- Joined
- Oct 1, 2022
I think the issue with the whole bending vs non-bending is that it represents a much bigger creative problem: the creators inserting simpleton examinations of political philosophy and having it clash with the world they created in the first place. The Avatar world is not like X-Men where there is a clear grey area to the conflict between humans and mutants. While also having a mystery as to why mutants even exist in the first place.Nah, Korra is perfect backdrop to handle anti-bender sentiment. During Aang's lifetime, everything was tribal, and the tribes were based on the bender element. You were in the EARTH KINGDOM whether you could actually bend earth or not. Tribe, not bending ability, was how people understood their identity and lives.
Then you get to Korra's era and you have Republic City, a city where people from all the nations live together. Removed from the tribe, how do people decide to view their role in society? Bending and not bending. Its frankly the biggest difference between people at that point. Either you have devastating powers or you don't. And if you don't, you're certainly going to be pissed when the government and the police are made up of benders.
In Avatar, bending is apart of a greater spiritual and Devine connection to the world. Where the people understand that there is greater power and balance to the world that all four nations have key parts to maintaining. Now maybe that was kind of the point to Korra: how people were losing sight of the greater spiritual balance to the world and the impact that was having on society. Some of that was explored in the first series: the Fire Nation thought they were greater than spiritual harmony and could do whatever they want without repercussion.
But in Korra, ignoring how they changed and completely butchered the concept of the spirit world, they handle it so poorly. It is understandable why the real world takes so many turns at different times in regards to culture, religion and politics associated with those things because there is always going to be a debate about what lays ahead and what is real. It is harder to model the Avatar world after the modern world because people actually do know what the afterlife is and how there is spiritual balance to the world they live in. It would be like having an atheist exist when there is literally no arguable doubt that god exists.
Obviously you can have different conflicts emerge since there are still numerous ways for the world they built to evolve and change. But you have to know how to approach them correctly when the way you setup the world previously limits the way things would play out in our real world.
That isn't true. The Air Nomads were the only nation of the four to not have any non-bending members of its society. That whole thing about only air benders only being able to access the temples is also not true.I think even the writers got into a mess because the air nomads yeeted their non bending children since they physically can't get off the mountain temples.
It has been stated in some of the expanded material that each nation had roughly an equal amount of benders within them at around somewhere in the thousands range. Despite being the largest nation of the four, the Earth Kingdom had the least amount of benders per the size of its population wherein the Air Nomads had the largest amount despite their small population size.