- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Based on the context of the email; refusal to settle would be my guess.What bogus grounds does he think he has at this point?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Based on the context of the email; refusal to settle would be my guess.What bogus grounds does he think he has at this point?
I'd assume with experience they know what will be really important, and they take notes.While trying to take in this flurry of new motions a question popped into my mind: how do actual attorneys, ones that aren't schizoposting from their phone out of a rented uber, keep track of such a clusterfuck of a case? Is there special management software that plots this web of motions and counter-motions, ECFs and their attached deadlines into a sort of timeline-flowchart? I wonder how Hardin manages to reference specific bullet points from ECFs that were added to the docket years ago without photographic memory.
Harden is periodically going through this thread via the highlightsI'd assume with experience they know what will be really important, and they take notes.
Hardin should file pro seHey. you wanna hear a fun fact? That's a cause of action recognized in Virginia under which Mr. Hardin can retalliate lawfully
View attachment 7004493
Based on the context of the email; refusal to settle would be my guess.
well just wait and see then, the district court of utah is full of surprisesI sure as hell hope that is not a real, valid reason to impose sanctions on a defendant who professes his innocence and wishes to be found not liable, and to recover costs.
Yeah but if you look at for example software development, there's a whole business around providing project management software that keeps track of everything so milestones can be met. Think Jira. Surely there's something equivalent that is custom-tailored to lawyers? (last post on this tangent)I'd assume with experience they know what will be really important, and they take notes.
Not a lawyer, but I've worked with a few. Outlook mostly.Yeah but if you look at for example software development, there's a whole business around providing project management software that keeps track of everything so milestones can be met. Think Jira. Surely there's something equivalent that is custom-tailored to lawyers? (last post on this tangent)
I think good lawyers are just Built Different™ (they be remembering stuff)Yeah but if you look at for example software development, there's a whole business around providing project management software that keeps track of everything so milestones can be met. Think Jira. Surely there's something equivalent that is custom-tailored to lawyers? (last post on this tangent)
Normally I would be worried about this possibility, but he's been perfectly respectful and conciliatory so far and it's gotten him nothing, so. Fuck it up, Hardenship!I really hate to say this but Hardin is going to piss off the judge with this many filings. The fact that this is at 240 docket entries is incredibly retarded.
Yeah but if you look at for example software development, there's a whole business around providing project management software that keeps track of everything so milestones can be met. Think Jira. Surely there's something equivalent that is custom-tailored to lawyers? (last post on this tangent)
I mean the judge said it himself in the 26(f) transcripts, he’d rather address any pre-trial motions in clumps instead of one at a time.Normally I would be worried about this possibility, but he's been perfectly respectful and conciliatory so far and it's gotten him nothing, so. Fuck it up, Hardenship!
Of course. Salesforce alone has plenty of custom programs, and there are certainly plenty of Salesforce (and other) development companies who build custom project management type solutions for niche businesses. (I dipped the veeeeerrrrrry tip of a toe of my own in Salesforce dev once upon a long time ago and played with other customizable CRM type products [not for legal stuff though]).
Sounds like the judge hit "subscribe" to the monthly "this is what the Tard did since last time" newsletter and Hardin is happy to oblige.I mean the judge said it himself in the 26(f) transcripts, he’d rather address any pre-trial motions in clumps instead of one at a time.
Oh, he's been meaning to do something? Haven't heard that one before! It's fun reading all this in his voice, seething and drooling as he stumbles through it.
I love his implication here that those dang dirty trolls somehow magically influence everybody to not buy his work, whether than the reality which is his work is so obviously bad nobody is going to pay money for it.
At the rate this pre trial discovery is going I guess we'll never know if critiquing a gay ass book and its author is fair use or not.he was not expecting process to be hard & long.
...
he does & null is anal/strick about it
View attachment 7004287
View attachment 7004292
The sheer amount of retardation The Hardship is having to go through to get ONE SINGLE PAGE of discovery is mind-boggling to me. I fear you are right that the actual central issue can never be decided at this rate until 2029. We are gonna have to do about three more sets of fundraising just to get there.At the rate this pre trial discovery is going I guess we'll never know if critiquing a gay ass book and its author is fair use or not.
Human evolution is proceeding faster than this lawsuit.The sheer amount of retardation The Hardship is having to go through to get ONE SINGLE PAGE of discovery is mind-boggling to me. I fear you are right that the actual central issue can never be decided at this rate until 2029. We are gonna have to do about three more sets of fundraising just to get there.