Off-Topic Indoctrination Material for Toddlers and Children from Mainly LGBT Organizations - And Unique Niche Books That Fit Nowhere

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
A bit late on this, but:
1737371704743.png

As the ritual of Naming approaches, brash Quartz already knows the path ahead, while watchful Almond feels torn, fearing that any choice will disappoint someone in the family. Prowling through secret fortress tunnels, Almond and Quartz overhear a villainous plot: an ambitious underling schemes to seize power from Finch, the rightful Irzemi heir.
Who the fuck names their kid Almond? This is a personal pet peeve of mine, but I hate when authors give their characters quirky names just to make their title sound interesting. Almond, Quartz, and Finch is a much more attention-grabbing than Sam, Alex, and Charlie.
1737371723617.png
...she even gets the attention of her hero, trans activist Kai Shappley.
I was gonna say this Kai person is a raging narcissist for making a children's book about how awesome he was, but I looked him up and he's only 14 and has been "out" since at least 2018 (A). The poor thing was 8 years old in 2018. He's also signed to CAA (A), the talent agency that astroturfed Dylan Mulvaney. Y'all better head on down to your local haberdashery. I'm gonna need all the top hats they've got.

1737371315901.png
 
A bit late on this, but:

Who the fuck names their kid Almond? This is a personal pet peeve of mine, but I hate when authors give their characters quirky names just to make their title sound interesting. Almond, Quartz, and Finch is a much more attention-grabbing than Sam, Alex, and Charlie.

I was gonna say this Kai person is a raging narcissist for making a children's book about how awesome he was, but I looked him up and he's only 14 and has been "out" since at least 2018 (A). The poor thing was 8 years old in 2018. He's also signed to CAA (A), the talent agency that astroturfed Dylan Mulvaney. Y'all better head on down to your local haberdashery. I'm gonna need all the top hats they've got.

View attachment 6879511
Even with he puberty blockers he's looking awfully male already (albeit a sickly one).
Also
you are one uf my cerator for me beibg a womon
What did he mean by this? :thinking:
 
It's been brought up a couple times before about the number of amputees we've been seeing in these books, but legit, this comes off more of a fetish than actual "rep". Based on the cover, the setting looks inspired by the Middle East where they will cut off your hand for stealing, so the one boy there is probably one of those unfortunate street rats. A character like this sounds interesting when handled by the right people.

Nah, looks more like it's just for the hell of amputee-rep and it's not actually important to the character's progression in the story and for the author to get creative with writing a one-handed character. The artist might've likely drawn it with one hand down their pants in that regard.

Many of these illustrations in this thread give off that vibe that the illustrator literally masturbated over their own work meant for children's picturebooks and it's icky.
 
It's been brought up a couple times before about the number of amputees we've been seeing in these books, but legit, this comes off more of a fetish than actual "rep".
This is one of those old timey fetishes that is so well known and established there were jokes about it on Seinfeld in 1993. Really tells you everything about how far gone our norms and standards are at this point that creeps are getting away with pushing it into kid lit and no one dares say a thing.
 
This is one of those old timey fetishes that is so well known and established there were jokes about it on Seinfeld in 1993.
Never heard about this being that old. Post Seinfeld clip, please.

Really tells you everything about how far gone our norms and standards are at this point that creeps are getting away with pushing it into kid lit and no one dares say a thing.
In How to Train Your Dragon, it was considered a shocker that Hiccup, a main character in an animated family film, lost his leg, but not once did I see fans cooming over it. You had a couple of "I felt seen!" comments, but the series treated it as a sincere life-changing event for the character to adapt to even though it's considered the norm (and even manly) in his culture for warriors to lose body parts.

That's how amputation should always be approached in stories, and outside of Luca a couple years ago where an older character had a stump and said it's not a big deal anymore, I've not seen it as such since then. It's really gross that these freaks are trying to push it in kids' faces more when there are unfortunate souls who've gone through it young and still want to be viewed as normal, and here they are salivating over it and essentially telling these kids "This is sexy" and no one seems to bat an eye at this.
 
Never heard about this being that old. Post Seinfeld clip, please.


In How to Train Your Dragon, it was considered a shocker that Hiccup, a main character in an animated family film, lost his leg, but not once did I see fans cooming over it. You had a couple of "I felt seen!" comments, but the series treated it as a sincere life-changing event for the character to adapt to even though it's considered the norm (and even manly) in his culture for warriors to lose body parts.

That's how amputation should always be approached in stories, and outside of Luca a couple years ago where an older character had a stump and said it's not a big deal anymore, I've not seen it as such since then. It's really gross that these freaks are trying to push it in kids' faces more when there are unfortunate souls who've gone through it young and still want to be viewed as normal, and here they are salivating over it and essentially telling these kids "This is sexy" and no one seems to bat an eye at this.

KRAMER: George, George, Get a Penthouse Forum.

GEORGE: I'm not getting a Penthouse Forum.

KRAMER: That will make great dinner party conversation. We'll read the letters at the dinner table.

GEORGE: Oh, that's nice.

KRAMER: Hey, did you ever read one of these?

GEORGE: It's not real. They're all made up.

KRAMER: Oh, it's real.

GEORGE: You know there is an unusual number of people in this country having sex with AMPUTEES! . . . Penthouse forum, newspaper, gum, Clark Bar.
 
Speaking of hair fetishes this deserves a crosspost from the Gaiman thread:

I don't think this has been posted yet. Gaiman did an illustrated children's book called Crazy Hair.

It's about an unkempt older man who meets a little girl named Bonnie.
He absolutely insists that she doesn't take the piss out of his stupid hair.
He tells her that his hair is actually a magical place, etc.
Oh yeah, and the man looks sorta like Gaiman.

The little girl ends up willingly trapped inside of his hair, and lives there forever after. Hmm.

The whole book is kind of sus, in light of recent disclosure. Not evidence but definitely an insight.
If you put pen to paper and wrote out your imagination, would it be a story about meeting a little girl who comes to live intimately close inside part of your body after a seductive conversation? No.


(Kindly let me know if I've fucked up attachments. I tried to thumbnail, honest. First time.)

View attachment 6879677View attachment 6879678View attachment 6879679View attachment 6879680

I shoud add: we were given our copy of this book. I don't like it, my wife finds it creepy, and the kids don't enjoy it either
 
I was gonna say this Kai person is a raging narcissist for making a children's book about how awesome he was, but I looked him up and he's only 14 and has been "out" since at least 2018 (A)
His mother proudly admitted to beating him several times as a small child because he liked toys for girls. Then she trooned him out.
 
It's been brought up a couple times before about the number of amputees we've been seeing in these books, but legit, this comes off more of a fetish than actual "rep".

This is one of those old timey fetishes that is so well known and established there were jokes about it on Seinfeld in 1993. Really tells you everything about how far gone our norms and standards are at this point that creeps are getting away with pushing it into kid lit and no one dares say a thing.

It's really gross that these freaks are trying to push it in kids' faces more when there are unfortunate souls who've gone through it young and still want to be viewed as normal, and here they are salivating over it and essentially telling these kids "This is sexy" and no one seems to bat an eye at this.

“Authors” born in the late 80’s- early 90’s are old enough to have snuck in Crash and get it a little twisted.

IMG_5227.webp
IMG_5228.jpeg

Fitting that this all is a Cronenberg nightmare.

Pretty solid movie. Imagine missing the point this hard.
 
IIRC snapping turtles snap because they're too fat to retract into their shells and it's their only means of defense. They'll snap anything they perceive as a threat.
You reminded me of this video I came across a bit ago about how to hold snapping turtles (supposedly) to where they never get agitated. Interesting, I thought.

Anyway, just the very cool documentary Chickenhawk. Which features some very south park levels of attempted grooming. Not really organization related other than it's good ol NAMBLA but it's my post tax.
 
Yup. The ever classic, "Pride parades are just fun get togethers!" Instead of the reality of "Its a den of perverts who will re-enact the first few parts of 120 days of Sodom" to any kid unfortunate enough to get caught in it.

The propagation of snowflake culture from Tumblr was a mistake.
 
Not exactly a meme, rather a catchy song that was popular around a decade ago. The more time passes, the worse the message gets, yet people still comment on how good this video is. It literally says that gender is just clothes, come on!


Maybe it could have been a good song about self-expression if it wasn't for genderism. I'm not so sure anymore, I'm getting fed up with that "me, myself, and I" parade.
Cross-posting this from pro-tranny memes thread. I don't know why I didn't check the main channel, it's a (morbid) gold mine of grooming content...

Alright, time to be a little mati at pedos online.

header.PNG
age appropriate.PNG

They position themselves as age appropriate sex ed channel. And the header says more info, less weird. Of course, the content is weird as shit, just like you would expect. I honestly don't even know where to start, none of this is actual sex ed. It takes around half an hour, maybe an hour max to explain to children all that they actually need to know about puberty and what their bodies are going through. It may be just my opinion, but everything that isn't a short brochure or a short one-shot video covering all that children need to know is suspicious and likely has grooming in it.


A child can't... actually, you know what, no. Nobody can be absolutely sure they won't want kids in future. There are some controversies around procreating at rather older age, but there's nothing inherently wrong if a woman starts to want children in her 30s or 40s, while previously claiming she would never ever. More so, she can't even know what she will want in future, in fact, nobody can know. Feeding these ideas about permanent changes in our bodies are setting us all up to unnatural lives in the context that we're making decisions that may essentially rob us from our future desires. This is evil.


... We didn't actually get an answer to what that is. If I didn't know anything about that, as an adult right now, I would be really confused as to what they're even trying to tell here. Remember, these videos are for children. Imagine how a child would be confused.


Right off the bat we're met with a thumbnail featuring condoms. We're not grooming your kids, pinky promise. And yes, sexual health topics they listed are: birth control, emergency contraception, STD and HIV testing and treatment, accesing HPV vaccince, gynecologycal exam and "general check ups". Ma'am, these are children. Everything she listed is a hyperspecific topic related to having an active sex life, meanwhile real sexual health concerns are vaguely referred to gyno exam and general check ups. No, an actual sexual healthcare for minors is taking girls seriously when they talk about odd pain which may end up to be endometriosis, it's running tests at endocrynologists' when a child has gastrointestinal issues that turned out to be coming as a symptom of malfunctioning gonads, it's... Jesus Christ, everything that is an actual danger to health and life is never mentioned by these "sex ed" groomer content farms. It's always stuff that directly or indirectly encourages promisquity through overwhelming coverage of active, or rather, specifically promiscuous sex life consequences.


What stood out to me is that their videos have this label.
profhealth.PNG
Also. Of course they collaborate with "youth liberation" aka pedo activism in disguise.
youthlib.PNG
 
I'm trying to figure out how non-grooming books for kids on the broader LGB shit would look. Are there any known examples of shit that wasn't normalizing something perverse or sexual? Early books showcasing two moms or something, I think I remember?

I think what's always been so hard about this crap to accept as normal is how egregiously heavy-handed it is. They act as if without these books and public school courses and a teacher with 12 genders, your children are always on the verge of invoking the "gay panic defense" after hate-criming an effeminate boy or something.

In reality, tolerance/acceptance of LGB is as simple as, "Son, sometimes boys like boys or girls like girls in the way that most boys and girls like one another. It's okay." So simple and only takes a second. And that's for the normal gays. Am I missing a time period in our youth (back when things were much more hostile than today) where gay people required everyone to worship them and treat them as so much better and shit?

Yet the weirdos are such a truly abnormal and nonsensical movement, they need this 24/7 bullying approach to convince us it's for our own good. They act as if without their flags in every office everywhere, we'll start the genocide, and society believes these accusations. With the weirdos, I can't see it being anything but grooming/indoctrination because that's all it is. Forced acceptance of something that is absolutely not a legit thing.

It may be just my opinion, but everything that isn't a short brochure or a short one-shot video covering all that children need to know is suspicious and likely has grooming in it.

We posted at the same time, but yes, this is what I'm trying to get at above. Like it's a tell-tale sign.
 
Last edited:
Right off the bat we're met with a thumbnail featuring condoms. We're not grooming your kids, pinky promise. And yes, sexual health topics they listed are: birth control, emergency contraception, STD and HIV testing and treatment, accesing HPV vaccince, gynecologycal exam and "general check ups". Ma'am, these are children. Everything she listed is a hyperspecific topic related to having an active sex life, meanwhile real sexual health concerns are vaguely referred to gyno exam and general check ups. No, an actual sexual healthcare for minors is taking girls seriously when they talk about odd pain which may end up to be endometriosis, it's running tests at endocrynologists' when a child has gastrointestinal issues that turned out to be coming as a symptom of malfunctioning gonads, it's... Jesus Christ, everything that is an actual danger to health and life is never mentioned by these "sex ed" groomer content farms. It's always stuff that directly or indirectly encourages promisquity through overwhelming coverage of active, or rather, specifically promiscuous sex life consequences.
Yeah, I definitely don't remember being in 4th grade and talking about wet dreams, erections lasting longer, getting boners for no reason, etc. Great indoctrination on puberty and how it'll cause you to question your identity. Perfect when the first x years were spent telling you that you can't be too sure if you're a boy or a girl. Love the IVF plugging and comment on only rich people being able to afford this.

More grooming to label the freaks at the school as "trusted adults" for 4th graders.
STEP 5: Tell students that there are many different people they can talk with if they are
having a problem in a friendship or other relationship. Sometimes people talk with other
friends or classmates, but sometimes it can be really helpful to talk with a trusted adult.
Pass out the “Trusted Adult” handout. Read and review it with students, then ask students
to think of a few adults in their life who they have gone to with a question or a problem or
who they can imagine going to with a problem in the future. Divide the board/newsprint
into three categories: Family, adult neighbors and friends, and Adult helpers in the school
or community. Ask students, “What types of people could possibly be trusted adults in
your life? As students brainstorm suggestions, record their answers under the appropriate
columns.

Note to the Teacher: Possible answers may include: Under “Family” – parents or guardians,
grandparents, older siblings or cousins aunts and uncles; under “Adult neighbors and
friends” – family friends, next door neighbor, parent of a friend; under “Adult helpers in the
school or community” – teachers, principals, school nurses, police officers, doctors, clergy.
Tell students to remember that the most important thing is always to go to an adult who
makes them feel safe and comfortable; someone who is trustworthy. If a person they trust
does something to make them feel uncomfortable or unsafe, there are always other trusted
adults they can go to. (8 minutes)

STEP 6: Pass out the “Circles of Trust” homework worksheet. Tell students that the purpose
of this homework activity is to show that they are surrounded by adults who care about
them and who can help them to solve a problem that may be too big to solve on their own.
Tell students that the center circle is labeled “Me.” Say, “Around you, you have your family,
and each family is unique. For homework, write the names of the people in your family you
can talk with or go to if you are having a problem in a friendship or relationship, or some
other problem. In the next circle is “Adult Neighbors and Friends.” In this circle, write the
names of the trusted adults that would fall into this category who you could go to about
a friendship or relationship problem, or some other problem. The outside circle is labeled
“Adult Helpers in the School and Community.” These are the people who surround you when
you are away from home. Write the names of people in school and the community who
you could ask to discuss a relationship issue or some other problem.
On the bottom of the
handout, have students fill out the following statement:

“If I wanted to talk with someone about a friendship or other relationship problem I was
having, the two people from my circles of trust I would most likely go to first are:”
Encourage students to share their homework with a trusted family member. (2 minutes)

Note to the Teacher: Encourage students to fill out the “Circles of Trust” worksheet in
consultation with a family member but tell them that this is not a requirement
. It is possible
that a student does not have a trusted adult in their home or family. In such a case, the
student should feel empowered to fill out the worksheet on their own.
Great way to isolate the students who may be "questioning" and have a lack of "support" at home. Man, easy prey, am I right?

I hate these fucking weirdos:
FREEZE FRAME ROLE-PLAY SCENARIO 5 Sydney and Zee Sydney is a trans girl who has a big crush on Zee. Both are free thinkers who don’t like labels. Sydney and Zee have been hanging out together for a few weeks and enjoy a lot of the same things. It’s clear that they’re attracted to each other, but they’ve never kissed or touched. Plan a role-play in which Sydney talks with Zee about having sex and they make a decision.

Sydney: You were assigned male at birth but have never identified as a boy or a man. You are a girl, but not a “girly” girl. You really like the fact that Zee is kind of androgynous, but you aren’t sure how to get things started. You decide that the two of you should talk about your feelings.

Zee: Biologically you were assigned female at birth but you hate all of the boxes that society puts people in and you identify as genderqueer. You work hard to have a gendernonconforming appearance and style. You enjoy gender-bending and you feel like with Sydney you have finally met someone who really “gets you.”
That's right, teens. It's cool and hip to be a "free thinker" who won't conform to such repressive bullshit. Also, if you're a girl who doesn't confirm to "'gender" stereotypes, welp, you're obviously "genderqueer." And if you do this performative nonsense, people will finally get you! Now, my little adults in disguise, perform sex roleplay for me so I can watch!

Who designed these courses? John Money?
 
Last edited:
I'm trying to figure out how non-grooming books for kids on the broader LGB shit would look.
It wouldn't look like anything because kids don't need to know there's 900 different sexualities and it's cool for girls to kiss girls and boys to kiss boys. Let them figure it out when they go through puberty.
 
Back