Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
browsed asktrans for a few election related posts. most seem very concerned and upset over simply not having a 'F' rather than a 'M' on their passport/ driver's license. totally a sane and mature group of people. totally not mentally ill developmentally stunted group of people.

Major W for the American people as a whole. The worst was when X became an actual option in some places. Stuff like this throws off statistics and archival records, and you just know at least some of these fuckers depend on erasing their birth identity to get away with the worst shit possible. Bruce Jenner coming out as Caitlin after that vehicle accident comes to mind. Or many of the troons with threads in Stinkditch and Animal Control...
 
Heh, I took a look at that subreddit and we got some people throwing shade at him. (Archive - which doesn't capture the video at the top of the post, but it's that Family Guy scene where Brian politely rejects Meg's advances and then she doubles down on her delusional love for him.)

View attachment 6876546
✨💖 “The shaaaadeeee!!!! Oh my God, sis, spill the tea!!!” 🍷🛍️
I hate how, even when trannies are right and correctly assessing one of their own to be a freak, they still need to indulge in their fetish. Like… just shut up, you annoying, disingenuous, fucking faggot. This isn’t the win for your side that you think it is.
🤣 “Teehee, I’m such a mean girl! Oh my God, can you believe Lily, Alice, and Lilith! Those shoes are so last year!” 👁️🫦👁️
They all do this fucking teen-movie-dialogue-written-by-adult-men because they’re adult men pretending to be teen girls. They’re shitting on their fellow troon as if they’re not all sex pests. As if they’re not all loathsome. As if they’re somehow better than this gay-workplace-harassment-neighbour-troon and not his equivalent. You just wanna scream, “yeah, this is why we hate all of you, so stop acting so fucking smug” at them. 🎩

It’s like when Robbie White and John Walker Flynn take victory laps around some genuine lunatic like Jonathan Yaniv or Nick “Lilly” Contino. Like they can’t even concede that their community is full of rapists and liars without jerking off to how much like a woman they are because they haven’t flayed someone alive. Yet. Wow, great fucking job, guys. Very cool. Can you beat a baby in an arm wrestling contest? Can you outrun a paraplegic? Can you pronounce basic English words better than the guy who owns the Kiwi Farms? Wow, I’m so fucking impressed right now. 🎩

"Can't stop thinking about women's fashion" or "masturbating while shopping for my ogre-sized early 2000s cosplay?"

I'm doubtful that he's reading up on flattering looks for the professional 40-something woman.
It’s very revealing that he’s obsessing over a pop star from what was likely his adolescence. It’s totally not a mid-life crisis brought on by him getting divorced and jerking off to his old high school yearbooks. Totally.
 
Last edited:
hmmm
Screenshot_20250120_215449_Boost.jpg
hmmm
Screenshot_20250120_215508_Boost.jpg

Sounds really life or death
Screenshot_20250120_215740_Boost.jpg
oh, violence
Screenshot_20250120_215750_Boost.jpg

no really though it's innate
Screenshot_20250120_222234_Boost.jpg

ok honey
Screenshot_20250120_230004_Boost.jpg
 
View attachment 6857410
In Sussex, a giant male lunatic was in fact running an asylum.
I also like his spironolactone gunt hanging over the pride banner.
I'm late late late because of how fast this thread moves, but I googled this nurse in question and his name is "Jaden Rachel Dios Hole". If that's not funny enough, googling him brings up:

1. The article in question above (Link) (A)
2. Past lawsuits against him (related to 1)
3. Custom Order for Jaden Rachel Dios Hole Child's crochet kippah in rainbow stripes (((A)))

Screenshot_20250120-191613.png
 
Executive Order that is a trans L:

DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT​



Some highlights:
Across the country, ideologues who deny the biological reality of sex have increasingly used legal and other socially coercive means to permit men to self-identify as women and gain access to intimate single-sex spaces and activities designed for women, from women’s domestic abuse shelters to women’s workplace showers. This is wrong.
Efforts to eradicate the biological reality of sex fundamentally attack women by depriving them of their dignity, safety, and well-being. The erasure of sex in language and policy has a corrosive impact not just on women but on the validity of the entire American system.
Nonbinaries BTFO:
It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.
 
Last edited:
Executive Order that is a trans L:

DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT​


(a) “Sex” shall refer to an individual’s immutable biological classification as either male or female. “Sex” is not a synonym for and does not include the concept of “gender identity.”

(b) “Women” or “woman” and “girls” or “girl” shall mean adult and juvenile human females, respectively.

(c) “Men” or “man” and “boys” or “boy” shall mean adult and juvenile human males, respectively.

(d) “Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.

(e) “Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.
Hava Nagila is Hebrew for "Let us rejoice". It is a Jewish folk song traditionally sung at celebrations and parties, and is based on a Hassidic melody. Specifically, a type of Hassidic music called a nigun (plural nigunim) or niggun (plural niggunim). Pronounced “nee-goon” or “niggah-numb”. Let’s look at the lyrics:
Hebrew transliteration English
Hava nagila
Hava nagila
Hava nagila
ve-nismeḥa
(repeat)
Hava neranenah
Hava neranenah
Hava neranenah
ve-nismeḥa
(repeat)
Uru, uru aḥim!
Uru aḥim be-lev sameaḥ
(4x)
Uru aḥim, uru aḥim!
Be-lev sameaḥ
Let us rejoice
Let us rejoice
Let us rejoice and be happy.
Let us sing
Let us sing
Let us sing and be happy.
Awake, awake, my brothers!
Awake my brothers with a happy heart.

Awake, my brothers!
Awake, my brothers with a happy heart​

American lady-Kiwis have good reason to be “positive Pollys”, and awaken tomorrow with happy hearts. Hava nagila, everyone, for every time you earn a W, a tranny gets their L. And remember, transphobia is a mitzvah!
 
Executive Order that is a trans L:

DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT​



Some highlights:


Nonbinaries BTFO:
The official definitions of "sex", "woman", "girl", "man", "boy", "female", "male", "gender ideology", and "gender identity":
“Sex” shall refer to an individual’s immutable biological classification as either male or female. “Sex” is not a synonym for and does not include the concept of “gender identity.”
“Women” or “woman” and “girls” or “girl” shall mean adult and juvenile human females, respectively.
“Men” or “man” and “boys” or “boy” shall mean adult and juvenile human males, respectively.
“Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.
“Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.
“Gender ideology” replaces the biological category of sex with an ever-shifting concept of self-assessed gender identity, permitting the false claim that males can identify as and thus become women and vice versa, and requiring all institutions of society to regard this false claim as true. Gender ideology includes the idea that there is a vast spectrum of genders that are disconnected from one’s sex. Gender ideology is internally inconsistent, in that it diminishes sex as an identifiable or useful category but nevertheless maintains that it is possible for a person to be born in the wrong sexed body.
“Gender identity” reflects a fully internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex and existing on an infinite continuum, that does not provide a meaningful basis for identification and cannot be recognized as a replacement for sex.
They masterfully dodged the "what about muh one in a million chromosomal disorder" by focusing on what type of gamete each sex produces.
 
They masterfully dodged the "what about muh one in a million chromosomal disorder" by focusing on what type of gamete each sex produces.
I wish I knew who the secret radfem lawyers were who drafted this. This language is iron-clad.
It goes even harder than Nancy Mace's current statements, since she's doing the "two genders" thing while this says "two sexes", and also calls to mind Ruth Bader Ginsberg's arguments that called sex "immutable".
 
I wish I knew who the secret radfem lawyers were who drafted this. This language is iron-clad.
Not quite. Under this definition women with Turner's Syndrome (45 XO; streak gonads that cannot produce gametes, large or small) will not be regarded as women. I presume the people who drafted the statement have that figured out and have a ready answer, and at any rate this has zero relevance to transsexualism.
 
Not quite. Under this definition women with Turner's Syndrome (45 XO; streak gonads that cannot produce gametes, large or small) will not be regarded as women. I presume the people who drafted the statement have that figured out and have a ready answer, and at any rate this has zero relevance to transsexualism.
They still belong to that sex even if they dont have the ability to produce eggs
 
They still belong to that sex even if they dont have the ability to produce eggs
If that makes sense
Whatever the case is, they will be the 0.0001% of cases and even if troons have triple hopium, none of them have the condition and none will get anyone who has that condition to defend them.
 
I wish I knew who the secret radfem lawyers were who drafted this. This language is iron-clad.
It goes even harder than Nancy Mace's current statements, since she's doing the "two genders" thing while this says "two sexes", and also calls to mind Ruth Bader Ginsberg's arguments that called sex "immutable".
It's genuinely impressive wording. The consistent use of "sex" over gender, expressions like "biological reality" and "immutable", bringing up large/small reproductive cells, because trannies love the X/Y chromosomal abnormalities in an attempt to justify their fetish. I like this part:
(g) “Gender identity” reflects a fully internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex and existing on an infinite continuum, that does not provide a meaningful basis for identification and cannot be recognized as a replacement for sex.
This is practically one step away from saying "It's a religion, and we don't have to follow it".

Whoever wrote this wasn't some 70 IQ who watched Matt Walsh's documentary and went "boys like pink, das bad". They did the actual research. I'd honestly believe this was written by Kara Dansky.
 
They still belong to that sex even if they dont have the ability to produce eggs
Literally. First, there are women with Turner syndrome who can produce eggs. They’re a minority, but they exist. Second, they have an XO karyotype. They literally cannot be male. They are female by default, and the only reason their junk doesn’t work is because they’re missing half their fucking chromosomes. Third, they have fucking wombs. Yeah, they’re “hypoplastic”, but they’re fucking uteruses.

Everyone shrieks and cries about CAIS males, for example, because they have a pseudo-vagina. I say “pseudo” because it has no cervix and connects to nothing because they have testicles. If everyone is willing to call them women despite every cell being male, then why would people start complaining about someone with a uterus and vulva not having working ovaries?

With that said, I do agree with the person you were referring to. I was a bit nervous reading the language, because it didn’t seem as air-tight to me as everyone else seems to be insisting at the moment.
 
Back