- Lift 50 lbs
- Walk 1 mile unassisted
- Get off the floor from a seated position without assistance
It's so reasonable to expect someone to immediately step down if he cannot do all three. If you can no longer do these things, it's time to shift your focus to philosophy, religion, spirituality, or all three. Clinging to worldly power and wealth will just make you and everyone around you miserable.
"But then the elderly won't be representeeeeed!"
Am I crazy or is representation one of the most damaging concepts of recent decades? No, we don't need fat representation, disabled representation, drug addict representation, or weak and frail elderly in power. They don't need it either, they need strong leaders who will care for their needs and improve their lives where possible.
It's awesome seeing smug spics getting their comeuppance.

This is a bit much, even for the Biden administration to allow. I guess they really did just give foreign invaders complete free reign for four years. I actually shudder to think what will happen if the pendulum swings back again and the Dems retake power. Just abolish the Democrats already, and make the other party the Libertardians. Let's get RETARDED!
If someone ever tries to use that question as a gotcha, I suggest asking them this hypothetical.
Let's say there's a brain surgeon, and he's the only one in the world that can do a very specific operation that can save people with a certain type of brain cancer. It takes him 2 hours per surgery. So with a normal 40 hour work week he could save ~20 people. Unfortunately, there are hundreds of people who need this surgery per week, or else they'll die. How many hours should the surgeon work?
I gotta say, I do not like your hypothetical because it is like a management game with a fixed outcome: you can't save everyone (I like that game, it's called Frostpunk, it's very good). The Healthcare as a Right Retards want the system to be so well-staffed and well-funded, that no one needs to go bankrupt as the result of an illness. It is feasible, but it's a goal that needs to be accomplished with precision, cooperation, care, and minimizing the number of cheap, underqualified Pajeet doctors.
The "healthcare as a human right" argument was ended ages ago by people pointing out that you don't have a right to someone else's labor.
I think the healthcare, housing, food, "as a right" rhetoric is a bold attempt to play on the heartstrings of young people who have no concept of hardship. It works on them because they would hate the uncertainty of losing their healthcare, and so therefore it would be unsympathetic of them to be indifferent to others losing their healthcare.