Kingdom Come Deliverance - Or how I stopped worrying about SJW and love Bohemia | Now with betrayal and a lot more niggers. "Historically accurate." BlackRock ruined the series.

View attachment 6953601
around the $40 million mark for developmental costs, not sure how much they spent in marketing though but if what Vavra said is true (lol) then it couldn't have been more than a few million at most if they're already net positive after Steam takes 30%.

i don't trust Vavra, i feel he's the kind of person to fudge the numbers because he doesn't want people to bully him on Twitter over the game not making money.
Wasn't 40 million the budget for the first game? I don't really buy it.
 
1 million sales is like 45 mil in cash after platform cuts and regional pricing. I personally do find 40 mil a bit low for like a decade of dev time. The game will not lose money by the looks of it. What remains to be seen is if the game will sell enough to allow Vavra to become real AAA dev like CBT Projekt Red.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Halmaz
It doesn't matter if the game breaks even, they're owned by Embracer now. They want this game to go mainstream, so if they want a sequel they are going to have to do A LOT better than that. The game isn't setting anyone's world on fire, just like with triple AAA trash the only ones who like it are the truest of believers and game journos. You can say the same about Dragon Age: Veilguard and look what happened to the devs afterwards.

Embracer will need a lot more proof this has legs as a franchise before they give Warhorse a bigger budget, all I am seeing is a retard that is actively losing them money with every tweet and sinking the brand to the bottom of the ocean.

So what does happen in the game? It's hard to understand what's exaggeration and what's actual things that happen.

I know the Muslim scholar is there and absolutely retarded (especially nowadays that Muslims are outright hateful of Jews, instead of covering it up under Zionism).

There's trannies apperantly?

Heroes being depowered for the start of the game is standard for a sequel, question if they are shamed for being white males?

Also is the Hans romance the kind that just talking to him automatically or at least something you need to actually trigger willingly?

Also there are Jews but besides not being able to kill them I haven't heard on some particular stupid thing they involve?
There is no trannies but there is a noble with a penis and a vagina. All the biggest whores in Bohemia are disgusted by him and won't be paid any amount of money to go back servicing him(lies, you have white women today being paid to go to middle eastern countries to quite literally be shat on by billionaires there. Yokel women from some shithole in a middle of nowhere would do anything for that kind of money too). Very funny, typical female writing.

There is a three hour tutorial that has Henry and Hans be humiliated every step of the way there, and ends with Henry starting out in a town that hates him with no skills and no money. The entire game is a humiliation ritual, at a certain point Henry has to eat corpses for a jew so he can tell if these are the right kind for his jewish cabal golem ritual, I am not even making this up. Speaking of jews, they're not supposed to be there since this is an imaginary village, there is a synagogue that wouldn't be build for hundreds of years, and there is an imaginary pogrom that didn't actually happen because Vavra is a jew and he needs goyim to feel bad for the chosen people. BTW Henry's half brother is also jewish and you can fuck him in the ass, yes there is more than one gay sex scene in this game. The third one is with a gay prostitute that just flat out asks you in a pub if you want a fuck, something you would get burned at a stake for at this point in time.
 
There's trannies apperantly?
One minor NPC mentions that someone she knew was a hermaphrodite. They do no appear in game, but it's a good meme screenshot.
Heroes being depowered for the start of the game is standard for a sequel, question if they are shamed for being white males?
Henry and his buttboy Hans are ambushed at the start of the game and lose all their equipment. Henry falls off a cliff and catches an arrow to his knee as well. They recuperate at a tavern and Hans spergs out at peasants because he's a noble. The same peasants beat them and the town guards put both Henry and Hans into the pillory. The villagers proceed to throw rotten vegetables at them. Hans get pissed afterwards and Henry is left without money, skills or a companion.
Also is the Hans romance the kind that just talking to him automatically or at least something you need to actually trigger willingly?
There are several dialogue checks with a literal heart next to them that only a /v/ or Kiwi Farms user would click. As such, it is a mandatory romance scene for anyone in this thread and the gays are literally raping them through the screen.
Also there are Jews but besides not being able to kill them I haven't heard on some particular stupid thing they involve?
Yes and that's a good thing.
 
Depends on the century and culture. This topic was discussed as early as 7th century and at times. Sometimes it was not forbidden, sometimes it was. The topic of Masturbation was never discussed in Quran so at this point you can only rely on logic and principles. this is why it was discussed. Both Hanbal and Hanifa allowed it only if it was to prevent adultary or other sexual deviancies. Others regarded it as directly sinful. Even if the dominant belief at a specific century disallowed it, as far as i know no one was, or can be punished for it. You can at most condemn them. ame with Christianity, where the church fathers believed it was sinful, but there was no punishment.
That's why you have the hadiths and shit to manipulate it however you want.
The islamic world is very well known for its porn consumption and even if some governments take a hard stance, that shit ain't working on the common village imam terroritory level.
This is plain wrong. The interpretations are as old as Islam. Because Qoran is a limited book. Never talk about everything. The notion that it cannot have multiple interpretation is only in some traditions. Kalam schools were always there. Sİmilar to other religions. There is no verse for Cloning in the tastement so you must interpate it. Only Protestant chuch is advocates for only reading bible and only using bible as "intended". the need for interpretation is required, and allowed because of variety of reasons.
It's plain right. You're conflating the ideal with reality. The koran is specifically pushed as a clear book understandable by anyone. Bar that you have to know arabic. Bar that the koran's arabic is shit. Bar that there are many versions of the koran. Bar that it is written in the most gibberish way possible.
The statement that it is supposed to be clear does not correspond to the reality that it is not, that is my point.
Maybe it is gibberish, maybe it is not.
It absolutely is. I challenge anyone to go find an online koran, read ANY random page and tell yourself it is coherent.
a thing an be clear yet also require interpretation.
No. A thing can be clearly written with unlcera meaning, but the koran is just plain giberish nonsense. There is no debate here.
Most laws work like that.
No, they don't. Most laws are extremely specific because they have to be clearly understood and their logic followed. The koran is, as stated many times now, just plain gibberish. This is not a reader's criticism, this is just plain stylistic fact.
because they dictate principle, not specifics.
My bro. Laws are SPECIFICALLY written to be specific. You're talking about constitutional law that is above any specific laws overseen by parliament and ministries. In islam it's the reverse, the hadiths and sunnas and local delegation take primarity and rule as they wish as long as they can limit themselves to the koran's gibberish, which is extremely easy to do. Here in the West, each nation's constitution takes prime law over regular law, but you have to go to court to establish it. You can't do that in islam just because how loose law is and how shit are the shcools of jureprudence with arhaic rules established centuries ago regardless of the koran, which by your own definition does not talk about cloning and shit.
you can talk more about it with a lawyer. Predetermination thing is also in Christianity as well and like all religions. Evil, Freedom, Destiny, Metaphysics etc was discussed by schoolars.
In Christianity, bar a calvinism, predestination is very limited and free will is a cornerstone. In islam there is no free will. Every single thing that has ever been is completely dictated by Allah. Nothing is free, all the mainstream muslim groups agree to this.
Again in 7th century the belief was even jihad would not allow you to go to heaven and an infidel with good heart can go to heaven. Can we also talk about those same rules in christianity or in any other religion?
Then good luck telling your courts that the sirrah sometime don't count and Muhammad was either a liar or islamic shcolarship sucks.
It is absolutely a valdi belief today that only jihad is a guarantee to heaven.
The only Christian rule aboout going to heave is that it is given by grace through Christ and you cannot attain it no matter how hard you try. That is the core of having a personal relationship with God, something that all mainline Christian denominations agree with as well.
Mut'ah nikah is older than islam, and is only allowed in Shia sects, and not in all of them. It is an abhorant thing that lowers the sacredness of marriage. That shit is indeed crazy and i wish this type of "marriages" are disallowed in the future.
Absolute bullshit. Sunis abuse mutah all the time in the west, let alone in their homelands as well. Aying it's a shia thing is just a suni cope.
I only pointed out that the sentence about masturbation from a muslim person that by all means should not be there, is not something that would not been said by a muslim.
Since no single muslim would wither agree or disagree, it's about how you weasel yourself out of it. That way anything can be legal, including porn.
From the context of the screenshot, if he says masturbation is preferable to adultary or rape, he is right. I am not here to talk about Islam.
My bro. I will repeat. If you can bullshit your law because of whatever school of juresprudence you want, because the koran is gibberish, ANYTHING is legal as long as you are clever enough.
It shares similarities to other religions in how it developed or created. It has some specifics to it that allow us to differ it. Some of it is good, some of is bad and some of it is horrible.
Islam is the LEAST understood religion solely because of its tendency for violence and blind faith. No other religion is as violent and anti academic study as islam.
Values of modernity, collective intellect and spirit of humanity is what we should all be guided by, but culture is a thread that binds us to history. I can be an atheist in Europe but as long as my name is Islamic, i am muslim. Even if that is not the case, from the first moment i have opened my eyes to today i have been developed and influanced by a tradition that was influanced and evolved by Islam. the most i can do is to accept it. If someone wants to discuss the specifict of religion, i invite them to my Dm's or to another topic. What i said was only to explain something about the game and nothing else. i would prefer it to be that way. Let us focus to the game.
I didn't finish reading this bullshit. Islam is as modest and lovey dovey peaceful as the rocks in my backyard are cookies and every muslim who says this should go to Speacker's Corner late at night, say louldy that they believe in Jesus the Messiah and then pick their teeth off the grass.
 
Actually asking here since I havent played either of the games but isnt the gay scene meant to be sort of mocking or done with the intent to embarrass you and find it funny?
From what ive seen of these characters, in both games, theyre kind of supposed to be bumbling immature idiots sometimes because the entire game seems more comedy driven. Or is it really supposed to be a serious storygame? I havent seen anything to indicate its trying to tell a proper story but again correct me if im wrong.

I feel under that pretense its more excusable if they were trying to take the angle of "these two guys are degenerate as fuck" since its not entirely unheard of for men in medieval times to fuck anything they come across, even other men.
 
SidAlpha proves to be another grifter, and one user crticizes him.
firefox_iT3CvnjYj4.pngfirefox_QircnsP3oY.png
 
So what does happen in the game? It's hard to understand what's exaggeration and what's actual things that happen.

I know the Muslim scholar is there and absolutely retarded (especially nowadays that Muslims are outright hateful of Jews, instead of covering it up under Zionism).

There's trannies apperantly?

Heroes being depowered for the start of the game is standard for a sequel, question if they are shamed for being white males?

Also is the Hans romance the kind that just talking to him automatically or at least something you need to actually trigger willingly?

Also there are Jews but besides not being able to kill them I haven't heard on some particular stupid thing they involve?
No trannies, although a woman does talk about a hermaphrodite.

At least at the start, they aren’t shamed for being white males specifically. Henry and Hans have no money and are treated as filthy vagabonds or beggars because of their ragged clothing they’re forced to wear. Hans gets himself and Henry locked up in the stocks because he keeps acting like a bratty noble despite nobody believing them, even if you try to tell him to knock that shit off.

For the romances, it’s not something you can accidentally trigger since there’s a heart icon for it in conversations. I don’t know if they keep popping up for Hans even if you try to avoid them, though.
 
Actually asking here since I havent played either of the games but isnt the gay scene meant to be sort of mocking or done with the intent to embarrass you and find it funny?
From what ive seen of these characters, in both games, theyre kind of supposed to be bumbling immature idiots sometimes because the entire game seems more comedy driven. Or is it really supposed to be a serious storygame? I havent seen anything to indicate its trying to tell a proper story but again correct me if im wrong.

I feel under that pretense its more excusable if they were trying to take the angle of "these two guys are degenerate as fuck" since its not entirely unheard of for men in medieval times to fuck anything they come across, even other men.
Are you on crack they added multiple gay romances and sex scenes why the fuck do you think they would do that as a joke?
 
Speaking of jews, they're not supposed to be there since this is an imaginary village, there is a synagogue that wouldn't be build for hundreds of years, and there is an imaginary pogrom that didn't actually happen because Vavra is a jew and he needs goyim to feel bad for the chosen people.
The historical inaccuracy offends me more than anything. It's so stupid, like the media storm for "no blacks in that time period" got the writers to go full fantasy in response.
No trannies, although a woman does talk about a hermaphrodite.

At least at the start, they aren’t shamed for being white males specifically. Henry and Hans have no money and are treated as filthy vagabonds or beggars because of their ragged clothing they’re forced to wear. Hans gets himself and Henry locked up in the stocks because he keeps acting like a bratty noble despite nobody believing them, even if you try to tell him to knock that shit off.

For the romances, it’s not something you can accidentally trigger since there’s a heart icon for it in conversations. I don’t know if they keep popping up for Hans even if you try to avoid them, though.
I guess the big question is whether those things are handpicked from 100+ hours of sidequests or are prominently displayed as part of the main quest and have to interact with the way the devs want to progress. I still remember how BG3 thread highlighted a lot of minor things that you can miss out completely so it ended up not being woke at all.
 
Actually asking here since I havent played either of the games but isnt the gay scene meant to be sort of mocking or done with the intent to embarrass you and find it funny?
No, it is character assassination to appeal to fujoshis. There is literally an entire DLC dedicated to trying to help Hans get some pussy, so him being a faggot is completely out of the picture. Henry isn't a faggot either, he has a very clear female love interest in the first game. The entire second game is a humiliation ritual, instead of being a knight and engaging with a power fantasy of a coming of age man in medieval times making his way thru the world you get bossgirls talking down to you, peasants covered in shit spitting on you, jews telling you to eat corpses, absolute most vile writing I have seen in a long time with lots of millennial writing tropes and quips you would expect more from Borderlands or MCU. KCD is definitely a more serious, grounded setting, the whole point of the first game was that Henry want from an illiterate bumbling peasant to a proper knight and an honorary noble. This gets taken away in the sequel and Henry gets treated worse than he ever was in the first game, you don't even get to be a proper knight in almost any mission anymore. For a point of reference, Henry's entire village, including his mother and father, were killed by Cumans. You spend the entire first game killing Cumans to the point you become their boogeyman and they might even run away from you. You are expected to fucking serve them food like a bitch in one of the first side quests of the second game instead of just killing them on the spot. The entire game is like this.


The second game is the opposite of what the fans wanted or expected from a sequel, it is very similar to The Last of Us 2 in that sense.
SidAlpha proves to be another grifter, and one user crticizes him.
Never trusted this cuck, another one to add to the pile.
 
I guess the big question is whether those things are handpicked from 100+ hours of sidequests or are prominently displayed as part of the main quest and have to interact with the way the devs want to progress. I still remember how BG3 thread highlighted a lot of minor things that you can miss out completely so it ended up not being woke at all
Jews are prominent as is their rightful place. Hans and Henry being treated like shit is literally the opening of the game. For the rest, you need to actively seek out screenshots on /v/ and repost them on Kiwi Farms as original content.
 
The historical inaccuracy offends me more than anything. It's so stupid, like the media storm for "no blacks in that time period" got the writers to go full fantasy in response.

I guess the big question is whether those things are handpicked from 100+ hours of sidequests or are prominently displayed as part of the main quest and have to interact with the way the devs want to progress. I still remember how BG3 thread highlighted a lot of minor things that you can miss out completely so it ended up not being woke at all.
It's main quests
 
The historical inaccuracy offends me more than anything. It's so stupid, like the media storm for "no blacks in that time period" got the writers to go full fantasy in response.
Don't worry, the black dude is fanfiction as well. He is based off someone who was literally dead by this point in time, and even then he's written more like a modern black caricature than an actual historical one. This game is full of shit like this, vast majority of the first one was very true to how Bohemia was actually like at that point in time and the game was written and developed by the same people as the first so apparently they did this on purpose.
 
Back