Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I want to hear what his wife and kids have to say.
I want to hear what his co-workers have to say.

Btw, I found his book online, here how it starts:
Chapter 1: How my egg cracked
I began my daily gooning session while the wife and kids were still at home, as per usual. A few hours into to my lesbian porn marathon, a thought crept into my mind, much like the serpent crept into the Garden of Eden, it said "what if I were one of those lesbians" and I instantly nutted the hardest nut I ever nutted out of my soon-to-be chopped off penis. That's when I knew what I was meant to be: a 100% biological woman.
 
Last edited:
Monstrous Bubo Productions is proud to announce a new publication which sensitively explores the gender confusion of a man called Chuck while also sharing some handy welding tips.
Oh thank God, a trans person writing about what it’s like to be trans and his personal journey of self-discovery. I don’t think we’ve ever seen that before.
 
Sincerely, there's nothing too wrong with a faggot. The organisations representing troons and poofs are trying their hardest to make me hate them all. And it's working.

I’ll side with you here.

I know a few based faggots that I consider good friends. They are just like you or I, but they fuck dudes. Gross, but they don’t make it their whole personality or shove it in my face.

They fucking hate trannies for the same reasons we do, they just also like to fuck other dudes.

There’s lots of fags like that out there, and I have no beef with them.
 
Dresses like a clown. Says, "I punch nazis". Christian, black, AND jewish? This is why you don't race mix. It produces abominations like this. link
1738065286085.png
 
The original social contract in the UK, when faggotry was legalised, was the shitstabbers would keep their degenerate, unhealthy and unnatural practices to themselves and behind closed doors.
I know you meant gay sex as a whole, but I immediately thought about Operation Spanner specifically.

In October 1987,[1] Greater Manchester Police acquired a videotape,[33] codenamed 'KL7',[34] depicting consensual sadomasochistic sexual activity between a group of men, including a sequence in which one man passed a nail through a piercing in another man's foreskin[35] and hammered it into a block of wood, before making a series of incisions into the man's penis with a scalpel.[36]
This case has been circulating alphabet soup social media circles as some sort of example of how bad conservatives are, for not letting people have fun behind closed doors, and basically the point they were trying to make is how consent is all that matters.

On 4 November 1987, raids were carried out at the homes of men in Bolton, Shrewsbury and Shropshire.[1] At the Shropshire address, sniffer dogs were taken around the property's garden, with police claiming to have reason to think that individuals may have been killed during the making of the tapes.[41] Activists and defence lawyers later questioned the likelihood of the men's consensual home sex videos being mistaken for snuff films,[36] leading Detective Superintendent Michael Hames of the Obscene Publications Squad to admit that he could not explain how such an error could have been made.[36] Nonetheless, he later insisted, "such reckless and escalating violence, left unchecked, was bound to lead to someone getting killed".[34]
Were they wrong though? I'm biased because all I listened to were low-tier YT true crime channels, but it seemed like there was a whole epidemic of sadomasochistic gay men horrifically torturing, raping, and killing unsuspecting men and underage boys during that era, Jeffrey Dahmer is prime example.

And speaking of consent:
Police were unable to find any participants who had not consented to the activities which took place, nor any who sustained lasting injuries.[45]
This is specifically what I mentioned above, the main point of this story getting circulated in woke circles. Everything is alright, as long as there's consent and injuries aren't that bad. Right? Right?..

Also, lmao:
In addition, one man was charged with bestiality and two were charged in relation to an indecent photograph of a child.[46]

I feel no empathy for gay men now, in spite of being an advocate for alternative lifestyles.
I partly blame the dog-fucker Pride Parades. A bit of me wants to balance the pride with a little more shame. Is that nasty?
Mostly, I blame trannies. The whole gay acceptance movement is filled with troons these days. LGBTQIA+?
It's hard to have empathy for a group that historically has been obsessed with self-destruction. I'm fully aware that there are normie-adjacent gay men who just happen to like dudes, but the real "community" every genderoid on social media tends to glorify has been built on actual degeneracy even if we exclude the most basic homosexual acts as perversion. Although anal sex specifically is dangerous regardless of you being a gay man or not, it's dangerous for everyone, and it's hard not to consider it perverse based on that fact alone.

Gay culture has been historically built on hedonism with their definition of "fun" being destructive, harmful activities that usually signaled partial or complete disregard of their own or their partners' dignity. AIDS crisis that wiped away a whole generation of gay and bi men while was tragic, it was still ultimately the "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" scenario. In a civilized, western society (noting this because the highest prevalence of HIV/AIDS is in Africa and I have no idea what they're even doing) it is relatively really hard to get infected with something like this if you're living by the most basic definition of morality. Aka, not being a drug addict and not being promiscuous. Gay men were not only incapable of taming their own lust in order to stay safe, they spawned a whole kink subculture of bug chasers because destruction, pain and humiliation is arousing to many of them.

It's also not hard to see that all these dark sides of gay history that many people either refuse to talk about or do but think it's alright because it's "consensual", rhyme pretty well with modern day alphabet soup community. Weird kink, extreme body mods, all of that is essentially the same.
I also just randomly recalled nullification being a common gay male kink. Along with rosebudding. And we're living in times where there are people who say it's alright as long as it's consensual and practiced "safely". Makes me wonder if these people genuinely care about human lives and rights as much as they say they do.

I'd argue that letting people to fall this low is as violent as actively beating and torturing them. Except this time our hands stay clean of blood, because we let people do these same exact horrors to themselves.
 
Meant to share this yesterday and got sidetracked.
1738066000740.png

(archive)

Fascinating to see HSTS trannies seethe over straight men going after pooners instead of men in skirts.
most of these guys are really into alt afab person
and what's even more crazier they'll go after transmen just simply think they have p*ssy 😭 aren't that makes them transphobic to our brother??
1738066330510.png
Are you fetishized or so unwanted you can't get a date? Pick a lane.

1738066348781.png
1738066367501.png
Not sure what either of them are trying to say here.

1738066388487.png
Interesting take.

1738066425898.png
1738066754469.png
The ideal partner is apolitical, slightly left-leaning, has never dated mtfs, doesn't know a lot about trans issues but is also "generally in favor of trans stuff", isn't straight, and isn't bi...? Basically a man with a loose personal identity who they can easily manipulate into "accepting" them, I guess.

1738066549121.png
1738066564176.png
1738066674866.png
1738066819755.png
Incredible seething. They act like the "woke" men going after theyfabs and feminine pooners are somehow unintentionally playing along with the game for easy coochie. I don't think this is really a secret to anyone but the pooners themselves, honestly. Calling it "transphobic" because they're chasing pooners and not you is craaazy.

1738066644974.png
No man is safe.

This thread was also interesting:
1738066859153.png
Spoiler: comments are mixed, lots of "yes, and if you don't you aren't really trans" and "no, if you do you're not really trans". Not sure what to make of it.

I can't really comment on most of these because they are so, so depressing. I can't tell if they are trying hard to force their experiences into a trutrans narrative (it was never about sex, it was always about social/physical things besides sex, sex came after) or if they genuinely are so borked in the head (homophobia? porn? it's a mystery) that they, despite enjoying intimacy as men, still castrated themselves.
1738066981611.png
1738066991394.png
1738066999814.png
1738067011308.png
1738067023008.png
1738067035599.png
1738067116139.png

1738067081775.png1738067064714.png
1738067171298.png

Monstrous Bubo Productions is proud to announce a new publication which sensitively explores the gender confusion of a man called Chuck while also sharing some handy welding tips.
From the Amazon listing:
1738066196613.png
>Reading age: 15-18 years

They're never beating the grooming allegations.
 

Attachments

  • 1738066967411.png
    1738066967411.png
    27.8 KB · Views: 62
the point they were trying to make is how consent is all that matters.
I'm becoming more and more convinced that informed consent, the kind of actual consent that matters, is a myth. Most people are too stupid to really understand the consequences of their actions. This is readily apparent in how many fatties there are that stuff their face with food and then wonder why their backs and knees are destroyed at the age of 40 but it happens in so many other ways too.
Were they wrong though? I'm biased because all I listened to were low-tier YT true crime channels, but it seemed like there was a whole epidemic of sadomasochistic gay men horrifically torturing, raping, and killing unsuspecting men and underage boys during that era, Jeffrey Dahmer is prime example.
Mental illness comes in clusters. Homosexuality was classified as a mental illness because it so often is comorbid with multiple other mental illnesses. As you noted, there's plenty of reasons why homosexuality is dangerous and the clustering of mental illness tracks with the rest.
 
There are more and more posts these days about whether or not it's ethical for trannies to disclose - why do we think that is, Farmers? Are the walls finally closing in?
Link | Archive

I hate the "it's rape if trans people don't disclose" debate

I just saw a discussion about this subject and it just annoys me every time. This trans panic isn't benefiting anyone. I don't see why it's rape if the person is pre op, you can see the genitals and the person just says stop if they don't want to do it. Is it also rape if he person is post op and so pretty much similar to a cis person? I never see that having other medical conditions and not disclosing them is rape. Like I was in a relationship with a man who first seemed like a usual guy and then turned out to be completely depend on his parents to manage his stuff while he pretended that he knows about his dependency and that he's not dependent at the same time. I partly felt like a second mother to him because I had to take care of some stuff. Would I go into this relationship if I'd knew? Of course not! Still the intercourse we had was fully consensual! Why should being transsexual even matter if someone is post op? Or why is it not okay to just stop if you're not attracted to the genitals of the other person? Why is that rape? Of course it's smart to disclose beforehand but this is just creating so much trans panic.
And the worst thing about this debate is that it's not even a fight worth fighting for. This is a discussion doesn't really benefit anyone but transphobes. They can paint trans people as predators because of that. It's just exhausting and I hate seeing this debate again and again...
Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 06-47-59 I hate the it's rape if trans people don't disclose debate r...png
Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 06-48-12 I hate the it's rape if trans people don't disclose debate r...png
Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 06-48-23 I hate the it's rape if trans people don't disclose debate r...png
Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 06-48-42 I hate the it's rape if trans people don't disclose debate r...png
Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 06-49-00 I hate the it's rape if trans people don't disclose debate r...png
Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 06-49-15 I hate the it's rape if trans people don't disclose debate r...png
Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 06-49-32 I hate the it's rape if trans people don't disclose debate r...png
 
>having sex with a transsexual didn't carry any risk of transmitting a disease to anyone... :story:

The entitlement of these people never fails to astound me. Maybe disclosing that you're a pooner or a trooner (for the poor souls who haven't had enough exposure to instantly clock them) is for the other person's comfort. Can they really not consider that someone might be a little upset if they're sold one thing, but find out its a bait and switch? That the nice car is really a lemon? Especially if the scenario is super intimate and involves very sensitive and emotionally valuable body bits? Ah, but giving any thought to another human is too much effort, apparently.

Lol at the "I have a pussy, what's the issue?" A rot pocket ain't a pussy. Heterosexual men appreciate actual vaginas and associated bits, who'd've thunk it.
 
"Is it rape if I have sex with a blonde guy but he was biologically ginger?"
Unironically yes. Rape isn't really the best word to use in this context, but informed consent about partner's biology is really important. Women that have had excessive plastic surgery to date successful men has been called fraud in South Korea.
 
"Is it rape if I have sex with a blonde guy but he was biologically ginger?"
Unironically yes. Rape isn't really the best word to use in this context, but informed consent about partner's biology is really important. Women that have had excessive plastic surgery to date successful men has been called fraud in South Korea.
You can be as "arbitrarily" picky with sexual partners as you want. That's what makes consent, consent. It doesn't matter what metrics other people think you should have. If I wanted to remain celibate for 10 years because I saw a sign in the clouds, it's my choice. If I decide guys who wear baseballs caps are suddenly never allowed to hit it ever, it's my choice. And you don't know WHY someone has the standards they do. Maybe previous bad experiences make them want to avoid certain traits.

This is also why you should never put someone into a situation where they "have to" explain in detail why they're not into you. It's one of those things you're better off not knowing because it literally is of no benefit to you especially with how subjective this stuff is. But trannies sort of create situations where they have to be painfully aware of it. Truly creators of their own hell.
 
"Is it rape if I have sex with a blonde guy but he was biologically ginger?"
Unironically yes. Rape isn't really the best word to use in this context, but informed consent about partner's biology is really important. Women that have had excessive plastic surgery to date successful men has been called fraud in South Korea.
To me, focusing on litigating over what constitutes rape (what if he lies about being married? What if she lies about having natural blue eyes? What if, what if, what if) is unimportant and distracts from the point that I care the most about: if you are aware someone would not consent to sex with you based on a trait you have or a lifestyle you lead, and you purposefully withhold this information to gain sexual access to them, then even if the law is on your side, you should be ashamed of yourself. If you are aware this person would not consent to sex with you and you willfully misrepresent yourself so that you can have sex with them, you may not be a rapist in the legal sense*, but in the moral sense you are prone to sexual violating others and do not see other people's bodily autonomy as worth honoring. Therefore, if someone beats the living shit out of you, all I can say is FAFO.

Also noteworthy, to me, is that everyone is essentially imagining that the violator is a MTF and the victim is some stupid privileged straight (presumably white) man. They've decided that this kind of person, as a victim, is not a "proper" victim and doesn't earn any right to feel violated, betrayed, cheated or misled. Which is deeply ironic, as most trannies and pooners were brewed in the social atmosphere in which trying to argue which victims were allowed to feel violated over what non-consensual acts they endured was seen as a verboten promotion of rape culture. How tides turn, eh?

*The law matters, as does the legal definition of words in terms of prosecution, but they always use this as a fallback when in most cases it's really a conversation about ethics. Legally, it's still permissible for men to rape their wives in some countries, but what kind of morally upright and loving husband would force himself on his wife? They think the law is the be-all end-all of the conversation because when you discuss the pure morality of it, they have nowhere to run, which is why you should never let them lure the conversation down this pathway if you have the misfortune of having it IRL.
 
This dude walked around with a "Transwomen are Men" sign as part of a first amendment audit:
I love how they can't even articulate why they are offended, they just think they should be. It's as funny as it is sad to see them so well programmed. The people who pull up their phone are something else, it's like a Redditor's protocol for how to act when you spot "hate speech".
 
Last edited:
Dresses like a clown. Says, "I punch nazis". Christian, black, AND jewish? This is why you don't race mix. It produces abominations like this. link
View attachment 6913368
Xir is also extremely broke, living off benefits that ran out a few days after this was published. This nigga now works for a convenience store. (Sorry not from burgerland but from what I could find Stewart's is a convenience store.)
Screenshot_20250128_073017_Brave.jpg
Flattering angle to be asking for hunded an fotie dollas
 
Back