Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

I could see intra-eu conflict arising if Greece or Italy or Hungary step out of line. The EU apparatchiks are married to the mass immigration for whatever reason.

If you're able to declare the government of the day illegitimate and accept the "pleas for help" from an government in exile, Article 222 TFEU and Article 42(7) TEU can be twisted easily enough to justify intervention.
 
Screenshot 2025-02-16 180003.png
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Welf Welf
If the loss ratio was so low and Putin is reportedly running out of, men, money and material, then why are frequently Ukrainian battalions under strength, under equipped, and getting overrun?

Though in honesty in just the pure morbid reason, I'm going to truly wonder how bad it is/was for both sides as it can be going great if Ukraine is having pressganger buses shipping men with sometimes two weeks of training to the front line.
 
The funniest bit to those that will perceive it will be the media simultaneously un-demonizing Russia and Russians after the happening concludes.
Since the average "politically active" European online is fully Americanized and consumes media straight from the USA, they'll be hit by cognitive dissonance very hard when domestic Brussels media will be crying about the RuZZians while the Americans don't give a shit.
I genuinely think they'll flip a switch and all the genocidal narratives about the extermination of subhumans, Mongolic hordes, Asiatics orks that will overrun Europe any moment etc. will vanish and everyone will pretend it never happened.
 
Zelensky's just flown to the UAE for some reason, although it's not clear whether it's at the call of the US or the Europeans
untitled44.jpguntitled41.jpg
This Ukrainian source also claims he's been ordered to turn up to the Saudi talks. The ones that other sources say are going to happen without him. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
untitled40.jpguntitled43.jpg
The audit's not looking good (although I did hear rumours that part of the missing weapons were diverted by Tony Blinken to Israel and to help overthrow the Syrian government - can't even remember where I heard that so feel free to doubt)
untitled42.jpg
So the Brits are coming with "an arsenal of futuristic weapons". How will the Russians ever match that? By picking up those that the Ukrainians drop as they retreat. If you ever wanted a short descriptor of how pathetic the British Army is, just take the first paragraph of this : "Due to the improper use and withdrawal of the Ukrainian armed forces, the Russian army has more American FGM-148 Javelin anti-tank missiles than the UK has" And didn't have to pay a single cent either.
untitled47.jpg
Another new Russian weapon. Presented just as a point of interest. I'm at a loss to say what this does that an artillery shell doesn't.
untitled46.jpg

Looks like things are already changing on the ground. I'm not sure how this will effect the current Ukie strategy of pointing bomb-filled gliders in the right-ish direction and hoping for the best, so we'll just have to see
untitled48.jpg

Finally a short clip of what it's like to be on the receiving end of cluster munition. Hollywood does it better
 
Last edited:
Does the US have any troops stationed in the UK? Maybe their strategy is to have a reason for the Russians to hit their bases with missiles and drag the US into the war.
Poland is much closer (and we do have american soldiers here AFAIK) and our retarded politicians seem very eager to shed polish blood for fucking hohols
 
Another new Russian weapon. Presented just as a point of interest. I'm at a loss to say what this does that an artillery shell doesn't.
Can wave off, redirect, or otherwise position itself to better strike a fixed target. The current crop of US guided artillery munitions can basically hit the exact grid point you want them to, but its only as precise as the intel that chose that square.

Its not a huge advantage, no universe shaking thing or the like, but it can be the difference as to whether your strike lands inside or outside of the enemy defenses. Its similar in advantage to the recent use of FPV drones to fly into open hatches and shit in Ukrainian vehicles. If I was the MIC trying to sell this to people, I'd call it "Intelligent Armor Piercing".
 
UK/Europe in a nutshell. Speak a big game but when it comes to actually provide funding then they either they go no-comm or just divert.

Europe need to realize that there are only two options.
1, let US carry the brunt of the cost for defence, but that does make you their bitch and you will have to do what you are fucking told.
2, build up your own defence, which has been neglected for so long. I would suggest they would need to dial spending up to ~5% of GDP for 10 years, to build a decent defence structure. After that they can pull it back to 2-3% to just maintain that level.

Be someones bitch or open the wallet and pay for your own defence. No other options.


I also don't understand how the brains of some people work.
"USA sucks, we will build our own armies and defences here in europe, take that Drump".
What the fuck, that is exactly whay he is telling you you should do. How/why do you think this is some gotcha?
 
Last edited:
Back