US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A tragic shame that their best candidate for it was while they were still in denial. They put too much support into trying to polish a turd to completely drop their organization, and there wasn't enough time for the party to make a show of how fucked they were.

If you asked me who the uniparty would pick for this, I would say Bernie. Old as fuck, a radical who has a fanbase which always believes they're one good primary away from greatness, and will accept a fifth house in exchange for playing the fall guy. this is a very different question from who WOULD be a good pick for this, which is probably a person of colour so virulently hateful and dumb they singlehandedly sabotage the 'pocs are better than whites' argument for a whole generation by their mere existence.
 
Last edited:
Eat shit, lady. Most men don't hate women. They just hate women like you.

This sums up everything I hate about women. They use too many words to say too little. I’m not reading that shit.

For your own sake fren I’d watch the one word replies. Make it two words at the very least.
I mean I show up with food and I don’t nag and I don’t think any man has ever openly expressed that he hated me.

Has she tried maybe shutting up a bit and actually making dinner once in a while?
 
The democrats are well and truly fucked. Not that I want to give them pointers, but until they stop being the Special Interest Group Super Friends they will never have a block to build on. They allowed too many niche, bullshit causes to take center stage in both the media and on policy.

In order for them to make any kind of headway as a party they have to find a place other than the one they currently are. You can't have a base of trannies, faggots, illegals, hood rats, and wine aunts.

They've lost the entirety of middle america. They've lost most of the blue collar workers, and the few who still stay with them are the union faggots who should have been drowned at birth.
 
I mean I show up with food and I don’t nag and I don’t think any man has ever openly expressed that he hated me.
A lot of women tell men what they need to do in an essay, when women can just tell men what they need to do in a few words. (Mothers, girlfriends, wives) Men work that way. I don’t know why women require so many words to understand a concept but that’s apparently the case.
 
So that can only really play out like that if they bring the radical populace to heel, and I really don't see that happening without a bunch of them snapping (which could be anything from a complete rejection of the left wing parties for the forseeable future to literal terrorist actions).
Liberals set off hundreds of bombs and caused thousands of casualties throughout the 1970's. There's always the possibility that this could resume (assuming there's at least a few liberals who aren't dumb enough to blow their own hands off) once enough of them finally snap.

Maybe this time we won't let them get away with it and vanish into academia to poison the next generation.
 
This could literally invalidate unionization of federal employees by the Supreme Court. Not even FDR could abolish federal unions and he tried.


Quite literally. It's constitutionally questionable that Federal workers even have standing to appeal to the courts since they are servants of the President, a coequal branch over which the courts only have cursory review power.
Seems like Congress could mandate outcomes, and control funding, but not tell the Executive exactly how to accomplish it.
 
A lot of women tell men what they need to do in an essay, when women can just tell men what they need to do in a few words. (Mothers, girlfriends, wives) Men work that way. I don’t know why women require so many words to understand a concept but that’s apparently the case.
We are different creatures than men. That’s fine. That’s how we were made. The problem comes when women expect men to behave like women. Just like in medicine, how problems arise when men expect women to behave like men.

Fuckin Rosie Riveter bullshit about how we are all the same has gotten ALL of us in a big ole mess. Let men be men. Let women be women.
 
With RFK being so heavily endorsed by his supporters and trumps, the mandate of the people will be so much more compelling than dollars from big food. You asked what would stop the millionaires and billionaires from changing their tune? They already have wealth. What can fast food companies offer? What could Monsanto or taco bell offer RFK to stop his holy war against processed foods? Trump has cosigned RFK in strong terms. I don't see it happening. Rate me optimistic, because I am. I'm on cloud nine of optimism right now. I believe Trump term #2 is a turning point, and I won't have negative nancies raining on my parade :mad:
Fast food won't die, Trump loves fast food and your average Joe isn't against the occasional big Mac now and then. The idea is to get people to eat less of it, and hopefully even start cooking for themselves again instead of eating shitty processed pre packaged meals. I've been slowly teaching myself how to cook over the years and while what I can make is limited, I feel proud that I can go to a grocery store and skip shit like frozen and canned meals.
 
Beggars can be choosers got it . You can go shit on white women all you want they are the reason why donnie over here is sitting on the throne . Meanwhile every single male group is either on parity or way behind in votes besides white men. I am sure banning abortion and shitting on white women will help.
No worries whichever party sends you to die for isreal is a go for me and probably lots of other women too.
Reminder that anti-woman content is also anti-family content. It's a psy-op designed to keep the lower classes seperate so they don't turn their eyes towards the McMansion on the hill. Unfortunately it seems like it's working, on both sides of the aisle.
How are these people still hyped up to vote for the weakest, most disastrous trainwreck of a political candidate in US history? It is really fitting for these stubborn morons to have a donkey as their symbol.
When did we start believing in polls around here? It's fake. They polled 30 blue-haired cat ladies from San Francisco to get the results they wanted. Nobody wants Kamala back.

The truth is, the rainbow fags are seething, the wetbacks are terrified, the few niggers that are left are either happy or in jail for shoplifting, and the natural-born Chicanillos are quietly delighted to get rid of the wetbacks. People are seething over the LA fires and the way that Bass and Newsom are obstructing the rebuilding process.

Former Democrats now realize that shoe-horning Kamala Harris in as a last-minute candidate ruined their party. I heard a long-term catlady lesbian say, "If they'd just let Biden lose fair and square, we could have tried again in 2028. Now we've got nobody." People are waking up, even some of the wokiest wokesters are admitting that mistakes were made.
Holy shit these states would rather choose death over liberty.
An article from Politico? Really? Walz doesn't have a chance either. Another psy-op.
Poor Null, he will never have a big girl to call his own while GOMELD GREMF remains in power.
We can just take three smol ones and glue em together, he'll be fine.
Wonder what Jefferson and Hamilton would think of a "permit to demonstrate"

every now and again I read something like that the snaps me out of our current time and place and I just see how the people of 1775 would respond to the British passing that as a law against them

You almost get the feeling we are only pretending we have some of the freedoms we claim to be so proud of and you just start to wonder, if that's the case how long has it been like that and even with all the good things happening now, can we ever get them back?

I know the jeet political party dosent seem like the hill to die on over this but its a good example of how you don't show the honesty of your policy's and ideals when they apply to you and yours but when you are confronted with them needing to apply to people you dont like or disagree with, thats when you find out if you really believe in anything or just whatever helps you out the most in the moment.
Jefferson and Hamilton would say "At least they didn't get shot." Nobody ever promised that protesting was 100% free of consequences for all actions done while protesting. This includes threatening the life of a visiting dignitary invited by the White House. And blocking the road. And harassing counter-protesters that DID get a permit. I predict we won't be seeing fiery but mostly peaceful protests any more.
RFK Jr. getting confirmed made me suddenly realise, that I haven't eaten a burger with a side of fries in about a year. Might as well go buy a Big Mac or a Double Whopper tomorrow. I'll do it for Robert.
Edit: Added Jr. The original RFK is unfortunately still dead.
Consider the Jack In the Box Smashburger, just try not to die of sticker shock before you get a chance to eat the burger. They're really, really good.
 
We are different creatures than men. That’s fine. That’s how we were made. The problem comes when women expect men to behave like women. Just like in medicine, how problems arise when men expect women to behave like men.

Fuckin Rosie Riveter bullshit about how we are all the same has gotten ALL of us in a big ole mess. Let men be men. Let women be women.
Oh well. I guess I know a nagging woman is at least acting like a normal woman. Even if it gets annoying, to say the least.

But I do love the women in my life, even if they drive me insane.
 
I'm curious what the future will look like for the Democratic party because they will most certainly lose the next election. Surely they will lose funding from their elites because they can't produce results. Will they split off into a new party? Rebrand into something else?

Edit: people rating me optimistic, I get it but the Dems are tripling down on identity politics. It would have to be retardation on an unfound scale for them to win.
Democrats are basically split in 3 directions, probably more, but in general, I would say 3.

On one hand, you have the old guard. These are Dems that are either late Millennial to Boomer. They cling to legacy media to make sense of anything as they are basically still living in the 2000s when John Stewart and SNL were "smart people" comedy. They will fight to bring in the next Black Jesus as they refuse to move past Obama even though they constantly talk shit at the Republicans for being afraid of change. This is the Dems primary demographic, though it is a dwindling one as it only applies to old folks. They cannot grow support from this base anymore.

Then you have the woke left. The wokes are useful idiots as they will always vote Dem, but they are absolutely dangerous in terms of biting the hand that feeds. Dems need to get rid of them as they are never satisfied and will continue to fight the party to go further left, often getting violent (including with other Dems).

Finally, you have the non-woke Bernie Bros. This 3rd camp probably hardly exists now given Trump has gifted them wins, but still a faction. Personally, I think Bernie and the more Progressives were the obvious answer to where the Dems head, but the party f'd them at every turn so they are no longer an option. Such a waste as they had Tulsi and RFK at one point yet threw them under, hell even 2016 Bernie wasn't that bad.

In terms of winning, only camp 3 really has a chance. It is likely an inevitability that some progressive will make it and do a Trump style take-over of the party now that they are extremely weakened. Really, the Dems just need a big man to turn up the same way Trump did, and they would be able to regain ground, only issue is that the party has been shown to kill off any opposition to the Clinton/Obama regime, so it will likely be awhile.

As for where Dems will head in 2028, bets are on them shuffling Mark Cuban out to be their "Trump" and have him sell healthcare. I doubt it will work as the party will clearly still have its tentacles wrapped around him, but I guess we wait and see.
 
in general thats 90% of "conservative" women, they were on default mode until something bad happened to them. look at ana from the young turks, or your average hick woman or woman in a neo-nazi group. aren't most of the bitches being e-celebs in the alt-right "former" coalburners as well?

women are all about their love of brown people and trannies and other "inferiors" until they have to interact with one.
With all do respect and sympathy for young men in an increasingly lonely society. You’re probably unfamiliar with pre- sex positive penis is everything movement. in the 90’s it was “dude meet my sister“ and it was more about having a nice face, and sharing similar experiences, back than your only competitor was the poster of David Vanian from the damned. I have to agree it’s sad the world and love just became just about pleasure.
 
In terms of winning, only camp 3 really has a chance. It is likely an inevitability that some progressive will make it and do a Trump style take-over of the party now that they are extremely weakened. Really, the Dems just need a big man to turn up the same way Trump did, and they would be able to regain ground, only issue is that the party has been shown to kill off any opposition to the Clinton/Obama regime, so it will likely be awhile.
It's going to be way harder for a trump style takeover based on the superdelegate system alone.
 
Back