Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.4%

  • Total voters
    464
Screenshot 2025-02-04 002301.png
 

Attachments

What fucking merits Russell, you have already admitted you have no merits or evidence of copyright infringement.

Also "I said they might testify, but I only wanted to list them so I could call them to testify, except they won't, and we said I wouldn't call them."
Screenshot_20250203-153110.png
 
As stated to Mr. Hardin, Steve was a college advisor/friend. Greer had known Steve since 2010. Steve managed a cafe at the Ensign College in Salt Lake City. Around 2021, Steve said he would be a witness if this case went to trial, while this case was pending in this Court before being dismissed. Just a casual, “sure,” he would do it kind of thing. Steve and Greer later had a falling out that same year over completely unrelated reasons. Contrary to how defendants were trying to portray the events, it wasn’t “they talked about kiwi farms and then fell out.” Plaintiff never said that. No, both instances were separated by months
Since Greer has learned Steve died, it makes sense why Steve never replied. Because he is deceased. Although Greer has lost texts with Steve talking about kiwi farms, attached is evidence that Steve and Greer did indeed talk. EXHIBIT B. The attached picture was from 2015. EXHIBIT C. It’s of Greer holding a poster trying to get Taylor Swift to meet him. Who took the picture? Steve Taylor. It was taken inside of the Carriage/BC Café. Greer gave Steve the nickname “Uncle Steve” because although they were not related, Greer confided in Steve about a lot. They indeed had long conversations regarding the kiwi farms.

I am on page 4 and already pissing myself.

It's impressive how much bullshit he can spew to demonstrate absolutely nothing. It's so bad, it's actually funny to think this dude has a "legal" background.
 
This could be further from the truth.
:story:

The adjective “eager” was miswritten and misinterpreted broadly and Greer meant that primarily with Scott, who ended up being pressured by family me to not testify.
:story:

Greer has since learned why he could never reach Steve — Steve is dead.
It is insulting that defendants are now dragging up the memory of a dead friend to Greer.
:story:

And plaintiff will once again reiterate: yes, all three witnesses said between 2021 and 2023 that they would testify. However, as this court understands, humans are fickle.
It's generally courteous to give somebody the heads up shortly before you namedrop them in a legal document that's about to get them subpoena'd. :story:
 
Confirmed Greer only learned Steve Taylor is dead from this thread
1738622368325.png

As a particular shitposter once said... glad I could help.

Can we bill our time doing research for Greer? Not as individual users, but collectively as Kiwi Farms, a website.

Edit: the absolute FUCKING nerve of this line.

This was also the first mention from defendants, in the 2-7 months defendants have been litigating this case
 
Confirmed Greer only learned Steve Taylor is dead from this thread

Yup. Good job, Kiwis.

It's generally courteous to give somebody the heads up shortly before you namedrop them in a legal document that's about to get them subpoena'd. :story:

And yet, I'm betting that the judge will fall for it, yet again. (But as I said previously, I thought this move of Hardin's was ill-advised or at least premature.)
 
The proof that they talked are just screenshot of emails he sent the dude. They don't appear to show a reply chain either.
The exhibits are the best bit!
  • An obituary of his dear friend Steve, who he only learned died literal days ago by accident
  • Him giving the heads up to uncle Steve how he plans to gloss over harassing Erika
  • His "acting resume"
  • The love quest sign for Taylor flanked by his ugly mug
I don't know why he thinks he needs to prove he was ever in contact with Steve. Nigga, you just need to demonstrate that you listed him as a witness based on information that a reasonable person would rely on. Instead you fell out of communication long enough for him to die and then just named him as a witness anyway based on him saying "yeah, whatever man" 4 years ago lmao. :story:
 
It's generally courteous to give somebody the heads up shortly before you namedrop them in a legal document that's about to get them subpoena'd. :story:
No, you should definitely list people as witnesses in your case who you haven't even talked to since they were GODDAMN DEAD FOR ALMOST A YEAR, and you should definitely list your family as witnesses, without telling them that you're doing it, because they'll surely give great testimony in your plightsuit even though they banned you from a wedding because of plightsperging.
 
Back