Payroll glowed so bright they couldn't see who was in there. Not their fault
It would be for the men too though. Better to go for judicial execution by the state.
How does Trump go forward after this, what's the next step of this plan if he wants to retry or reinstate it.
And here I thought it'd be cruel and unusual to lock a woman in a cage with a rapist. Hopefully SCOTUS takes a look at this.
Appeal. Alternatively, he can bring back the age old tradition of impeaching federal judges.
It gets appealed upwards until it hits the Supreme Court and they have to review precedent of what is considered cruel and unusual
Moral and morale are two completely different things. Look into it.
What I love about the join date feature is how much info it can give you about the poster.
No sweaty, because men are all rapists who will rape women; but transwomen are true and honest women who wouldn't do that (ignore their rape convictions, pls)
Just confirmation of what we already knew, but couldn't prove beyond reasonable doubt. This is probably a result of Obama gutting the Smith-Mundt Act.
Preliminary Injunction? Yes, but one of the requirements to grant it is signing off that you think you're going to give them the case, i.e. that "the movant is likely to succeed on the merits". Besides, while Trump's order is stopped, men can be placed in women's prisons, so even as a PI, it's doubly bad.
Likely doesn’t mean definitely. But yeah. Tbh I expected the PI and it was already posted in another thread. God willing, the administration either wins in court or appeals and wins.
Absolutely. Women shouldn’t be raped in prison and we don’t want prison to be a birthing center
SCOTUS has a soft spot for Government seeking review, and a bigger one for Trump. They'll take it up, if the appellate court does not slap this down
True. But there is ongoing harm while that gets hashed out, which can take years.
Can they at least just be put in cells alongside women who have killed their own children? I wouldn't mind that, in theory.
that would just give the troons more women to rape and the baby killers babies to kill
True, but I'm just joking mostly that women who kill kids deserve rape.
Treating a man as a man is "cruel and unusual punishment"? There's so many radical, unproven, unprecedented assumptions implied here, I don't know how anyone rules this without signing it in crayon.
