Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 70 17.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 159 40.1%

  • Total voters
    397
I don't think it is exciting at all, because the source is this criminal lolcow milker with a "trustme bro I verified the source" claim.

Everyone already knew the kid tested positive and that Nick's excuse was bullshit.
I do not for a second believe that if a blood test had shown RECENT cocaine use, and the hair test had shows PROLONGED! cocaine use by the daughter that Nick would have gotten his kids back "just like that".

I really really doubt that CPS would send a kid back into a home with a parent who was a party in the continued and intentional dosing of a minor with cocaine.

That leaves two options:
1) This story is bullshit and made up (or partially wrong/misleading)
2) Nick lied about the kids being back with him and having full custody over ALL of them

[EDIT] Or 3) both of the above I guess
Remember, Nick said the kids were back over the Summer (implying case was over) and then in the Fall he admitted the "Trial Home Visit" just ended. He has never said the case was 100% done
 
This whole Zumock thing reeks of gayops. Why the fuck would someone apparently so knowledgeable about Nick and his case choose this absolute nobody to leak information to and potentially jeopardise the whole thing? Gay shit. Gay gay gay gay. The only question for me is if Zumock is being hoodwinked or if he made it up himself. I also think the CPS response would look different if they had proof of extremely recent drug use by the child, which a blood test would suggest.
You are correct to be suspicious. Zumock (The self-described "Mudshark") is notoriously untrustworthy, and is considered a lolcow even among the elderly spazzes of the Dabbleverse. And like so many other retards in that universe, he's a grown ass man who thinks pro wrestling and "kayfabe" are peak entertainment.

At his core, he's an unemployed alcoholic "comedian" attention seeker famed for (in addition to an extensive criminal record) making up stories to attack perceived enemies, and engaging in gay ops to get an extra 20 viewers to his tiny YouTube channel. He's got real peak Ralpha-male energy, streaming while blacked out and going on insane crusades against anyone who slights him, no matter how insignificantly.

He'll often just make shit up, or take something an a-log in chat says and roll with it (likely what happened here). In other words, he's a lying piece of shit.

Just because he's telling you something you want to hear about Nick (or Cumia, or Melton, or whoever), doesn't mean you should believe a word he says. Giving Zumock's claims credence, barring other evidence, just feeds into Nick's "it's all lies" coping.
 
The fact that he is in current litigation with the balldos means he would have to be absolute pants shitting retarded to be leaking information about them to a random criminal YouTuber. Use your fucking head for a second Jesus Christ.
About a sealed case involving minor children.

There are easier and less painful ways to get yourself fucked in the ass then messing with the court system you are currently already getting ass fucked by over a Revenge Porn charge by the mother of the child he would have leaked information about. If he wants the felony charge (intent to harass needs to be proven) so badly, this would be a great way to prove the malicious intent behind his actions.

I trust that Aaron punches himself in the dick, but this is too retarded to be coming even from Aaron and Keanu.
 
Zumock is the Temu MN Public Records, vagueposting to garner a reaction from Nick (with the goal of self-incrimination).

If there's any iota of truth in his 'source', it's gotta be Aaron (or Zumock's fellow Cleveland native Sean) using Chad as the retard conduit for spicy info the same way Nick and April used Keanu.
Nope. I wouldn't do that shit in a million years.

This is the first I've heard of a blood test.
 
Zumock is getting trolled, but the troll is right.

* Nick's kid tested positive at a level consistent with daily use.

We know that the test was a true positive because:

* Had there been a second test that showed negative, Nick would have released it or at least talked about it.
* If he thought the first test was a false positive, he would have had the kids grandparents re-test his children (they were the foster parents)
* If his parents refused to re-test, Nick would have had a re-test done when he got custody back. Had the daughter consumed drugs around the time of the arrest, they would have still showed up in a hair test at this point, so a negative test result at this point would at least show that she wasn't getting drugged right up until the arrest.
* He was trying to damage control the positive test before the results were even back ("Your honor - as it shows up the CPS report, the kids say if they've been exposed to drugs it must have been somewhere else! So if that drug test comes back positive uhhhh it wasn't me your honor!")

:really:

We know that Nick was the one giving the kid cocaine because:

* Nick came up with multiple contradictory explanations for the positive test (the test was a false positive [10x the cutoff btw] and also the cop wiped cocaine on the daughter's scalp [wouldn't cause a positive test]).
* Nick was trying to convince people that cocaine is a good treatment for ADHD, explaining WHY he would give his kid cocaine
* The cocaine was in a locked safe in a locked room, so the kid couldn't have gotten it herself.
* Nick accused Aaron of dosing Nick's kid through food - this basically serves as Nick's confession. He knows his daughter wasn't snorting the cocaine, but was instead being poisoned through her food and drink. Nick needs to explain how this could have happened without it being his fault, hence accusing Aaron. Also don't forget that Aaron had been out of Nick's life so long that it couldn't have been Aaron.

It's funny to me because most of the things that solidify to me that Nick was intentionally drugging his 9 year old daughter with cocaine came out as a result of him attempting to manipulate everyone and control the narrative.



Q: Why wouldn't he just say he had her re-tested and lie? The CPS case is sealed, no one would be able to fact check him
A: Nick prefers to manipulate with lies of omission, half truths, implications, etc. He will straight up lie when he has to, but his go-to is to suggest something so he can go back and say "I didn't say that" - like when he suggested the cops planted the cocaine to Chrissie Mayer, or when he suggested Aaron dosed his kid with cocaine. I've known people like Nick before and they've behaved the same way. I think they kind of see it as a game and get a dopamine rush if they can trick someone without outright lying. So he has been SUGGESTING that the test is a false positive, and SUGGESTING that the cops contaminated her hair to cause the positive, and tricking some number of people despite not actually completely facially lying.
 
Without the tests or the write up of the report containing the results of the test, it is a massive "I want to believe" stance to believe someone that got to know about Niggieta yesterday has some inside scoop about a confidential CPS report; I´m sorry for anyone giddy about it, but there is no way to believe it, specially mentioning a blood test that has a pretty short window to attest use and wasn´t made at the time of the report we got via @MNPublicRecords already verified.
 
* Nick's kid tested positive at a level consistent with daily use.
That statement is not supported by the information available to us.
All we know is that one test exceeded the range of the calibration.

This could have been an entire hair or a section for a specific period from which you could extrapolate at what time the cocaine was consumed.
I assume that the more detailed test was done, but results are sealed, and all court documents it would be discussed in are sealed as well.

The ONLY thing we know for a fact is that there was a test that showed a positive test result, no info about the time frame or frequency of use.
Anyone claiming differently is as retarded as Nick and making shit up.
 
Without the tests or the write up of the report containing the results of the test, it is a massive "I want to believe" stance to believe someone that got to know about Niggieta yesterday has some inside scoop about a confidential CPS report; I´m sorry for anyone giddy about it, but there is no way to believe it, specially mentioning a blood test that has a pretty short window to attest use and wasn´t made at the time of the report we got via @MNPublicRecords already verified.

Sorry, but are you ACTUALLY kidding?

If I was an innocent parent, particularly a parent in the public eye, in which the law and approximately +/- 100K people are paying attention...

...I would:
1) Retest my kid on my own dime. Her hair is long. This is not hard. (It's still long, btw. Pics are out there.)
2) Publicize the negative tests ON BLAST.
3) Scream to the HIGH HEAVENS that I have EVIDENCE that her hair does not show cocaine dosing.

Nick cannot do ANY of that. I wonder why.

Also, do you really think the State wouldn't have followed up on the positive test? Of course they did.

Is this an agenda against Chad? I don't even know what we're discussing.

It's obvious (to me) Nick was dosing his kid. He'd have proven otherwise by now if it was not true.
 
Last edited:
If I was an innocent parent, particularly a parent in the public eye, in which the law and approximately +/- 100K people are paying attention...

...I would:
1) Retest my kid on my own dime. Her hair is long. This is not hard. (It's still long, btw. Pics are out there.)
2) Publicize the negative tests ON BLAST.
3) Scream to the HIGH HEAVENS that I have EVIDENCE that her hair does not show cocaine dosing.

Nick cannot do ANY of that. I wonder why.

Also, do you really think the State wouldn't have followed up on the positive test? Of course they did.
Such a shame that information isn't public. I agree with you but I think we could go on for weeks and weeks speculating without ever getting real answers unfortunately.
 
That statement is not supported by the information available to us.
Bullshit. The amount was consistent with daily use. That doesn't mean it PROVES daily use. It is also consistent with a single particularly large dose, perhaps from negligent exposure. It is not consistent with incidental exposure.
 
Such a shame that information isn't public. I agree with you but I think we could go on for weeks and weeks speculating without ever getting real answers unfortunately.
Bullshit. The amount was consistent with daily use. That doesn't mean it PROVES daily use. It is also consistent with a single particularly large dose, perhaps from negligent exposure. It is not consistent with incidental exposure.
It's entirely possible we may never know with 100% certainty exactly what happened in that house, but we should all be able to agree on this:

There is zero legitimate reason his daughter should have tested positive for coke. And certainly not in the levels she did.

And no, it didn't happen because a cop patted her head
 
Keep in mind the daughter knows the truth and so do the rest of his kids. Nick may have got his kids back, but did he actually? Remember the horrific shit he's said about his wife and kids in public, and that's even before he eventually ends alone, living the Ralphamale lifestyle. He's also not going to stop and it's a matter of when he breaks his probation, not if. I give it less then a month, especially if he starts doing streams again. He'll just get so fucked up, and basically do a repeat of the Cokestream, but with whippets this time.
 
We're discussing Aaron.

If you don't think he wouldn't be "leaking information" then "use your head for a second Jesus Christ."

Also, I happen to think Aaron is a bit lovable but he IS "absolute pants shitting retarded", as is the entire Dabbleverse.

Thanks for making this post so easy by quoting you.
I think Aaron would be leaking info like a sieve. I just don't think Aaron has any credible paths to actual or truthful information about the kids. Aaron is a degenerate idiot. He is a true cow, just like all the rest. None of these people would have access to any of the child related info. EVER. It's a sealed child related court proceedings that also involves the personal medical records of minors.

Two things can be true here.
A. Nick's 8-9 yo daughter tested positive for obscene levels of cocaine metabolization. We have seen documents confirming this.

B. This new "Shocking Insider Leak" is almost certainly Ralph style made up bullshit to drive traffic to one of these retards streams. Could it be true? It's within the range of possibilities based on the test we do know about. Is it likely true? Not based on the sketchy sources.

Law Enforcement or the DA can and do leak. But not about something like this. You don't touch the kid stuff.

If the tests had come back the way this Zummock cow is claiming Nick would be facing felony child abuse charges. Any plea would have been shredded and he would be going to jail. They don't generally hand wave this sort of thing away. They don't waffle over whether they Lawtube Cocaine King shared his mountains of cocaine with his kid, if they find it in the bloodworm or urine. The Prosecutor will roll the dice on that.
 
He is a giver, He is a giver.
He fed his kids bowls of jism.
cuckieta-cooking.png
He has his kids thoroughly blackmailed. If they do not go along with his story, he will force them to eat whatever vile slop this is. Fuck, look at his threatening eyes in the third panel. Du VILL eat de JIZZUM!
 
I'll leave it there. This seems obvious to me.
Although I appreciate your contribution to the thread, @Melty Butter, one must always be responsible to keep their own confirmation bias in check.

While it may be compelling to believe in Zumock's story, the objective reality is that we have Zumock stating that someone said they know that someone else knows that Rekieta's children tested positive for cocaine in multiple tests. That is hardly credible information.

For such strong allegations, this is not enough for me to trust this information. It may be fun to speculate about this, for sure, but I wouldn't trust it per se. I don't think anyone in this thread is also saying that such a thing is impossible to have happened. People are just saying that Zumock's clips are hardly compelling evidence for this hypothesis.
 
I am not a lawyer or legal professional, but is it not an incredibly easy thing to look at Nick, who has admitted he wants to do more drugs, who (in the past) has gone to Vegas and presumably consumed alcohol and cocaine in Vegas, and say, "You are absolutely not going out of state to a place where you used the substances we're not going to allow you to use while you're on probation, you fucking retard"?

Because if I was a judge and I had a defendant plead to possession of cocaine, who has obviously abused multiple substances simultaneously, I wouldn't let him go back to a place where he has done it. It'd look like if they let him go, they were banking on his inability to control himself to fuck himself over.

Actually on second thought, I'm fully supportive of it. Let Nick felt himself again. He hasn't clinched LOTY2025 yet.

I will note he did not reveal the location. I think he is trying to get an approval before naming the location. If he is forced to do so, I wish I sould hear his spin of the trip as 'business'.

But fr, I wonder if the stupid one-space approach is partially why so many yoots can't seem to tell when to use a comma and when to use a period - they have lacked an additional visual association that would underscore the difference and reinforce when to use which. And they also don't read enough real books.

Pure speculation, but I'm equally dismayed by single-spacing and comma splices, so I've sewn them together with my theory.

I am not an enjoyer of the double-return after a full stop, but I link the decline in reading comprehension and writing skills to the removal of the Classics and Bard study in grammar classes and the discontinuation of sentence diagramming.

Robert Barnes's pet retard Viva Frei has broken out the big broom to sweep up for Barnes and Rekieta.

View attachment 6914066

Link | Archive
I legitimately want to know what Viva means by "Barnes was right"
Didn't Barnes say the warrant would be tossed out? Instead it got affirmed and Nick plead guilty

He was 'right' about the 'conspiracy' against Nick! The government HAD to convict him, and the fact they did is PROOF of the conspiracy!
 
Back