Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Captain Manning]

Aaron Imholte is a moron.

also, he's in the dabbleverse

Both true.

And yet... AND YET...

He's still considerably less offensive and stupid than Rekieta, who is not in the Dabbleverse.

If you can believe it.

Were it not for Zumock, I might be under the misguided impression Aaron were these least offense Dabbleverse member but.. I have to say... Zumock is witter. He doesn't drip feed stuff. He just straight up tells you what he thinks, and is often pretty funny when when he does it.

I kinda like Zumock. Though I am sure one day that feeling will change. He is Dabbleverse too, afterall.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

but he's also her former lawyer, he represented her (inadvisably) last year after their arrest.

No he didn't. Nick is a lying liar who lies. He said that to the judge but it doesn't make it true. He was never her lawyer and the court and prosecutor saying it was an unwaiveable conflict immediately after he said it. The court let her see him because they are spouses.

 

[Desktop User2]

If Nick did have access to Aaron's emails and Aaron spoke to his lawyer in said emails then the case is as good as dead. You need to consider that not only is Nick Kayla's husband, but he's also her former lawyer, he represented her (inadvisably) last year after their arrest. So we have a situation where Kayla's former Lawyer, who she is cohabitating with, is accessing Aaron's correspondence, some of which has Aaron speaking with his lawyer about Kayla's revenge porn case.

The case against Aaron is brought up by the State. Nick´s shithousery has nothing to do with Aaron´s case. It´s not a civil suit.

 

[Oxyjen]

Sorry if late but Meme Copium has done a PowerPoint.

 

[Maraschino]

You need to consider that not only is Nick Kayla's husband, but he's also her former lawyer, he represented her (inadvisably) last year after their arrest. So we have a situation where Kayla's former Lawyer, who she is cohabitating with, is accessing Aaron's correspondence, some of which has Aaron speaking with his lawyer about Kayla's revenge porn case.

He literally couldn't be her lawyer and was shot down because he's a co-defendant, and it'd be an ethical breach, same with April.

It's worse for Nick because as an attorney on the bar, he should know what he's doing is not just illegal in the standard sense of intruding on someone's digital privacy, it's a violation of lawyer ethical standards: you can't break someone else's attorney-client privilege because you're perpetually derriere devastated he managed to get out and avoid arrest, and you didn't. And he didn't do this as a layman (which is already retarded), he did it as someone on the bar in opposition to someone who he pressed charges against, which just so happened to appear after your own criminal case which he is a potential witness for. It reeks of impropriety.

Imagine:

You get charges pressed against you by the court, your former gay naked Twister partner becomes a potential state witness (and it looks like he had access to any and every statement Aaron messaged to the prosecutors for it), and then you look like you conspire with other faggot retards (one of whom is your former partner's ex-wife, who you were arrested with) to methodically humiliate him to ruin his life by trying to have him convicted for revenge porn charges, and then revealing months later you were going to drip feed embarrassing information (which you illegally obtained) with the assistance of some other obese retard pedophile (which wouldn't even be the first one Nick associates with, mind you) whose mere existence is an affront to polite society.

It's not even a difficult narrative to spin for someone such as myself who isn't an attorney. I bet a licensed defense attorney (like Aaron's) or a prosecutor would have a field day with the stupid bullshit Nick has done (and if any attorneys would like to comment in this thread what they'd try as a defense, it'd be informative at best, and funny and weird at worst).

Altogether, he's failed in so many fundamental ways as an attorney (Trying to represent Kayla/April in a case he literally shouldn't even attempt to, failing to even appear for April's hearing as her attorney when he actually was allowed, the Aaron email breach, his standard practice of just ignoring things as basic as traffic violations because he believes he's above the law or just happens to act like he is) that I'd suggest he's legitimately too unethical to remain a licensed attorney. At the very least, him being on cocaine (and admitting to it after the fact he was abusing illegal substances) while he was supposed to represent April, and then failing to do so, should give the Minnesota State Bar some pause. "I wuz on coke and had to drive my child to a 3 AM violin recital" isn't a fucking excuse to not do your goddamned job when it's someone else's ass on the line. It doesn't matter if it was for a minor traffic violation, it's the principle.

Nick could be a felon as a result of being convicted for cocaine possession, but him losing his license to even practice law because of something he did to Aaron would be the true ego death. That's worse for him as a punishment than going to prison, in my opinion. I don't think he would even stream ever again if it happened, because how could he? It'd be literally impossible for him to try to stream trial streams if he's not even a attorney, because why would you listen to someone who was perpetually wrong in his own case, who then was decided by his state board to be so corrupt he couldn't be allowed to keep his bar license? He wouldn't just be a retard, he'd be an evil retard. He couldn't show up on other shows because he'd be immediately (and correctly) ridiculed for it. It'd truly be over for him.

There are attorneys caught for trafficking drugs who still have their license. You have to fuck up on a monumental level in relatively narrow ways to be disbarred.

Were it not for Zumock, I might be under the misguided impression Aaron were these least offense Dabbleverse member but.. I have to say... Zumock is witter. He doesn't drip feed stuff. He just straight up tells you what he thinks, and is often pretty funny when when he does it.

I kinda like Zumock. Though I am sure one day that feeling will change. He is Dabbleverse too, afterall.

Sean actually mentioned on a stream not too long ago he'd actually heard of Zumock years ago (on the radio, I'm fairly sure), well before any of this stupid bullshit happened. I think Zumock and @Potentially Criminal should consider doing a stream together.

 

[DaleMcGuy]

aaron wishes he was in The Sektur

he's in the dabbleverse......even though The Sektur is dead/gay, even it won't house aaron

Everyone who comes into guntact is sucked into the event horizon of the Sektur.
The Sektur is eternal straight from Papa Nurgle. Each person who is blessed with its content continues to spread the pathogen.

 

[Melty Butter]

Putting this here bc the thread itself is somewhat interesting. About 10 hours ago this StockardChanningTatumONeil account was having a long argument about Nick's parenting with a degenerate sweeper for Nick. Nick decided to ring in an hour ago.

I'm assuming the mention of the son concerns the CPS case wherein Nick's son was named as someone who would report any problematic behavior in the future. (I vaguely recall that in the docs; someone here will likely remember the specifics.)


Archive

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Putting this up here bc the thread itself is somewhat interesting. About 10 hours ago this StockardChanningTatumONeil account was having a long argument about Nick's parenting with a degenerate sweeper for Nick. Nick decided to ring in an hour ago.

I'm assuming the mention of the son concerns the CPS case wherein Nick's son was named as someone who would report any problematic behavior in the future. (I vaguely recall that in the docs; someone here will likely remember the specifics.)

View attachment 6882684
Archive

Yes, the son was mentioned in the CHIPS case transcript (which I am too lazy to go looking for where exactly) as part of the "support structure" to help Nick and Kayla stay clean.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

You can't violate probation by something you did before you were even on probation.

However, and I'm not sure how Minnesota does this, the subsequent offense could be treated as a second offense rather than a first offense, because he committed it after the first offense. Again, I'm not sure whether Minnesota does it that way or whether you have to have been convicted of the prior before it can be counted as one.

You gave to be convicted and sentenced. No weight to prior felonies for which a guilty judgment and sentencing/stay was not entered at the time of sentencing for current offense per the Sentencing Guidelines. [There are also partial points added if the subsequent offense was committed during certain custodial statuses (probation, parole, supervised release, etc.) but all require conviction (pretrial release is not listed).] But once a sentence is imposed or stayed for the earlier offense(s) it counts for points in sentencing on the subsequent one(s), regardless of status at time of commission.

As per the Mondry example cited here earlier Minnesota will only treat a previously convicted and sentenced offense as a prior for purposes of a present application of the sentencing guidelines,

Mondry only stands for the proposition that for non-sameday sentencing, any prior sentences count for purposes of sentencing calculations in a current case (aka, if later-committed offenses get sentenced before older ones, the later-committed offenses count in the sentencing calculation for the earlier-committed but later-sentenced offenses). Current, as in 2004, SG refers to sentencing. 2.B(1)/ Comment 2B.101.

If Stearns intends to pursue hacking-related offenses, they're waiting until the current stuff is at or near sentencing. Per Mondry, it cuts both ways, though: if they charged the hacking stuff and it somehow resolved with a conviction and sentence before the drug etc stuff went to sentencing, the hacking stuff would be factored into the guidelines calculation for the drug stuff.

 

[Strix454]

He's still considerably less offensive and stupid than Rekieta, who is not in the Dabbleverse.

Through his constant appearance and interactions with Melton and friends, its possible now to make a case for Nick being in the dabbleverse. If not directly, then indirectly as a member of Melton's wack pack.

 

[Folgers Can]

I'm assuming the mention of the son concerns the CPS case wherein Nick's son was named as someone who would report any problematic behavior in the future. (I vaguely recall that in the docs; someone here will likely remember the specifics.)

Unfortunately any attempt to correct him will become another of his trademark "I never said that" moments. On the one hand it is true that the transcripts certainly reflect an argument "put forth" against CPS that it was part of the safety plan for the eldest son to tard-wrangle his parents:

Hey, the oldest son can be a part of the safety plan.
He can TAKE CARE of his parents. Mummy and daddy, no snow today okay? Maybe they can get him to read GC-MS reports next.

On the other hand, technically the above quote was uttered by the court-appointed attorney for the three eldest children themselves, and even though that attorney and the parents' attorneys (and Nick's many times talking over his own attorney) were all obviously tag-teaming CPS as a united front, the fact remains that technically the 7% of that tweet saying "by his parents" is "false" to that limited extent. If you ask him whether he means the remaining 93% of the tweet or the overall thrust of the tweet's argument was "false," he gets to say "I never said that!"

Checkmate, prudes!

 

[johnnynoname]

At this point, enough gunt has infected the storyline that Aaron is pretty much part of the sektur.

Everyone who comes into guntact is sucked into the event horizon of the Sektur.
The Sektur is eternal straight from Papa Nurgle. Each person who is blessed with its content continues to spread the pathogen.

halt your jacking, Aaron- while the above two are good points, you ARE in the dabbleverse

. If not directly, then indirectly as a member of Melton's wack pack.

Ironically, nick is NOT in the dabbleverse (even though he interacts with dabbleverse people)

He's miles morales when he transported to Earth 616 and met Earth 616 Peter Parker...even though he's in that world, he ISN'T part of that world

 

[Swole McPole]

Even more relevant, by the better Devvo.

He was OK but not a patch on the legendary C Mack, Little Kev and over there in the corner, Ginger Joe.

Kick it Little Kev

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Unfortunately any attempt to correct him will become another of his trademark "I never said that" moments.

This pisses me the fuck off. I want to beat his lying liar face in. He used his kid in court to avoid real accountability and now he wants to deny what is on paper, spoken under penalty of perjury. This faggot junkie needs to be put out of his children's misery.

 

[Windy Moors]

Would somebody be so kind as to post screenshots of Nick’s new regrets?

Wait when did he get spade tattoo? I missed something for sure. That’s universal swinger language for my wife fucks niggers

Apologies I posted the wrong one, don't know how I missed it with that file name!

This is the tattoo image that was meant to be posted:

Original post

Also sorry to the mod who had to deboonk my post. It's a shitpost I mistook for the real thing, that could be become reality one day, given enough time and whippets I believe anything is possible with Rekieta.

 

[holyhandgrenade]

He's miles morales when he transported to Earth 616 and met Earth 616 Peter Parker...even though he's in that world, he ISN'T part of that world just like my favorite superhero

 

[AnOminous]

It's worse for Nick because as an attorney on the bar, he should know what he's doing is not just illegal in the standard sense of intruding on someone's digital privacy, it's a violation of lawyer ethical standards: you can't break someone else's attorney-client privilege because you're perpetually derriere devastated he managed to get out and avoid arrest, and you didn't.

Aaron is fucking retarded if he doesn't file an ethics complaint against Balldo. This is such a blatant violation of legal ethics it's disbarrable.

This is the tattoo image that was meant to be posted:

What a homo.

No heterosexual man would get that tattoo. That is the tattoo of a man who takes dicks up his ass on the daily.

 

[Agamemnon Busmalis]

No heterosexual man would get that tattoo. That is the tattoo of a man who takes dicks up his ass on the daily.

I don't even think gay men would like that shit unless they're into PnP.

 

[Folgers Can]

Mondry only stands for the proposition that for non-sameday sentencing, any prior sentences count for purposes of sentencing calculations in a current case (aka, if later-committed offenses get sentenced before older ones, the later-committed offenses count in the sentencing calculation for the earlier-committed but later-sentenced offenses). Current, as in 2004, SG refers to sentencing. 2.B(1)/ Comment 2B.101.

If Stearns intends to pursue hacking-related offenses, they're waiting until the current stuff is at or near sentencing. Per Mondry, it cuts both ways, though: if they charged the hacking stuff and it somehow resolved with a conviction and sentence before the drug etc stuff went to sentencing, the hacking stuff would be factored into the guidelines calculation for the drug stuff.

Obviously Mondry's facts aren't on-point and it's only cited for a recitation of the standard being the date of sentencing rather than the date of offense or the date of conviction like it may be in other jurisdictions, so we're saying the same thing. In theory it's possible that a Stearns County complaint, plea, and sentencing could all be concluded before the Kandiyohi County sentencing in February/March, but it would be insane (even for Nick) to enter a plea so swiftly as to make that happen.

For that reason Stearns County has no incentive to wait unless they know there is still ongoing misconduct that they prefer to monitor until after probation begins, such as re-accessing the google account even after knowing he's been caught (extremely unlikely), obstruction of justice by destroying evidence (unlikely because that would have already been done by now), solicitation or conspiracy regarding obstruction of justice by telling Melton et al to destroy their evidence as well (somewhat more likely), or even coercion or witness tampering as to Melton et al (unlikely as there's been no visible falling-out yet). Trapping him with a probation violation could work for new offenses like that related to the cybercrime case, but the original offense in the cybercrime case shouldn't affect the Kandiyohi County sentencing or probation at all.

 

[Captain Manning]

Through his constant appearance and interactions with Melton and friends, its possible now to make a case for Nick being in the dabbleverse. If not directly, then indirectly as a member of Melton's wack pack.

That's a fair point. You could argue Nick is essentially Dabbleverse now by way of hating Aaron so much Melton is his BFF.

What's one more line item on his ever growing list of faggotry, really, eh?