Why a higher standard and not the same standard? All putting the church on a higher standard does is leave other institutions like public schools unaccountable for doing more of the exact same thing. Teachers are supposed to be protectors of kids while they're in their care. That's part of the social contract.
We aren't even told that anymore, in my high school we were told "Hoovervilles were cause of Homeless people gathering" not that they were camps for workers.
as a christian myself, i would say it's because as a member of christ's flock, it's up to us to attempt as best as we humanly can to embody His perfection in our behavior. teachers aren't trying to live up to a standard set by someone who was literally sinless, we are.
how dishonest of them. the death of the department of education cannot come swiftly enough. total departmental deconstruction.
Some of these moves are so retarded it’s hard to believe that Trump is receiving fair treatment by the leftist judges. For example, the complaint in the case filed in the District of Rhode Island has five counts. The first two counts are brought under the Administrative Procedure Act. The last three counts are not brought under any cause of action. They are claims based on broad constitutional clauses which do not, in themselves, create a self-executing cause of action. Rather, they seem to skirt past this and argue they can bring the claim under 28 USC 2201. That statute allows a party to seek a declaratory judgment from a court. The issue, however, is that section 2201 does not create a freestanding cause of action. It creates a remedy, not the cause of action.
Classes should be livestreamed so that parents can check on what is going on in these schools at any time. Our children are being dropped off and left with strangers.
Catholic priests do not diddle more than any other group that is commonly in a trusted position around children such as doctors or teachers. It's true that rather than quietly move the pedo's around they should have quietly introduced them all to a woodchiper, but the public perception of pedo priests is out of line with reality. There are many cases of schools, unions, and basically any organization that you could think of covering up the sexual assault allegations for their members. The key difference is that the Catholic church has morals and so it's faithful expected more of them and it's enemies saw it as an opportunity to attack. This many years after the crisis when the church has done so much to introduce safeguards to prevent similar circumstances from occurring again, I believe that most people who bring it up are just looking for a way to attack the church because they don't like that it stands by it's teachings, especially with regards to abortion and homosexuality, rather than because they are actually concerned about children.
So the church just thought "we're the church, we can handle this?"
This is what I'm getting at though: I heard that the church knew about its pedophile problem in the 60's and 70's. They contacted lawyers and other "experts" who told them to move offenders around instead of confront the issue directly since that would result in massive legal problems and a massive reputational hit. The Catholic Church was already scared about their steadily declining membership.
the problem lies right here. they have protected pedophiles. there is simply no defense for an organization who has dedicated itself to protecting child molesters and rapists, especially not one who claims to be the true church of Christ. it is spitting in the face of what the very messiah they worship preached.
i have absolutely no problem with this at all. i'm even perfectly fine with security measures being enforced in this way, like tracked tablets that the parents use (on loan with a consequence of full price buying the tablet if damaged/lost) or whatever else might be useful. that's an excellent idea as long as the security of preventing pedos from watching children in school is taken seriously.
i'm sorry, but i simply don't accept, at face value, the idea that the church should ever have cared about what lawyers would think. the correct action morally was always to report them, and the consistent and continued to this very day failure to do so reveals exactly why the church doesn't do it; they are not concerned about the people who will be hurt, they are concerned about their reputation.
Can Elon even be impeached if he's not on a government payroll?
I don't believe that for a second. How would you even know the real numbers? The clergy has a higher number of weirdos to start with due to the whole celibacy thing.
He did intervene immediately and did so to a large degree. He had bailouts and massive public works (Hoover dam ring a bell?). He was trying to pass a massive bit of legislation that FDR ultimately signed after he was inaugurated.
They’ve been doing it even longer than that, remember Jim’s video on the Nu-cannibals where millennials would do gross shit like Cum cocktails, vaginal bacon, and pussy blood muffins? He talked about articles at the beginning claiming that if you work out you’re alt-right.
The minimum standard to hold yourself to is the legal one, the maximum standard to hold yourself to is God's standard.
You answered this way better than I could have.
Fucking good. These extra judicial ex parte ROs are such fucking bullshit, and should be ignored.
The word you are looking for is "homosexuals".
