AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities
- Thread starter gagabobo1997
- Start date
The Spoils of War
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2025
Can we get chatgpt to interpret this?
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2021
If a fancier chatGPT destroys humanity we deserved it. All these AI safety/alignment goals are mostly to stop language models from saying nigger or telling you how to cook meth.
x3firehexx
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2024
Actually you can bait a AI model into telling you how to cook meth pretty easy, maybe not openAI's models but like other random models are easily jailbroken. I think you can bait deepseek into telling you basically anything if you are smart enough (except anything china related)
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2015
Kiwisee
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2021
I once baited an AI model to tell me how to make explosives and then handed the instructions to a crackhead.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I wouldn't trust any AI generated explosive instructions. Even if the AI has been scouring the web for such instructions the stuff openly available on clear is very low quality taken as a whole, and that's not including the fact the glowies have seeded a lot of the honeypot sites they put this stuff on with bad instructions that could get you killed or (more often) that just leave out critical steps in the process and would get you some inert substance as a result.
I saw this post in twitter, and it's interesting. Because it's dripping in irony in several ways.
These are the videos in this post.
A video showcasing the progress of AI being used in this video to replace the dancer with a statue, using technology 2 years apart, showing how the consistency and quality of the rendering has improved since.
This is an animation of images of statues sequenced so that they appear to be dancing to the same song.
Now what's the irony?
Well the irony begins when you actually look at the source for the original video of the dancing statues.
This is the piece "All Creative Work Is Derivative" published under the Youtube Channel Question Copyright and this specific piece was made by Nina Paley, a strong advocate for copyright abolishment.
Now how does Nina feel about AI and Copyright?
Well.
Clearly, she doesn't align with AI-seether's on Twitter. Not that she would have otherwise because she is a proud Trans-Exclusionary Reactionary Feminist.
There other ironic thing? OP didn't even credit her properly, instead posting the derivative version with the music switched, and claiming that to be the original, which kinda further cements the message of the animation "All Creative Works Are Derivative"
And just to be a little bit more petty, Nina has produced a video advocating for properly crediting others.
This is your daily dose of Media Literacy.
These are the videos in this post.
A video showcasing the progress of AI being used in this video to replace the dancer with a statue, using technology 2 years apart, showing how the consistency and quality of the rendering has improved since.
This is an animation of images of statues sequenced so that they appear to be dancing to the same song.
Now what's the irony?
Well the irony begins when you actually look at the source for the original video of the dancing statues.
Now how does Nina feel about AI and Copyright?
Well.
Clearly, she doesn't align with AI-seether's on Twitter. Not that she would have otherwise because she is a proud Trans-Exclusionary Reactionary Feminist.
There other ironic thing? OP didn't even credit her properly, instead posting the derivative version with the music switched, and claiming that to be the original, which kinda further cements the message of the animation "All Creative Works Are Derivative"
And just to be a little bit more petty, Nina has produced a video advocating for properly crediting others.
This is your daily dose of Media Literacy.
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2015
These people were reminded of Nina Paley through Ai war BS.
I was reminded of her through Joe Gran's Schizo shitposts early last year.
- Joined
- May 25, 2024
This is false, even with their very intrusive multi layered filtering you can bypass it through context poisoning to the extreme. It does make for very amusing jailbreaks though.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2020
I know I should just be grossed out by this, but man, I couldn't help but laugh at some of those, the "Anthro Chicken" and "Futanari bridge monster" in particular. I mean, how the fuck do you even develop a fetish like that?
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2022
If flyover America is an indicator, any lowered barrier to meth production is an x-risk. Damn AI is going to meth us into the grave (and then also die when the methheads strip its substrate for copper)
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2024
I used to watch Joe's content, what the fuck happened to the guy
is this what kikehating gone too far does to a nigga
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2024
Pot calling the kettle black.
aka another way of expressing someone's hypocrisy aka
"Your slop is no different from mines. Human made or not, anything can be slammed the 'slop' label just from being merely disinterest in it. I could count your favorite piece of media as 'slop' regardless of its quality. If you can do the same with what I'm into—whether the justification is valid or not—then I should be allowed to express the same with your interests." (To my best interpretation.)
Don't get The Works of Michelangelo bit, though. I still hate the word slop with a deep passion (autism) but it has its reasonable usages. It's the go-to word to describe anything that feels inauthentic and mass produced, in which, unfortunately, most AI work is since most of them are being done by people who are clearly using AI for the trendy hype train than actually utilizing it in a positive way.
In the end,
People don't say "content farm" anymore, they just say slop.
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2015
The twist is he's also a jew! He just doesn't like the US funding the shit out of isreal and them fucking carpet bombing people over "hamas might be there!".
Also he fucking hates hollywood but that's obvious.
Context: Chomba is a member of the AIsphere on Twitter where he shits on LLMs, gets frequent retweets from Gary Marcus.
Aidan is an OpenAI ballwasher with a gigantic ego who recently got hired due to his great ballwashing skills. Notably every entry on his list is outright wrong.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2022
The talk of data scraping used for training outputs does make me think there might be market potential for data gathering in areas not quite as well documented. Examples like how a creative person goes about finishing their art pieces instead of feeding the bot the finished product. Or creating videos on performing certain tasks in order for the bot to reference its own needs.
I know this would require heavy monitoring and depending on how it goes could be a severe invasion of privacy, but with Reinforcement Learning amongst us it probably wouldn't take that much to begin with if the AI thinks about what it can do with the limited data it has available to it.
I know this would require heavy monitoring and depending on how it goes could be a severe invasion of privacy, but with Reinforcement Learning amongst us it probably wouldn't take that much to begin with if the AI thinks about what it can do with the limited data it has available to it.