Kingdom Come Deliverance - Or how I stopped worrying about SJW and love Bohemia | Now with betrayal and a lot more niggers. "Historically accurate." BlackRock ruined the series.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
i hope it's true just to see how Vavra handles this revelation even when it fucking ruins the game.
He has been eerily quiet since this latest development. Ironically this also dropped after Grumz decided to back Vavra, so hopefully he gets some egg on his face too.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Halmaz
He has been eerily quiet since this latest development. Ironically this also dropped after Grumz decided to back Vavra, so hopefully he gets some egg on his face too.
I hope this is the controversy that makes people ignore Grumz. It's clear he only got as respected as he is by anti-SJWs by luck, and his fence sitting shows he doesn't actually know what he is talking about.
 
Sure, he and fundies complained about that as well, but no one took them seriously by that point. Jack and people like him had little to no impact on gaming. Unlike leftist political activists, fundamental Christians never infiltrated game development teams, where they weasled themselves into positions of power and had everyone fired who was not practicing the Faith. They did not subvert the medium and turned every video game into hamfisted sermons.
So, next time you hear one of these cunts bring up ol' Jack, just call them out on their bullshit.
Agreed. The fundies were the suckers holding the purse once the fallout came. A lot of people screaming "the fundies" confuse them having actual power to censure and ban things with YOUR parents were fundies that made your childhood shit.
Scalps from people like Vavra are the most important ones to get. They are the people who stab you in the back at the first chance. After this backlash do you think he is going to more or less likely to push woke stuff? I wouldn't be surprised if they just include trans/gay pride shit in the dlc just to spite the chuds. Anyone who was e-friends with him should start making sure he can't dump anything damaging.
Never forget, if you have an enemy and a traitor in front of you and a gun with a single bullet, you shoot the enemy and beat the traitor with the gun to death. Because traitors deserve the worst death possible.
Why is Grummz so hesitant to criticize this game?
Because it was supposed to be BASED! It was supposed to be an actual win in the culture war and it's a very bitter pill to swallow. And he's probably flip flopping like mad between "it isn't what was promised" and "well, it's only 1 nigger and options gayness!".
 
Last edited:
Its clearly not about the stupid arguments you are putting forward to justify your continued diet of globalist slave slop.
In addition to "if you disagree with me you're a Leftist/sellout" (assume I share your exact values on everything), here's "if you disagree with me you're a consoomer."

Brother, answer this question: when do you think is the last time I went and bought a game at full price, much less at launch, much less a preorder?

Found a pretty good review of Kingdom: Cum Delivery
Good pun.
 
The real subversive thing is that even if you explicitly choose the non-gay path for all of the Hans and Henry interactions, and if the “platonic” camaraderie between them does turn out to be subtle, it’s forever tainted by the knowledge that they are meant to share fecal microbiomes with each-other in the end. And if only they had enough of a budget to faithfully model and animate an anal prolapse it would have happened in the first game too.
 
The real subversive thing is that even if you explicitly choose the non-gay path for all of the Hans and Henry interactions, and if the “platonic” camaraderie between them does turn out to be subtle, it’s forever tainted by the knowledge that they are meant to share fecal microbiomes with each-other in the end. And if only they had enough of a budget to faithfully model and animate an anal prolapse it would have happened in the first game too.
This is why I say that if there is an option for sodomy, your character is a sodomite. Also done on purpose, as faggots seem to get off on putting this thought in straight men's heads.

In completely unrelated news, why do you think most functioning civilizations persecute homosexuals?
 
In completely unrelated news, why do you think most functioning civilizations persecute homosexuals?
Where to even begin?

Because they are mentally ill pedophiles obsessed with sex to the exclusion of everything else, they reproduce through sexually abusing children, they spread STDs like a cult of Nurgle worshippers, they make a mockery of marriage, they parade their degeneracy in front of everyone - especially children- and then cry foul when told to go fuck themselves etc.

Basically, because they make the lives of normal people objectively worse in every metric imaginable, and the only reason anyone can come up with as to why they shouldn't be rounded up and sent to camps is because they vaguely resemble humans.
 
Where to even begin?

Because they are mentally ill pedophiles obsessed with sex to the exclusion of everything else, they reproduce through sexually abusing children, they spread STDs like a cult of Nurgle worshippers, they make a mockery of marriage, they parade their degeneracy in front of everyone - especially children- and then cry foul when told to go fuck themselves etc.

Basically, because they make the lives of normal people objectively worse in every metric imaginable, and the only reason anyone can come up with as to why they shouldn't be rounded up and sent to camps is because they vaguely resemble humans.
It was a rhetorical question, but this is the answer. 10/10
 
The real subversive thing is that even if you explicitly choose the non-gay path for all of the Hans and Henry interactions, and if the “platonic” camaraderie between them does turn out to be subtle, it’s forever tainted by the knowledge that they are meant to share fecal microbiomes with each-other in the end. And if only they had enough of a budget to faithfully model and animate an anal prolapse it would have happened in the first game too.
Yep. You can't choose to be gay. If your character's best bud is capable of falling in love and butt fucking, he's gay and so are you. There's no "straight" path, only open vs repressed homosexuality.
 
This is why I say that if there is an option for sodomy, your character is a sodomite. Also done on purpose, as faggots seem to get off on putting this thought in straight men's heads.

In completely unrelated news, why do you think most functioning civilizations persecute homosexuals?
Faggots have this fantasy that they can covert normal men.

Where to even begin?

Because they are mentally ill pedophiles obsessed with sex to the exclusion of everything else, they reproduce through sexually abusing children, they spread STDs like a cult of Nurgle worshippers, they make a mockery of marriage, they parade their degeneracy in front of everyone - especially children- and then cry foul when told to go fuck themselves etc.

Basically, because they make the lives of normal people objectively worse in every metric imaginable, and the only reason anyone can come up with as to why they shouldn't be rounded up and sent to camps is because they vaguely resemble humans.
Sodomites prove that Nurgle and Slaneesh aren't enemies. Hilariously they are going to kill the post 60s concept of sex, as they create superbugs immune to drugs.
 
In completely unrelated news, why do you think most functioning civilizations persecute homosexuals?
It serves no useful function.

Firstly, whatever makes people homosexuals tends to also make them extremely promiscuous, leading to them being vectors of nasty sexual diseases. It tends to also make them pedophiles, and you can argue separately about why a pedophile taboo exists, but let's take for granted that it's bad (ain't like anyone around here is going to argue otherwise). Homosexuals in general just seem to be opportunistic sex-crazed maniacs and live fast and loose lifestyles. That's not true of all of them, and I think much of it is cultural, but it seems common enough to understand why ancient patriarchs would condemn the lot of them.

The closest you could maybe argue to a useful function comes from the Greek erastes-eromenos relationship, and even that's controversial. I found it fascinating (I know, lol gay) in college, but I understand people around here say it's all revisionist fairy tales. But the way it was pitched was that in some Hellenic cities in some time periods (not all of Greece all of the time) among the upper class there was a tendency for old men to groom younger lads in a relationship that was part pedophilic rape and part mentoring. However, you could just as well look at this as having been the equivalent of the tranny/gay pride craze in today's society (Athens = San Francisco), a social contagion verging on a mass hysteria that spread out of control that was unwelcome before and made itself unwelcome again. Most importantly, there's no real reason why your mentor should have to grind his willie on your pubescent thighs. Really, you could probably compare it to the out-of-control sexual perversion in the British aristocracy. Same thing, people in high positions of power are free to live chaotically; so are the lower classes. It's the middle class that preserves the morals of a culture.

Another thing you find is that all cultures that aren't actively self-destructing from Commie subversion have values that exist to promote family life. You have gender roles because men and women simply do not - statistically - have the same personalities. You have pairing of male and female to make children and women take care of children, at least below a certain age, and you have defined families so that people actually take care of those children with male and female authority figures. These don't have to strictly be biological fathers and mothers (Cherokees, for example, had avuncular families, Heian Japanese had duolocal residences), but it seems like cultures converge on monogamous households with biological mothers and fathers for a reason. It encourages the most responsibility, it reduces social strife by redistributing women (a limited resource). The more a culture's wealth comes to be dependent on men the more authority the men will, understandably, gain, both due to plow agriculture and to warfare.

What role do homosexuals have in this? They're aberrant by nature. What causes them? I don't think there's a single cause. I think it's clear by now that the nurture vs nature debate is a bad way of looking at it; some are born that way. Every culture has noticed that some little boys are just faggy and they think like girls and grow up to like playing with pricks. But grooming makes more of them, and the tranny explosion shows that you can even, in some sense, groom adults to, you put the idea out there and they're receptive to it when maybe they would have never thought of it on their own. It's both, it's both a biological defect and culturally propagated. But even in societies like the (again, alleged) Greeks, it was still a minority perversion. Homosexuality just isn't human nature, especially for men who seem to, across cultures, have more of a revulsion to it.

So even your cultures that tolerate homos still expected them to marry off to women, to raise children, to continue to perform male gender roles. Those cultures (like Cherokees) that recognized trannies usually required them to fully conform to a set of gender roles. There was no individual freedom, no mixing and matching. If a boy is broken in the head and he wants to take dick up the ass he'd better go spin cloth with the women. If he wants to spin cloth with the women he'd better take dick. That's how Cherokee culture worked, you could be a man-who-lives-like-a-woman or a woman-who-lives-like-a-man, but you had to COMMIT to one side or the other, and men-who-are-women were usually scorned. A woman that can live in a man's world is a badass, admirable. People have told stories like Mulan forever; they're rare, Western culture went overboard with that stuff due to girl power, but people have always recognized how impressive it is when a woman really can be a man. The reverse, a man that shirks his male duties, is contemptible, because it's understood that a man's life is simply harder, except for childbirth, and a tranny never can do that.

So the traditional culture makes their men marry, have sons and daughters, raise sons and daughters, do men's work, and the defects are given various ways out, but they're sure as shit not celebrated for it. What prestige is there, then, in sucking dick? None. It can only undermine the family. Undermine the martial relationship. Encourage faggotry in the children. And people have always wanted to marry for compatibility. Maybe not love as such, not like we think of it now, but political marriage is a rich man's thing. Even cultures with forced marriage still have fathers that love their daughters and try to do well for them. Who would want to marry their daughter off to a pole-fancy?

So that was a giant ramblepost just to say, it's taboo because it's completely useless to the world. Western individualism has many, many upsides, but its one massive downside (that may yet kill the world) is that it tends to reject all social responsibility. Ancient people understood that the continued existence of your people carries a ton of social responsibility to the point that sex is not really a private act.

Edit: We're at a point where people are going to have to learn to accept that breeding is mandatory or social support - pensions and stuff - is directly linked to it. Likewise, society is going to have to learn that the only way to deal with single motherhood is to start punishing it. Unfortunately, women in the West are, based on this abortion shit, especially prone to shirking personal responsibility.
 
Where to even begin?

Because they are mentally ill pedophiles obsessed with sex to the exclusion of everything else, they reproduce through sexually abusing children, they spread STDs like a cult of Nurgle worshippers, they make a mockery of marriage, they parade their degeneracy in front of everyone - especially children- and then cry foul when told to go fuck themselves etc.

Basically, because they make the lives of normal people objectively worse in every metric imaginable, and the only reason anyone can come up with as to why they shouldn't be rounded up and sent to camps is because they vaguely resemble humans.
They also warp the view women have of men. Why did all this 'share your feelings' start? Because a bunch of AWFLs hung around gay men and started to think that is how men should act. They changed the whole education system to make men act like gay men only to find out women are repulsed by it.
 
I really want to be anti LGBT, but I cannot with this cringe shit. You cunts really are too embarrassing and post pages of autistics ramblings about the societal utility of homosex in the Cherokee nation in response to the mere possibility of poopdick in your favorite video game of the month. Of course, you also cannot stop yourselves from complaining about abortion and women not breeding with you anymore.

Stop being cringe retards, it's the fags that are supposed to be embarrassing to associate with. Literal trannies are less insufferable than this because at least they kill themselves after they post their sperg manifesto.
 
Back