Manosphere Andrew Tate / Top G / Cobratate - Egotistical MRA "influencer", arrested for trafficking in Romania, lied about having lung cancer

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
"I didn't pay attention to Biden aside from what Xitter /pol/ rapefugees told me, so he was a dishonest president veiled in opacity"
Screen Shot 2025-01-22 at 7.38.26 PM.png
 
I notice Andy is both a product of, and takes advantage of a phenomenon I'm sure others have noticed but I call "The single mother to misogynist pipeline."

Many misogynists, especially incels on platforms like 4chan, tend to have something in common, single mothers. When they're raised alone by an unreliable welfare queen whore who trades their foodstamps for drugs, they tend to grow up thinking all women are lazy stupid whores, leading them to make observations like "My mother taught me women are lazy and useless unless they have a man to beat them." And with slut culture being so popular with feminists and marriage unpopular, there're more whore single mothers than ever. Feminism is raising misogynists.

It's sort of like that meme

Hard times make strong men
Strong men make good times
Good times make weak men
Weak men make hard times

Except in this case it's:

Traditional nuclear families raise sons who respect women
Respecting women leads to feminism
Feminism leads to single mothers
Single mothers raise misogynist sons
Misogyny leads to the tradition nuclear family

These are the cultural currents that lead to Andrew Tate
 
Feminism leads to single mothers
A better argument would be the welfare state leads to single mothers. But no, not even really that.

The #1 cause of single mothers is dudes running out on their offspring. Factually that's the only provable cause in basically 99% of them, with ancillary contributing factors like the welfare state or feminism kinda trailing around the margins.
 
A better argument would be the welfare state leads to single mothers. But no, not even really that.

The #1 cause of single mothers is dudes running out on their offspring. Factually that's the only provable cause in basically 99% of them, with ancillary contributing factors like the welfare state or feminism kinda trailing around the margins.
That still doesn’t explain the rise in single motherhood. Men obviously aren’t becoming more abusive or leaving women more (the obvious 13% exempted), and women initiate the vast majority of divorces, so there has to be more to it than just, “it’s men leaving”. Hence why people are trying to figure whether single motherhood is caused by feminism, the welfare state, a weakening social fabric, or (my personal pick) the sexual revolution.
 
That still doesn’t explain the rise in single motherhood. Men obviously aren’t becoming more abusive or leaving women more (the obvious 13% exempted), and women initiate the vast majority of divorces, so there has to be more to it than just, “it’s men leaving”. Hence why people are trying to figure whether single motherhood is caused by feminism, the welfare state, a weakening social fabric, or (my personal pick) the sexual revolution.
"Women initiate" doesn't mean anything without a lot more detailed data. It can strictly speaking be the woman who first serves papers, but by any measure that counts, the relationship was dead and buried for months by the actions of either or both parties.

And yeah, actually, men leaving is the principal problem. Perhaps with further underlying causes. But still, what are we saying? That women have become so intolerable that the only reasonable action is for a man to abandon his fucking children? Don't get me wrong, it's certainly possible.

But even if that's the case, that's certainly a more profound statement than "lol bitches be sluts".
 
A better argument would be the welfare state leads to single mothers. But no, not even really that.

The #1 cause of single mothers is dudes running out on their offspring. Factually that's the only provable cause in basically 99% of them, with ancillary contributing factors like the welfare state or feminism kinda trailing around the margins.
I agree that abolishing welfare wouldn't magically make the men stay, but I'd say it's feminism that gives these women the idea it's okay to spread your legs for 50 men before marriage and getting pregnant by 8 of them without any husband in sight!
 
I agree that abolishing welfare wouldn't magically make the men stay, but I'd say it's feminism that gives these women the idea it's okay to spread your legs for 50 men before marriage and getting pregnant by 8 of them without any husband in sight!
Why do those fifty men think it's OK to bust in a woman before marriage?

Feminism certainly doesn't help, but it's an absurdly one sided analysis for this situation.
 
I agree that abolishing welfare wouldn't magically make the men stay, but I'd say it's feminism that gives these women the idea it's okay to spread your legs for 50 men before marriage and getting pregnant by 8 of them without any husband in sight!
Nah, feminism tells women to avoid casual sex because it hurts women and serves men. This is like something Tate would say, ironically. "How DARE those feminists promote sexual freedom for women because they'll end up having tons of casual sex! Women need strong, masculine men like my War Room boys to coerce them into joyless casual sex for money they won't even see!"
 
Why do those fifty men think it's OK to bust in a woman before marriage?

Feminism certainly doesn't help, but it's an absurdly one sided analysis for this situation.
I agree it's an unfair double standard and that for pretty much all history men weren't expected to save it for marriage like women were, or even be faithful to their wives. HOWEVER the only place men could stick it, when every reputable woman demands a husband, was a literal WHORE he has to pay money, a woman of "ill-repute" and even if not a literal prostitute, being a man's "mistress" would be something shameful to hide, helping discourage any woman from ever doing it, making it much harder for men to find a woman to do it short of marriage or being a literal hooker.

Where feminism comes in is that if men whore around women should too, so every woman's a whore and there are many more times the bastards being raised by single mothers than if this were contained to one small profession on the fringes of society.

People will point out that there have always been women who get seduced and go away to the country side for nine-months before coming back with a new infant "sibling". Again, the fact they had to conceal this shows how much less acceptable, and thus less prevalent, this was in society. It certainly wasn't the norm that every High School needs a daycare for all the bastards being born left and right!

Unfair or not, this version of equality leads to more single mothers
 
A better argument would be the welfare state leads to single mothers. But no, not even really that.

The #1 cause of single mothers is dudes running out on their offspring. Factually that's the only provable cause in basically 99% of them, with ancillary contributing factors like the welfare state or feminism kinda trailing around the margins.
I was watching a video on Pruitt-Igoe, the worst housing project, a while back. Apparently, families with both fathers couldn't receive government benefits. As a result, you got a lot of single mothers living in the projects. Say what you will about welfare and government aid, but the projects were made for the demographic that uses those the most.
 
I was watching a video on Pruitt-Igoe, the worst housing project, a while back. Apparently, families with both fathers couldn't receive government benefits. As a result, you got a lot of single mothers living in the projects. Say what you will about welfare and government aid, but the projects were made for the demographic that uses those the most.
Oh administrations under Johnson absolutely denied welfare homes to families with both parents intact. It was legit harder to get help from the government when the father wanted to actually take care of his kids. It was some insidious shit.
 
Last I read, the judge released him from house arrest after like
Nope, he's still under house arrest (largely because he is under indictment for anally raping a 15 year old) and his brother is under juidicial control meaning he has to regularly report to police. Both brothers also can't legally leave Romania.
 
Nope, he's still under house arrest (largely because he is under indictment for anally raping a 15 year old) and his brother is under juidicial control meaning he has to regularly report to police. Both brothers also can't legally leave Romania.
Is there any place that they could actually escape to if they tried to leave Romania? I assume the US and UK (and anyone allied with them or Romania) would send his ass back to Romania
 
Is there any place that they could actually escape to if they tried to leave Romania?
When he tried faking lung cancer he wanted to go for "treatment" to Dubai. Which is incidentially where he was building a new compound reight before he was nailed by Romanian police. This is why he converted to Islam publically (according to defected War Room members he's not a Muslim in the slightest): He wanted to move his pimping/white slavery operation to the UAE. Two of his still loyal War Room cronies and his madams are still based there atm.
 
Back