT the one consuming Judicial Resources. The Judge has ruled Hardin is not the one consuming Judicial Resources. Russ might want to look up "Recalcitrant" in the dictionary. Russ is monumentally fucked. Remember at this point the Judge had not seen Russ's bullshit list of evidence and discovery. Or his reply to the question of what litigation and criminal cases he has been involved in. Which doesn't include half of it. A more complete list of which is already in the record because Hardin submitted that filing from the AGT lawsuit. Russ is still half assing his homework after the bell has already rung. All his sassy tough guy talk about getting Hardin's Pro Hac Vice status revoked does not cure the deficiencies in his discovery and disclosure.

I wonder had Greer seen the Order before he submitted this one? It reads like he had not and was just going tit for tat regarding Hardin's notices regarding his non compliance
It's going to be painful, even if the judge extends a certain degree of tard mercy, which I'm expecting.
Why would the Judge be willing to extend any mercy at this point. The Plaintiff has dragged this mess on procedurally for almost 5 years. Caused the defendant tens of thousands in expenses, while producing no witnesses, no evidence, And the vaguest notion of a tort remaining, while he continues to press nonstop on issues that were already dismissed by the prior court.
 
Last edited:
If the court starts seizing Mr. Greer's assets, I hope Mr. Moon is awarded ownership of, "Yo, Yovanna." I'm directing a feel-good summer movie that will be featured at the 2026 Sundance Film Festival and I really want to use that song for the intro. It inspired the writers to name the main female character Yovanna (played by Camilla Belle). I'd be willing to pay Mr. Moon $30,000 for a limited use license, but only under the assurance that none of the money benefits Mr. Greer. He's disabled and doesn't deserve to profit from his work.
 
Go ahead and place me firmly in "Camp Optimistic Possum", because I believe the Judge is absolutely fed up with Russhole's shenanigans and is preparing to tie off the noose rope he's been allowing Shit-Lips to gather for himself. I think these sanctions are Russhole's LAST CHANCE with this Judge, and if he fucks them up in any way, no matter how minor, he's going to dismiss this case with prejudice, because by now it's clear that any appeal that Dildo Saggins makes is going to get slapped down hard. The courts DO NOT like it when you wilfully waste their time and repeatedly ignore their clear and direct instructions.
 
He did also pay the $1500 that the judge ordered him to pay to Skordas when the Ariana Grande lawsuit got dismissed, though his apparent financial situation was a bit better then.
Only when he was threatened with enforcement.

Russ starts to realize
No.

It reads like he had not and was just going tit for tat regarding Hardin's notices regarding his non compliance
That's been his strategy in every case. I don't know if he's thought too deeply, but from the outside it looks like 'I'm going to be a pain in the ass, the only way to make me go away is to settle on all my terms.'
 
Why would the Judge be willing to extend any mercy at this point. The Plaintiff has dragged this mess on procedurally for almost 5 years.
Mercy was given when this case was dismissed under rule 12b(6).

It was the Plaintiffs decision to escalate the case to the Appellate division. The Appelate division in their wisdom decided to restore the case, saying the retard may have a point. So the District Court entertained the retard at the orders of the 10th circuit. Yet the retard was retarded. He could not do big boy court stuff. Worse, all the stuff he pleaded before the appellate division about a totally legit case with totally legit witnesses and stacks of evidence had to be construed as true. So the Appellate division said it was true "ON THE FACE OF THE PLEADINGS" and sent it back.

Which meant it was put up or shut up time. Okay Greer. You have all these witnesses. You have all this electronic evidence. You told the 10th Circuit of the United States you had it. Lets see it! And what does the court get? Nothing. All the electronic evidence miraculously vanished when Greer was evicted. All the Witnesses either don't want to testify or have no relevant information. Or both! This is a big problem for the Circuit court. Because now they have a remanded case that was sent back to them by the Appellate division based on borderline perjury. Worse, the Plaintiff who committed the Perjury is also breaking the rules of evidence discovery to hide the fact he lied to the Appellate division.

Congrats Greer. You are the dog who caught the car. Now enjoy being run over.
 
borderline perjury
If that's the case would the lawyer firm that got him that appeal in the first place be in trouble at all? They may not be involved in this mess and they only argued this in order to get that sweet copyright precedent but would they not seen all the apparent evidence and witnesses Russ had and helped him to commit prejury? Or can they claim to be not responsible for how he's been doing this case?
 
InB4 Russ files a whiny plightfiling bawling about how he didn't KNOW he had to specifically note something as confidential or "for counsel's eyes only" to have it covered under the protective order, so that shouldn't count! How is he supposed to know that? He's not some fancy lawyer! It's not fair!
Oh! I do hope he pulls that since it was in the video. The video by the presiding judge that Russ was told to watch by said judge.
The judge would swap his gavel for the biggest fucking sledgehammer you've ever seen in an instant.
 
If that's the case would the lawyer firm that got him that appeal in the first place be in trouble at all? They may not be involved in this mess and they only argued this in order to get that sweet copyright precedent but would they not seen all the apparent evidence and witnesses Russ had and helped him to commit prejury? Or can they claim to be not responsible for how he's been doing this case?
I imagine they might claim they decided to drop him as a pro bono client from how he behaved in getting the case to the Appellate Court, because if they were going to have to wrangle a retarded client, they were going to get paid for it. I further imagine they might additionally claim that they didn't know about Greer lying about possessing witnesses and evidence, as they dropped him for being a pain in the ass before things could ever get to discovery.

Oh! I do hope he pulls that since it was in the video. The video by the presiding judge that Russ was told to watch by said judge.
The judge would swap his gavel for the biggest fucking sledgehammer you've ever seen in an instant.
A shame recording is generally not permitted in federal court. A short video of Russ getting smacked down by the judge could probably go win an award at Sundance.
 
Last edited:
I'm kinda curious to see how the sanctions affect Russ going forward. Unlike someone like Acerthorn who's happy living in squalor on NEETbux, while filing his lawsuits, Russ at least attempted to be a somewhat productive member of society, even if it was mostly only to get him hookers. Between the eviction arc, and then potentially facing months and months of working only to pay Null, instead of getting him his penis sucked, I wonder if it'll demotivate him enough to say fuck it to even pretending to be normal.

UM, you are a legal god among peasants. and we peasants adore you.
For those who enjoy UM's many contributions and haven't seen, they're nominated for Best Overall Contributor in the First Annual Buford Awards.
 
If Hardin was truly a neutral 3rd party, he would have deleted Russ' email and told him how to mark something confidential, instead of filing it with the court!
I’m surprised Russ hasn’t made this argument: “it’s clear what I wanted Hardin should have read my mind and fixed it for me!”
 
Back