The original social contract in the UK, when faggotry was legalised, was the shitstabbers would keep their degenerate, unhealthy and unnatural practices to themselves and behind closed doors.
I know you meant gay sex as a whole, but I immediately thought about
Operation Spanner specifically.
In October 1987,
[1] Greater Manchester Police acquired a videotape,
[33] codenamed 'KL7',
[34] depicting consensual sadomasochistic sexual activity between a group of men, including a sequence in which one man passed a nail through a
piercing in another man's foreskin
[35] and hammered it into a block of wood, before making a series of incisions into the man's penis with a scalpel.
[36]
This case has been circulating alphabet soup social media circles as some sort of example of how bad conservatives are, for not letting people have fun behind closed doors, and basically the point they were trying to make is how consent is all that matters.
On 4 November 1987, raids were carried out at the homes of men in
Bolton,
Shrewsbury and
Shropshire.
[1] At the Shropshire address,
sniffer dogs were taken around the property's garden, with police claiming to have reason to think that individuals may have been killed during the making of the tapes.
[41] Activists and defence lawyers later questioned the likelihood of the men's consensual
home sex videos being mistaken for
snuff films,
[36] leading
Detective Superintendent Michael Hames of the Obscene Publications Squad to admit that he could not explain how such an error could have been made.
[36] Nonetheless, he later insisted, "such reckless and escalating violence, left unchecked, was bound to lead to someone getting killed".
[34]
Were they wrong though? I'm biased because all I listened to were low-tier YT true crime channels, but it seemed like there was a whole epidemic of sadomasochistic gay men horrifically torturing, raping, and killing unsuspecting men and underage boys during that era, Jeffrey Dahmer is prime example.
And speaking of consent:
Police were unable to find any participants who had not consented to the activities which took place, nor any who sustained lasting injuries.
[45]
This is specifically what I mentioned above, the main point of this story getting circulated in woke circles. Everything is alright, as long as there's consent and injuries aren't that bad. Right? Right?..
Also, lmao:
In addition, one man was charged with
bestiality and two were charged in relation to an
indecent photograph of a child.
[46]
I feel no empathy for gay men now, in spite of being an advocate for alternative lifestyles.
I partly blame the dog-fucker Pride Parades. A bit of me wants to balance the pride with a little more shame. Is that nasty?
Mostly, I blame trannies. The whole gay acceptance movement is filled with troons these days. LGBTQIA+?
It's hard to have empathy for a group that historically has been obsessed with self-destruction. I'm fully aware that there are normie-adjacent gay men who just happen to like dudes, but the real "community" every genderoid on social media tends to glorify has been built on actual degeneracy
even if we exclude the most basic homosexual acts as perversion. Although anal sex specifically is dangerous regardless of you being a gay man or not, it's dangerous for everyone, and it's hard not to consider it perverse based on that fact alone.
Gay culture has been historically built on hedonism with their definition of "fun" being destructive, harmful activities that usually signaled partial or complete disregard of their own or their partners' dignity. AIDS crisis that wiped away a whole generation of gay and bi men while was tragic, it was still ultimately the "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" scenario. In a civilized, western society (noting this because the highest prevalence of HIV/AIDS is in Africa and I have no idea what they're even doing) it is relatively
really hard to get infected with something like this if you're living by the most basic definition of morality. Aka, not being a drug addict and not being promiscuous. Gay men were not only incapable of taming their own lust in order to stay safe, they spawned a whole kink subculture of bug chasers because destruction, pain and humiliation is arousing to many of them.
It's also not hard to see that all these dark sides of gay history that many people either refuse to talk about or do but think it's alright because it's "consensual", rhyme pretty well with modern day alphabet soup community. Weird kink, extreme body mods, all of that is essentially the same.
I also just randomly recalled nullification being a common gay male kink. Along with rosebudding. And we're living in times where there are people who say it's alright as long as it's consensual and practiced "safely". Makes me wonder if these people genuinely care about human lives and rights as much as they say they do.
I'd argue that letting people to fall this low is as violent as actively beating and torturing them. Except this time our hands stay clean of blood, because we let people do these same exact horrors to themselves.