Zoosadist Pamperchu - Microwaved Diapers, Pedophilia, Zoosadism, and Meth

Next Highlight
bradsternum said:
I don't think he's a pedo, I think he's willing to ignore the fact that the site is clearly a front for a pedo ring because his obsession runs that deep.
Click to expand...

Not trying to white knight or anything, but looking at the website in question, I don't really see the "front for a pedo ring" thing. While the pictures in the catalog are a bit disturbing, it's really not showing anything more inherently sexual than a young model in a JC Penney's ad wearing track shorts, at least not insomuch as the qualifications for child pornography is concerned. Besides, youth incontinence products are legitimately a thing, it's just the perverts who try to fetishize it.

Besides, if a bunch of pedoforks were going to set up a front for their pedo ring, I would think that they'd pick something that wouldn't be so obvious, especially considering the kinds of things that are likely to happen to people like them in jail.
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
Reactions: Scotsman, Sarcastic Weasel and Marvin
Hakurei said:
seriously
i'm surprised if this fetish didn't cause him cancer
nothing against him man but
WHO WOULD MICROWAVE A DIAPER
A USED DIAPER
BETTER NOT REUSE THAT SHIT
Click to expand...

And in an ancient microwave that probably has less shielding that what is now considered the safe amount.
Also, if you are still thinking the diaper website isn't a front for pedo activities, I suggest you search the name "Deeker" for a wild ride on why it all is.
 
Enig said:
Also, if you are still thinking the diaper website isn't a front for pedo activities, I suggest you search the name "Deeker" for a wild ride on why it all is.
Click to expand...

Yes, I know about Deeker, and I know that he's a total creeper, but how does that prove that the "qualitydiapers.net" website is a front for pedoforks? Does he secretly run the website or something?
 
Trickie said:
Not trying to white knight or anything, but looking at the website in question, I don't really see the "front for a pedo ring" thing. While the pictures in the catalog are a bit disturbing, it's really not showing anything more inherently sexual than a young model in a JC Penney's ad wearing track shorts, at least not insomuch as the qualifications for child pornography is concerned. Besides, youth incontinence products are legitimately a thing, it's just the perverts who try to fetishize it.

Besides, if a bunch of pedoforks were going to set up a front for their pedo ring, I would think that they'd pick something that wouldn't be so obvious, especially considering the kinds of things that are likely to happen to people like them in jail.
Click to expand...

1) You have way too much faith in our justice system.

2) The site sells CATALOGUES of half-naked boys for 100$. For a catalogue. That sounds like covert porn to me.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sarcastic Weasel
trombonista said:
^Supposedly, yes.
Click to expand...

Really? How do we know about it?
bradsternum said:
1) You have way too much faith in our justice system.

2) The site sells CATALOGUES of half-naked boys for 100$. For a catalogue. That sounds like covert porn to me.
Click to expand...

1) Not really, I just think that if I were going to guess what kind of website would be a front for a pedo ring, it wouldn't be the website that practically begs the authorities to check up on the welfare of the kid whose picture they're plastering all over the place.

2) Is it covert porn because it's a catalogue? Or is it covert porn because it's a particularly expensive catalogue? I'm not getting a cohesive argument out of this.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin
autiste said:
Oh dear. He is absolutely horrifying, but chemo is no joke. And its irritating to see the idiots of the internet post such comments...way to make him look 100 times better in comparison.
Click to expand...

He is a human being, after all. The guy is pretty weird, and pretty fascinating. I seem to particularly enjoy the stunted manboys of the net, particularly the most tragic cases like Pamperchu and Chris. They're both cartoonish, childish, perverted, sexually awakened white men who have chosen a life of dependence over the pursuit of being a "self-made man." They're both avid consumers, internet attention starved "celebs" and basically come off like they've lived through some extreme childhood trauma that rightly fucked them up hard for good. I really, truly appreciate that they chose to share their creepy, strange lives with me.
 
Trickie said:
2) Is it covert porn because it's a catalogue? Or is it covert porn because it's a particularly expensive catalogue? I'm not getting a cohesive argument out of this.
Click to expand...

Are you being deliberately obtuse? The place offers one product. Please don't tell me you think people would pay one hundred bucks to look at a product that one can view for free on the internet. In addition, I'd say the fixation on blonde boys should set off alarm bells. Girls bedwet too. What's the point of having a company who only caters to one gender when they could make more money doing both?
 
bradsternum said:
Are you being deliberately obtuse? The place offers one product. Please don't tell me you think people would pay one hundred bucks to look at a product that one can view for free on the internet. In addition, I'd say the fixation on blonde boys should set off alarm bells. Girls bedwet too. What's the point of having a company who only caters to one gender when they could make more money doing both?
Click to expand...

Obtuse? For not buying that putting pictures in an expensive catalogue magically makes porn out of non-porn? Even if it was porn, why would you buy an expensive catalogue of porn that you can just download off the internet? It's like you're trying to ask me why someone would sell pet rocks unless they were hollowing them out and smuggling cocaine in them. It could be any number of reasons, possibly very stupid ones, but that doesn't automatically make it suspicious.

And it's not so much of a fixation on blonde boys as it is a fixation on a single blond boy. They only have the one, and I can't imagine a lot of young male models are clamoring to be photographed wearing a diaper, can you?
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
Reactions: Scotsman, Sarcastic Weasel and Marvin
Better discussion: Two videos are made by him about his cancer.



Sorry for double post, but I bring to you, quality comments on the cancer video.

wAxa9dO.png

d9v7hUL.png

p6KnNBR.png

16J1lUt.png

w6x1FGu.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
Reactions: WireSponge
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back