"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

[FamicomGorby]

Quick Null, add this to the show before it’s too late

U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE PUBLISHED THEIR STANCE ON AI

View attachment 6925421

52 pages, so here’s a quick TL;DR

The U.S. Copyright Office finally published their stance in AI.

It’s 52 pages long but here’s the tl;dr:

• The human authorship requirement a mandatory principle of copyright law. Solely AI-generated content without m human input is not copyrightable.
• AI-generated works may qualify for copyright if human contributions are substantial, such as modifications, expressive inputs, or structured arrangements.
• Prompts alone do not establish authorship since as they function as instructions rather than creative expression. Similarly, prompts cannot be copyrighted.
• Copyright law does not need to be updated to address AI.
• The use of AI as a tool to assist human creativity for editing, brainstorming, or arrangement does not affect copyrightability. Meaning you can use AI in your work and still copyright it

Probably will put a dent in using AI to replace creative roles. Like Hollywood can get an AI to make a generic movie script, like they probably have been doing, but they can't copyright that script unless they pay some union bozo to make transformative changes.

 

[Null]

If anyone asks, yes YouTube channels are allowed to monetize my streams as they see fit, I do not care.

Wait... Copyright being BASED? You can use AI in your shit now??? Art bros fucking mad.

They're saying AI generated content is public domain, similar to when an animal creates something. For it to hold copyright, it must be remixed by a human. It is a good finding.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Quick Null, add this to the show before it’s too late

U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE PUBLISHED THEIR STANCE ON AI

View attachment 6925421

52 pages, so here’s a quick TL;DR

The U.S. Copyright Office finally published their stance in AI.

It’s 52 pages long but here’s the tl;dr:

• The human authorship requirement a mandatory principle of copyright law. Solely AI-generated content without m human input is not copyrightable.
• AI-generated works may qualify for copyright if human contributions are substantial, such as modifications, expressive inputs, or structured arrangements.
• Prompts alone do not establish authorship since as they function as instructions rather than creative expression. Similarly, prompts cannot be copyrighted.
• Copyright law does not need to be updated to address AI.
• The use of AI as a tool to assist human creativity for editing, brainstorming, or arrangement does not affect copyrightability. Meaning you can use AI in your work and still copyright it

Obligatory Abolish Copyright. #CopyrightKills

 

[Castoreum]

Quick Null, add this to the show before it’s too late

U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE PUBLISHED THEIR STANCE ON AI

View attachment 6925421

52 pages, so here’s a quick TL;DR

The U.S. Copyright Office finally published their stance in AI.

It’s 52 pages long but here’s the tl;dr:

• The human authorship requirement a mandatory principle of copyright law. Solely AI-generated content without m human input is not copyrightable.
• AI-generated works may qualify for copyright if human contributions are substantial, such as modifications, expressive inputs, or structured arrangements.
• Prompts alone do not establish authorship since as they function as instructions rather than creative expression. Similarly, prompts cannot be copyrighted.
• Copyright law does not need to be updated to address AI.
• The use of AI as a tool to assist human creativity for editing, brainstorming, or arrangement does not affect copyrightability. Meaning you can use AI in your work and still copyright it

Is there any statement in those 52 pages about models using copyrighted material for training?

 

[mindlessobserver]

Quick Null, add this to the show before it’s too late

U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE PUBLISHED THEIR STANCE ON AI

View attachment 6925421

52 pages, so here’s a quick TL;DR

The U.S. Copyright Office finally published their stance in AI.

It’s 52 pages long but here’s the tl;dr:

• The human authorship requirement a mandatory principle of copyright law. Solely AI-generated content without m human input is not copyrightable.
• AI-generated works may qualify for copyright if human contributions are substantial, such as modifications, expressive inputs, or structured arrangements.
• Prompts alone do not establish authorship since as they function as instructions rather than creative expression. Similarly, prompts cannot be copyrighted.
• Copyright law does not need to be updated to address AI.
• The use of AI as a tool to assist human creativity for editing, brainstorming, or arrangement does not affect copyrightability. Meaning you can use AI in your work and still copyright it

I sensed a great disturbance in the force. As if thousands of lawyers cried out in ecstasy at the thought of all the billable hours they are going to make litigating every paragraph of this.

 

[lIllllIiiiiLLLLiiiiIIIIll]

Not finding a livestream on rumble yet? If it's delayed and I just didn't see, I'ma gonna sperg so hard.

 

[Happy Camper]

Not finding a livestream on rumble yet? If it's delayed and I just didn't see, I'ma gonna sperg so hard.

I was wondering the same same thing. I looked through the last few pages but didn't see anything about a cancelation. There may be statements about it further back relating to the poll, so sorry that I can't give you a better answer. Not seeing a listing on Odysee or Kick either, by the way.

 

[Pierre D'Olnique]

Not finding a livestream on rumble yet? If it's delayed and I just didn't see, I'ma gonna sperg so hard.

I was wondering the same same thing. I looked through the last few pages but didn't see anything about a cancelation. There may be statements about it further back relating to the poll, so sorry that I can't give you a better answer. Not seeing a listing on Odysee or Kick either, by the way.

Blind niggas. Highlights exist for a reason.

Which is to say, 7 hours from now.

 

[Happy Camper]

Blind niggas. Highlights exist for a reason.
View attachment 6925729
Which is to say, 7 hours from now.

Thanks a lot buddy! Missed that! Cheers!

 

[Atlas Sneezed]

Goddamit Jersch, the one evening in the year where the kids are away and I have time to listen to the stream interruption free and live, you decide to stream during the middle of the night. Thanks for nothing

 

[GenociderSyo]

On the telegram it states the stream is going to be at 7pm EST/1AM EU Central

 

[DavidS877]

Not finding a livestream on rumble yet? If it's delayed and I just didn't see, I'ma gonna sperg so hard.

I was wondering the same same thing. I looked through the last few pages but didn't see anything about a cancelation. There may be statements about it further back relating to the poll, so sorry that I can't give you a better answer. Not seeing a listing on Odysee or Kick either, by the way.

Delayed due to Josh having an "appointment", likely his gender transition consult.
7PM US/Eastern

 

[turditup]

when Josh is like "no stream next week/month, because such and such" i'm fine, i can live

When a stream is late i'm fuckin jonesin' tho

 

[shebangbinsh]

On the telegram it states the stream is going to be at 7pm EST/1AM EU Central

Is the telegram archive is lagging behind? I don't see the announcement listed there.

 

[GenociderSyo]

Is the telegram archive is lagging behind? I don't see the announcement listed there.

Might be it was posted yesterday at 9:30am EST.

 

[DavidS877]

Is the telegram archive is lagging behind? I don't see the announcement listed there.

No, it's only KiwiFarms messages, not MadAtTheInternet(@mationair) messages.

You can read mationair without an account though:

Mad at the Internet 🎙

Mad at the Internet on Telegram

t.me

Click "Preview channel" if it doesn't show.

 

[Desktop User2]

So, the moment he went back to Muttland, he dropped to one stream per week and started to be 7h late like a lazy nigger? Holy shit, the muttfication in America is inescapable...

 

[Blackstar]

 

[TETRABAX]

When India and Pakistan go to war, it's the rest of the world that wins

 

[( ◠‿◠ )]

I thought I was being really clear. Wishing death on somebody makes you worse than the person you're wishing death upon absolutely.

This is late, but that is incredibly stupid. It doesn't just happen to be false. It's clear that you haven't even really understood what you're saying.

If two people wish death on each other then according to you they would each be worse than the other.
But that means they each would be worse than themselves.
To spell it out more clearly, person A is worse than person B who is worse than person A, which means that person A is worse than himself.