"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Sneeds said:
I was cursed into seeing this so, I’m gonna curse you all with this fat bitch saying they them energy
What is the point of a fat bitch going they/them in their 40s? Also the crowd is pure nigger cattle
Click to expand...
PPP, is that you?
 
Ok, I have to preface this with stating that this is not nutritional advice. However, that tuna talk made me remember this:
So apparently this schizophrenics father ate tuna sandwiches from ages 12 to 30 as a cost saving measure, something like saving 50 cents a day by eating tuna regularly.
However this also resulted in the guy getting mercury poisoning at the time he conceived his retard son.
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
Reactions: lIllllIiiiiLLLLiiiiIIIIll, CheeseCrackers, Marsh Rabbit and 5 others
Stop trying to turn Null onto anime. There are only two good animes; one is Cowboy Bebop and the other is King of the Hill. The rest can be entirely discarded. Yes, this includes Akira, Ghost In The Shell, Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood, all that nonsense.

Only those two are worth Americans' time.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: byuuWasTaken, Patrick Bait-man, Catgirl Tyranid and 9 others
elon had 'what did you do this week' emails sent out to government workers and people are absolutely losing their shit over it
GkbNpE8W4AEzve5.jpg
leftists like will stancil are encouraging people not to answer the emails
"he cant just fire people..right guys?"

I'm also wondering this question. I hope everyone gets fired.
Screenshot 2025-02-23 023316.png
he thinks you need to read every email to figure out who sent an email or not
Screenshot 2025-02-23 023610.png
i'd imagine you could just write a simple query or something to figure this out but what do i know
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: indomitable snowman and Vecr
31. Januar said:
It's true ultimately that women seem to be a lot less mature than men.
Click to expand...
You will never get me to believe this, and here is why.
Cheese Balls said:
Holy fuck, never thought my NASCAR sperg would get me a free MATI feature, thank you very much.

Since you seemed somewhat curious about NASCAR in general, I think you might find this funny: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQNP3vn_g8Q

NASCAR sometimes releases the radio communications of drivers, and there's a certain driver named Kyle Busch that's famous for having autistic Bossman-like rages & meltdowns during races.

If you liked that DOTA guy having a catastrophic meltdown, you'll probably enjoy it. Unfortunately, some of it is censored because NASCAR is run by pussies.
Click to expand...
image_2025-02-23_025235856.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Convallaria majalis and Let's find Crack
Honka Honka Burning Love said:
I am not trying to convince him Anime is good..but hearing that he got his recommendations from 4Chan explains everything.
Click to expand...
I remember watching Lupin III: The Castle of Cagliostro with my girlfriend and enjoying it but it still wasn't enough to dent my overall opinion on anime (that it's gross shit for horny teenagers and pedophiles.)

The issue with anime as a whole is that even if there's "good anime" it's still an industry that is by and large defined by weird ass shit. For every Lupin III there's a billion The Secret Dungeon Only I Can Enters and Redo of Healers. Even if you take recommendations from seemingly normal people you will almost always get weird softcore rape porn anime where the women all sound like prepubescent children and get romantically involved with the generic protagonist with short black hair even after he gropes her 300 times; because those are tropes that are just considered normal in anime. The meme about every anime recommendation coming with a shit load of caveats is real. 4chan is just the natural endstage of that content being encouraged and welcomed as a mainstay of the genre; I doubt Josh would have come away with a more positive opinion of anime if it was anywhere else.

This is purely anecodtal but I'm suddenly reminded of a reddit post I saw one time where a young girl went on the anime subreddit asking for animes that don't have episodes or gags talking about/comparing womens' breast sizes, because she was insecure about her own breast size and found that stuff upsetting (specifically the "haha female character is upset because her tits small and other character has bigger tits" trope). The thread almost immediately erupted into autistic discussion of breast sizes in anime and the girl had to make an edit asking people to please try and be normal. That's what I think of when I think about the wider anime community; horny jackals eating each other because they've rotted their brains with porn and can't engage with women other than to talk about how hot their waifus are.

bookers said:
leftists like will stancil are encouraging people not to answer the emails
"he cant just fire people..right guys?"
Click to expand...
The President is elected. Employees of the government aren't. Therefore, to keep the country from being ran de-facto by unelected tyrants, government workers answer to the executive branch. That's why an executive order is called that; it's an order to the entire executive branch. Naturally, the President has the power to hire and fire government workers.

I don't know why this is so hard to get for leftists, there's over 200 years of precedent behind this. Trump and Elon are some of the richest dudes on the entire planet and have almost certainly hashed out these plans with some of the top lawyers in the entire US; they'd be pretty damn stupid not to. The idea that some random dipshit on X spotted something that a team of the Jewiest layers on the planet didn't is asinine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: GungusDingaling, Catgirl Tyranid, I'm a Silly and 5 others
The Noise said:
Naturally, the President has the power to hire and fire government workers.
Click to expand...
I recall reading awhile back -- I think even before Trump's first term -- about existing case law that limited the ability of the President's power to remove federal employees. The way I recall this being couched was that there was a concern that if Presidents could just fire everyone, there could be extreme vacillations where every 4 years, all the agency's staff would be fired and then replaced; placing certain staff as being 'immune' from Presidential changes was supposed to provide some stability. As I write this, it really comes across as an obvious argument supporting the administrative state, which I'm personally not a fan of, but I can see the concern. I can't recall what case they were referring to that supposedly established this precedent; it might be Humphrey's Executor v. United States, as I thought it was a Supreme Court case. Maybe someone more well read in federal matters can correct me.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: I'm a Silly
Not A Cat Person said:
Stop trying to turn Null onto anime. There are only two good animes; one is Cowboy Bebop and the other is King of the Hill. The rest can be entirely discarded. Yes, this includes Akira, Ghost In The Shell, Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood, all that nonsense.
Click to expand...
Josh already has admitted he likes an anime—The Boondocks.
dvorak said:
I recall reading awhile back -- I think even before Trump's first term -- about existing case law that limited the ability of the President's power to remove federal employees. The way I recall this being couched was that there was a concern that if Presidents could just fire everyone, there could be extreme vacillations where every 4 years, all the agency's staff would be fired and then replaced; placing certain staff as being 'immune' from Presidential changes was supposed to provide some stability. As I write this, it really comes across as an obvious argument supporting the administrative state, which I'm personally not a fan of, but I can see the concern. I can't recall what case they were referring to that supposedly established this precedent; it might be Humphrey's Executor v. United States, as I thought it was a Supreme Court case. Maybe someone more well read in federal matters can correct me.
Click to expand...
There is some case law about this, just as there is some case law about impoundment. But a lot of the constitutional questions have never been adjudicated seriously because nobody has tried before, especially not in an environment overrun by uncontrolled administrative agencies. And the concern about vacillations is a policy concern, not a constitutional concern. Sometimes policy concerns get constitutionalized—Miranda rights, for example, are made up entirely to address a series of policy issues with policing. But just because something seems like good policy doesn't mean it's constitutionally mandated. And just because a policy is reified over many years of different administrations doesn't mean it's protected under the Constitution.

Humphrey's Executor is a weird case from the 30s that confirmed certain protections for certain congressionally created agencies. But what some people forget is that the case is ultimately about backpay, not about undoing the removal of an officer. I don't want to emphasize that too much, but we just have to remember that the relief being sought there was not "restore this guy to office" but "this guy was removed improperly which means his estate, because he's now dead, is entitled to his withheld salary." So when you have people today arguing that Humphrey's Executor means a person can't be removed by the president, it doesn't exactly mean that they have to be restored to office. And even then, the agency at issue was fairly unique in its structure. The case may not apply with the same force to the horde of novel agencies and positions that exist today.

It gets even more complex when you start linking up Humphrey's Executor with the recent case of Seila Law and the Unitary Executive Theory. I'm not a huge proponent of the popular idea of the unitary executive because I've read the Federalist Papers, and it's clear from them that the branches of government are melded together rather than being independent pillars. The different branches have some powers that theoretically should belong to other branches—the Senate confirms presidential appointees, the President vetoes congressional bills, the President can overturn a judicial conviction with pardons, etc. If a unitary executive were maximally true, then there could not be a melding of some parts of the executive with the legislature and judiciary, which the Framers by their own words intended. But at its core, the theory is that the executive power is vested in a president, not in an executive apparatus, according to the text of the Constitution. That is true and I don't know how you get around that. With the judiciary, you can get around it to some extent because Congress is given the power to create and control courts inferior to the Supreme Court, in which is explicitly vested "the judicial power." Maybe you can argue that the reference to "executive departments" in Article II of the Constitution implies some division of executive power, but I would hazard that a common law investigation of that clause and comparison with, e.g., Article III giving Congress power to create inferior courts, would militate against that conception.

We live in constitutionally exciting times. My main concern is the left returns to committing terrorism like it did in the 30s and 70s when they don't win politically and judicially. We get told the right is dangerous even though it's historically the left who bombed cities regularly when they couldn't get their way.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Gregis, I'm a Silly, dvorak and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back