Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Follow up question: was the plane designed by Subaru?How soon until they acknowledge that both pilots were stunning and brave lesbians that everybody adored?
Yeah I know. But the fact you can’t see this is trumps fault is just baffling tbh.this was in Canada retard.
Today's crash did an incredible job of selling the CRJ. Just on how seemingly strong the main fuselage is. The wings and tail tore off but the passenger compartment stayed together. That planes a tank.Also, can we just point out that the last 4 major hull loss incidents involving us airlines have all be CANADIAN built CRJ variants. A runway overrun in a delta crj, the delta CRJ that had its tail chopped off by an a330, the DC collision and now this.
This is a fucking Canadian plot I'm telling you.
Ah yes, the good old Canadian Rolling Jet. A fine specimen.Today's crash did an incredible job of selling the CRJ. Just on how seemingly strong the main fuselage is. The wings and tail tore off but the passenger compartment stayed together. That planes a tank.
Maybe so, but I'd gladly trade some hull points for the "Lands Upright" trait.Today's crash did an incredible job of selling the CRJ. Just on how seemingly strong the main fuselage is. The wings and tail tore off but the passenger compartment stayed together. That planes a tank.
That or since that plane flight is from Minneapolis, they could have hired local Somalians as pilots as well.If the Governments were hellbent on doing that, then they could just hire South Korean pilots in mass, instead of making overcomplicated DIE/BRIDGE standards, and then they'd have money leftover to burn elsewhere.
Also, can we just point out that the last 4 major hull loss incidents involving us airlines have all be CANADIAN built CRJ variants. A runway overrun in a delta crj, the delta CRJ that had its tail chopped off by an a330, the DC collision and now this.
This is a fucking Canadian plot I'm telling you.
Maybe so, but I'd gladly trade some hull points for the "Lands Upright" trait.
Probably was funded by USAIDDarn that Trump for defunding the… Canadian ATC.
Are you flying on ANA? Should be fine. JAL? Usually pretty good, although they have been dipping their toes into the woke waters as of late.Guys, I'm scared. I have a flight in April to Osaka I don't know how I feel about current day pilots...
Nah, they were still coming in way too hot and touched down entirely too late. They were going into that wall regardless of the orientation. Although upside-down would have included the possibility of the nose digging into the dirt and turning the whole thing into a 200mph ball of flaming, somersaulting metal.Come to think of it, had the Jeju Air crash been an upside down landing, that may have been enough to slow the plane down so it doesn't crash into that retaining wall like a pancake.
We lost a U-2 that way in Korea, many years ago. Just about ready to land, bad winds in winter there, flipped the plane over, killed the pilot.High crosswinds and possibly light on fuel which would make the crosswinds worse. That's my bet.
nah the CRJ is Bombardier (was built in Montreal)Follow up question: was the plane designed by Subaru?
Nah, they were still coming in way too hot and touched down entirely too late. They were going into that wall regardless of the orientation. Although upside-down would have included the possibility of the nose digging into the dirt and turning the whole thing into a 200mph ball of flaming, somersaulting metal.![]()
At the speed they were going when they hit the wall (approx. 175mph/152kts by my math), if the nose had dug in, it would have trashed the plane 800 feet sooner. But instead of a pancake it would have just ripped everything apart and flung it into the air (a 737 isn't gonna stay intact when a flip is initiated by the nose suddenly stopping). And just like when they hit the wall, the whole thing would have most likely been on fire. Anyone who survived the initial impact and possibly became airborne on their own would have died when that section hit the ground again.Wouldn't a plane somersaulting like that disperse energy in a safer way than the sudden stop into that wall, or would the spins be enough to throw occupants around so hard that it causes blunt force trauma deaths? (Can airplane seatbelts keep people restrained in spin crashes?) It reminds me of how in motorsports crashes, the more dramatic looking ones were the safer ones where the driver walks away unharmed, i.e. Allan McNish's crash at LeMans in 2011, but it's the sudden stop ones that will fuck you up, i.e. Allan Simonsen's crash at LeMans 2017 (?) and Dale Earnhardt Sr's fatal Daytona 500 crash.
The big three are notable - DC, this one, and the medical flight.Are there actually more airplane incidents at once or are they just being reported more thoroughly because they are in the public consciousness currently?
It's media bouncing the ball around until they have something they want to really prioritize. Mainstream news can't say that DOGE is doing work finding dumb expensive crap that John Q. Taxpayer is footing the bill on. They also can't say that Trump's border and deportation policy is doing good. They're in an actual media hold pattern until the next schizo shoots up a school or blows up a bomb.Are there actually more airplane incidents at once or are they just being reported more thoroughly because they are in the public consciousness currently?