Off-Topic Indoctrination Material for Toddlers and Children from Mainly LGBT Organizations - And Unique Niche Books That Fit Nowhere

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I'm trying to figure out how non-grooming books for kids on the broader LGB shit would look.
It wouldn't exist. The demographic these books target are too young to care about being in a relationship. Most of them still think the opposite gender has cooties. Pushing the alphabet on them at that age will just cause problems down the road. Just because an 8yo boy thinks girls are icky doesn't mean he'll turn out gay. Your personality and identity shift so much so rapidly during the first 20 years of your life. Kids are in no place to be making concrete decisions about who they are and will be for the rest of their lives.
 
Everything she listed is a hyperspecific topic related to having an active sex life, meanwhile real sexual health concerns are vaguely referred to gyno exam and general check ups.

The reason sex is talked about in middle school puberty talks is because, unfortunately, kids do have sex. I thought I was a freak for not losing my virginity at twelve. Granted, I went to a very latino and black heavy middle school. They sure love their molestation!

The average age (as of a few years ago) for losing your virginity was 17, whereas it used to be 15-16. I’m sure the age has gone up with everyone being locked down and turbo-autismed through the coof.

When I was in school in the 2000’s, we had abstinence-only education, and this was in a very Democrat area. I’m a millenial-fag, and I know people in even non-religious schools, in the Midwest and the South, who passed around a piece of tape and were told as a woman, every time you have sex, your worth goes down. Must feel really good for the (many) molested girls told they’re ruined by things out of their control.

That being said, the pendulum shift has clearly gone way too far.

No, an actual sexual healthcare for minors is taking girls seriously when they talk about odd pain which may end up to be endometriosis, it's running tests at endocrynologists' when a child has gastrointestinal issues that turned out to be coming as a symptom of malfunctioning gonads

The fact we were never taught about endometriosis and that it’s normal to be in agonizing pain on your period and during sex is despicable. Fun fact: women are more likely to tell other women their pain is fake and they should suck it up. Girl power!

I'm trying to figure out how non-grooming books for kids on the broader LGB shit would look.

“Here are two mommies. They love each other. Some people are different. You probably have a mommy and daddy, and that’s great. If you don’t, that’s fine too. Congratulations!”

The 70’s-2000’s was far from perfect “representation-wise,” but far less insane than 2012-now.

Yeah, I definitely don't remember being in 4th grade and talking about wet dreams, erections lasting longer, getting boners for no reason, etc.

We learned about periods in 4th grade and everyone “ewwwed.” We also were told about our “no no square.” Planned Parenthood came to our class in middle school, and even they promoted abstinence-only— you know, the abortion provider extraordinaires. High school we were told about STDs at the same time as “faces of meth.”

When kids/preteens are already facing sex abuse and drug abuse at home, introducing vague awareness and how to get help vital. It’s disgusting, but this is a dark, cruel world. Troonshit is where we have to draw the line.

I would’ve hoped millenials would have pushed back after a decade of groomer men promoting 12 year olds cutting and being anorexic, but people never learn. Troonism is the new “Cut for Bieber.”’
 
When I was in school in the 2000’s, we had abstinence-only education, and this was in a very Democrat area. I’m a millenial-fag, and I know people in even non-religious schools, in the Midwest and the South, who passed around a piece of tape and were told as a woman, every time you have sex, your worth goes down. Must feel really good for the (many) molested girls told they’re ruined by things out of their control.

That being said, the pendulum shift has clearly gone way too far.
Yeesh, that reminds me of an anecdote I saw where someone’s sex ed class had the girls write down their hopes and dreams on a sticky note, and if it had a mark meaning pregnancy on the back, the note was torn up. That’s definitely not going to fuck up any kid’s views on motherhood. Somehow I got lucky with a pretty decent class in the 2010s. Definitely better than whatever troonshit or god forbid, straight up porn they’re probably talking about these days.
 
Yeesh, that reminds me of an anecdote I saw where someone’s sex ed class had the girls write down their hopes and dreams on a sticky note, and if it had a mark meaning pregnancy on the back, the note was torn up. That’s definitely not going to fuck up any kid’s views on motherhood.

“Pregnancy will ruin your life” doctrine is why many women refuse to have children for their career. Between extreme conservatism and extreme leftism, it’s codified as a death sentence for happiness. (Not as much for men, because of course.)

The most based thing I ever had a teacher say (a lone Republican in a very Democrat area) was, “there is nothing wrong with being a stay-at-home mom. It’s a beautiful job and incredibly fulfilling. You are no less of a successful woman for doing it, and it will benefit your children more.” I’d never heard that before— only that being stay at home meant your husband would come home and beat you if dinner wasn’t ready
, and if you tried to escape, you would be homeless and sexually assaulted.

Promoting this, in an era after when feminism actually helped women be independent, is how we were conned into never being able to have a single income home, and having thousands of third world, religious immigrants, who have zero issue with, you know, the miracle of life, replacing Americans with slave labor. (tinfoil hat taken off)
 
It wouldn't exist. The demographic these books target are too young to care about being in a relationship. Most of them still think the opposite gender has cooties. Pushing the alphabet on them at that age will just cause problems down the road. Just because an 8yo boy thinks girls are icky doesn't mean he'll turn out gay. Your personality and identity shift so much so rapidly during the first 20 years of your life. Kids are in no place to be making concrete decisions about who they are and will be for the rest of their lives.
Right. I think that's why my example was about having same-sex parents, which I think is fine for a book. Gay people exist so it's normal they have some representation. Trans people don't, hence the heavy-handed approach where they need to retcon history and all this shit. Then the pedos and pervs join in and it's insanity.
 
Courtesy of the freaks in Seattle:

Understanding and Accepting your LGBTQ+ Child​

Family acceptance is the number-one determinant of LGBTQ+ youth safety, health, and wellbeing. All parents want their children to be safe and healthy. Still, when a child or teen comes out as LGBTQ+, family members might struggle to accept this truth, especially if they were raised in communities where LGBTQ+ people were not accepted or discussed.

It’s okay to temporarily feel grief when your child comes out as gay or transgender. It’s important to recognize, however, that what you are grieving is your expectation of how you imagined your child’s life in the future.

Your child is still right there in front of you: and by sharing their truth, they are moving closer to living a healthy, authentic life rather than one of denial or shame. To ensure that they make it through the challenges of LGBTQ+ childhood and adolescence, they need your unconditional love, support, and acceptance.
The purposeful blending of gay with trans so you look like a dated bigot for not wanting your child to be harmed by the gender cult. Classic guilt-tripping with emotional blackmail, shaming you for being so outdated and rigid in your archaic beliefs. Sorry, you wanted your son to be a stonemason like his old man, not a friggin' ballerina! This shit is so insane and patronizing. I hate these freaks.

Seattle doesn't allow parents to opt their children out of the indoctrination, either. They can opt out of sex ed, but not the queering garbage. And now even the parents are getting "reeducation." No reference to any of the harms, just undermining parental influence and rights.

How did these lunatics get in these positions?
 
Last edited:
Seattle doesn't allow parents to opt their children out of the indoctrination, either. They can opt out of sex ed, but not the queering garbage. And now even the parents are getting "reeducation." No reference to any of the harms, just undermining parental influence and rights.
Yeah fuck that if I lived somewhere like that I'd homeschool.
In fact I don't think I could live somewhere like that tbh.
Its just not worth it. We used to live in the PNW when my Dad worked there in the late 80's-early 90's and it was starting to turn into a shithole by the time I left. I wouldn't go back now if you paid me. Theres certainly no fucking way I'd want to raise a family around that shit.
 
My sex ed class in the early 2010s was interesting; they didn't preach that all sex was evil, but they did show us all disgusting pictures of STD's that I'm sure shocked everyone into using condoms for the next 10 years of their life. I guess it worked for the most part, there was only one student who was pregnant while I was in high school. Then again my school was quite small.

No woke-pushing, I think I was right before the cusp of when that started going mainstream. There were kids that people just knew for the most part were gay and they didn't get much shit. What a surprise, people in fact get more divided when this patronizing shit is forced on them.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
USA, dawg. Why do you think millenials and zoomers are retarded and girls want to chop their tits off?

This country is filled with shadow run Mormon child sex torture work camps. The USA isn’t the greatest country in the world, even though it used to be.
Can confirm - US sex ed is a clusterfuck. Mine could be summed up in one sentence - "The safest sex is no sex." We didn't learn about safe sex. We were just told not to have it. They never really touched on the dangers of having unprotected sex. The area I grew up in isn't conservative. I honestly think they were just too lazy to add it to the curriculum.
 
Honestly the idea that schools need to teach such a thing is a pretty alien concept and part of the problem it's difficult for them to do correctly. Basic reproductive stuff should be covered in bio/science classes in dry, clinical terms, and doctors should prompt them in their understanding of certain things and explain in more detail if necessary during regular check ups. There's always a what if situation where something falls through the cracks but that is life and part of the growing pains.
 
Honestly the idea that schools need to teach such a thing is a pretty alien concept and part of the problem it's difficult for them to do correctly. Basic reproductive stuff should be covered in bio/science classes in dry, clinical terms, and doctors should prompt them in their understanding of certain things and explain in more detail if necessary during regular check ups. There's always a what if situation where something falls through the cracks but that is life and part of the growing pains.
In my school district, sex ed and health were always taught by the PE teacher for some reason. The only thing I remember is being told to just not have sex and not being allowed to call the fluids that come out of your vagina during you period blood. I can't remember what we ere supposed to call it, but we weren't allowed to call it blood. The area I grew up in wasn't conservative at all, but our sex ed curriculum would have you none the wiser. The fact that those are the only two things I remember from that part of my public education is a testament to what an absolute clusterfuck it is. As one would expect, there were multiple teen pregnancies in my school.
 
You see, i thought Canadian schools did a weird job with sex ed. Apparently we're leagues ahead of our southern neighbor though?

The biggest thing we did that felt important was have a lady from the rape clinic come in in grade 11 and teach us about safe sex, STDs, ect in detail.

All years previous just went over anatomy and that always felt like a waste of time for me.

Good to know that was, in fact, being well taught.
 
How many of these fucking books do we need? It's just the same thing over and over. "Little Timmy went to the pride parade and learned that inclusion and being tolerant is fun! wheeeeee." Hell, even the spines tend to look the same. You have rainbow motifs and the title is always something like "A Day of Pride!" or "Esteban's Sparkly Dress!" or "Rainbow 1-2-3!"

I'm trying to figure out how non-grooming books for kids on the broader LGB shit would look.
I don't think that there's any way to make sexual identity the focus of a kids' book that isn't bizarre and perverse. It's a little like non-mainstream political ideology -- you might have a kids' book that alludes to it in some way (for instance, kids' books with historical settings) but publishing a kids' book about the virtue of such-and-such non-mainstream political ideology is inevitably going to be weird and bad.

In the same way, I think the closest you'll get to a decent kids' book on "LGB shit" would be a kids' book that isn't really about LGB shit, but that tacitly acknowledges the existence of homosexuality in some incidental way, the same way that a kids' book set in the medieval period will tacitly acknowledge the ideology of monarchism without being a screed designed to brainwash Little Billy into becoming a monarchist.
 
I don't think that there's any way to make sexual identity the focus of a kids' book that isn't bizarre and perverse. It's a little like non-mainstream political ideology -- you might have a kids' book that alludes to it in some way (for instance, kids' books with historical settings) but publishing a kids' book about the virtue of such-and-such non-mainstream political ideology is inevitably going to be weird and bad.
Like I said before, a lot of these things don't belong in kids' books simply because kids don't care. Boys think girls have cooties. Girls think boys have cooties. They don't care about politics because they're too young to do anything with/about them.

A bit OT: The game Road 96 is a great commentary on kids'/teens' understanding of politics in a way I'm not entirely sure was intended. You play as various nameless, faceless teenagers hitchhiking their way to cross the border and flee the fictional country of Petria. We don't know much about the country other than Tyrak, the president and incumbent candidate in the upcoming election, is really bad and ruining the country. We also know nothing about his opponent Flores(?) other than that she's good and will make things better. There are various other hitchhikers you come across in the game who all have one thing in common - they have no plan for what they'll do after they cross the border.

There are some things kids and teens just don't care about or don't have the capacity to fully understand. I remember seeing an interview with Desmond is Amazing on Good Morning America and it was so obvious he was completely detached from the words coming out of his mouth. He didn't understand them and he clearly didn't enjoy drag. Anyone who's spent any time with kids knows that when a kid is passionate about something you know they're passionate about it. And if you show any interesting in said thing, they get so fucking excited to share it with you.
 
In my school district, sex ed and health were always taught by the PE teacher for some reason. The only thing I remember is being told to just not have sex and not being allowed to call the fluids that come out of your vagina during you period blood. I can't remember what we ere supposed to call it, but we weren't allowed to call it blood.

It’s weird they’d harp on it, but technically, it’s menarche (or menses, or something, I don’t quite remember either.) It is blood, but the difference is between needing a tampon, and needing the Emergency Room.

Desmond is Amazing

Mobilfagging here , (sorry)

More like Desmond is Amazing-ly still alive *sigh*
 
Last edited:
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Procrastinhater
It’s weird they’d harp on it, but technically, it’s menarche (or menses, or something, I don’t quite remember either.) It is blood, but the difference is between needing a tampon, and needing the Emergency Room.
I cannot for the life of me remember what they wanted us to call it. Come to think of it, my high school was super weird about word policing. I had an English teacher who forbid us from using "be" verbs (was, were, am, etc.) or ever writing in the first person. I had to unlearn so many habits when I started college.
 
not being allowed to call the fluids that come out of your vagina during you period blood. I can't remember what we ere supposed to call it, but we weren't allowed to call it blood.
What
It’s weird they’d harp on it, but technically, it’s menarche (or menses, or something, I don’t quite remember either.) It is blood, but the difference is between needing a tampon, and needing the Emergency Room.
Mens (month/moon ) arche (beginning see also "archeology") = when you have your first period.

What is shed during a period isn't only blood, but blood is definitely in there. Your teachers were retarded, and you should have studied Greek and Latin roots.
 
Back