US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
I found this interesting article...

'We will not hesitate': Canada prepares to hit U.S. with billions in tariffs

So basically, these leafs think they have the power to cripple the US economy with lackluster intimidation, which, you know, is hilarious. Reddit seems to be flippin' about it -
View attachment 6873076

"Imagine the RED STATES faces as no one wants their Whiskey anymore in Canada - Instead, China will offer them a better deal!" - A retarded faggot.

I know that Reddit consists of niggers with holes in their brains. Still, the doom train news articles nonstop suggest the economy is going to implode because an orange man bullied a jew-spic cartel puppet, and a leaf is really something else as threats from these nations are laughable at best. I constantly see news that oil will rise, the seas will boil, and avocados will now be $5 instead of $ 3.50 at the Food Lion. Imagine thinking that America has to play fair and provide some form of equality to shitty neighbors that refuse to tidy up after themselves or hold some dignity concerning ethics in markets and migrants.
I always love how smug and fart huffing these redditors are. I've noticed this with libtards in real life. they legit believe if they were in charge they'd provide us utopia. Retards.
 
Canada has lines for food pantries that stretch for like two city blocks due to hyperinflation and too many imported pajeets.

The idea that they can successfully wage economic warfare on the US is fucking insane.
Canada can cause some discomfort (especially for fuel like diesel), but then they'd be able to only do it once since their economy would be totaled after that.
 
Canada has lines for food pantries that stretch for like two city blocks due to hyperinflation and too many imported pajeets.

The idea that they can successfully wage economic warfare on the US is fucking insane.
I mean, round up every fucking Indian Temporary Foreign Worker and international student in Canada and ship them across the border and that would count as economic warfare.
 
Because all gay ass faggots are the same and equally disgusting. All deserve to burn. I don't discriminate. A faggot is a faggot if you deviate from straight.
Mm yes but if all gays are faggots then does that then all lesbians Are faggots, but wouldn’t it make more sense to call gays maggots and lesbians faggots, or pre haps we can revere to all lgbt folk as fags, or more accurately we can refer to trans as traggets thus create the new lgbt of slurs
faggots
maggots
baggots
traggets.
 
I'm neither a member of the 50cent club nor did I say China's gonna win against the US. Difference is I doubt China would care much about losing a carrier outside the blow to morale it would cause.
It'd be a pretty big issue for them. I'm not sure how you can day it matters to the US but it doesn't matter to China.
US Navy and functionality lmao let me tell you these boys would never risk their beloved Ferraris in a real fight.
Lol sure bro. We trust you.
Make that a 1000 converted fishing boats, half of which you can write off as casualties without stress, vs. a single Colossus you can't lose no matter what.
You don't seem to understand that aircraft carriers can take a lot of hits before they sink and they don't just show up alone. You're not fighting 1 collosus you're fighting an entire carrier battle group. You're also going to be sending slow minimally armored fishing ships that would be sunk by pretty minimal incoming fire.

You're also going to need to set them up with crews, arms, fuel, etc. that you'd more than likely want to use in other places. The other thing about aircraft carriers is they're not going to fight directly with you. They're meant to be far out at sea. I think you're going to lose a lot more than 500 ships before they get into any sort of meangful range to engage them.
My sniper scenario is something Russians did in Georgia when dealing with urban snipers.
Okay this is an actual scenario for drones. It's not hard.
 
It'd be a pretty big issue for them. I'm not sure how you can day it matters to the US but it doesn't matter to China.

Lol sure bro. We trust you.

You don't seem to understand that aircraft carriers can take a lot of hits before they sink and they don't just show up alone. You're not fighting 1 collosus you're fighting an entire carrier battle group. You're also going to be sending slow minimally armored fishing ships that would be sunk by pretty minimal incoming fire.

You're also going to need to set them up with crews, arms, fuel, etc. that you'd more than likely want to use in other places. The other thing about aircraft carriers is they're not going to fight directly with you. They're meant to be far out at sea. I think you're going to lose a lot more than 500 ships before they get into any sort of meangful range to engage them.

Okay this is an actual scenario for drones. It's not hard.
Killing an aircraft carrier is hard. Mission killing it is pretty easy though.
 
Tbh I needed an excuse to show off my new avatar but it is the actual viewpoint of some of my liberal friends. They are applauding the ERA thing as if it were real lol.
Just quoting you because there's nothing like a troll who knows what he's doing. You are part of what makes this thread so much fun to keep abreast of :story:
 
Worst sequel ever.
I am beginning to suspect that our political enemy's may not be as smart as we keep saying they are.
The people who just turned up to protest are the true believers. They seem to number under 5000. No violence or unrest, just impotent screeching and sign holding. With all the cliché's Handmaden LARP, Troon signs, Abortion.
I personally wish they would boogaloo. It would be a great sight to see them face some real consequences for their chimp outs. Because it would give Trump a real backed excuse to slam down on the Antifa training camps(university's).
 
Democrats nonplussed by their prospects want ‘political exorcism’ (archive). Other than having a wonky title, the article is interesting because it has unnamed strategists within the Democratic Party bemoaning their lack of good candidates for 2028. It's most likely James Carville getting quoted, since there's lots of salty language (if an "unnamed strategist" is quoted and there's lots of swearing, there's a 90% chance it's Carville). Donors are also fucking pissed about the state of the party and some of the quoted strategists point out the obvious that running an anti-Trump-movement candidate is a losing ticket because Trump won the popular vote this time around. It's a very strange situation where the donors and strategists seem to have the right diagnosis and treatment, but I'm not certain that the politicians and their acolytes will step down.

Imagine the shitshow that would happen if a white dude with reasonable positions gets all the money from donors in 2028? The Progressives would try to burn the whole house down. In my opinion, that is the elephant in the room.

The first article has an ultimate link that leads to a further narrative:
Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) has also carved a unique path since November, moving toward the center on some issues and signaling a desire to work with Trump and some of his appointees. He represents a swing state that Trump won in 2024.
Fetterman’s approach to Trump stirs speculation
Fetterman's approach to Trump stirs speculation.png
(Archive)
Sen. John Fetterman’s (D-Pa.) open-minded approach to President-elect Trump is fueling questions about his motives and vexing some of his fellow Democrats.

In the wake of Trump’s victory in November, Fetterman has emerged as a critic of his own party’s messaging, while also signaling a willingness to entertain some of the incoming administration’s policy ideas.

The Pennsylvania senator drew praise from Trump himself after the two men met last week. Fetterman had already become a lightning rod among progressives thanks to his embrace of Israel, and his recent actions are further adding to his polarizing reputation in the party, where some see him positioning himself for a bigger national presence.

“I wouldn’t 100 percent rule out that maybe or slightly there is some thinking about different or future opportunities,” said Eddie Vale, a longtime Democratic strategist.

Others are even less certain why Fetterman has taken some of his recent positions.

“There’s no telling with any certainty what Fetterman’s motivations are. I do political analysis, not psychoanalysis,” said Norman Solomon, a progressive strategist and founder of the activist network RootsAction. “But clearly, he has been moving rightward.”

Less than a week until inauguration, the sit-down at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club is drawing speculation about what role Fetterman could play in Trump’s second term. Shortly after the meeting, Trump lavished Fetterman with praise, calling him “a fascinating man,” distinguishing him from most Democrats who are still keeping their distance.

Ford O’Connell, a Republican strategist, suggested Trump is being strategic in finding a Democrat on Capitol Hill for bipartisanship. “If you’re willing to put the country first I’m willing to work with you,” he said about the president-elect’s thinking. “That’s what he’s been projecting.”

Both populist leaders have been looking for common ground ahead of Jan. 20. A Trump transition official confirmed to The Hill that the two discussed areas of agreement on Israel, the U.S.-Mexico border and the future of steel manufacturing, as first reported in the Washington Examiner.

Although the meeting came at Trump’s request, Fetterman’s engagement is just as notable. A product of America’s top battleground, he convinced a politically diverse, working-class coalition to back his 2022 Senate campaign.

Fetterman’s victory was seen by some Democrats as a road map for how they might rebuild trust with low-wage and non-college educated voters. He did so, successfully, by telling those voters he was not a “progressive,” a distinction that won him broader statewide support. Trump, who has changed the nature of Republicanism in his own right, appeared to pick up on that nuance. “He’s a commonsense person. He’s not liberal or conservative,” the incoming president said about the 6-foot-8-inch senator.

While Fetterman has bristled at the progressive label, he did tack to the left on a variety of policies, attracting support from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and allies; many left-wing Democrats considered him poised to take up the working-class mantle in the upper chamber by prioritizing things such as union jobs and a federal minimum wage increase.

But his recent moves have been met with confusion. During his most recent race against physician Mehmet Oz, Fetterman made it clear that he would not be another “Manchin” Democrat, referencing former Sen. Joe Manchin (I-W.Va.), who blocked key areas of Biden’s agenda. But some Democrats already see him becoming more like Manchin, and more like former Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.), who got her start with the Green Party before becoming a reliable vote against Biden’s more liberal policies.

To longtime observers, however, Fetterman has always been a bit of a chameleon. When he first launched a Senate bid in 2016, “he ran as a younger, taller, tatted Bernie bro,” said Christopher Nicholas, a Pennsylvania-based GOP consultant and publisher of the PA Political Digest newsletter. He likened Fetterman’s style to a “dog and pony show.”

“He’s accurately read the room and knows there’s a new sheriff in town,” Nicholas said. “He’s very adroit at shocking people and then coming back with a retort when they seem shocked. It’s his modus operandi.”

The lack of clarity around Fetterman’s ambitions or end goal makes him intriguing, sources on both sides of the aisle say. Some sympathetic to Trump see him as one of the most important rising figures as the Senate confirmation hearings start for Trump’s Cabinet nominations.

Fetterman is seen as a likely “yes” in favor of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whom Trump nominated to lead the Department of Health and Human Services. Fetterman’s own personal health history could impact his decision after working to recover from a recent stroke.

But as questions swirl over Fetterman’s underlying agenda, Vale, the Democratic strategist, says it’s worth taking the senator at face value.

“[The] simplest answer is just what he is saying,” Vale said.

“He is a senator from a 50/50 state that voted for Trump twice, so he’s trying to have a foot in both worlds,” he added.
I'll try and chop down the article and highlight things that stuck out to me.
The Pennsylvania senator drew praise from Trump himself after the two men met last week. Fetterman had already become a lightning rod among progressives thanks to his embrace of Israel, and his recent actions are further adding to his polarizing reputation in the party, where some see him positioning himself for a bigger national presence.
Shortly after the meeting, Trump lavished Fetterman with praise, calling him “a fascinating man,”
Both populist leaders have been looking for common ground ahead of Jan. 20. A Trump transition official confirmed to The Hill that the two discussed areas of agreement on Israel, the U.S.-Mexico border and the future of steel manufacturing
Fetterman’s victory was seen by some Democrats as a road map for how they might rebuild trust with low-wage and non-college educated voters.
“He’s a commonsense person. He’s not liberal or conservative,” the incoming president [Trump] said about the 6-foot-8-inch senator.
attracting support from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and allies; many left-wing Democrats considered him poised to take up the working-class mantle
Fetterman has always been a bit of a chameleon
“He’s accurately read the room and knows there’s a new sheriff in town,” Nicholas said. “He’s very adroit at shocking people and then coming back with a retort when they seem shocked. It’s his modus operandi.
Fetterman is seen as a likely “yes” in favor of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
But as questions swirl over Fetterman’s underlying agenda...“[The] simplest answer is just what he is saying,” Vale said.
I am almost certain they are going with:
"Honest" Abraham Lincoln 2.0

"Populist leader" that is "6-foot-8-inch" (really spell it out) that says "shocking" statements, but wins you over with his "retorts". If you doubt his motives, don't worry he says "just what he" means; like ol' honest Abe. [Lincoln was well known for telling shocking stories and dirty jokes].

RFK Jr is another potential Democratic Party president candidate in 2028. But, Kennedy isn't easy for the globalists to control. I don't think they would risk giving Kennedy power unless extremely desperate or they manage to heavily compromise him.

I wonder if they can manage to get AOC into presentable shape to run as Fetterman's VP. They could put Bernie as VP (strategically, probably not). Strategically the VP could be a southern woman "of color": Frederica Wilson (D-FL), Lucy McBath (D-GA), Valerie Foushee (D-NC). But, the voters might not be up for it. Maybe if Condoleezza Rice ran as a Democrat or they find another colored woman who can project military competence.

Edit: If AOC starts walking around on aircraft carriers the jig is up.
 
Last edited:
Most maple syrup on the shelves these days is actually just flavored corn syrup so I don't think most Americans would even notice.
@High-Fructose Corn Syrup thoughts?

Someone at work this week was mocking Trump being inside for the inauguration. He said it was to hide the small crowds and low support.
 
They are "protesting" apparently. Low energy, few in number. Just screaming about tranny rights.
Hardly Soros backed super soldiers coming to do gay ops to over turn and assassinate him. Just the usual fat ass white women, cuck men and tranny loons.
The left simply don't make protesters like they used to. What happened to liberals college students making a complete ass of themselves for the nation's amusement?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back