Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 13.8%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.7%
  • This Year

    Votes: 74 15.5%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 164 34.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 118 24.7%

  • Total voters
    478
Seems nice of Hardin to only list the fees that Null actually paid instead of his Fitzpatrick rate of $669. Any idea why he wouldn't have invoiced Russ for the full value of his time?
My retarded take is that Hardin is reading the room. This is a Pro Se retard doing stupid shit. The court is required to sanction him by rule so Hardin comes in with a reasonable and justified number that's not likely to be reduced.

If, on the other hand, Greer had counsel and pulled this shit then it's likely that Hardin could have come in at full rate and included every second he spent and gotten it as a way to smack down the stupidity.
 
I love that Russ's response to being slapped by fees is to go full unresponsive.

Russ, that won't help, you can't turn back now! But rooting for you to get those $225.
I believe from the correspondence and how he handled it that he's going to file something that's essentially "I thought when I objected to the motion the timer stops on the sanctions and I don't have to think about them at all and actually Hardin was badgering me and being mean to me which added to my stress" because he pulled that shit before too.
 
I wonder who "that woman" is?
View attachment 6970633

Based on the 12/5 date, I am guessing it's in reference to this (footnote of ECF 187):

1739296435887.png

This goes back to Greer's original complaint in which he himself admits:

1739296497755.png
1739296594318.png
etc. etc. etc. -- that's the Erika chick, right? The one whose interactions are featured on his Encyclopedia Dramatica page?

Greer is going to respond to this with some plightsperging about how he was waiting for the district judge to rule on his objection and that's why he didn't engage with Hardin because how was he supposed to know that the case was still moving and it's not fair he thought deadlines were paused blah blah blah. Basically what he pulled last year.

He will absolutely 100% be doing this. But his complete failure to communicate with Hardin whatsoever when the fees and costs were sent, especially since he said he would reply after filing his objection, will hopefully work against him.
 
I love that Russ's response to being slapped by fees is to go full unresponsive.

Russ, that won't help, you can't turn back now! But rooting for you to get those $225.
I think he's finally internalising the message that every plightsperge Mr Hardin is forced to answer following a sanction just adds zeros to the bill.

Alas, the silent treatment is only appropriate in a limited number of situations, especially as the plaintiff. I'll let Russ figure out which ones. :)
 
Last edited:
Holy cow, at $300/hour for litigation work, Hardin is REALLY giving Null a sweetheart deal. I know it had been described as such already, but that's practically paralegal rates.

Bless him. If only more people were able and willing to stand up for the Farms like that.
 
5k is an amount that even a pretty poor working person can scrape together, especially with a payment plan.
Greer's got 14 days to pay it after the judge orders him to. So I guess he's gonna have to go to another payday loan place that he hasn't been sued by if he wants to keep the case going.
 
Greer's got 14 days to pay it after the judge orders him to. So I guess he's gonna have to go to another payday loan place that he hasn't been sued by if he wants to keep the case going.
I thought this too, but the order makes it seem like if the judge is forced to rule on the amount, then the repayment period is discretionary.
Screenshot_20250211-183035.Adblock Browser.png
It's not entirely clear. Either way, Shitlips does not just have 5k going spare.
 
Very reasonable rates based on what Hardin has stated. Under half of what he's entitled to based upon the Fitzpatrick Matrix (IANAL so I was actually a little curious how lawyers determine rates and what's considered reasonable). I also like showing that it's well under what this court has considered fair, as they awarded $400/hr rate prior. Sure I'm a layman of the law, but I find it convincing to say $300/hr is more than reasonable if you said $400/hr is. No matter what gimpy says.
 
Is it fair to assume that everyone involved in this lawsuit wants to eat a bullet for one reason or another? The judge now has to read Greer explicitly defying a court order, Greer has to pay Null and Null will never see that money since you can't get blood from a rock. Hardin may be the only one laughing right now.
:story:
 
Last edited:
Back