Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[holyhandgrenade]

sentence diagramming.

Sentence diagramming can suck these nuts. However, if I hadn’t done it in middle school I wouldn’t have learned as much about the English language. I was only made to do it because I was in advanced classes the normies never had to.
That being said nick is guilty and sucks dick for cock

 

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

...I would:
1) Retest my kid on my own dime. Her hair is long. This is not hard. (It's still long, btw. Pics are out there.)
2) Publicize the negative tests ON BLAST.
3) Scream to the HIGH HEAVENS that I have EVIDENCE that her hair does not show cocaine dosing.

Nick cannot do ANY of that. I wonder why.

Nick's cope for this is that the police weren't interested in doing a second test. Nick also claimed that he couldn't do a test himself because he no longer had access to his kids so he couldn't do a test, he claimed he asked the court and they refused (clips of this were posted a while ago). Of course no one believes him, just saying that is what he said.

 

[AltisticRight]

First time poster here, I don't know if this if this true, and God I hope not, this was one of the worst things I've ever read from a cow ever. If this true then Nick should fucking kill himself, no fucking child ever should be given drugs and he actually cared about his family once to know this.

Welcome to the thread of twice loty WINNER and superior milk producer (also according to Aaron Imholte) compared to yawn-inducing gambling retard.

Anyways, top level rundown:
- it is true
- his daughter tested positive for a cocaine metabolite called benzoylecgonine, which is excreted via urine and metabolised in the liver
- the positive result here refers to the cutoff, which was 500 picograms/milligram
- this means his other kids might have all tested positive for trace amounts of said metabolite, but it was below the cutoff, so the state didn't care. Skelly can disprove my claim by showing me the test results.
- she tested at over 5000pg/mg, over ten times the cutoff
- they definitely retested the samples
- We don't know how the cocaine got into her.
- everything nitrous Nick said was a lie. The cop with gloves, test results being wrong, it's all lies and lies and lies. He claimed he read 40 free abstracts (he still cannot pronounce the metabolites) and thus is an expert. Turns out his lie was based solely on a quora post made by someone who was convicted for running a ecstasy lab.
- GC-MS will NOT get this wrong. All the studies I've read regarding intentional exposure mostly had test levels at well below the 500 cutoff, it was never above 1000. This means I did see a few results that were above the cutoff. I never saw anything close to 2000 let alone >5000.

And yeah. When this news was brought to us by @MNPublicRecords, the first few responses was "kys nick". He should take this advice.

 

[Sinbad the Sailor]

I still think the idea that Rekieta intentionally dosed his kid is insane and I don't believe it.

First, the guys an addict and that's a waste of good blow. Second, as much you could conceive that maybe he would come up with such a harebrained scheme, do you really think everyone else would go along with it? Did he hide it? How did he do that? How did he justify it then after the test results?

After she tested positive, do you not think CPS wouldn't have gone through some questions with the kid and Rekieta? Do you honestly think the guy would walk with some probation and a promise to be a good boy if they caught wind of him dosing his nine-year-old?

I think it is far, far more likely that this wetbrained retard who had spent shells all over his floor just wasn't careful locking up his stash and his kid got into it without him realising. Because he is a narc, he can't ever concede that his horrible parenting abilities and poor life decisions that are so FUN and WEIRD had an adverse effect on those he is supposed to protect and so he just denied it ever happened.

He never saw his kid high (because he never watches them), so therefore it didn't happen, therefore the state made it up. That's the way I see it.

 

[Vibralldo]

First, the guys an addict and that's a waste of good blow.

Nick shared it with Kayla, Aaron, and April, so I'm sure he's willing to share with his daughter if he considers it her "medicine"

Second, as much you could conceive that maybe he would come up with such a harebrained scheme, do you really think everyone else would go along with it? Did he hide it?

Probably hid it. Nick's a known liar and seems to manipulate Kayla regularly (I will be us tattoo). Wouldn't be surprised if he used the "metabolized glove" excuse on her and April too. If not, he probably justified it to Kayla by saying he knew what he was doing and it would treat her ADHD. She's a pushover retard and would just believe him. Once the shit hit the fan he probably told her that if she snitched about the cocaine it'd destroy the family and it'd be her fault

After she tested positive, do you not think CPS wouldn't have gone through some questions with the kid and Rekieta? Do you honestly think the guy would walk with some probation and a promise to be a good boy if they caught wind of him dosing his nine-year-old?

Nick did his gay implication thing to imply Aaron dosed her with cocaine in her food. That sounds like a Freudian slip to me. Daughter can't snitch because she didn't know she was getting dosed. CPS is notoriously incompetent. Nick probably just said he didn't know how she got the positive test and they just believed him.

I think it is far, far more likely that this wetbrained retard who had spent shells all over his floor just wasn't careful locking up his stash and his kid got into it without him realising. Because he is a narc, he can't ever concede that his horrible parenting abilities and poor life decisions that are so FUN and WEIRD had an adverse effect on those he is supposed to protect and so just denied it ever happened.

I think it's far less likely an 8 year old would be ingesting cocaine on her own.

He never saw his kid high (because he never watches them), so therefore it didn't happen, therefore the state made it up. That's the way I see it.

Nick falsely accused the state of lying throughout the entire trial. He said the cops planted the cocaine, he accused the judge of lying under oath, he claimed the whole thing was a conspiracy to frame him, he said they lied about the warrant.

Whenever Nick accuses someone else of lying, he's lying.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

On a day when there’s been so much to clear up, Nick has been unusually quiet.

 

[Radola Gajda]

For the sake of innocent skunks and raccoons, I hope the answer is no.

Do not worry incel prude karen farmer I Law Pope am true reneissance man . And I will get rid of those nasty pests same way . I did last time. I can drown them or I can fight them with knife and hammer.

 

[Oxyjen]

Doesn't it depend on the formality of the writing? Comma splices in formal writing to the point it makes it unclear sucks, but I like deliberately making it unclear with them if I don't care what people think about it.

I always liked Joyce's deliberately annoying refusals to punctuate to make things even more ambiguous than they already were.

David Foster Wallace was the master of the run-on sentence - some of his in Infinite Jest go on for 3 pages.

A quote from him.

Reading is a very strange thing. We get talked to about it and talk explicitly about it in first grade and second grade and third grade, and then it all devolves into interpretation. But if you think about what’s going on when you read, you’re processing information at an incredible rate. One measure of how good the writing is is how little effort it requires for the reader to track what’s going on. For example, I am not an absolute believer in standard punctuation at all times, but one thing that’s often a big shock to my students is that punctuation isn’t merely a matter of pacing or how you would read something out loud. These marks are, in fact, cues to the reader for how very quickly to organize the various phrases and clauses of the sentence so the sentence as a whole makes sense.

Nick did his gay implication thing to imply Aaron dosed her with cocaine in her food. That sounds like a Freudian slip to me. Daughter can't snitch because she didn't know she was getting dosed. CPS is notoriously incompetent. Nick probably just said he didn't know how she got the positive test and they just believed him.

I dunno man I’m struggling with this one. I can fully believe Nick would do something like this, and the surface level evidence seems to support that he did.
But how the fuck did he get away with it then? There were child abuse charges at first - that was about the positive test, wasn’t it? So how did they get dropped?
This seems too serious to just sweep under the rug, more serious than the possession itself.
Did the cops actually fuck something up and that’s why such a lenient deal was offered, to avoid going to trial and having to admit that?

 

[Thunderous Lightning]

There was a video on X recently about a girl filming herself walking out in public with man splooge on her face. A cum selfie walk I believe it was called. Mr Non Lawyer But Definitely A Criminal Rekieta, I challenge you to do the walk of Jizz (and live stream it), to show those scandi prudes who's the real alpha in MN. I know you can't use Aaron's special blend of coom anymore, and we are sorry about that. But feel free to use your own.

I think this would be a big "cumback" for your streaming career. And let's face it. If dosing your kid with cocaine doesn't get rid of your subs, jannies or members, then NOTHING will!

Let's see you take the degeneracy to the next level. Maybe even try to fuck a dog outside or something? I dunno. Surprise us with more content or something, fuckface.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

49:53-50:45
Robert Barnes on the 28th of May 2024: "The warrant basically violates all the war rules of warrants"

1:01:38-1:03:42
Robert Barnes on the 28th of May 2024: "A corrupt cop wrote a fake warrant"

You attached the same clip for both of them

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

I dunno man I’m struggling with this one. I can fully believe Nick would do something like this, and the surface level evidence seems to support that he did.
But how the fuck did he get away with it then? There were child abuse charges at first - that was about the positive test, wasn’t it? So how did they get dropped?
This seems too serious to just sweep under the rug, more serious than the possession itself.
Did the cops actually fuck something up and that’s why such a lenient deal was offered, to avoid going to trial and having to admit that?

They likely asked her if she had been taking a white powdery substance up her nose. If she says no, what can they do? At that point you are at accidental environmental ingestion as a likely explanation and no obvious reason why someome would literally feed their child cocaine.

However it isn't like there was no impact. They lost livimg with their kids 3 months. Then had a trial placement with testing another 3 months or so. CPS also won't be out of their lives now either.

 

[Swole McPole]

First, the guys an addict and that's a waste of good blow.

If he was fiddling around with grams and quarter grams, he might begrudge his daughter the odd line or two but this motherfucker had an ounce in the safe and a trustfund buying him as much coke as he wanted.

Personally, I would have seen giving coke to Kayla, Aaron and April as a waste of good blow, but Nick obviously liked to share his coke around.

Second, as much you could conceive that maybe he would come up with such a harebrained scheme, do you really think everyone else would go along with it?

They went along with his wifeswapping plans, didn't they? They seem to have been as depraved and retarded as he is.

I'm not saying Rekieta DID deliberately give his kid cocaine. I don't know one way or the other. Both hypotheses are plausible to me.

 

[N1bbaN3rd]

View attachment 6915588
- Nick Rekieta, Xitter 1/26/2025 (after pleading guilty).

Full Xeet.
View attachment 6915601
I'll leave it there. This seems obvious to me.

I don't care what any DNA test may say, Nick has earned himself a Star of David for such unabashed kikery.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Bullshit. The amount was consistent with daily use. That doesn't mean it PROVES daily use. It is also consistent with a single particularly large dose, perhaps from negligent exposure. It is not consistent with incidental exposure.

You are forgetting that all cut-off and test values are for use by adults, there are no values for children. Or at least that is what I remember on the topic from the aggregated information posted on KF when the info first came out.

What might just be a blip on the radar for an adult could show very different for a child.

If the kid ate a gram of coke on her cookie when nobody was looking, or if it was Nick/Kayla dosing her to shut her up, we don't really know. And I do not think we should speculate about that, especially not when its Zumock spreading the bullshit.

You could of course be right, but the info we have available does not allow the leap to "intentional dosing", and accidental would already be bad enough that we do not have to invent new things to dislike the skelly junkie faggot. We are not KinoCasino who just run with every lame rumor and pretend its accurate without doing even basic research.

 

[Desktop User2]

Sorry, but are you ACTUALLY kidding?

If I was an innocent parent, particularly a parent in the public eye, in which the law and approximately +/- 100K people are paying attention...

...I would:
1) Retest my kid on my own dime. Her hair is long. This is not hard. (It's still long, btw. Pics are out there.)
2) Publicize the negative tests ON BLAST.
3) Scream to the HIGH HEAVENS that I have EVIDENCE that her hair does not show cocaine dosing.

Nick cannot do ANY of that. I wonder why.

Also, do you really think the State wouldn't have followed up on the positive test? Of course they did.

Is this an agenda against Chad? I don't even know what we're discussing.

It's obvious (to me) Nick was dosing his kid. He'd have proven otherwise by now if it was not true.

"Is this an agenda against Chad"
Who gives a fuck about Chad, mate?
He made an specific claim without providing fuck all and the blood test makes it pretty odd, specially because the retests were not cited in the initial report. If the blood test detects it in a very short range of time, when they were made? Why would they need a blood test if the hair is perfectly accurate and CPS is not part of the forum and fighting nigger narratives about faulty tests?
If your hatred for Niggieta makes you accept anything without a shard of evidence, go for it.

 

[Scorpion From MK]

You attached the same clip for both of them

Apologies, this is the "This warrant violates all the rules of warrants" clip.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Sorry, but are you ACTUALLY kidding?

If I was an innocent parent, particularly a parent in the public eye, in which the law and approximately +/- 100K people are paying attention...

...I would:

You would do nothing because you had the case sealed. Any court records, including tests and their results, are under seal.
I am not sure about private testing performed, but since the CHIPS case primarily deals with the children's welfare, I do not think that Nick can just go around publishing things because he needs to argue with people online.

Then again, no such tests likely exist and Nick is a big fat liar.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

I do not think that Nick can just go around publishing things because he needs to argue with people online.

True, but this is Nick.
One can only hope his wet hole filled brain does it - if they existed.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

View attachment 6917332
Apologies, this is the "This warrant violates all the rules of warrants" clip.

Thank you!

 

[Terrorist]

Everyone involved in “The Dabbleverse” should be lynched.