State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
I mentioned this as the likely outcome on the day of his arrest when I streamed about it.
Yeah, I don’t understand everyone who’s crying “ITS SO BALLDOVER” when almost everyone was saying that the most likely outcome, Nick will have to cop to one felony, lose his guns and everything else will probably be dismissed.

I am a little surprised the child endangerment stuff disappeared, but it is all linked to the drug addiction at the end of the day.

He's not a lawyer anymore right? So is streaming his only choice for income unless he gets a real job?
He could technically do like 40 hours of classes and get his license back, but he doesn’t wanna do that. He hated being a lawyer and having to do real work.

He was given leniency and he's going to try to spin it that he was in the right and had to take something to get the evil state off his back. But there's a thing about second chances, you only get them once.
Yep, this is gonna be the most annoying thing. He’s basically gonna have to live the rest of his life like Ethan Ralph. “I NEVER DUN DID GIVE MAH KEEDS COKE, THAT WASDISMISSED IF YOU WANAN KNOW THE TROOTH ABOUT IT.”
 
Yep, this is gonna be the most annoying thing. He’s basically gonna have to live the rest of his life like Ethan Ralph. “I NEVER DUN DID GIVE MAH KEEDS COKE, THAT WASDISMISSED IF YOU WANAN KNOW THE TROOTH ABOUT IT.”
He can ragepig all he likes, we all know the truth, this worthless bastard exposed his nine year old to cocaine. Everyone knows it. Everybody knows.

He can suck Satan's cock for all eternity.
 
The stay of adjudication and the very near sentencing hearing means it's very likely he will have no criminal record in April. He is not a felon.
I don't quite understand. Perhaps because I'm not American. Could you or a lawyer explain this more extensively?
 
I don't quite understand. Perhaps because I'm not American. Could you or a lawyer explain this more extensively?
All proceedings are on hold. He pleads guilty but he is not considered guilty. He is not convicted of anything.

If he gets arrested again the proceedings continue. The stay can be anywhere from a few months (likely when that sentencing hearing is scheduled) or up to 20 years.

If the stay is completed without issue he is not convicted of anything.

You can consider the process the punishment. Having to sell a house to pay his defense. Outside of that, nothing.
 
I don't quite understand. Perhaps because I'm not American. Could you or a lawyer explain this more extensively?
He has entered a guilty plea. However, being a convicted felon only occurs when the court adjudicates it and enters a conviction onto the record, thereby convicting the felon. If Nick is a good little boy for whatever the period of deferred adjudication is, the judgment will not be entered onto the record.

Therefore, Nick will have pled guilty to a felony, but yet not be a convicted felon.
 
All proceedings are on hold. He pleads guilty but he is not considered guilty. He is not convicted of anything.

If he gets arrested again the proceedings continue. The stay can be anywhere from a few months (likely when that sentencing hearing is scheduled) or up to 20 years.

If the stay is completed without issue he is not convicted of anything.

You can consider the process the punishment. Having to sell a house to pay his defense. Outside of that, nothing.
Nope, I’m going to go full schizo and take reiki classes and shit until I can woo some cancer into this nigger
 
This is the important part, I think:

View attachment 6899715

I have been told by my attorney and understand:
a. That my attorney discussed this case with one of the prosecuting attorneys and that my attorney and the prosecuting attorney agreed that if I entered a plea of guilty, the prosecutor will do the following: (Give substance of the agreement)

  • Plead guilty to amended charge of drug possession in the third degree
  • Statutory stay of adjudication pursuant to Minn. Stat. §152.18
  • Remaining terms of the sentence at Court’s discretion
  • State drops all other charges.
  • State dismisses 34-CR-24-342 against Kayla Rekieta and case against April Imholte
You know what that means? BODYCAM MOVIE NIGHT
 
All proceedings are on hold. He pleads guilty but he is not considered guilty. He is not convicted of anything.

If he gets arrested again the proceedings continue. The stay can be anywhere from a few months (likely when that sentencing hearing is scheduled) or up to 20 years.

If the stay is completed without issue he is not convicted of anything.
He has entered a guilty plea. However, being a convicted felon only occurs when the court adjudicates it and enters a conviction onto the record, thereby convicting the felon. If Nick is a good little boy for whatever the period of deferred adjuciation is, the judgment will not be entered onto the record.

Therefore, Nick will have pled guilty to a felony, but yet not be a convicted felon.
I see... This is the consequence of the:
  • Statutory stay of adjudication pursuant to Minn. Stat. §152.18
I'd imagine.
 
No. That is retarded. You cannot be violated on probation for crimes you committed before the probation was instituted.
That's true, but I'm suggesting that they are waiting to charge new offenses until after he's already plead guilty to the old ones so that they can be used to enhance the sentencing on the new charges. I never said anything about a probation violation.
 
This is the important part, I think:

View attachment 6899715

I have been told by my attorney and understand:
a. That my attorney discussed this case with one of the prosecuting attorneys and that my attorney and the prosecuting attorney agreed that if I entered a plea of guilty, the prosecutor will do the following: (Give substance of the agreement)

  • Plead guilty to amended charge of drug possession in the third degree
  • Statutory stay of adjudication pursuant to Minn. Stat. §152.18
  • Remaining terms of the sentence at Court’s discretion
  • State drops all other charges.
  • State dismisses 34-CR-24-342 against Kayla Rekieta and case against April Imholte
So Rekieta got off lightly. There was no need for that song and dance of filing all of these stupid motions and wasting money.

There was no need to play a jilted, resentful, spurned ex-lover and go after that stupid Imholte idiot, waste even more money and even get himself into more legal liabilities.

Wouldn't it be funny that after this, he'd be charged with digital trespass and the whole cycle of Rekieta digging deeper holes for himself repeats itself though?
 
All laid out for convenience sake & for any who don’t want to download:
View attachment 6899737
View attachment 6899739
View attachment 6899740
View attachment 6899738
"You almost stopped Jersh from getting the bodycam."
"With a few more copestreams, who knows"
jimmy-kim-smoking-cigarette-better-call-saul-series-finale-1620297005.png
 
There was no need to play a jilted, resentful, spurned ex-lover and go after that stupid Imholte idiot, waste even more money and even get himself into more legal liabilities.
But Aaron swallowed his jizz! Certainly it was worth tens of thousands of dollars to be able to rant about this.

Even though Nick obviously took multiple loads of Aaron's cum up his gay butthole.
 
Well all this is is just a interlude until the Galaxy gas damage to his brain causes him to slip up again

Or he goes back to the whiskey or the crackarooski. If anything this is gonna be the option that generates more content as he has learned nothing and will be at the height of pride and hubris thinking he got away with it and outsmarted everyone before his next fall
 
I don't quite understand.
At the sentencing hearing in April the judge will stay the adjudication of his guilt alongside a period of probation.
  1. If Nick successfully completes probation the conviction is basically erased.
  2. If Nick violates his probation conditions, the stay COULD be revoked and then, since he already pleaded guilty, the conviction will go through and he will be sentenced.
    • The sentence (assuming no convictions for other things happen in the meantime) would likely be more probation, but this time with a suspended 21 month prison term based on the sentencing guidelines.
If he gets arrested again the proceedings continue. The stay can be anywhere from a few months (likely when that sentencing hearing is scheduled) or up to 20 years.
After pleading guilty Nick said in Melton's chat that he'll be getting probation. The chances of the case being dismissed as of the sentencing hearing are basically zero.

MN has also recently imposed a maximum limit of 5 years for probation, which I assume applies for probation associated with stays of adjudication as well.

My guess is somewhere between 1-5 years probably on the lower end.

I see... This is the consequence of the:
  • Statutory stay of adjudication pursuant to Minn. Stat. §152.18
I'd imagine.
Yes. They also had to drop the charge to third degree to make him eligible for that as well, though. The initial charge of second degree isn't eligible for stay of adjudication under that section.
 
So if I understand this right all that Balldo has to do is behave for a little while then he'll be let off free and clear? The sonichu medallion's power works in mysterious ways.
 
Back