- Joined
- Dec 17, 2017
His father was too busy being a highly educated polyglot and military man to get his son an eyepatch. SAD.That's my point. His parents could've done something about it decades ago.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His father was too busy being a highly educated polyglot and military man to get his son an eyepatch. SAD.That's my point. His parents could've done something about it decades ago.
Trump is not coming to save you, Andy. Make your peace with dying of old age in prison."I didn't pay attention to Biden aside from what Xitter /pol/ rapefugees told me, so he was a dishonest president veiled in opacity"
View attachment 6892726
Tate is correct. Though it’s not going to save him from getting assraped by slavs in a Romanian prison (they like cute little twinks like him)."I didn't pay attention to Biden aside from what Xitter /pol/ rapefugees told me, so he was a dishonest president veiled in opacity"
View attachment 6892726
A better argument would be the welfare state leads to single mothers. But no, not even really that.Feminism leads to single mothers
That still doesn’t explain the rise in single motherhood. Men obviously aren’t becoming more abusive or leaving women more (the obvious 13% exempted), and women initiate the vast majority of divorces, so there has to be more to it than just, “it’s men leaving”. Hence why people are trying to figure whether single motherhood is caused by feminism, the welfare state, a weakening social fabric, or (my personal pick) the sexual revolution.A better argument would be the welfare state leads to single mothers. But no, not even really that.
The #1 cause of single mothers is dudes running out on their offspring. Factually that's the only provable cause in basically 99% of them, with ancillary contributing factors like the welfare state or feminism kinda trailing around the margins.
"Women initiate" doesn't mean anything without a lot more detailed data. It can strictly speaking be the woman who first serves papers, but by any measure that counts, the relationship was dead and buried for months by the actions of either or both parties.That still doesn’t explain the rise in single motherhood. Men obviously aren’t becoming more abusive or leaving women more (the obvious 13% exempted), and women initiate the vast majority of divorces, so there has to be more to it than just, “it’s men leaving”. Hence why people are trying to figure whether single motherhood is caused by feminism, the welfare state, a weakening social fabric, or (my personal pick) the sexual revolution.
I agree that abolishing welfare wouldn't magically make the men stay, but I'd say it's feminism that gives these women the idea it's okay to spread your legs for 50 men before marriage and getting pregnant by 8 of them without any husband in sight!A better argument would be the welfare state leads to single mothers. But no, not even really that.
The #1 cause of single mothers is dudes running out on their offspring. Factually that's the only provable cause in basically 99% of them, with ancillary contributing factors like the welfare state or feminism kinda trailing around the margins.
Why do those fifty men think it's OK to bust in a woman before marriage?I agree that abolishing welfare wouldn't magically make the men stay, but I'd say it's feminism that gives these women the idea it's okay to spread your legs for 50 men before marriage and getting pregnant by 8 of them without any husband in sight!
Nah, feminism tells women to avoid casual sex because it hurts women and serves men. This is like something Tate would say, ironically. "How DARE those feminists promote sexual freedom for women because they'll end up having tons of casual sex! Women need strong, masculine men like my War Room boys to coerce them into joyless casual sex for money they won't even see!"I agree that abolishing welfare wouldn't magically make the men stay, but I'd say it's feminism that gives these women the idea it's okay to spread your legs for 50 men before marriage and getting pregnant by 8 of them without any husband in sight!
I agree it's an unfair double standard and that for pretty much all history men weren't expected to save it for marriage like women were, or even be faithful to their wives. HOWEVER the only place men could stick it, when every reputable woman demands a husband, was a literal WHORE he has to pay money, a woman of "ill-repute" and even if not a literal prostitute, being a man's "mistress" would be something shameful to hide, helping discourage any woman from ever doing it, making it much harder for men to find a woman to do it short of marriage or being a literal hooker.Why do those fifty men think it's OK to bust in a woman before marriage?
Feminism certainly doesn't help, but it's an absurdly one sided analysis for this situation.
What is even going on with his case? Last I read, the judge released him from house arrest after like…. What? 1 1/2 years? Are they ever going to move forward or dismiss?Trump is not coming to save you, Andy. Make your peace with dying of old age in prison.
I was watching a video on Pruitt-Igoe, the worst housing project, a while back. Apparently, families with both fathers couldn't receive government benefits. As a result, you got a lot of single mothers living in the projects. Say what you will about welfare and government aid, but the projects were made for the demographic that uses those the most.A better argument would be the welfare state leads to single mothers. But no, not even really that.
The #1 cause of single mothers is dudes running out on their offspring. Factually that's the only provable cause in basically 99% of them, with ancillary contributing factors like the welfare state or feminism kinda trailing around the margins.
Oh administrations under Johnson absolutely denied welfare homes to families with both parents intact. It was legit harder to get help from the government when the father wanted to actually take care of his kids. It was some insidious shit.I was watching a video on Pruitt-Igoe, the worst housing project, a while back. Apparently, families with both fathers couldn't receive government benefits. As a result, you got a lot of single mothers living in the projects. Say what you will about welfare and government aid, but the projects were made for the demographic that uses those the most.
Nope, he's still under house arrest (largely because he is under indictment for anally raping a 15 year old) and his brother is under juidicial control meaning he has to regularly report to police. Both brothers also can't legally leave Romania.Last I read, the judge released him from house arrest after like
Is there any place that they could actually escape to if they tried to leave Romania? I assume the US and UK (and anyone allied with them or Romania) would send his ass back to RomaniaNope, he's still under house arrest (largely because he is under indictment for anally raping a 15 year old) and his brother is under juidicial control meaning he has to regularly report to police. Both brothers also can't legally leave Romania.
When he tried faking lung cancer he wanted to go for "treatment" to Dubai. Which is incidentially where he was building a new compound reight before he was nailed by Romanian police. This is why he converted to Islam publically (according to defected War Room members he's not a Muslim in the slightest): He wanted to move his pimping/white slavery operation to the UAE. Two of his still loyal War Room cronies and his madams are still based there atm.Is there any place that they could actually escape to if they tried to leave Romania?