Ukrainian Defensive War against the Russian Invasion - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

Tucker continues his campaign of smarmy lies. A few days ago it was his rants with Piers Morgan about how Ukraine is evil and Putin has never done anything to him. Well, now he's repackaging old conspiracy theories:


LPT: Anyone who repeats that something is "a fact" seven times is probably lying to you.

The claim that weapons we send Ukraine are being resold to Mexican cartels is a fake story from June 2023. A Mexican reporter (mis)identified a weapon an alleged cartel member had as a Javelin, and mentioned in passing that the Javelin is also being used in Ukraine. Several zigger-rightists (including such luminaries as Jack Posobiec and Vivek Ramasamy) jumped on this and misrepresented the reporter's comment as claiming that the cartel's weapon actually came from Ukraine. Some bottom-barrel news outlets repeated the false story (Example).

In reality, most analysts say the weapon was likely an AT4, not a Javelin. And obviously Ukraine is in no position to sell spare weapons to cartels halfway around the world.

Article from Reuters / Archive

So, Tucker is trying to breathe new life in an old debunked story. He even got a shout-out from Libs of TikTok, who characterized it as "Tucker Carlson EXPOSES a major scandal":
lott.png

Sorry Chaya, spewing evidence-free assertions in a Twitter interview does not constitute exposing a scandal.
 
The claim that weapons we send Ukraine are being resold to Mexican cartels is a fake story from June 2023
I keep seeing that mentioned from time to time, no sources of course. I mean, it's hypothetically possible that weapons from Ukraine (not just Ukrainian but Russian too) would find their way on black market, it's a massive warzone.
But to state it as a matter of fact and some kinda systematic problem? Yeah, they're full of shit.
Basically, these people try to find or manufacture flaws in Ukraine to justify Russia, even though it's faulty logic to begin with. None of it justifies Russia's invasion, let alone all the shit that resulted from it.

It's just disingenuous bullshit. I'm 100% convinced Tucker is a fucking shill.
 
So, Tucker is trying to breathe new life in an old debunked story. He even got a shout-out from Libs of TikTok, who characterized it as "Tucker Carlson EXPOSES a major scandal":
This open traitor to the United States, who happily works for the Russian government and others to spread anti-western propaganda lies, is still meeting with Trump.
GjMoLL8WsAAAsG7.jpg
link <- official POTUS twitter
Clearly Trump has no issues with someone being anti-American so long as they are loyal to him, hence Tulsi Gabbard and others.
There was an article recently about how there's conflict between two wings in the US government, one who want the US to kneel to Russia, and one that wants to defeat Russia, and it's unclear which will prevail.
Stuff like this is why I think that's likely (aside from Trump cucking to China regarding espionage and trade issues, as well as the lying campaign that culminated in the dissolution of USAID).
GjHpW-qXMAE5NMG.png
 
This open traitor to the United States, who happily works for the Russian government and others to spread anti-western propaganda lies, is still meeting with Trump.
View attachment 6969883
link <- official POTUS twitter
Clearly Trump has no issues with someone being anti-American so long as they are loyal to him, hence Tulsi Gabbard and others.
There was an article recently about how there's conflict between two wings in the US government, one who want the US to kneel to Russia, and one that wants to defeat Russia, and it's unclear which will prevail.
Stuff like this is why I think that's likely (aside from Trump cucking to China regarding espionage and trade issues, as well as the lying campaign that culminated in the dissolution of USAID).
View attachment 6969915
Oh no not an "anti-amrican"

Its comical that your bitch ass still thinks anyone who doesn't see you propaganda and failed policy stance as "Russian bots". You do realize you're in the minority on this site and in real life?

Please film yourself giving a blowjob to a loaded shotgun and stop shitting up this site with your nonsense. Hope you get pancreatic cancer.
 
This open traitor to the United States, who happily works for the Russian government and others to spread anti-western propaganda lies, is still meeting with Trump.
View attachment 6969883
link <- official POTUS twitter
Clearly Trump has no issues with someone being anti-American so long as they are loyal to him, hence Tulsi Gabbard and others.
There was an article recently about how there's conflict between two wings in the US government, one who want the US to kneel to Russia, and one that wants to defeat Russia, and it's unclear which will prevail.
Stuff like this is why I think that's likely (aside from Trump cucking to China regarding espionage and trade issues, as well as the lying campaign that culminated in the dissolution of USAID).
View attachment 6969915
Oh no. Tucker has a OPINION. He's allowed to have that. Also USAID was a fucking ponzi scheme funding trannies. Calm down.
 
America lost vietnam and basically every other conflict up to now.
My contention with this (and I assume @Ghostse's as well) is that people conflate this with tactical level defeat. The US lost Vietnam and Afghanistan due to political-level failures, despite tactical-level successes. The Iraq war is a perfect example of this. The US, with an undersized force, was still able to conquer Iraq and topple Saddam in under a month with minimal casualties. The problem that lead to the following shitshow was political; stand down orders during the looting, Rumsfeld refusing to provide the coalition with adequate strength for occupation, and the CPA passing fucking awful orders that antagonized the population.
You do realize you're in the minority on this site
Good
You do realize you're in the minority...in real life?
lol, lmao even
 
1739287762492.png
You do realize you're in the minority on this site
I recall dealing with a redditor(Think it was when I called desTiny a cuck) and he said something like "read the room you're the only one here who thinks this way" so congrats on the reddit tier faggotry. Truth is not measured by mass appeal try a better argument faggot.
 
Oh no. Tucker has a OPINION
1. It’s opinion he states as fact. That if you don’t believe it you are wrong and the opposition.
2. It is one of many, many “opinions” the tard has had, each of them consistently in line with the Russian propaganda machine, to the point he soy faced at a Russian shopping cart.

I understand that when you’re ingrained in an “us vs them” mentality it’s very difficult to step back and criticize the people you think are on your side. Let me help you out: Tucker does not give a solitary fuck about you or America. His entire objective is to score ratings and make money. He is the citizen that welcomes the invader in with open arms because it simply means they just pay him in a new currency. Don’t defend him. You will quickly find yourself sitting amongst vipers as all the good ones are outed. At the rate he’s going, in the history books (if he even scores a footnote) he’ll be reviled as a propagandist.
 
My contention with this (and I assume @Ghostse's as well) is that people conflate this with tactical level defeat. The US lost Vietnam and Afghanistan due to political-level failures, despite tactical-level successes. The Iraq war is a perfect example of this. The US, with an undersized force, was still able to conquer Iraq and topple Saddam in under a month with minimal casualties. The problem that lead to the following shitshow was political; stand down orders during the looting, Rumsfeld refusing to provide the coalition with adequate strength for occupation, and the CPA passing fucking awful orders that antagonized the population.

The military campaigns for Desert Storm, Afghanistan, and Iraq were such quick one-sided affairs that online armchair generals and their adjacent circles have had nothing to do but endlessly pick apart the subsequent 20-year occupation, acting as if it were one big 24/7 Fallujah.

Their perspective of the entire conflict is probably still deeply rooted in the sensationalist stories that were massively peddled in the 2000s by fear-mongering entities like Fox News and CNN to keep their ratings high. The way that they were reporting it, you would have thought that tens of thousands of U.S. soldiers were being gunned down every week in the streets as the nation was just this close to collapsing! The "dull" reality of the area being turned into a background babysitting job by late 2004, with less than a dozen casualties each year, was one seldom heard on the major news channels.

Too many people have this "video game" mentality of warfare where there is only one "decisive" way to win or lose a war even though half of all conflicts throughout history can be considered slightly beneficial stalemates. Europeans butchered each other for 30 years in the 1600s only to then all collectively agree to fall back and end the conflict. Prussia "lost" the First Schleswig War to Denmark due to similar political pressures, and the Crimean War just made everybody go bankrupt for a few Christian communities in the Ottoman Empire. The United States held down a chunk of mountainous desert the size of Texas or California from across the Atlantic for over two decades while facing so little economic or military repercussions, that many downright forgot we were still there before the pull-out reminded us. The only true anguish felt was from the Military Industrial Complex, who couldn't test out their new toys in the sandbox anymore.
 
Last edited:
1. It’s opinion he states as fact. That if you don’t believe it you are wrong and the opposition.
It's also not an opinion he actually holds.
He knows there is no evidence for the things he says, but he says the evidence exists anyway.
We know he has no evidence, because there is no evidence for things that did not happen.

He is a slimy liar who makes his living by deceiving people.


And make no mistake, Ukraine is not the only thing he lies about. All these "you don't hate [group] enough"/"they hate you and want you dead" type grifters lie all the time about all kinds of shit.

Unfortunately A&N is effectively a MAGA echo-chamber, with its own ecosystem of blue checkmark liars feeding them bullshit that they then circlejerk among themselves as though it was true, same as the vatnigger thread does for their vatnigger "news".
So if you casually use this site to inform yourself, you are being indoctrinated with made up "facts" and horseshit arguments.

You can see the effect in this thread too. When someone says something bad about Trump, they get downvoted and attacked with nonsense. Whether it is sensible or plainly obviously true does not matter whatsoever, the response is the same. It's identical to the way the vatniggers react to information that doesn't conform to their echo-chamber.
 
You can see the effect in this thread too. When someone says something bad about Trump, they get downvoted and attacked with nonsense. Whether it is sensible or plainly obviously true does not matter whatsoever, the response is the same. It's identical to the way the vatniggers react to information that doesn't conform to their echo-chamber.
Come on man, that's being extreme. Just because you get neg rated for sperging about trump now and then doesn't mean this is some scary MAGA ECHO CHAMBER. From what I've seen in this thread is that no one (including myself) thinks it's novel or interesting to go after Trump like we're online MSNBC commentators based off of shitty hearsay and bad reporting.

We've seen 8 years of it going on 9 and it's tedious. Criticise him for real shit he does wrong/badly, not imaginary things. If he turned around and said 'fuck Ukraine, Russia rules we're done supporting them and your waifu a shit' do you think this thread would just support it because we're so obsessed with defending our Fuhrer?
 
Just because you get neg rated for sperging about trump now and then doesn't mean this is some scary MAGA ECHO CHAMBER
It's a MAGA echo-chamber because anyone who dares intrude with facts is heckled until they shut up, while bullshit information is affirmed and reinforced.

And as I said, whether information is true or an argument is sound plays no role, the only that matters is whether it makes Trump look kinda bad. And Trump is an amoral retard, so he says and does bad things all the time and it's virtually impossible to talk about him without him looking bad.
It's like asking that Ethan Ralph is only covered in a way that doesn't cast him in a bad light, and to never use any negative adjectives to describe him.
It's impossible and it begs question why you can't stand seeing something true be said about this person or his apostles.

If he turned around and said 'fuck Ukraine, Russia rules we're done supporting them and your waifu a shit' do you think this thread would just support it because we're so obsessed with defending our Fuhrer?
I think there would be a lot of sperging about how bad Europe is and looking for infinite copes about about how China is the main concern and it's just reasonable and bla bla.
I am virtually certain that the hardcore Trump cultists would NOT change their mind about Trump, at best blaming some boyars.
They can't even admit that his lying campaign about USAID is fucked up and hurts American interests, they can't admit that he lies all the time, they can't admit that he doesn't understand balances of trade or tariffs, they can't admit that him making Kremlin propaganda his election platform hurt the US, they can't admit that anti-American agents like Tucker and Gabbard are even anti-American to begin with. Why? Because they are with Trump, and if Trump surrounds himself with traitors, he would be bad, so he cannot surround himself with traitors, so the traitors are not actually traitors. QED.

They're not cultists because they support Trump, but because of the insane way they worship him like a flawless God and cannot stand ANY criticism of him.

MAGA are some of the biggest crybabies on the internet and at the same time they're some of the most obnoxious and obsessive hecklers, so I see no reason to mince words, especially when they try to present themselves as being better than the vatniggers, even though they suffer the same kind of retardation, just about a different topic.
They sperg out whenever someone says something true about their God, so they can hear what people who aren't part of their echo-chamber think about them.
 
It's very rare to find a US soldier or marine who legitimately believes "wow they beat us" as much as "so that was a waste of time and lives". You could argue this is some sort of pride cope, but I tend to believe it.
4,500 KiA over 20 years. That's 225 a year, or in other words you had 140 days out of every year where nobody died (or not quite four months), and this is in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Anyone acting like we were dramatically forced to flee with our tails between our legs is bullshitting you. Iraq wasn't Somalia and not even Fallujah was Mogadishu.
1739304022878.png
 
4,500 KiA over 20 years. That's 225 a year, or in other words you had 140 days out of every year where nobody died (or not quite four months), and this is in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Anyone acting like we were dramatically forced to flee with our tails between our legs is bullshitting you. Iraq wasn't Somalia and not even Fallujah was Mogadishu.
View attachment 6971051
Iraq was a military victory that got stuck in a politically untenable situation. Even then US forces still won. Saddam died and his government was dissolved.
 
Back