Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Associate Rick]

The only time that skeletal faggot has seen the inside of a gym is when he went there to blow dudes.

I hope to see a future when Nick posts Tomlinsonesque pictures from a gym notorious for its gay sauna orgies, he'd have to get a hair transplant first though.

 

[Strix454]

I don’t get the obsession with Aaron? Like Aaron is kind of annoying, but in the way a lot of people are. Is it because he actually had a radio show? Is it literally a Tall Poppy situation? They just want another Cumia? Is Kayla Aaron’s Sue Lightening?

People in the dabbleverse feud with each other and use their feuds to enforce the hierarchy of who is more important than who within the overall dabbleverse. I believe Aaron was originally feuding with someone like maybe Redbar over obscure things. And that Melton attached himself to that feud. Melton kept the feud going because it gave him something to talk about on his garbage show. Alot of it is that Melton and the people around him are garbage. By having someone (Aaron) to attack and to feud with, it makes them feel like less of a collection of nobodies.

Its ultimately all about status. Redbar and Mersh are fighting with Aaron to be greater in status than him in the greater dabbleverse. Melton is fighting with Aaron to reach the status of an Aaron in the dabbleverse. Aaron's play until recently was to get on the compound media payroll by sucking up to Geno Bisconte. But with Compound media gone, Ol' Steel Toe has to come up with a new plan.

 

[Schpoots]

View attachment 6861873

Fat rekieta looks so funny.

 

[Lukie]

Nick should be really careful about taking a guilty plea while at the same time questioning the validity of his Daughter's hair sample. The Judge may take away that choice if they become aware of it.

 

[Law]

Can Nick top his 2024? I don't know. But I wouldn't put it past him.

He's like the Fast and the Furious of life ruination. You think, ok, there's no way they can top that bank vault scene, then boom! airplane chase, followed by a supercar jumping through three skyscrapers, and it just keeps going and going.

he'd have to get a hair transplant first though.

He should do it Bobby Fingers style: fly to Turkey to get arse hairs implanted in his scalp.

Seriously, though, how can he top 2024? Obesity? Homeless arc? RV stream? Dying?

 

[Folgers Can]

Why would it not be granted? This is open court, not pre-trial stuff that is automatically excluded as per court rules.

Why not? The reason the court cited for not granting the first one is there's actually a rule against coverage of pretrial hearings and the court would have had to justify deviating from the rules.

Not to be a buzzkill but in the context of a plea hearing the threshold under the rule is no longer "pretrial" per se and could be more precisely described as "pre-plea-acceptance", which sucks because the judge would not actually accept a plea until the very end of the hearing and this would exclude all the juicy stuff in the plea colloquy that preceded acceptance. If you think about it in terms of the policy considerations underlying exclusion of other pretrial proceedings like the omnibus hearing, drawing the line at the moment of acceptance makes sense because there's always the possibility that a defendant with a merely proposed plea deal could pull a Baked Alaska in the middle of the plea colloquy and get the judge to reject the proposal and schedule a trial date after all, in which case having publicly streamed the abortive attempt at a plea could taint that unanticipated trial's jury pool just as streaming other pretrial proceedings would have.

Perhaps the judge could narrowly tailor an order or directives from the bench in such a way as to allow the camera to be flipped on at the exact moment of acceptance and record the few minutes between that moment and going off the record, but other than that it would be only the post-plea-acceptance sentencing hearing in February/March that would have a rebuttable presumption in favor of video coverage, which Nick would be hard-pressed to rebut in that instance:

Rule 4.02 Exceptions
...
(e) In criminal proceedings occurring after a guilty plea has been accepted or a guilty verdict has been returned, a judge must, absent good cause, allow visual or audio coverage. The fact that a guilty plea will be accepted or a guilty verdict returned at the same hearing when sentencing will occur is not a basis to deny coverage of a sentencing proceeding. The consent of the parties is not required for coverage under this paragraph and lack of consent is not good cause to deny coverage. To determine whether there is good cause to prohibit coverage of the proceeding, or any part of it, the judge must consider (1) the privacy, safety, and well-being of the victim(s), defendant, participants, or other interested persons; (2) the likelihood that coverage will detract from the dignity of the proceeding; (3) the physical facilities of the court; and (4) the fair administration of justice.

Minn. R. Gen. Pract. 4.02(e)

Until that sentencing hearing, the even hypothetical possibility that a plea proposal might not end up getting accepted still leaves this stuck with the permissive standard that applied in August:

(d) In criminal proceedings occurring before a guilty plea has been accepted or a guilty verdict has been returned, a judge may authorize the visual or audio recording and reproduction of trial proceedings unless there is a substantial likelihood that coverage would expose any victim, or witness who may testify at trial, to harm, threats of harm, or intimidation. To determine whether to grant a request for visual or audio recording and reproduction, the presiding judge may consider any relevant factors, including but not limited to (1) the positions of the parties and wishes of the victim(s); (2) the level of public interest in the trial; (3) the necessity of coverage to safeguard the defendant's right to a public trial or the public's right of access to criminal trials; (4) the existence of security issues, courtroom or courthouse facility limitations, or public health concerns that would merit restricting observers from the physical courtroom; (5) courtroom or courthouse facility limitations that would render coverage impractical; (6) the positive or negative impact of recording and reproduction on the dignity and decorum of the trial proceedings; and (7) the effect of recording and reproduction on transparency, public eduction, and public trust and confidence in the proceedings or the judicial system. Coverage under this paragraph is subject to the following limitations:
...
(v) There shall be no visual or audio coverage of any pretrial proceedings, including but not limited to bail hearings, arraignment, pretrial or omnibus hearings, motions in limine or any other proceedings prior to the jury being sworn, or any hearings that take place outside the presence of the jury.

Minn. R. Gen. Pract. 4.02(d)

That said, obviously there can be a strong showing on the permissive test's public interest prong and a decent showing on some other prongs, so the request is always worth a shot just in case the past five months of Balldo's antics have pissed Judge Wentzell off enough to stick it to him this time around, but there's no point getting hopes up quite so much that any denial of the request could be spun into a perceived "W" to smugly munch a Dorito about. It's just worth a shot and let the chips fall where they may.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

 

[AnOminous]

That said, obviously there can be a strong showing on the permissive test's public interest prong and a decent showing on some other prongs, so the request is always worth a shot just in case the past five months of Balldo's antics have pissed Judge Wentzell off enough to stick it to him this time around, but there's no point getting hopes up quite so much that any denial of the request could be spun into a perceived "W" to smugly munch a Dorito about. It's just worth a shot and let the chips fall where they may.

Worst case we get a transcript and whoever attends can report on it. The first does seem to say that: "The fact that a guilty plea will be accepted or a guilty verdict returned at the same hearing when sentencing will occur is not a basis to deny coverage of a sentencing proceeding."

Nick claims (but is a lying liar) that the sentence has already been agreed to so presumably it would be rendered immediately.

If he lied and pulls a Baked Alaska, that's kind of his fault.

And if not SJW will probably fire back a big fat no pretty immediately.

One solution that makes sense is allowing filming but only allowing its release it if Nick doesn't tard out.

 

[God's strongest milkman]

View attachment 6862054

I feel like that specifically wouldn't be allowed and is an awful idea for Aaron but could you fucking imagine how funny that would be?

 

[daniel day]

Doritos won't show up on a hair test. Might as well eat the whole bag, Nick, just to take the edge off.

Its common for druggos to get fat because theyll use anything to stay off. Usually, food is a first choice, especially if youre suddenly hungry again because you stopped snorting coke.

Expect nick to get fat as fuck in a year from now. (You know, if he doesnt git dead)

 

[Strix454]

Its common for druggos to get fat because theyll use anything to stay off. Usually, food is a first choice, especially if youre suddenly hungry again because you stopped snorting coke.

Expect nick to get fat as fuck in a year from now. (You know, if he doesnt git dead)

Its even worse at Nick's age. Because the muscle lost doesn't come back and everything extra you eat turns into all body flab. He is well on his way to being a barrel of flab An eventual Ozempic arc would seem one possibility..

He was warned and he did not listen.

 

[not william stenchever]

I have more bad news for Rekieta. The guy who was fucking his wife wasn't a sex coach either. So all the advice he was giving wasn't licensed as he fucked the shit out of your wife and you watched.

Are we sure Ricardo or Romaine weren't licensed?

 

[Stationary aszs]

I am putting forward my Unified Theory of Composite Balldonamics. This builds on the tireless work and observations of many farmers in this thread, as well as discussions of incomplete bits and pieces of the theory. This theory will come as a shock to no one in this thread, and is something I hope you will immediately recognize as true and/or something you already knew, even if you did not explicitly think it. It also explains the behavior of both Nick and Aaron. And finally, I am not the first to put forward the thrust of it, but I would like to solidify the framework.

Firstly, what we do know:
Rekeitea is extremely effeminate and gay
Aaron can be a fag at times, but isn’t that gay or effeminate
Rakieta is obsessed with talking about Aaron, and about how Aaron Totally Ate His Semen
Aaron devotes a small amount of time on his show to talking about Nick because it drives engagement and he’s boring as fuck otherwise
Aaron is semi athletic, a bit pudgy, typical guy
Niq is super stud he-man, manly Chad bro who’s tough and rugged and totally manly
Nick is impotent

The Theory: The end of the Qover was a direct result of Nick and Aaron actually having gay sex, each of whom for their first time, and Nick was the bottom.

Nick is obviously gay, and may have been in denial or may have been honest with himself. He was a male cheerleader and despite his attempts at retconning the reason, it’s obvious why he was one. He had likely been fantasizing about this moment for the majority of his life, either consciously or subconsciously. Him having gay sex for the first time was almost certainly a pivotal moment in his life, and a way for him to be honest with himself about who he is. When he came down from whatever mind altering substances that allowed him to finally make the jump, he felt very close and intimate with Aaron. He was likely happy for the first time in a long time, had a moment of clarity, and felt like he found what he was missing in his life.

Aaron, on the other hand, was likely only a little curious and needed to be slightly groomed into the idea. Nick probably persuaded him during a moment they shared while both substantially high and intoxicated. Upon coming down, Aaron probably felt intense shame at what had happened, and shame that he had probably enjoyed it. He did not enjoy it as much as Rekketa, nor as much as sex with women, and made up his mind that he did not want further relations with men/Nikk.

At a time when Requita wanted intimacy, Aaron wanted space and on further reflection excused himself from the situation permanently. So, the reason everyone points out Nick is acting like a spurned lover is exactly that: he is. What was a life defining, momentous moment to Nick, was a moment of shame abashedness for Aaron.

Aaron is paradoxically left with the certainty he doesn’t want to be gay, despite doing gay, and Mancy of Minnesota is left feeling abandoned, hurt, and with a gaping hole in his life. His only method of cope is for his mind to reject his homosexuality, which leads to the moronic attempts at LARPing as straight we see today. This is why he attempts to paint Aaron as the gay one, and repeatedly tells anyone who will listed that actually Aaron ate my Cum. He can’t handle the truth and the hurt so he projects. He can’t be Aaron’s bottom so he can’t be gay, mustn’t be gay. He must be the chad, not the one deeply deeply hurt and confused. He didn’t realize he is not impotent, he just can’t have sex with women. After all, his penis that hasn’t worked in years, or decades, did not just magically work again that one night.


This is what broke Nicholas Rekieta.

 

[Folgers Can]

The first does seem to say that: "The fact that a guilty plea will be accepted or a guilty verdict returned at the same hearing when sentencing will occur is not a basis to deny coverage of a sentencing proceeding."

Nick claims (but is a lying liar) that the sentence has already been agreed to so presumably it would be rendered immediately.

If he truly believes that, then the perfect storm of galaxy gas demyelination and wetbrain erased any memory of even his few years actually practicing, because the time needed for a pre-sentence investigation (PSI) and report between the time of conviction and the time of sentencing are statutorily mandatory for a felony plea such as his:

609.115 PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION. § Subdivision 1. Presentence investigation. (a) When a defendant has been convicted of a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor, the court may, and when the defendant has been convicted of a felony, the court shall, before sentence is imposed, cause a presentence investigation and written report to be made to the court concerning the defendant's individual characteristics, circumstances, needs, potentialities, criminal record and social history, the circumstances of the offense and the harm caused by it to others and to the community. At the request of the prosecutor in a gross misdemeanor case, the court shall order that a presentence investigation and report be prepared. The investigation shall be made by a probation officer of the court, if there is one; otherwise it shall be made by the commissioner of corrections. The officer conducting the presentence or predispositional investigation shall make reasonable and good faith efforts to contact and provide the victim with the information required under section 611A.037, subdivision 2. Presentence investigations shall be conducted and summary hearings held upon reports and upon the sentence to be imposed upon the defendant in accordance with this section, section 244.10, and the Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Minn. Stat. § 609.115, subd. 1(a).

Is he to have us believe that he got a sweetheart deal dropping every count to misdemeanors where a plea/sentencing combo hearing would be allowed? Or is he to have us believe there's a slightly-less cushy deal with the sort of temporarily convictionless stay of adjudication that wouldn't trigger a PSI at all until the years of probation are completed? Or is he to have us believe that his hardnosed negotiation tactics strongarmed the prosecution into some sort of celebrities-only deal front-loading completion of the PSI before the plea, which the independent probation officers who conduct PSIs would be loath to work on for a bare plea proposal that may or may not end up accepted, and which would appear to be in direct contravention of the statute because it is to be "the court" that is to "cause" the PSI "to be made to the court" rather than the PSI being something the prosecutor can simply conjure on a whim? He's out of his mind.

But let him keep saying otherwise, because any quotes to that effect thrown into a memorandum in support of Hardin's request would only help it by adding a bonus argument that at least the capability to start video coverage should be allowed in the courtroom just in case Nick's public assurances of a "surprise" plea/sentencing combo suddenly come true out of the blue, lest his sneaky gambit deprive the public of coverage of the sentencing portion that is presumptively allowed. That way an order before the hearing or even directives from the bench in real-time can simply instruct the videographer to turn the camera on or off at the appropriate time.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

If he truly believes that, then the perfect storm of galaxy gas demyelination and wetbrain erased any memory of even his few years actually practicing, because the time needed for a pre-sentence investigation (PSI) and report between the time of conviction and the time of sentencing are statutorily mandatory for a felony plea such as his:

Don't you trust that Frank negotiated it down to a misdemeanor?
Nick has the best attorneys.

 

[StannisTheMannis]

People in the dabbleverse feud with each other and use their feuds to enforce the hierarchy of who is more important than who within the overall dabbleverse. I believe Aaron was originally feuding with someone like maybe Redbar over obscure things. And that Melton attached himself to that feud. Melton kept the feud going because it gave him something to talk about on his garbage show.

At the beginning, the dabbleverse revolved around Stuttering John, who's a Howard Stern alumnus. Eventually, John took a break from the internet and the universe scrambled to re-invent the 'next Stuttering John'........

......enter Chad Zumock (the same guy who torched Nick a couple of months ago), a credit card thief and struggling comedian. Aaron Imholte, to please the his idol Cumia and Karl (yes, the same Balldowashing Karl with Melton), started shitting on Chad out of the blue in a quest to make him the central lolcow of the dabbleverse post-John. Chad and him then had a months-long beef where Chad doxxed Aaron's kids and his 1st ex Ashley and was going hard after April (telling her she's not a real mom and she's a whore).

When it was really getting to April, Aaron chickened out, then Chad gave Aaron a W by pulling a Jussie Smollett, saying Aaron sent goons to beat him up.......

...enter Pedo Patrick Melton. At this time, Melton was recovering from years of being Redbar's bitch and he was a tiny streamer on YT although he claimed to be podcasting for 2 decades. Melton inserted himself in the Aaron-Chad beef by riding Chad's dick and boasting that he hired a private investigator who has proof that it was the Stoney's owner who beat Chad up at the behest of Aaron. When this retarded story fell apart, Chad went his own way, and Melton took up the mantle of Aaron a-log.

Now Melton's life's goal is to do to Aaron what Redbar did to him.

 

[JustTheFaxcts]

At the beginning, the dabbleverse revolved around Stuttering John, who's a Howard Stern alumnus. Eventually, John took a break from the internet and the universe scrambled to re-invent the 'next Stuttering John'........

......enter Chad Zumock (the same guy who torched Nick a couple of months ago), a credit card thief and struggling comedian. Aaron Imholte, to please the his idol Cumia and Karl (yes, the same Balldowashing Karl with Melton), started shitting on Chad out of the blue in a quest to make him the central lolcow of the dabbleverse post-John. Chad and him then had a months-long beef where Chad doxxed Aaron's kids and his 1st ex Ashley and was going hard after April (telling her she's not a real mom and she's a whore).

When it was really getting to April, Aaron chickened out, then Chad gave Aaron a W by pulling a Jussie Smollett, saying Aaron sent goons to beat him up.......

...enter Pedo Patrick Melton. At this time, Melton was recovering from years of being Redbar's bitch and he was a tiny streamer on YT although he claimed to be podcasting for 2 decades. Melton inserted himself in the Aaron-Chad beef by riding Chad's dick and boasting that he hired a private investigator who has proof that it was the Stoney's owner who beat Chad up at the behest of Aaron. When this retarded story fell apart, Chad went his own way, and Melton took up the mantle of Aaron a-log.

Now Melton's life's goal is to do to Aaron what Redbar did to him.

I wasn't sure whether to rate your post informative or horrifying. It's all just so...retarded.

 

[Space Pope]

Dr Robert Bob Keenan

Those ankles scream FDA leadership.

My soul magnifies my Doc, my Supplier most great, who sees my need.
All users shall envy my connection, to him whose supply is potent indeed.
His mighty cankles stand, like Cedars of Lebanon in girth, a sign of his wealth.
He fills my veins with good things; the narcs he sends away empty.
He helps his own, as he always said,
'Take two tabs and call me in the morning, you know I'm always holding.'

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

was going hard after April (telling her she's not a real mom and she's a whore

I mean, Chad wasn't completely wrong.

The more I see of Nick's appearance on Melton and with Karl, it's just infuriating. When the stupid gay puppet is the hardest interviewer of the bunch, but none of them give a single fuck about him, my brain just wants to go to whippet town.

(TBF, Karl has reason to shit-heel Nick, after Nick did his best to ruin a live WATP show in Philly by "not reading social cues".)

 

[W@rui]

I wonder how much money Balldo made off of Rekieta's publicity.