Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Catgirl Tyranid]

I legitimately want to know what Viva means by "Barnes was right"

Like every other lawtuber, Barnes probably made one couching statement when no one else was watching saying that this was a possibility. A lot easier to say you were right when you take every likely outcome as a position at least once.

Or he told Viva that, but told his audience the opposite.

 

[Captain Manning]

I legitimately want to know what Viva means by "Barnes was right"

"Barnes was right" is a stupid meme among the Barneswalkers. He is, in fact, frequently wrong.

His ranting about the warrant was, in some ways, even more embarrassing than Rekieta's. Rekieta spoke with some at least some vagueness on the topic, whereas Barnes spoke with absolute certainty. Mis-citing nearly every Constitutional amendment while doing so.

Barnes is a joke, and Viva is his lapdog.

Didn't Barnes say the warrant would be tossed out? Instead it got affirmed and Nick plead guilty

Yes, and yes

EDIT: Word order.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

No, he will not be a convicted anything.

What the fuck is that system.

That is way too lenient, for the duration of the diversion he should be treated as the criminal he is.

Didn't Barnes say the warrant would be tossed out? Instead it got affirmed and Nick plead guilty

Barnes not only said the warrant would get tossed, he also claimed the Frank's motion would go through and completely dismantle the state's case.

 

[AnOminous]

What the fuck is that system.

That is way too lenient, for the duration of the diversion he should be treated as the criminal he is.

It streamlines the process if you do blow the deferred adjudication, more than the usual diversion agreement where you plead guilty to nothing and then if you blow that, you go back to trial. If he blows the deferred adjudication, then they can just go directly into entering the adjudication. He's already pled to it.

Barnes not only said the warrant would get tossed, he also claimed the Frank's motion would go through and completely dismantle the state's case.

Barnes is a bloviating stuffed shirt phony and has gone out of his way to make that abundantly clear.

 

[Folgers Can]

Didn't Barnes say the warrant would be tossed out? Instead it got affirmed and Nick plead guilty

Surely his cope can always be that the warrant would have been tossed out if Nick had petitioned the Minnesota Supreme Court for review of the Minnesota Court of Appeals' affirmance, if Nick had petitioned SCOTUS for certiorari to reverse the Minnesota Supreme Court, if Nick had petitioned the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota for a writ of habeas corpus, if Nick had appealed denial of habeas corpus to the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals, and if Nick had petitioned SCOTUS for certiorari to reverse the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals.

Because Nick was too much of a pussy to try each and every one of the above, Barnes can forever rest soundly in the knowledge that the warrant would have been tossed out and Barnes would have been proven right had Nick not been such a pussy.

Nick L, Barnes W.

 

[Strix454]

What the fuck is that system.

That is way too lenient, for the duration of the diversion he should be treated as the criminal he is.

A felony conviction doesn't mean much of anything anymore in Minnesota in any case. About all not tagging with the felony means for Nick is that he gets his guns and his gun rights back.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Chad Zumock had someone write in (anonymously) as a TM Zumock exclusive about Nick's 4th child testing positive for coke.

Apparently, there were multiple tests that came up positive for the kid, including a blood test. Chad's a dummy and couldn't understand some of the words, including I'm guessing "metabolite". The young girl 100% was taking coke, per the alleged source.

Supposedly the source of the leak was close to the prosecution.

Update on the drug usage, from the internet rumor mill.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Update on the drug usage, from the internet rumor mill.

Oh to be inside the cocabunker right now. Nick must be punching himself hard. I would like this to be false for the kid’s sake, but I want Balldo to SUFFAH.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

A felony conviction doesn't mean much of anything anymore in Minnesota in any case. About all not tagging with the felony means for Nick is that he gets his guns and his gun rights back.

I do not think that he is allowed to. I believe for the duration of the adjudication he does not have the right to own a gun, because it is for a felony.
But that might be different in Minnesota, I am going by what I remember from youtube videos on plea cases and the states might differ on the topic of allowing felons with adjudicated sentences owning guns.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Chad Zumock had someone write in (anonymously) as a TM Zumock exclusive about Nick's 4th child testing positive for coke.

Apparently, there were multiple tests that came up positive for the kid, including a blood test. Chad's a dummy and couldn't understand some of the words, including I'm guessing "metabolite". The young girl 100% was taking coke, per the alleged source.

Supposedly the source of the leak was close to the prosecution.

Edit to add: Zumock makes his streams members only after they air, so uh... get on it clippers.

Here it is clipped, with some minor edits, cutting out the preamble. I still recommend watching at 1.5x speed:

Transcription of the message from his "informant":
(In yellow, Zumock's observations; otherwise, the message he is reading from this informant.)
"So my source talks to this person that's very close to Nick, sent me this and I have it confirmed."
"I have some Rekieta dirt for you. Please, please, never mention my name. I do not want to be on his radar." Here it is. "His daughter tested positive for cocaine more than once. It's not that she had cocaine in her hair. She didn't. And Nick is exploiting that misinformation to claim a cop dusted hair with coke. That is not true. His daughter's hair contained a high level..." what's that word? I don't even know what that is... "that the body produces after consuming cocaine. Nick has lied and said they only tested her once. That is false. The prosecution requested multiple tests, including a blood test. The eight-year-old girl tested positive for cocaine across all tests. Every one of the tests she tested positive. She consumed cocaine." an eight-year-old! "I know I'm just being super..." okay, I can't read that.... "If my source was revealed, it could cause Nick to have legitimate grounds against the prosecution. I've been following Nick for years now..." Can't read that... "He's an absolute monster."

I personally find it hard to believe a blood test would be positive.

(edit: changed the video codec from h.265 to h.264 for mobile users)

 

[Strix454]

Update on the drug usage, from the internet rumor mill.

I'd describe it as a dabbleverse rumor mill. Nick is sinking further into the dabbleverse. Zumock is not remotely reliable. All these dabbleverse people have confidential inside sources and it almost always turns out to be made-up nonsense.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Notice also how the site automatically alters your own posts from the one last bastion that was APA Style Manual 6th Edition backed by science to the utterly benighted barbarism that has been the Chicago Manual (and APA 7th Edition apostasy that I'd just as soon pretend never happened), unless you deploy embedded PNGs to get around it.View attachment 6914113Null does enjoy his petty torments.

I am currently being put through similar plights & torment at work because [the people who get to make the technical rules for formal/official documentation] recommend one space and are currently reviewing a huge document of mine. I pettily hope they miss one.

As for Null and most of the rest, I can only meditate on Luke 23:34. But as for the bastards out of Chicago and their followers, they are Philistines at the gate!

A felony conviction doesn't mean much of anything anymore in Minnesota in any case. About all not tagging with the felony means for Nick is that he gets his guns and his gun rights back.

Well, it does can matter in the private sector. MN has some huge companies with thick HR manuals, and though a felony isn't always a bar to hiring, it's certainly not a help. If he were ever to (ha ha ha) try to get back to working for a bank in any capacity*, or (ha ha ha ha x 2) aim to be hired as counsel somewhere, a felony can be an effective DQ.

* depending on role, this may require FBI-level background checks, prints, etc. Often the disclosure question is about arrests/ charges, not just convictions, but obvs no conviction is better.

...Of course that's all irrelevant for no-work-Nick, but for most people a felony conviction - or even arrest/ charge - can have a significant negative impact on their futures and that of their family. As it should. Especially for a man in his 40s and masquerading as an ups anding member is society.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

I personally find it hard to believe a blood test would be positive.

According to Doctor Google it only stays in the blood for 1-2 days (maybe longer/shorter for children, I do not know).
So if it was true a blood test was positive, it would mean the child used cocaine within 48 hours of the police searching the house.

I personally do not trust this clown to "verify" anything. The fact that he actually talks about the source being connected to the state is absolutely moronic. That mention alone is enough for Nick to go on a fishing expedition and put in a complaint with the judge about confidential information for a SEALED chips case being leaked by the state or CPS workers.

This clown actually talking about that is beyond me.

"If my source was revealed, it could cause Nick to have legitimate grounds against the prosecution."

LMAO, WHAT?
This smells like a super gay attention seeker spreading bullshit tbh



@Potentially Criminal What is your take on this?

 

[Strix454]

I do not think that he is allowed to. I believe for the duration of the adjudication he does not have the right to own a gun, because it is for a felony.
But that might be different in Minnesota, I am going by what I remember from youtube videos on plea cases and the states might differ on the topic of allowing felons with adjudicated sentences owning guns.

I tried to look it up. The federal courts apparently consider for purposes of gun rights that state deferred adjudication is equal to being under indictment for the entire term of deferred adjudication. So apparently in such a situation you at a minimum fail the federal background checks for the purchase of a firearm.
I could not find a definitive answer about ownership of existing guns within the state and under Minnesota state law.

 

[Space Pope]

I could not find a definitive answer about ownership of existing guns within the state and under Minnesota state law.

For the sake of innocent skunks and raccoons, I hope the answer is no.

 

[Melty Butter]

Here it is clipped, with some minor edits, cutting out the preamble. I still recommend watching at 1.5x speed:

HOLY FUCK!!!!!!

THERE IT IS. THERE IT IS. THERE IT IS.

"MORE THAN ONCE"

"BLOOD TESTS"

I've watched enough of Zumock to believe him.

(Also, the informant is clearly Aaron or Keanu. Probably Keanu.)

 

[Vibralldo]

Here it is clipped, with some minor edits, cutting out the preamble. I still recommend watching at 1.5x speed:

(If this is true)

Nick gave it to her 100%

We joke around a lot about lolcows who do horrible shit, but Nick giving his daughter cocaine and then trying to cover it up is arguably one of the worst things a lolcow has ever done and I unironically believe that he should be killed by the government because of it

It's worse than anything Ralph's ever done, it's up there with Nick Bate molesting his sister. Genuinely evil

 

[Harm]

Transcription of the message from his "informant":
(In yellow, Zumock's observations; otherwise, the message he is reading from this informant.)
"So my source talks to this person that's very close to Nick, sent me this and I have it confirmed."
"I have some Rekieta dirt for you. Please, please, never mention my name. I do not want to be on his radar." Here it is. "His daughter tested positive for cocaine more than once. It's not that she had cocaine in her hair. She didn't. And Nick is exploiting that misinformation to claim a cop dusted hair with coke. That is not true. His daughter's hair contained a high level..." what's that word? I don't even know what that is... "that the body produces after consuming cocaine. Nick has lied and said they only tested her once. That is false. The prosecution requested multiple tests, including a blood test. The eight-year-old girl tested positive for cocaine across all tests. Every one of the tests she tested positive. She consumed cocaine." an eight-year-old! "I know I'm just being super..." okay, I can't read that.... "If my source was revealed, it could cause Nick to have legitimate grounds against the prosecution. I've been following Nick for years now..." Can't read that... "He's an absolute monster."

All things considered, I believe it.

The court wouldn't one-and-done a positive drug test for cocaine on a child that young, and even Nick admits that the initial positive test did happen. All Nick has to do to disprove this is unseal the records or produce the sealed records himself (which he won't do because it's all true). It just makes too much sense between him pre-emptively trying to discredit the tests before they were even conducted, to him sealing the record as soon as it became public knowledge what had happened.

The more he works to cover up the facts or spin these bullshit tales about contamination from a cop, the more it becomes clear he poisoned her and almost definitely did so on purpose. I mean, if the tests are as faulty as he says, then why would he also be providing explanations for why it's legitimate with the glove story? It's him hedging all his bets when the truth is he poisoned his young daughter with cocaine.

 

[AnOminous]

I do not think that he is allowed to. I believe for the duration of the adjudication he does not have the right to own a gun, because it is for a felony.

If the next post is correct, he doesn't.

While the only gun charge was dropped, it was in there and was concerning enough to be brought in the first place. It might be because he's a habitual drug user, though, if he doesn't clear that up.

So apparently in such a situation you at a minimum fail the federal background checks for the purchase of a firearm.

And he's in big trouble if he commits perjury on Form 4473, which it is to claim you're not a drug user when you are.

Also, as for the other question on 4473.


So considering the indictment is still active and we're in a period between plea and sentencing, he couldn't pass.

 

[Me262PrinceOfTurboJet]

Aren’t there exemptions to probation drug testing? Correct me if I’m wrong but can’t Nick just convince a psychiatrist he needs methylphenidate, or amphetamine for reasons? And continue his stimulant usage more or less. He’s mentioned modafinil before which is a controlled drug. Why not bump it up to adderall and continue to get high.

Any legitimate doctor would immediately recognize his drug seeking behavior a fucking mile away. He'd have to find some charlatan and he'd still have to notify his probation officer and let them know what he's supposed to be taking. They would start him on a lower dose that he would go through in a couple of days and then have to wait a month to get more.