Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 16.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 24.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 153 40.4%

  • Total voters
    379
You mean he rejected the very case that established judicial review, and is the basis of Supreme Court authority? Sounds in line for a lawyer that is not, not has ever been, a lawyer.
Yes. And at the time, he was not so incessantly high on Galaxy Gas and admitted he held a fringe opinion on the subject. It still should have been a sign. It was and is absolute nutjobbery.
It's true they didn't explicitly spell out the concept of judicial review in Article III, but you know why? Because NO SHIT, SHERLOCK!
Anyone who thinks the Framers actually intended to create three branches of government, but one of the branches would be a completely impotent rubber stamp, is absolutely retarded.

Read the Federalist Papers, nigga!
x9vw68d70qtd1.png
Honestly, the Nick saga has made me far more "right-wing". (What does that even mean anymore?
I don't consider myself "right wing" and have no intention of ever being some kind of winger.

Even diluting my current political opinions to avoiding conflict irl, I have had people I've known for a long time asking why I've turned right wing. I HAVEN'T. The "left wing" has just become so absolutely insane I can no longer agree with it. I didn't leave the left wing, the left wing left me.
 
Last edited:
But sending your wife's attorney to go harangue a witness in a criminal case is exactly the sort of nitwit legal theory I would see Nick coming up with.
Considering we saw Kayla's attorney do Nick's bidding with the garbage motions, it's possible this actually happened.

Then again, Geno is an idiot
 
The coke was in the house. By definition it's near children.
Nick pled guilty to all these facts, admitted he was not denying guilt, and he did this under oath. These facts that he pled to amount to all the crimes he was accused of, including child endangerment.

Now he can whine and cry in his nasal fag voice that he hasn't been found guilty of that particular crime against his children, one of whom tested positive for cocaine abusive on the level of a regular user, but he has admitted, under oath, that he is guilty of every single factual element of the crimes he committed.

He did that, under oath.

He will burn in Hell for the vile crimes he committed against his own children.
 
Considering we saw Kayla's attorney do Nick's bidding with the garbage motions, it's possible this actually happened.

Then again, Geno is an idiot
I don't really think Geno or Keanu have the capacity to research who Kayla's attorney is, I don't think it's something they'd make up

How bizarre though
 
He's a lolbertarian, and they will generally break for a Republican over a Democrat in most cases.
Lolbertarians are just leftoid whores that want lower taxes and less regulation (specifically on the age of consent).
On the "near" issue. Let's just assume Aaron's version is correct (and I do): Nick & Co did drugs in the master bathroom. That's on the same floor as another bedroom housing one of his kids and about 15 feet vertically from the other four kids.
Under the same roof doesn't constitute as "near"?
In the same master bedroom where admittedly one of his kids likes to stay at, the same that tested positive for cocaine metabolites at more than 10 times the cutoff isn't "near"?
From the streaming dungeon that's in close proximity to the living room and kitchen isn't "near"?
What does he think the word NEAR means?
 
I don't really think Geno or Keanu have the capacity to research who Kayla's attorney is, I don't think it's something they'd make up

How bizarre though
If Kayla's attorney is contacting Geno directly it means they plan a civil case of some sorts.

Of course, with Nick's expert definition of lie that will go swimmingly.

Geno has also previously said that Rekieta asked him to lie about something. To my knowledge he didn't yet reveal what.

The writing has been on the wall for awhile now. Nick directly attributes his current popularity with Aaron and what Aaron said, not the actual police investigation and subsequently what was found.

I really don't think Balldo has the cash for another civil case or understand what he hopes to achieve. No jury is going to be particularly sympathetic. Minnesota is a lolcow liberal state, but where Nick and Aaron live the voters are heavily conservative.
 
Under the same roof doesn't constitute as "near"?
We're dealing with Nitrous Nick faggot logic here.

In his nasal fag voice, "near" means whatever he thinks it does. It can mean that it isn't "near" if it isn't a nano-angstrom away.

Just pointing out. Nick is an absolute faggot who constantly redefines words so that in his tiny little worm brain, no accusation against him is true.

Then he can whine in his pathetic homosexual fag voice that the people telling the truth about him are wrong.

This works in his mindless little worm world.
 
I really don't think Balldo has the cash for another civil case or understand what he hopes to achieve. No jury is going to be particularly sympathetic. Minnesota is a lolcow liberal state, but where Nick and Aaron live the voters are heavily conservative.

He has a whole house left to leverage debt with.

Step 1: Mortgage the house, pay giant retainer to Maggie.
Step 2: Sue Aaron and win Aarons house
Step 3: Lose main house to foreclosure
Step 4: Lose Aaron's house to Montegraph

It's a 4 step plan to keep KF threads buzzing for years.
 
He has a whole house left to leverage debt with.

Step 1: Mortgage the house, pay giant retainer to Maggie.
Step 2: Sue Aaron and win Aarons house
Step 3: Lose main house to foreclosure
Step 4: Lose Aaron's house to Montegraph

It's a 4 step plan to keep KF threads buzzing for years.
This is bleak and on point. Nick has at least $800K to play with.
Aaron needs to consider a GiveSendGo asap.
 
But sending your wife's attorney to go harangue a witness in a criminal case is exactly the sort of nitwit legal theory I would see Nick coming up with.
And if it fails or backfires, he'll blame her. Just like he threw White and his partner under the bus.

I am convinced all of Nick's motions were tightly directed, if not actually outright ghostwritten, by Nick.

Considering we saw Kayla's attorney do Nick's bidding with the garbage motions, it's possible this actually happened.
I don't really think Geno or Keanu have the capacity to research who Kayla's attorney is, I don't think it's something they'd make up
I also can't think of a single reason why'd they'd have any problem with Kayla's attorney, but for a situation where she causes a problem for them.

I think they're telling the truth.
 
I don't really think Geno or Keanu have the capacity to research who Kayla's attorney is, I don't think it's something they'd make up

How bizarre though

I'm not sure why I find 'dumb' so annoying in 2025 but I agree.

Hey AARON, we know you're around. Please let them know about MCRO and give them the case numbers. This is embarrassing. Throw in a dictionary. Some of the three-syllable words may be challenging.

Yours: 73-CR-24-6910
Nick's: 34-CR-24-341
Kayla's: 34-CR-24-342
April's: 34-CR-24-487

While you're at it, tell them to throw $500 at a cheap lawyer to get some advice, or call Sean instead of publicly insulting him.
(An HRO against Nick would be hilarious and not the worst idea.)
 
Last edited:
Nick's cope went from "I never did coke" to "I never did coke around my kids", there's no doubt it'll keep getting worse as time goes on until it's "I only gave my daughter the appropriate amount of cocaine"
Nick's cope is: we did coke and ketamine and meth and swinging RESPONSIBLY around the kids!!!

Junkie Logic
That is all.

Last NOTE: as one of rackets former friends identified early on.....junkie n whore should have left it AT THE DOOR. Once you bring it inside your home where your kids live, you are Trash Parents. Periodt. Dont forget that was gasbag Boss Baby Barnes claim that the drugs were in a safe, the affidavit does not state that, and society as a whole knows that to be a lie from watched or actual experience. Junkie man thinks Coke is good for people stress levels. Aint no way he was careful with it around his kids. Just like he was OPENLY too lazy to feed his child a QUESADILLA on pedoh show [after the arrest], it figures that he was also too lazy and drugged out of it to put anything away while drugged out. Bleach is not dangerous anymore to the Junkie I guess. But ketamine and coke was definitely put away. Just show the arrest pix. Those addicts had no clue what their left hand was doing much less where they left their coke.

The MAXIM "the walls have ears" exist for a reason. And its definitely because a JUNKIE be a JUNKIE
 
Last edited:
Considering we saw Kayla's attorney do Nick's bidding with the garbage motions, it's possible this actually happened.

Then again, Geno is an idiot
The motions filed by Maggie Kluver made no sense without the context of supporting Nick's insane ramblings.
He tried to slip in a probable cause challenge through her case because he and his lawyer fucked up and forgot to raise the issues during the Omnibus Hearing, effectively waiving them. If this challenge of probable cause had resulted in evidence being suppressed or the case being dismissed for Kayla, then Nick would have had a good case to appeal in his own case.

There was also no reason for the personal attacks aimed at Aaron in the filings, the entire thing was very unprofessional and unbecoming of a professional lawyer. Kluver is a professional, she is an elected attorney in a county, had about 250? active cases in Minnesota within a year.

No way in hell she would file this kind of garbage without Nick riding her ass and paying through his nose.

[EDIT] To fix double post
While you're at it, tell them to throw $500 at a cheap lawyer to get some advice, or call Sean instead of publicly insulting him.
(An HRO against Nick would be hilarious and not the worst idea.)
HRO against Nick and Kayla would be a fun escalation and absolutely deserved. Nick is an insane manchild with a revenge boner who likes to go after people to ruin their lives. Montagraph ruining Nick in return will be the highlight of 2025 hopefully.
 
What exactly would Nick sue Aaron for that would actually win him anything in court? Defamation? Aaron didn't destroy his reputation, Nick did that himself when he streamed 5 hours of insane ranting high on cocaine as the culmination of his 2 year meltdown. Not to mention Nick currently is himself being sued for defamation. Revenge porn for his wife? I mean I guess that would work, but all he's gotta do is play Bug-Eyed Kayla's "I'm a failure of a mother" clip and show all the nude pictures they took at Hedonism 2 and their own bedroom they posted to Locals. I'm pretty certain Nick thinks "revenge porn" is some sort of auto-win, but even if the law is stupidly broad and Aaron technically broke it, what jury is going to award much of a verdict because a perverted polycule couple had a single picture leak?

I guess I could see Nick winning on both counts, but he's gonna win like $1 for his wife's destroyed Jamaican semen-soaked body. And he'll win the defamation but at the cost of hilariously embarassing details coming out in discovery that prove Aaron only embellished stories about Nick's drug junkie cuck lifestyle and no doubt includes shots of Nick's filthy home and inshallah the holy grail of the bodycam footage itself. That's the sort of self-own Nick's into, just like when he admitted in court filings that he was a cuck whose wife voluntarily sent naked pictures to a washed up loser radio DJ.
 
What exactly would Nick sue Aaron for that would actually win him anything in court? Defamation? Aaron didn't destroy his reputation, Nick did that himself when he streamed 5 hours of insane ranting high on cocaine as the culmination of his 2 year meltdown. Not to mention Nick currently is himself being sued for defamation. Revenge porn for his wife? I mean I guess that would work, but all he's gotta do is play Bug-Eyed Kayla's "I'm a failure of a mother" clip and show all the nude pictures they took at Hedonism 2 and their own bedroom they posted to Locals. I'm pretty certain Nick thinks "revenge porn" is some sort of auto-win, but even if the law is stupidly broad and Aaron technically broke it, what jury is going to award much of a verdict because a perverted polycule couple had a single picture leak?

I guess I could see Nick winning on both counts, but he's gonna win like $1 for his wife's destroyed Jamaican semen-soaked body. And he'll win the defamation but at the cost of hilariously embarassing details coming out in discovery that prove Aaron only embellished stories about Nick's drug junkie cuck lifestyle and no doubt includes shots of Nick's filthy home and inshallah the holy grail of the bodycam footage itself. That's the sort of self-own Nick's into, just like when he admitted in court filings that he was a cuck whose wife voluntarily sent naked pictures to a washed up loser radio DJ.
Nick just wants to financially hurt Aaron out of spite and cost him 5+ figures to defend himself
 
We're dealing with Nitrous Nick faggot logic here.

In his nasal fag voice, "near" means whatever he thinks it does. It can mean that it isn't "near" if it isn't a nano-angstrom away.

Just pointing out. Nick is an absolute faggot who constantly redefines words so that in his tiny little worm brain, no accusation against him is true.

Then he can whine in his pathetic homosexual fag voice that the people telling the truth about him are wrong.

This works in his mindless little worm world.
Agreed, which is why I said in a previous post that Nick needs to be beaten with a 2x4 until the Clinton is completely out of him. Unfortunately for him, I suspect that point will be when he's a puddle of red jelly on the floor -- but we must take these risks for SCIENCE!!!
 
If Kayla's attorney is contacting Geno directly it means they plan a civil case of some sorts.

Of course, with Nick's expert definition of lie that will go swimmingly.

Geno has also previously said that Rekieta asked him to lie about something. To my knowledge he didn't yet reveal what.

The writing has been on the wall for awhile now. Nick directly attributes his current popularity with Aaron and what Aaron said, not the actual police investigation and subsequently what was found.

I really don't think Balldo has the cash for another civil case or understand what he hopes to achieve. No jury is going to be particularly sympathetic. Minnesota is a lolcow liberal state, but where Nick and Aaron live the voters are heavily conservative.
Lololololol
A civil suit AFTER being arrested AND junkie pleading guilty.
Oh AND DOCUMENTED two female polycule members were dismissed charges BUT still have arrest pix and charges? The arrest does not get expunged, doh. Lest we forget the affidavit of Aaron's arrest had many MANY witness facts from junkie, whore-wife AND minnesota 6.

Best of luck
Please do go get embarrassed more
Junkie Logic is wild!!!

A minnesota Attorney.contacting a citizen of ANOTHER STATE??? I do hope Kayla's attorney was authorized to practice in Geno and Keanu's state OR we do have BAR LICENSE issues for Kayla's attorney. I keep saying a subpoena from minnesota carries no weight in a NON-minnesota state.

Anyone recall Rittenhouse?
Ya know having to extradite rittenhouse from illinois to wisconsin AND THAT WAS the government wanting Rittenhouse [in neighboring states] NOT JUST a mealy-mouth attorney who was likely NOT AUTHORIZED to practice in Geno's state of residence actually contacting Geno/Keanu!!! I bet the AG of Geno/Keanu state might be interested to know simple-minded MN attorneys are trying to threaten citizens NOT residing in MN.
Maybe not.
State Bar of Minnesota is interested, if not licensed to practice in Geno/Keanu state.

Many attorneys believe they are all-powerful and can reach out and touch anyone, for any reason, in other states, license be damned.
They would be wrong.

Just more FUEL for Aaron's Attorney's fire, to take down MN RP statute to the SCOTUS. AND to dismiss the RP case because who sent a lowly MN attorney to bother a witness in a criminal trial that was weak by the MN DA own mouth, if not the MN GOVERNMENT.

There are possibly multiple levels of stupid in this BS RP Case. Aaron should use this admission on video by geno, just as MN DA intends to use that VIDEO geno ADMISSION as element of a crime....so should Aaron.

Either its allowed by both
Or
Neither.

Either way, case is doomed for dismissal based on the atty contacting Geno.

1. Shows state is nervous
2. State is talking with its CI---a junkie called Nick
3. State action, this is what happens when government gets involved with addicts. Stupid moves abound.

FUCKING HILARIOUS
 
Last edited:
What exactly would Nick sue Aaron for that would actually win him anything in court?

A civil case would be around damages suffered by Kayla as a result of Aaron's actions. Presumably reputational or emotional damages suffered as a result of the "revenge porn" incident.

But it would be an extremely difficult and unusual case because:

1) They would have to prove that Kayla was damaged by an act of revenge porn that involved at best one image being shared with one person who seems to have looked at it once on their cell phone and disposed of it.

2) The damages associated with revenge porn are usually associated with uncontrolled public dissemination of an image on something like the internet. That the images get out in an uncontrolled way on the internet and thus do damage that is not easy to address. That didn't happen in this case.

3) The case would be around a person arrested for drug charges who had their children taken away by the government for six months and has been shamed in public as a sexual degenerate and swinger claiming that during all those things going on she suffered great personal or reputational harm by Geno allegedly seeing a single nude picture of her.

4) A criminal case or a criminal trial helps with establishing facts, but it does not help with establishing damages. The criminal law was written in a very specific way such that distribution of one photo to one person is revenge porn. But civil law would be about proving damages.
 
What exactly would Nick sue Aaron for that would actually win him anything in court? Defamation? Aaron didn't destroy his reputation,
Yes, defamation causing a loss of income (Nick's) due to reputational damage. Nick and Kayla (and even April) could also argue some version of pain and suffering because of Aarons's public disclosures.

but he's gonna win like $1
The point might be to bankrupt Aaron with legal fees.

Lest we forget the affidavit of Aaron's arrest had many MANY witness facts from junkie, whore-wife AND minnesota 6.
April and Kayla can either deny the polycule, and later thruple, or say that it was meant to be confidential. The case law on this might be interesting considering that Nick admitted to April being his "girlfriend" and all the public cum-eating disclosures after Aaron spilled all of the salacious details.

One interesting issue: Nick's eldest will be 18 years old in November. What does he know? And what did the kids say to CPS or their grandparents?

The face-licking of Aaron and the hot tub video would be the most obvious pre-salacious disclosures that would make the case challenging and funny. Also hilarious is that we're back to the anti-SLAPP issues that occurred in the Monty case (MN is anti-SLAPP but it's very narrowly defined IIRC).

Anyway, I would argue that Nick has a case. Kayla has an HRO against Aaron and the polycule was called a Qover in an obvious "agreement" among the four to keep it under cover. Is that considered a contract, lol?
 
Back