Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 14.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 110 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 80 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 182 41.2%

  • Total voters
    442
self aware.PNG
I know it's an edit, but I can't help but want it to be that Nick is staring down this awareness of how untrue it is that he's a practicing member of the Minnesota Bar. Also how is he looking more sickly then he did this time last year? He looks so dead inside...
 
Is that the infamous $50,000 USD joker painting?

Good god that is so mid and cringe - don't get me wrong that Joker movie was great but anyone who uses it as fan art, gets paintings, tattoos or customizes their car to feature decals from it is turbo cringe.

Yes, it is. Additionally, the other two paintings (Depp and kitten) are also multiple tens of thousands of dollars. The amount those other paintings cost is around in the thread somewhere, but I am not sure where (maybe the OP, as Hime was quite comprehensive). But they were big bucks also.
 
Crossposting from Aaron's thread:

Aaron Imholte is now scheduled to be going to trial, being accused of sending nude images of his former lover Kayla Rekieta to Geno Bisconte.

He had earlier secured a postponement which he said was for his lawyer's "investigator" to examine Nick's illicit access of his online accounts. Whatever the investigator determined was not sufficient for charges to be dropped, at least not yet, and the trial is set to occur over two days in May.

Aaron Imholte's case 73-CR-24-6910 has been updated.

While at the last settlement conference Aaron won a delay with a second one being scheduled for yesterday, Aaron's gambit to claim to be a victim of Nick Rekieta appears to have FAILED and Aaron additionally must have rejected any plea deal which was on offer.

That is because the case is now set for a two-day jury trial in May, with a pre-trial motion hearing the previous month.
 
Yes, it is. Additionally, the other two paintings (Depp and kitten) are also multiple tens of thousands of dollars. The amount those other paintings cost is around in the thread somewhere, but I am not sure where (maybe the OP, as Hime was quite comprehensive). But they were big bucks also.
:really:"You Incel prudes don't understand! You don't own a BUSINESS! This was a tax write off! I probably made MONEY on this painting! -hic At least that's what the accountant Randazza recommended to me said.."
 
Aaron Imholte is now scheduled to be going to trial, being accused of sending nude images of his former lover Kayla Rekieta to Geno Bisconte.

He had earlier secured a postponement which he said was for his lawyer's "investigator" to examine Nick's illicit access of his online accounts. Whatever the investigator determined was not sufficient for charges to be dropped, at least not yet, and the trial is set to occur over two days in May.

So Aaron is going to fight the government while Rekieta is going to do the anathematic action of groveling beside the government, huh?
 
The only thing more pathetic than Nick Rekieta's return to streaming is all the simpletons still trying to suck up to him with reassurances of "hey Nick, I don't care about all this lame Internet drama because I'm a mature adult :smug: now take my money so you can buy more cocaine to poison your children!"

Wow, how mature of you to turn a blind eye to a drug addict poisoning his starving children because he occasionally entertains you. Brilliant priorities.
 
Does anyone have a timestamp and/or clip of him talking about Montegraph in this most recent stream?
It was only mentioned in a Superchat at 3:02:22

Superchat: Do you still stand by what you said and think Montagraph is a pedophile?
Nick: Um advice of council says not to talk about that but yes my opinion has not changed I have no reason to disbelieve anything I said about Montegraph.
Superchat [finishing]: That melon was ripened so it was of age
Nick: How did you know? Did you skirt-check the melon?
 
Watching this is just sad. There is without a doubt zero possibility for a comeback. He's fucking boring and so wet brained now. The only reason people are watching is to witness his next fuckup.

Also this camera angle? The up-nose shot shows he's really fucking ugly.
To hide the fact his desk is covered in whippit cannisters and galaxy gas cans. And to also hide his fluffer April. Shlobbing his flaccid noodle to keep him alert enough to stream.
 
Will the judge take his plea tomorrow? This is the question. Surely they have been keeping an eye on his online activities in the meantime. Even if just a casual check now and then. He's left plenty of evidence in the public domain that he's unrepentant about doing drugs, that he was the only victim of his actions. Not his children, wife, ex lover or family.

"No. It only affected me. I'm not sorry for any of it and I was just having fun your honor", is what he has been saying everywhere else.

Could we be seeing his attempt at a guilty plea tossed out on Friday due to this mismatch in honesty?
 
Sorry if this has been posted before, but I found some new Rekieta comment on some videos. It might be worth watching the comments of every video that gets put out about Rekieta, he might be lurking in every comment section reading everyone's messages.
1. The Camelot stream from almost a week ago
View attachment 6884198View attachment 6884201
2. Stallyn's video of Aaron commenting on Nick on Coomalot's show.
View attachment 6885951
3. Stallyn's video Nick commenting about the foreclosure on Coomalot's stream.
View attachment 6885954
Late response, but I remember when Dobson quit the internet, peoplewas able to find some Youtube comments from him about a month after before he wiped his account there too. There’s a way you can search a YouTube account’s comment activity if you’d like to keep track of exactly where he comments and what he says. Unfortunately, the video that explained how to do so seems to have been deleted.
 
Could we be seeing his attempt at a guilty plea tossed out on Friday due to this mismatch in honesty?
While I'd love to see that happen, I doubt it will.
To the judge he's just another coke addict caught for the first time, plus there's the small town syndrome going on. Doesn't matter if he's cordially hated by the legal community in his county, the judge is gonna lean extra hard on being seen to be fair and impartial for the actual offense Rackets is charged with. Letting him plea out and get him off the calendar is likely to be the order of the day.
If he fucks up his conditions, he can be dealt with then.
 
Is this the bed rumored to be used for a grandparent to sleep on? (He adjusted the angle not to show it a couple of minutes into the show.)
1737657329668.png
No. That's not a bed. You can see it sitting on the table in his last stream from August.

nickaugust.jpg

There is no reason to believe either sets of grandparents have ever been sleeping at the home either. April, maybe.

A possibility for the bed in the streaming room is that its become April's room after the other house sold. Or else Nick sleeps there now after being kicked out of the main bedroom by Kayla.
The room is simply too small to fit a desk and a bed.

When I initially suspected April Imholte was sitting in Nick's corner and sleeping at his home, long before any of the swinging shit was confirmed, I came to the conclusion for various reasons that the room is likely too small to fit even a cot along with Nick's streaming desk and the items in the background.

I'm not convinced yet that there's a bed in the room, but I'll give a hint to those who do. If there is a bed in that room, it's not something that is being displayed on camera.

What would be happening is that he moved out his desk, moved in a bed where the desk used to be and has the camera propped up on the bed looking up at him, which would explain the weird camera angle. However, he appears to be looking up at his monitors slightly above eye level which would seem to be hard if they were set up on top of a bed.

1737657963447.png
 
Yes, it is. Additionally, the other two paintings (Depp and kitten) are also multiple tens of thousands of dollars. The amount those other paintings cost is around in the thread somewhere, but I am not sure where (maybe the OP, as Hime was quite comprehensive). But they were big bucks also.
At this point it is probably safe to assume that each of those paintings included a "mountain of coke" as a free gift with purchase.
 
Back