if mitch's heart gives out from all the pressure of voting right before he votes no, what's the actual precedent for that? has it ever happened that a congressman of any kind has croaked during or directly before a vote on something like this? i imagine it would postpone the vote again and give the left even more time to wait on confirmation.
How many times has he voted against Trump's picks? Because if a no vote for RFK is the third, him dying right after would be quite the sign. As the song goes, "And it's one, two, three strikes you're out at the old ball game."
How many times has he voted against Trump's picks? Because if a no vote for RFK is the third, him dying right after would be quite the sign. As the song goes, "And it's one, two, three strikes you're out at the old ball game."
if mitch's heart gives out from all the pressure of voting right before he votes no, what's the actual precedent for that? has it ever happened that a congressman of any kind has croaked during or directly before a vote on something like this? i imagine it would postpone the vote again and give the left even more time to wait on confirmation.
I dont think anyone had a problem with any political position as long as the person is logical, reasonable, and consistent about their view. That indicates they can be reasoned with so they can hear your logic and change their incorrect ways or even better they take what you said and help you see it from a new perspective changing YOUR view.
However at this point there really isnt anyone on the left who is any of those 3 things. Most here don't even agree with trump on everything they just see how bad things have gotten in both parties. There was a chance for a true outsider with bernie and warren seemed legit for a hot minute but hillary killed that. The senator from fucking Hawaii changed their party affiliation it's so bad.
Had a guy at my work file an HR complaint about a liberal arguing their logical and worldview didn't make sense and it wasn't safe work with someone who's judgment you couldn't trust.
At this point, the only argument libs make any more boils down to, "You're wicked and only think the things you do to justify hurting marginalized people," or "Your eyes are closed to the Truth of Science by a combination of ignorance and religious fundamentalism."
Either way, libs think that you are a danger to society and should be suppressed. It's why they believe in censoring the internet and firing employees for having non-leftist political opinions. As a result, though, they've become retarded. They no longer test their ideas against anything, since the act of testing their ideas is morally evil. So they've become intellectually soft and weak, and susceptible to embracing obvious lies and total insanity as long as it's framed as "The Science," "protecting marginalized people," or, really, "whatever the Democratic Party says I'm supposed to support this week."
There's really no reason to even try to engage leftists any more. You're not going to learn anything or have any ideas challenged. Some idiot is just going to shriek at you that you're a bigot, try to find out where you work to get you fired, and accuse you of being a science-denier. I already know what every liberal will say before they say it, so why waste the time hearing them regurgitate the same ol' same ol'?
When I was young, I thought the idea of a state sponsored war on Christianity was absurd. The easiest way to get black pilled on this subject today is to trace the USAID money. You see, much of USAID spending goes straight to manufactured consensus. And Church is ripe for this. Now, ignoring the dyke cunt that lectured Trump who was receiving millions in tax dollars, let's check out another.
Meet Reverand Brent Hawkes. A faggot sex creep and fake Christian. View attachment 6977133
Brent oversaw one of the first gay marriages in Canada, was named one of the "500 most influential gay men in the world" by the European gay magazine Mate; and in 2013 he was inducted into the Queer Hall of Fame.
He entered politics in the 90s and, you guessed it, ran on gay rights. In his later career, as seen below, he's known as a fixture at gay marriages and gay pride parades. View attachment 6977144
Brent Hawkes is part of the Metropolitan Community Church. Described as a LGBT-affirming mainline Protestant Christian denomination, they collect your tax dollars through USAID and install a weird sex pervert in your town/city to preach anything but Christian values.
Before you ask, yes, Brent Hawkes likes little boys. View attachment 6977149
Hawkes was a teacher in the 1970s, making him a sex pest super combo, and was seen by witnesses abusing minors. Unfortunately, despite multiple witnesses coming forward, enough time had passed that the charges were dropped.
Anyway, here is Brent Hawkes making news recently, leading his congregation to committing the only unforgivable sin: View attachment 6977158
You see, in the Bible, it's interpreted that the only unforgivable sin a person can commit is rejecting The Holy Spirit. And, of course, rejecting any part of The Holy Trinity is rejecting The Holy Spirit.
In a nicer timeline priests wearing rainbow garb would be a sign of them celebrating the scripture and God's promise after the Flood to not do it again. Instead it got co-opted by faggots.
I believe I've said it before, but my father is extremely online when it comes to news about the Front. Every six months or so there's a conversation that goes as such;
>Anything new in the world?
-The Ukrainians have <new weapon> using it to great effect and have broken through the russian lines in <shitcuntsky oblast vladivladovstoksburg>! Lots of progress
>Cool, have the Ukrainians moved the front significantly since the last time we spoke of this?
-No
You see, in the Bible, it's interpreted that the only unforgivable sin a person can commit is rejecting The Holy Spirit. And, of course, rejecting any part of The Holy Trinity is rejecting The Holy Spirit.
i disagree with this idea, as a christian myself. I think it's fairly obvious that what Christ is saying when he speaks of the unforgivable sin is for someone to spend their entire life rejecting God and the message of salvation from Christ, meaning that they cannot be forgiven because they do not ask for or seek forgiveness. @MetokurGroomedMe
This thread goes so fast and I have so little time but--the unforgivable sin is attributing what the devil does to the Holy Spirit, like the Pharisees did when they accused Jesus of using satan's power to drive out demons. All this liberal doctrine these leftists churches are espousing is playing with that fire, if not outright chucking themselves into it.
Politics: I lost the post but anyone whining about Trump actually talking to leaders to achieve diplomacy as "normalizing" them is a huge part of the problem. Putting people in permanent good and bad boxes is the death nell of diplomacy, and discourse in general.
Also--it's always amusing when new posters waltz in here, pretend they've actually read the thread when they haven't, disingenuously try to act superior by pretending to be "level headed" or "neutral", proceed to insult the thread's collective intelligence, refuse to add to the discourse when asked, then scurry back to their NPC hug box and say, "Well, I tried, but they're all a bunch of (insert sexual act analogy) over there". Many sad cases.
They should print some $47 bills with Trump on the front, mail a few out to everyone with money recovered that was marked for funding communism and fag-sex. Shitcongo pavement apes will be selling trump bags.
Ah shit nigga, 'e did half a trump bag right dere! I seent it! muhfuggah goin sleep now! e goin sleep now! lookit dat muhfuggah! e sleepin! call da bambalamps! mess aroun dem trump bags!
I believe I've said it before, but my father is extremely online when it comes to news about the Front. Every six months or so there's a conversation that goes as such;
>Anything new in the world?
-The Ukrainians have <new weapon> using it to great effect and have broken through the russian lines in <shitcuntsky oblast vladivladovstoksburg>! Lots of progress
>Cool, have the Ukrainians moved the front significantly since the last time we spoke of this?
-No
There's a scene in All Quiet on the Western Front where the soldier goes home and gets pissed off at the blowhard armchair generals at the pub who have no idea what is actually going on. That is every internet thread about an ongoing war ever.
i disagree with this idea, as a christian myself. I think it's fairly obvious that what Christ is saying when he speaks of the unforgivable sin is for someone to spend their entire life rejecting God and the message of salvation from Christ, meaning that they cannot be forgiven because they do not ask for or seek forgiveness. View attachment 6977223 View attachment 6977224
wait, they actually did what they said they'd do? and doesn't that sound suspiciously close to the amount of money sent to FEMA NYC for migrants? 60m for 'disaster relief' for niggerfaggot migrants.
funny that they lie and say that elon musk alone took the money, but then reading it you find out it's absolutely within the fed's rights to do.
hey, maybe you shouldn't have drawn so much attention to yourselves while directly defying the president.
if mitch's heart gives out from all the pressure of voting right before he votes no, what's the actual precedent for that? has it ever happened that a congressman of any kind has croaked during or directly before a vote on something like this? i imagine it would postpone the vote again and give the left even more time to wait on confirmation.
I'm trying to find real confirmation from non-german-faggot news but it seems like Zelensky backed out of signing a rare earth metals deal with the US today, after the EU started reeeee'ing about not being at the table for upcoming peace negotiations.
Let’s be honest, when Trump announced his retarded Gaza idea some people here were doing mental gymnastics to justify why it was a good thing. Others, including me, pushed back.
This thread can become a circlejerk but you just need to put the cocksuckers in line by rating them dumb and calling them out.
Also--it's always amusing when new posters waltz in here, pretend they've actually read the thread when they haven't, disingenuously try to act superior by pretending to be "level headed" or "neutral", proceed to insult the thread's collective intelligence, refuse to add to the discourse when asked, then scurry back to their NPC hug box and say, "Well, I tried, but they're all a bunch of (insert sexual act analogy) over there". Many sad cases.
It's hilarious that anyone would call this thread a GOP lovefest when I'm sure everyone who posts in it would like to see Mitch McConnell have one of his freeze-ups while he's walking across train tracks.
No he's right the US government better give lockheed another 2 trillion dollars to develop something that would even have a chance to defeat such a fierce fighter!
Besides, this is how we defeat Russian fighter jets in the 21st century:
The Su-57's radar profile is about 10x larger than the F-35's, meaning that the distance a SAM can detect and hit one is significantly larger, which in turn reduces the operational range of the Russian jet. The Su-57 is basically limited to raids against shithole countries that can't afford or aren't permitted to buy current-generation SAM technology.
If Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 became real life, the Russian Federation's single squadron of Su-57s wouldn't be a difference maker.
