Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 360 25.4%
  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 51 3.6%
  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,008 71.0%

  • Total voters
    1,419
I hope this is the peak of blackwashing, i.e., it's all downhill from here.
Her name is literally the color of her skin.
View attachment 6866191
That's never stopped a Judeo-Communist the Shadow before. It cannot create, it can only corrupt and destroy the good.
The Rangs of Black Powuh.jpeg
 
Gaston did nothing wrong, Belle was a whore who married into the Aristocracy
Gaston had a trio of blonde bombshells fawning over him at all times, but his ego led him to constantly pursue and harass the girl who wasn’t into him, and was about to throw her dad into an insane asylum for not marrying him. Then he riled up the townspeople and essentially put their lives in danger trying to kill the Beast. If you want to say a Disney villain has done nothing wrong, Magnifico is right there.
 
Gaston did nothing wrong, Belle was a whore who married into the Aristocracy
Gaston's villain song is also basically a dude trying to cheer up his bro after he got rejected by a girl by reminding him how awesome he is regardless. So evil.
Spectacular Spider-Man died because of the Disney Marvel purchase. That brilliant show died for ... This shit.

Yes, I am still incredibly pissed off and salty about it 15 years later.
I hate to defend Disney but Spectacular Spider-Man's cancellation isn't actually their fault. That shit started before Disney purchased Marvel due to legal shenanigans between Sony and Marvel which resulted in only Marvel being legally permitted to produce Spider-Man cartoons (meaning that Sony could no longer continue making Spectacular Spider-Man) but with Sony still holding the rights to all the elements of Spectacular specifically which meant that Marvel couldn't take over the production of Spectacular. And Sony, being fucking Sony, held on to the rights to Spectacular for dear life and refused to budge. And while this entire mess was happening, Disney bought Marvel and also expressed interest in continuing Spectacular Spider-Man but Sony dug their claws in even deeper because Disney was one of their direct competitors.

So it's basically Sony's fault for being greedy douches. As for how the rights for Spider-Man animation went back to Marvel, Sony apparently returned them to Marvel in exchange for Marvel giving them extra concessions regarding the live-action films. With Sony fully aware that this would result in Spectacular being consigned to legal hell.
 
Last edited:
I put all the blame on these reimaginings on to that weird and bizarro Alice in wonderland film from 2010 by Tim Burton.

Some female animator had the bright idea to basically take the old concepts from Mary Blair that she did for the original 1950s film, and turn Alice into this weird mentally ill woman that in her head basically becomes a Joan of Arc feminist figure.

Wish I was being hyperbolic but that was literally the reason that film was made and because everybody was obsessed with 3D it managed to ride the Avatar wave and make a billion dollars.

If something like Alice in wonderland which while classic, is more of a B-tier Disney film can do that the idea is how much money could everything else make?

Fast forward an extra decade and here we are
 
They recently aired the live-action Beauty and the Beast on ABC on primetime. There was a note at the beginning saying some scenes had been cut for time, and unless I just blacked out at some point, the entirety of "Gaston" was not aired. It's one of the better parts of the live-action version because Luke Evans and Josh Gad are good at their roles.
 
I put all the blame on these reimaginings on to that weird and bizarro Alice in wonderland film from 2010 by Tim Burton.
I agree that it's definitely partly what started this trend, but the thing setting that movie apart from the disney remakes despite it being framed as the "first one of the live action remakes" by internet review people is it's not a fucking remake. It's literally just like the plot of HOOK where it's framed like a sequel to the original animated adaptation but live action and darker in tone. Literally the same thing of "title character from first movie is now grown up offscreen after initial adventures and has to go back to solve issue in world from original movie." As far as that type of movie goes it was ok but not the best because of how severely redesigned all the characters were compared to the thing it was meant as a sequel to. Kind of a reverse HOOK in that sense because in that Robin Williams looks like a businessman for like the first half while the pirates look like live action versions of the animated counterparts. In the alice tim burton movie alice looks like a mildly grimdarkified version of her original look from the first movie but older while everyone else is cgi or live action guys trying to imitate tim burton's nightmare before christmas-ish style and not the characters from the original.
 
I like the style of Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland, even though I found all eye scream in a PG film questioning. Weirdly enough, my mom liked the film and she's never liked the story, not even the Disney animated movie, which she only got because of us kids.

I have actively refused to watch the sequel, though. If it had come out a few years sooner, I might have.
 
I like the style of Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland, even though I found all eye scream in a PG film questioning. Weirdly enough, my mom liked the film and she's never liked the story, not even the Disney animated movie, which she only got because of us kids.

I have actively refused to watch the sequel, though. If it had come out a few years sooner, I might have.
Alice and it's sequel are pre-slop era and were pretty good actually.
 
I like the style of Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland, even though I found all eye scream in a PG film questioning. Weirdly enough, my mom liked the film and she's never liked the story, not even the Disney animated movie, which she only got because of us kids.
pretty sure it was inspired by the games (and even if not it's hard to ignore when you want to do a "dark alice" movie), then they got burton to add his usual style. problem is it's still a disney movie, so for all that style it had no substance and was boring as fuck. it was even more disappointing considering you could expect more from burton, at least back then - sweeney todd came out 3 years earlier.
 
it was blatantly made with that in mind more than likely. I remember the comparisons even back when the movie was first shown off in trailers.
McGee's alice was actually charming and novel for its time and a lot of the concepts and art direction and designs in it are still really good.

The alice remake feels more like an incredibly watered down version of the sequel after someone tied it up and forcefuly sanded all the edges off with a belt sander and ITS sequel is literally direct to video tier bad.
 
pretty sure it was inspired by the games (and even if not it's hard to ignore when you want to do a "dark alice" movie), then they got burton to add his usual style. problem is it's still a disney movie, so for all that style it had no substance and was boring as fuck. it was even more disappointing considering you could expect more from burton, at least back then - sweeney todd came out 3 years earlier.
The scene where Johnny Depp does a gay little dance at the end made me want to blow my brains out in the theater. That movie sucked so much cock.
 
Back