US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Woah! Null needs me? Okay, I'll do it. I'm going to bat for you, Null! I got your ba--

wait this requires me to visit reddit, maybe even make an account. Sorry bro, I don't want to risk my soul.
no account needed to lurk and screengrab. I understand it takes a special kind of autistic but I like wading in the cesspit, makes me feel better about myself I guess
 
I think he's had trusted(really trusted since there were no leaks) people digging deep into the government's paperwork, tracking things down. He likely only could get so far, hence needing DOGE to fully expose things, but he got a good idea of how fucked things are.
don't forget he was running in a real-estate business in fucking new york in the 70's.
not only is he more clued in into business dealings than your average DC swamp creature, he has probably seen the worst of it.

The main fly in the soup here, and this is my research into the topic coming in, is it will be impossible to pacify Gaza without significant troop deployments. The way you defeat insurgencies is coverage. If you have 50 insurgents operating in a square mile radius, you want a whole battalion there. This huge amount of coverage denies insurgent operational capabilities - there's literally no way for them to do anything because there are soldiers everywhere. Gaza is 141 square miles. That's a fuckton of soldiers and you also need to get in there and fight the insurgents, which is bloody and risky business. No one wants high casualty counts, but that's exactly what you're going to get.
one thing that was talked about back in october was that not every palestinian is hamas.
otoh every population deserves it's government. but if you could remove or neuter the radical elements, the rest would probably be happy not to live in a bombed out hut without running water.

I assume it has been tried before, so who knows if that's even a possibility anymore.
 
I wish I had the picture of SpongeBob wiping his brow on hand. Fuckin' A.
one thing that was talked about back in october was that not every palestinian is hamas.
otoh every population deserves it's government. but if you could remove or neuter the radical elements, the rest would probably be happy not to live in a bombed out hut without running water.

I assume it has been tried before, so who knows if that's even a possibility anymore.
Arab countries are probably happy to let the US handle it so they can reap the benefits of a stable region. Most of the instability in the region originates in Palestine, usually with funding, training, supplies, and direction from Iran. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar all know they can't sell oil forever and King Salman especially wants his country to survive when the wells run dry.
 
don't forget he was running in a real-estate business in fucking new york in the 70's.
not only is he more clued in into business dealings than your average DC swamp creature, he has probably seen the worst of it.
Yeah, but this fucked Trump in his first term. Trump assumed that once the deal goes through that every one benefits from it would be honored. He didn't understand how the backstabbing and ideology is more important in DC.

But he does now.
 
I assume it has been tried before, so who knows if that's even a possibility anymore.
Maybe someone proposed it at some point but who knows considering how many times someone has tried to solve the Palestine-Israel conflict.

If someone tries that and it fails just add it to the list:
 
Yeah, but this fucked Trump in his first term. Trump assumed that once the deal goes through that every one benefits from it would be honored. He didn't understand how the backstabbing and ideology is more important in DC.

But he does now.
And by God is he not holding back. I was honestly skeptical about Trump's 2nd term and how this will all turn out. But there's no denying it: He's pulling no punches. I think what truly held him back was his inexperience with the government on top of what you've said.
 
View attachment 6945238

Cory booker is about to burst a blood vessel

my favorite part watching all this right now is how disconnected all their messaging is, each speaker has a slightly different thing to say and its hard to understand what their cohesive message is other than "this sucks"
It’s funny how artificial globo homo is. Turns out all we had to do was flip the switch on funding.
 
Last edited:
I know everyone is all busy with the winning and what not but Judicial Watch is not giving up on the Fanni Willis/Jack Smith documents.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/jack-smiths-fani-willis-comms/

Recent a Washington district judge ruled that because the case was now closed that Fanni Willis's DA office was no longer responsible to FOIA requests and thus she does not have to turn anything over to the watch dog. The reasons listed were frankly insane but a Washington Judge running cover for the Dems is hardly surprising.

This lasted for all of a week when a Federal Judge went DaFuq? And issued this ruling;

Since DOJ filed its motion for summary judgment and supporting Declaration in March 2024, the Special Counsel’s criminal enforcement actions have been terminated…. The cases are “closed—not pending or contemplated—and therefore are not proceedings with which disclosure may interfere.” … Thus, the agency’s sole justification for invoking the Glomar doctrine under Exemption 7(A) is no longer applicable.

Accordingly, the Court will deny DOJ’s motion for summary judgment and grant the plaintiff’s cross motion. DOJ is directed to process the plaintiff’s FOIA request and either “disclose any [responsive] records or establish both that their contents are exempt from disclosure and that such exemption has not also been waived.”

TLDR: The Federal judge said WTF are you smoking, closing a case in no way makes it immune to a FOIA request and ordered Fanni to disclose the documents by a set date.

Things get more interesting as the DoJ has now stepped in and ordered that the names of people involved in these document be redacted to which the judge has not yet replied. As redacting that information would make the documents pretty useless. Which I personally would guess is the whole point. Even now member of the DoJ are trying to hide the extent of the co-ordination of the Trump prosecutions.

That's gota be the reason Fanni and her sympathizers are fighting so hard to keep any records out of public hands. What ever she and Jack Smith talked about with the Biden Whitehouse has got to be very damning for them to put out all this effort as this is not without risk with a Trump GA coming in any day now who could very well start his own investigation into it.

Hopefully JW gets these docs and we can see exactly how much the Biden Admin was involved in pushing for Trump's prosecution.
 
A fair amount of federal property may be sold off in the near future.

Donald Trump to Sell Off Half of All Federal Property: What to Know

The General Services Administration (GSA) reportedly sent out notice on Tuesday that it plans to sell half of the federal property it manages—a move that appears to contradict Donald Trump's and Elon Musk's plans to get federal employees to return to in-person work in the office.

Why It Matters​

Trump is pushing to drastically shrink the size of the federal government, signing an executive order that imposed a 90-day hiring freeze on federal agencies—with the exception of military personnel of the armed forces or roles linked to immigration enforcement, national security and public safety—and offering incentives to federal workers to quit their jobs.

In an email sent to federal workers late last month, the Trump administration asked almost all government employees to decide by February 6 whether they want to resign and receive payment for eight months. The move was strongly condemned by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), who said it created "chaos for the Americans who depend on a functioning federal government."

GSA regional managers last week received messages from the agency's headquarters in Washington directing them to terminate the leases on all of the roughly 7,500 federal offices across the country, the Associated Press reported.

The ultimate goal of these moves is to save money for the federal government; senior Trump officials reportedly told the media that downsizing the federal workforce could save up to $100 billion.

What to Know​

In a message shared on social media by journalist Lisa Desjardins, GSA's Public Buildings Service (PBS) Commissioner Michael Peters informed the agency's employees that a recent analysis revealed "a gross excess of space" in PBS' portfolio "as well as substantial levels of deferred maintenance."

The combination of these two factors, Peters said, has resulted in "excess spending" and "suboptimal working conditions for the federal workforce at many locations."

The solution to these problems, the commissioner said, is to reduce non-DoD federal building space by "at least 50 percent." This reduction will come from "more efficient space utilization, as well as an overall downsizing of the federal workforce," Peters wrote. "In addition, by transitioning from an agency-centric model of space utilization to a 'whole government' approach that assesses requirements and availability across agencies, we expect to further consolidate and reduce space, as well as downsize the associated support staff and other PBS resources," he added.

According to the GSA website, PBS currently owns or leases an inventory of more than 8,800 assets, maintains more than 370 million square feet of workspace for 1.1 million federal employees, and preserves more than 500 historic properties.

The reduction in federal property seems to contradict Trump's recent order for federal employees to quit remote work and return to the office "as soon as practicable." On January 20, the president issued a memo asking heads of all departments and agencies in the executive branches of the government to "take all necessary steps to terminate remote work arrangements and require employees to return to work in-person at their respective duty stations on a full-time basis."

While the GSA's plans to sell off half of its federal property is likely to leave federal employees wondering whether they'll have a workplace to go back to in the first place, the move seems to fit in with Trump's plan for a reduced federal workforce.

What People Are Saying​

A former GSA official told the Federal News Network on condition of anonymity: "It is a prerogative of the president to set the budgets, to make sure that the government is functioning in a reflection of the way they want. I'm not trying to take that away from the administration. But to come in and just do mass layoffs and without really understanding the potential consequences — there's mission-critical infrastructure run out of GSA."

Heather Long, an economic columnist at the Washington Post, wrote on X: "This is so short-sighted. The GSA oversees federal buildings and office leases. If the US gov't dumps half of its real estate portfolio overnight, that would [be] a fire sale. Keep in mind the GSA has been steadily reducing the US gov't office footprint since 2013. GSA shrank its office space footprint by 43% from 2013 to 2023. More reductions are in the works, but you want this to be a GRADUAL process. Otherwise taxpayers won't get a good deal."

The Department of Government Efficiency wrote on X on Tuesday: "Today: - 12 consulting contract terminations (in GSA and the Dept. of Education) for a total savings of ~$30mm, including a $23mm work order for 'digital modernization Program Management Office support'; -12 underutilized lease cancellations for an annual savings of ~$3mm."

What's Next​

While admitting that there's no fully formed plans for how to shrink the federal property portfolio, Peters said that it's clear that the GSA "is going to be a substantially smaller organization in the future."

The commissioner offered no details on a timeline for the downsizing, but the Federal News Network reported that employees have been told a non-voluntary Reduction in Force (RIF) is expected shortly after Thursday.

Article Link
 
View attachment 6945592
TEMPORARY. AS IN, NOT FOREVER. DOOMER/MIGA FAGGOTS BTFO ONCE AGAIN. BURGER SUIT BUSINESS BOOMING
So the proposition is: the Palestinians will be temporarily warehoused in neighboring Arab countries while the United States sends an army of contractors over to reconstruct the smoking ruins of Gaza so that they can then move all the Palestinians back in. It will be so nice after its rebuilt that the Palestinians will stop being violent, and the Jews will also stop antagonizing them because the US is going to make Israel pay for it so they'd just be blowing up their own money. Military deployment is off the table, this is a JFK style peace mission.

Its less crazy than it sounded when he announced it, but its still pretty crazy. If it were to be enacted as proposed I almost like it, because it is reminiscent of the vast projects like the Panama Canal that America was doing during its heyday. The things I don't like about it are as follows:
-It requires an enormous amount of political capital to get every involved party to agree to this and hold up their ends. That is a lot of points of failure, and any of them failing puts the entire thing in jeopardy. For example, if Israel refuses to pay for it, who will? It will be hard to pull off.
-Even if everything went as planned, I don't think it would stop the Israelis and Palestinians from fighting each other because their blood feud is generations deep and the wounds of Oct. 7 and Israel's reaction will be fresh for decades.
-I also am not convinced giving the Palestinians a brand new country wouldn't end with them ultimately running it into the ground. I guess giving them a chance to not do that is admirable, as long as we don't have to pay for it.

Ultimately, it this entire scheme seems to hinge on raising the quality of life for the Palestinians in order to kill their support for Iran's proxies. By doing the work ourselves, we avoid handing the money and resources over to said proxies who would otherwise hoard them and keep the quality of life low. And the fallout of harming Americans with Trump in office should keep everyone involved on their best behavior. I can at least see the logic to it now.
 
Back